- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Criticality at Work: Scaling in the Mouse Cortex Enhances Performance

Gustavo G. Cambrainha1, Daniel M. Castro1, Nivaldo A. P. de Vasconcelos2, Pedro V. Carelli1, and Mauro Copelli1,*

  • *Contact author: mauro.copelli@ufpe.br
PDF

PRX Life 3, 033026 – Published 24 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w49n-2vz8

Abstract

The critical brain hypothesis posits that neural systems operate near a phase transition, optimizing the processing of information. While scale invariance and non-Gaussian dynamics—hallmarks of criticality—have been observed in brain activity, a direct link between criticality and behavioral performance remains unexplored. Here, we use a phenomenological renormalization group approach to examine neuronal activity in the primary visual cortex of mice performing a visual recognition task. We show that nontrivial scaling in neuronal activity is associated with enhanced task performance, with pronounced scaling observed during successful task completion. When rewards were removed or non-natural stimuli presented, scaling signatures diminished. These results suggest that critical dynamics in the brain is crucial for optimizing behavioral outcomes, offering new insights into the functional role of criticality in cortical processing.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (61)

  1. A. Cavagna, A. Cimarelli, I. Giardina, G. Parisi, R. Santagati, F. Stefanini, and M. Viale, Scale-free correlations in starling flocks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11865 (2010).
  2. T. Mora and W. Bialek, Are biological systems poised at criticality? J. Stat. Phys. 144, 268 (2011).
  3. J. Hidalgo, J. Grilli, S. Suweis, M. A. Muñoz, J. R. Banavar, and A. Maritan, Information-based fitness and the emergence of criticality in living systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10095 (2014).
  4. H. de Paoli, T. Van Der Heide, A. Van Den Berg, B. R. Silliman, P. M. J. Herman, and J. Van De Koppel, Behavioral self-organization underlies the resilience of a coastal ecosystem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8035 (2017).
  5. P. Villegas, T. Gili, G. Caldarelli, and A. Gabrielli, Evidence of scale-free clusters of vegetation in tropical rainforests, Phys. Rev. E 109, L042402 (2024).
  6. J. M. Beggs and D. Plenz, Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits, J. Neurosci. 23, 11167 (2003).
  7. J. M. Beggs, The criticality hypothesis: How local cortical networks might optimize information processing, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 366, 329 (2008).
  8. D. R. Chialvo, Emergent complex neural dynamics, Nat. Phys. 6, 744 (2010).
  9. W. L. Shew and D. Plenz, The functional benefits of criticality in the cortex, Neuroscientist 19, 88 (2013).
  10. Criticality in Neural Systems, edited by D. Plenz and E. Niebur (Wiley, Weinheim, 2014).
  11. N. Tomen, M. J. Herrmann, and U. Ernst, The Functional Role of Critical Dynamics in Neural Systems (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019).
  12. M. A. Muñoz, Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 031001 (2018).
  13. J. O'Byrne and K. Jerbi, How critical is brain criticality? Trends Neurosci. 45, 820 (2022).
  14. N. Bertschinger and T. Natschläger, Real-Time computation at the edge of chaos in recurrent neural networks, Neural Comput. 16, 1413 (2004).
  15. C. Haldeman and J. M. Beggs, Critical branching captures activity in living neural networks and maximizes the number of metastable states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 058101 (2005).
  16. O. Kinouchi and M. Copelli, Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality, Nat. Phys. 2, 348 (2006).
  17. W. L. Shew, H. Yang, T. Petermann, R. Roy, and D. Plenz, Neuronal avalanches imply maximum dynamic range in cortical networks at criticality, J. Neurosci. 29, 15595 (2009).
  18. L. de Arcangelis and H. J. Herrmann, Learning as a phenomenon occurring in a critical state, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3977 (2010).
  19. W. L. Shew, H. Yang, S. Yu, R. Roy, and D. Plenz, Information capacity and transmission are maximized in balanced cortical networks with neuronal avalanches, J. Neurosci. 31, 55 (2011).
  20. J. Boedecker, O. Obst, J. T. Lizier, N. M. Mayer, and M. Asada, Information processing in echo state networks at the edge of chaos, Theor. Biosci. 131, 205 (2012).
  21. S. H. Gautam, T. T. Hoang, K. McClanahan, S. K. Grady, and W. L. Shew, Maximizing sensory dynamic range by tuning the cortical state to criticality, PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004576 (2015).
  22. V. Capano, H. Herrmann, and L. de Arcangelis, Optimal percentage of inhibitory synapses in multi-task learning, Sci. Rep. 5, 9895 (2015).
  23. L. Michiels van Kessenich, D. Berger, L. de Arcangelis, and H. J. Herrmann, Pattern recognition with neuronal avalanche dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 99, 010302(R) (2019).
  24. A.-E. Avramiea, A. Masood, H. D. Mansvelder, and K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, Long-Range amplitude coupling is optimized for brain networks that function at criticality, J. Neurosci. 42, 2221 (2022).
  25. G. Barzon, D. M. Busiello, and G. Nicoletti, Excitation-inhibition balance controls information encoding in neural populations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 068403 (2025).
  26. V. Zimmern, Why brain criticality is clinically relevant: A scoping review, Front. Neural Circ. 14, 54 (2020).
  27. M. Breakspear, J. A. Roberts, J. R. Terry, S. Rodrigues, N. Mahant, and P. A. Robinson, A unifying explanation of primary generalized seizures through nonlinear brain modeling and bifurcation analysis, Cereb. Cortex 16, 1296 (2006).
  28. N. Dehghani, A. Peyrache, B. Telenczuk, M. Le Van Quyen, E. Halgren, S. S. Cash, N. G. Hatsopoulos, and A. Destexhe, Dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition in human and monkey neocortex, Sci. Rep. 6, 23176 (2016).
  29. F. U. Hohlefeld, J. Huebl, C. Huchzermeyer, G. Schneider, T. Schönecker, A. A. Kühn, G. Curio, and V. V. Nikulin, Long‐range temporal correlations in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson's disease, Eur. J. Neurosci. 36, 2812 (2012).
  30. G. Alamian, T. Lajnef, A. Pascarella, J.-M. Lina, L. Knight, J. Walters, K. D. Singh, and K. Jerbi, Altered brain criticality in schizophrenia: New insights from magnetoencephalography, Front. Neural Circ. 16, 630621 (2022).
  31. K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, V. V. Nikouline, J. M. Palva, and R. J. Ilmoniemi, Long-Range temporal correlations and scaling behavior in human brain oscillations, J. Neurosci. 21, 1370 (2001).
  32. T. L. Ribeiro, M. Copelli, F. Caixeta, H. Belchior, D. R. Chialvo, M. A. L. Nicolelis, and S. Ribeiro, Spike avalanches exhibit universal dynamics across the sleep-wake cycle, PLoS One 5, e14129 (2010).
  33. F. Lombardi, H. J. Herrmann, C. Perrone-Capano, D. Plenz, and L. de Arcangelis, Balance between excitation and inhibition controls the temporal organization of neuronal avalanches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 228703 (2012).
  34. E. Tagliazucchi, P. Balenzuela, D. Fraiman, and D. R. Chialvo, Criticality in large-scale brain fmri dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis, Front. Physiol. 3, (2012).
  35. J. M. Palva, A. Zhigalov, J. Hirvonen, O. Korhonen, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, and S. Palva, Neuronal long-range temporal correlations and avalanche dynamics are correlated with behavioral scaling laws, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3585 (2013).
  36. O. Shriki, J. Alstott, F. Carver, T. Holroyd, R. N. Henson, M. L. Smith, R. Coppola, E. Bullmore, and D. Plenz, Neuronal avalanches in the resting MEG of the human brain, J. Neurosci. 33, 7079 (2013).
  37. A. J. Fontenele, N. A. P. de Vasconcelos, T. Feliciano, L. A. A. Aguiar, C. Soares-Cunha, B. Coimbra, L. Dalla Porta, S. Ribeiro, A. J. Rodrigues, N. Sousa, P. V. Carelli, and M. Copelli, Criticality between cortical states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 208101 (2019).
  38. D. Dahmen, S. Grün, M. Diesmann, and M. Helias, Second type of criticality in the brain uncovers rich multiple-neuron dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 13051 (2019).
  39. Z. Ma, G. G. Turrigiano, R. Wessel, and K. B. Hengen, Cortical circuit dynamics are homeostatically tuned to criticality in vivo, Neuron 104, 655 (2019).
  40. S. A. Jones, J. H. Barfield, V. K. Norman, and W. L. Shew, Scale-free behavioral dynamics directly linked with scale-free cortical dynamics, eLife 12, e79950 (2023).
  41. S. Bradde and W. Bialek, PCA meets RG, J. Stat. Phys. 167, 462 (2017).
  42. L. Meshulam, J. L. Gauthier, C. D. Brody, D. W. Tank, and W. Bialek, Coarse graining, fixed points, and scaling in a large population of neurons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 178103 (2019).
  43. L. P. Kadanoff, Scaling laws for ising models near Tc, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 2, 263 (1966).
  44. K. G. Wilson, Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971).
  45. K. G. Wilson, Renormalization group and critical phenomena. II. Phase-Space cell analysis of critical behavior, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3184 (1971).
  46. M. E. Fisher, Renormalization group theory: Its basis and formulation in statistical physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 653 (1998).
  47. J. J. Jun, N. A. Steinmetz, J. H. Siegle, D. J. Denman, M. Bauza, B. Barbarits, A. K. Lee, C. A. Anastassiou, A. Andrei, Ç. Aydın, M. Barbic, T. J. Blanche, V. Bonin, J. Couto, B. Dutta, S. L. Gratiy, D. A. Gutnisky, M. Häusser, B. Karsh, P. Ledochowitsch et al., Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity, Nature (London) 551, 232 (2017).
  48. G. B. Morales, S. Di Santo, and M. A. Muñoz, Quasiuniversal scaling in mouse-brain neuronal activity stems from edge-of-instability critical dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2208998120 (2023).
  49. A. Ponce-Alvarez, M. L. Kringelbach, and G. Deco, Critical scaling of whole-brain resting-state dynamics, Commun. Biol. 6, 627 (2023).
  50. D. M. Castro, T. Feliciano, N. A. P. de Vasconcelos, C. Soares-Cunha, B. Coimbra, A. J. Rodrigues, P. V. Carelli, and M. Copelli, In and out of criticality? State-Dependent scaling in the rat visual cortex, PRX Life 2, 023008 (2024).
  51. B. R. Munn, E. J. Müller, I. Favre-Bulle, E. Scott, J. T. Lizier, M. Breakspear, and J. M. Shine, Multiscale organization of neuronal activity unifies scale-dependent theories of brain function, Cell 187, 7303 (2024).
  52. Allen Institute for Brain Science, Allen brain observatory: Visual behavior neuropixels technical whitepaper V1.0 – 8.16.22 [Whitepaper], Tech. Rep. (Allen Institute for Brain Science, 2022).
  53. J. H. Siegle, X. Jia, S. Durand, S. Gale, C. Bennett, N. Graddis, G. Heller, T. K. Ramirez, H. Choi, J. A. Luviano et al., Survey of spiking in the mouse visual system reveals functional hierarchy, Nature (London) 592, 86 (2021).
  54. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/w49n-2vz8 for analyses of different time windows, the presence of possible noise units, the change in exponent values with threshold, a comparison of kurtosis before and after coarse-graining, p-values, activity density as an alternative parameter, the average shape of distributions with different kurtosis, and fatigue effects.
  55. G. Nicoletti, S. Suweis, and A. Maritan, Scaling and criticality in a phenomenological renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023144 (2020).
  56. J. S. Sooter, A. J. Fontenele, C. Ly, A. K. Barreiro, and W. L. Shew, Cortex deviates from criticality during action and deep sleep: A temporal renormalization group approach, bioRxiv: 10.1101/2024.05.29.596499.
  57. C. Stringer, M. Pachitariu, N. Steinmetz, M. Carandini, and K. D. Harris, High-dimensional geometry of population responses in visual cortex, Nature (London) 571, 361 (2019).
  58. K. F. R. Nascimento, D. M. Castro, G. G. Cambrainha, and M. Copelli, The phenomenological renormalization group in neuronal models near criticality, arXiv:2506.14053 [cond-mat.dis-nn].
  59. V. Priesemann, M. Wibral, M. Valderrama, R. Pröpper, M. Le Van Quyen, T. Geisel, J. Triesch, D. Nikolić, and M. H. J. Munk, Spike avalanches in vivo suggest a driven, slightly subcritical brain state, Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8, 108 (2014).
  60. K. B. Hengen and W. L. Shew, Is criticality a unified set-point of brain function? Neuron 113, 1 (2024).
  61. Allen Brain Institute for Brain Science, Allen institute - visual behavior - neuropixels [data set]. Dandi archive (2024), https://doi.org/10.48324/dandi.000713/0.240702.1725.

Outline

Information

PRX Life 3, 033026– Published 24 September, 2025
  • Received 18 December 2024
  • Accepted 18 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation