Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Revealing Stimulus-Dependent Dynamics Through Statistical Complexity

Edson V. de Paula1, Rafael M. Jungmann2,3, Antonio J. Fontenele4, Leandro A. A. Aguiar1,2,3, Pedro V. Carelli1, Fernanda S. Matias5, Mauro Copelli1,*, and Nivaldo A. P. de Vasconcelos6,†

  • *Contact author: mauro.copelli@ufpe.br
  • †Contact author: nivaldo.vasconcelos@ufpe.br

PRX Life 4, 023018 – Published 22 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wndc-k654

Abstract

Advances in large-scale neural recordings have expanded our ability to describe the activity of distributed brain circuits. However, understanding how neural population dynamics differ across regions and behavioral contexts remains challenging. Here, we surveyed neuronal population dynamics across multiple mouse brain areas (visual cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and midbrain) using spike data from local ensembles. Two complementary measures were used to characterize these dynamics: the coefficient of variation (CV), a classical indicator of spike-time variability, and statistical complexity, an information-theoretic quantifier of organizational structure. To probe stimulus-dependent activity, we segmented and concatenated recordings from behavioral experiments into distinct time series corresponding to natural image presentations, blank screens during visual task, and spontaneous activity. While the CV failed to discriminate between these conditions, statistical complexity revealed clear, stimulus-specific motifs in population activity. These results indicate that information-theoretic measures can uncover structured, stimulus-dependent patterns in neural population dynamics that remain unobserved in traditional variability metrics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

22 July, 2026

Correction: A minor error in Eq. (9) has been fixed.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. E. D. Adrian and Y. Zotterman, The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings: Part 3. Impulses set up by touch and pressure, J. Physiol. 61, 465 (1926).
  2. C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Chaos in neuronal networks with balanced excitatory and inhibitory activity, Science 274, 1724 (1996).
  3. C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Chaotic balanced state in a model of cortical circuits, Neural Comput. 10, 1321 (1998).
  4. N. Brunel, Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci. 8, 183 (2000).
  5. K. D. Harris and A. Thiele, Cortical state and attention, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 509 (2011).
  6. H. Sompolinsky, Computational neuroscience: Beyond the local circuit, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 25, xiii (2014).
  7. I. H. Stevenson and K. P. Kording, How advances in neural recording affect data analysis, Nat. Neurosci. 14, 139 (2011).
  8. G. Hong and C. M. Lieber, Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330 (2019).
  9. A. E. Urai, B. Doiron, A. M. Leifer, and A. K. Churchland, Large-scale neural recordings call for new insights to link brain and behavior, Nat. Neurosci. 25, 11 (2022).
  10. C. Stringer, M. Pachitariu, N. Steinmetz, C. B. Reddy, M. Carandini, and K. D. Harris, Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity, Science 364, eaav7893 (2019).
  11. N. A. Steinmetz, P. Zatka-Haas, M. Carandini, and K. D. Harris, Distributed coding of choice, action and engagement across the mouse brain, Nature (London) 576, 266 (2019).
  12. M. L. Kringelbach and G. Deco, Brain states and transitions: Insights from computational neuroscience, Cell Rep. 32, 108128 (2020).
  13. S. Durand, G. R. Heller, T. K. Ramirez, J. A. Luviano, A. Williford, D. T. Sullivan, A. J. Cahoon, C. Farrell, P. A. Groblewski, C. Bennett, J. H. Siegle, and S. R. Olsen, Acute head-fixed recordings in awake mice with multiple neuropixels probes, Nat. Protoc. 18, 424 (2023).
  14. J. H. Siegle, X. Jia, S. Durand, S. Gale, C. Bennett, N. Graddis, G. Heller, T. K. Ramirez, H. Choi, J. A. Luviano, P. A. Groblewski, R. Ahmed, A. Arkhipov, A. Bernard, Y. N. Billeh, D. Brown, M. A. Buice, N. Cain, S. Caldejon, L. Casal, et al., Survey of spiking in the mouse visual system reveals functional hierarchy, Nature (London) 592, 86 (2021).
  15. A. Renart, J. De La Rocha, P. Bartho, L. Hollender, N. Parga, A. Reyes, and K. D. Harris, The asynchronous state in cortical circuits, Science 327, 587 (2010).
  16. R. López-Ruiz, H. Mancini, and X. Calbet, A statistical measure of complexity, Phys. Lett. A 209, 321 (1995).
  17. O. A. Rosso, H. A. Larrondo, M. T. Martin, A. Plastino, and M. A. Fuentes, Distinguishing noise from chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 154102 (2007).
  18. H. B. de Lucas, S. L. Bressler, F. S. Matias, and O. A. Rosso, A symbolic information approach to characterize response-related differences in cortical activity during a go/no-go task, Nonlin. Dyn. 104, 4401 (2021).
  19. N. Lotfi, T. Feliciano, L. A. A. Aguiar, T. P. L. Silva, T. T. A. Carvalho, O. A. Rosso, M. Copelli, F. S. Matias, and P. V. Carelli, Statistical complexity is maximized close to criticality in cortical dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 103, 012415 (2021).
  20. R. M. Jungmann, T. Feliciano, L. A. A. Aguiar, C. Soares-Cunha, B. Coimbra, A. J. Rodrigues, M. Copelli, F. S. Matias, N. A. P. de Vasconcelos, and P. V. Carelli, State-dependent complexity of the local field potential in the primary visual cortex, Phys. Rev. E 110, 014402 (2024).
  21. M. Granado, N. Martinez, F. Miceli, O. A. Rosso, and F. Montani, Canine preictal topology: Ordinal complexity and neural mapping, Eur. Phys. J. B 98, 229 (2025).
  22. Allen Institute, Visual behavior - Neuropixels (2024), https://doi.org/10.48324/dandi.000713/0.240702.1725.
  23. K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, V. V. Nikouline, J. M. Palva, and R. J. Ilmoniemi, Long-range temporal correlations and scaling behavior in human brain oscillations, J. Neurosci. 21, 1370 (2001).
  24. J. M. Palva, A. Zhigalov, J. Hirvonen, O. Korhonen, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, and S. Palva, Neuronal long-range temporal correlations and avalanche dynamics are correlated with behavioral scaling laws, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3585 (2013).
  25. F. Rieke, D. Warland, R. de R. van Steveninck, and W. Bialek, Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).
  26. C. Bandt and B. Pompe, Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 174102 (2002).
  27. C. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, 1949).
  28. P. W. Lamberti, M. T. Martín, A. Plastino, and O. A. Rosso, Intensive entropic non-triviality measure, Physica A 334, 119 (2004).
  29. M. Martin, A. Plastino, and O. Rosso, Generalized statistical complexity measures: Geometrical and analytical properties, Physica A 369, 439 (2006).
  30. G. Tononi, O. Sporns, and G. M. Edelman, A measure for brain complexity: Relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5033 (1994).
  31. J. H. van Hateren and A. van der Schaaf, Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex, Proc. Biol. Sci. 265, 359 (1998).
  32. E. P. Simoncelli and B. A. Olshausen, Natural image statistics and neural representation, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1193 (2001).
  33. N. A. P. de Vasconcelos, C. Soares-Cunha, A. J. Rodrigues, S. Ribeiro, and N. Sousa, Coupled variability in primary sensory areas and the hippocampus during spontaneous activity, Sci. Rep. 7, 46077 (2017).
  34. M. D. Fox, A. Z. Snyder, J. L. Vincent, M. Corbetta, D. C. Van Essen, and M. E. Raichle, The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9673 (2005).
  35. J. Fiser, C. Chiu, and M. Weliky, Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision, Nature (London) 431, 573 (2004).
  36. I. Stitt, E. Galindo-Leon, F. Pieper, G. Engler, E. Fiedler, T. Stieglitz, and A. K. Engel, Context-specific modulation of intrinsic coupling modes shapes multisensory processing, Sci. Adv. 5, eaar7633 (2019).
  37. D. V. Buonomano and W. Maass, State-dependent computations: Spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 113 (2009).
  38. S. Grossberg, Cortical and subcortical predictive dynamics and learning during perception, cognition, emotion and action, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1223 (2009).
  39. S. H. Gautam, T. T. Hoang, K. McClanahan, S. K. Grady, and W. L. Shew, Maximizing sensory dynamic range by tuning the cortical state to criticality, PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004576 (2015).
  40. S. Akella, P. Ledochowitsch, J. H. Siegle, H. Belski, D. D. Denman, M. A. Buice, S. Durand, C. Koch, S. R. Olsen, and X. Jia, Deciphering neuronal variability across states reveals dynamic sensory encoding, Nat. Commun. 16, 1768 (2025).
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/wndc-k654 for a detailed description of dynamical systems, parameter exploration, and mean correlation measures, which includes Ref. [42].
  42. M. R. Cohen and A. Kohn, Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations, Nat. Neurosci. 14, 811 (2011).
  43. M. A. Wilson and B. L. McNaughton, Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep, Science 265, 676 (1994).
  44. D. A. McCormick, D. B. Nestvogel, and B. J. He, Neuromodulation of brain state and behavior, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 43, 391 (2020).
  45. J. P. Cunningham and B. M. Yu, Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings, Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1500 (2014).
  46. J. A. Gallego, M. G. Perich, L. E. Miller, and S. A. Solla, Neural manifolds for the control of movement, Neuron 94, 978 (2017).
  47. V. Mante, D. Sussillo, K. V. Shenoy, and W. T. Newsome, Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex, Nature (London) 503, 78 (2013).
  48. A. Clark, Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 181 (2013).
  49. D. Vidaurre, S. M. Smith, and M. W. Woolrich, Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12827 (2017).
  50. N. Chen, H. Sugihara, and M. Sur, An acetylcholine-activated microcircuit drives temporal dynamics of cortical activity, Nat. Neurosci. 18, 892 (2015).
  51. B. Yogesh and G. B. Keller, Cholinergic input to mouse visual cortex signals a movement state and acutely enhances layer 5 responsiveness, eLife 12, RP89986 (2024).
  52. A. Sarkar, D. P. Bhatt, and J. P. Gavornik, M2 receptors are required for spatiotemporal sequence learning in mouse primary visual cortex, J. Neurophysiol. 131, 1213 (2024).
  53. E. Schneidman, M. J. Berry, II, R. Segev, and W. Bialek, Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population, Nature (London) 440, 1007 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation