- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Paused in Translation: A Model for the Transcript Length-Dependent Impact of Ribosome-Targeting Antibiotics on Degrading mRNAs

Johannes Keisers1,*, Norbert Kern2, and Luca Ciandrini1,3,†

  • *Contact author: johannes.keisers@umontpellier.fr
  • †Contact author: luca.ciandrini@umontpellier.fr
PDF

PRX Life 4, 023024 – Published 3 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vrqp-4y74

Abstract

Ribosome-targeting antibiotics, such as chloramphenicol, stall elongating ribosomes during protein synthesis, disrupting mRNA translation. These antibiotic-induced pauses occur stochastically, alter collective ribosome dynamics, and transiently block protein production on the affected transcript. Existing models of ribosome traffic often rely on idealized assumptions, such as infinitely long and stable mRNAs and simplified pausing dynamics, overlooking key biological constraints. Here, we develop a totally asymmetric simple exclusion process that incorporates stochastic particle pausing and lattice degradation, using experimentally determined pausing and unpausing rates to model the effects of ribosome-targeting antibiotics. We introduce a single-cluster approximation, which is analytically treatable, tailored to capture the biologically relevant regime of rare and long antibiotic-induced pauses. This biologically constrained model reveals three key insights: (i) the inhibition of antibiotic-induced translation strongly depends on transcript length, with longer transcripts being disproportionately affected; (ii) reducing ribosome initiation rates significantly mitigates antibiotic vulnerability; and (iii) inhibition of translation is governed more by collective ribosome dynamics than by single-ribosome properties. Our analytical predictions match Gillespie simulations, align quantitatively with experimental observations, and yield testable hypotheses for future experiments. These findings may have broader implications for the mechanistic modeling of other biological transport processes (e.g., RNAP dynamics), and more generally for the community studying traffic models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Biologically relevant finite-size effects in a driven lattice gas with particle pausing and dynamical defects

Johannes Keisers, Lorenzo Vito Dal Zovo, Norbert Kern, and Luca Ciandrini
Phys. Rev. E 113, 064114 (2026)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. S. Klumpp and T. Hwa, Stochasticity and traffic jams in the transcription of ribosomal RNA: Intriguing role of termination and antitermination, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18159 (2008).
  2. B. Kavčič, G. Tkačik, and T. Bollenbach, Mechanisms of drug interactions between translation-inhibiting antibiotics, Nat. Commun. 11, 4013 (2020).
  3. C. T. MacDonald, J. H. Gibbs, and A. C. Pipkin, Kinetics of biopolymerization on nucleic acid templates, Biopolymers 6, 1 (1968).
  4. R. A. Blythe and M. R. Evans, Nonequilibrium steady states of matrix-product form: A solver's guide, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, R333 (2007).
  5. T. Tripathi and D. Chowdhury, Interacting RNA polymerase motors on a DNA track: Effects of traffic congestion and intrinsic noise on RNA synthesis, Phys. Rev. E 77, 011921 (2008).
  6. J. Wang, B. Pfeuty, Q. Thommen, M. C. Romano, and M. Lefranc, Minimal model of transcriptional elongation processes with pauses, Phys. Rev. E 90, 050701 (2014).
  7. A. A. van den Berg and M. Depken, Crowding-induced transcriptional bursts dictate polymerase and nucleosome density profiles along genes, Nucl. Acids Res. 45, 7623 (2017).
  8. R. C. Mines, T. Lipniacki, and X. Shen, Slow nucleosome dynamics set the transcriptional speed limit and induce RNA polymerase II traffic jams and bursts, PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009811 (2022).
  9. L. B. Shaw, R. K. P. Zia, and K. H. Lee, Totally asymmetric exclusion process with extended objects: A model for protein synthesis, Phys. Rev. E 68, 021910 (2003).
  10. S. Klumpp, Y. Chai, and R. Lipowsky, Effects of the chemomechanical stepping cycle on the traffic of molecular motors, Phys. Rev. E 78, 041909 (2008).
  11. L. Ciandrini, I. Stansfield, and M. C. Romano, Role of the particle's stepping cycle in an asymmetric exclusion process: A model of mRNA translation, Phys. Rev. E 81, 051904 (2010).
  12. Y. Rousset, L. Ciandrini, and N. Kern, Exclusion process subject to conformational size changes, SciPost Phys. 6, 077 (2019).
  13. L. B. Shaw, J. P. Sethna, and K. H. Lee, Mean-field approaches to the totally asymmetric exclusion process with quenched disorder and large particles, Phys. Rev. E 70, 021901 (2004).
  14. J. Szavits-Nossan, L. Ciandrini, and M. C. Romano, Deciphering mRNA sequence determinants of protein production rate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 128101 (2018).
  15. D. D. Erdmann-Pham, K. D. Duc, and Y. S. Song, The key parameters that govern translation efficiency, Cell Syst. 10, 183 (2020).
  16. L. Ciandrini, R. L. Crisostomo, and J. Szavits-Nossan, TASEPy: A Python-based package to iteratively solve the inhomogeneous exclusion process, SciPost Phys. Codebases, 22 (2023).
  17. F. Turci, A. Parmeggiani, E. Pitard, M. C. Romano, and L. Ciandrini, Transport on a lattice with dynamical defects, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012705 (2013).
  18. B. Waclaw, J. Cholewa-Waclaw, and P. Greulich, Totally asymmetric exclusion process with site-wise dynamic disorder, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 065002 (2019).
  19. C. Zhu, X. Guo, P. Dumas, M. Takacs, M. Abdelkareem, A. Vanden Broeck, C. Saint-André, G. Papai, C. Crucifix, J. Ortiz, and A. Weixlbaumer, Transcription factors modulate RNA polymerase conformational equilibrium, Nat. Commun. 13, 1546 (2022).
  20. A. Nagar, A. Valleriani, and R. Lipowsky, Translation by ribosomes with mRNA degradation: Exclusion processes on aging tracks, J. Stat. Phys. 145, 1385 (2011).
  21. Q. Zhang, E. Brambilla, R. Li, H. Shi, M. Cosentino Lagomarsino, and B. Sclavi, A decrease in transcription capacity limits growth rate upon translation inhibition, mSystems 5, e00575-20 (2020).
  22. C. T. Walsh, Antibiotics: Actions, Origins, Resistance, by C. Walsh. 2003. Washington, DC: ASM Press, Protein Sci. 13, 3059 (2004).
  23. M. Scott, C. W. Gunderson, E. M. Mateescu, Z. Zhang, and T. Hwa, Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: Origins and consequences, Science 330, 1099 (2010).
  24. R. J. Harvey and A. L. Koch, How partially inhibitory concentrations of chloramphenicol affect the growth of Escherichia coli, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18, 323 (1980).
  25. S. Pestka, Binding of [C14]erythromycin to Escherichia coli ribosomes, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 6, 474 (1974).
  26. X. Dai, M. Zhu, M. Warren, R. Balakrishnan, V. Patsalo, H. Okano, J. R. Williamson, K. Fredrick, Y.-P. Wang, and T. Hwa, Reduction of translating ribosomes enables Escherichia coli to maintain elongation rates during slow growth, Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16231 (2016).
  27. L. Ciandrini, I. Stansfield, and M. C. Romano, Ribosome traffic on mRNAs maps to gene ontology: Genome-wide quantification of translation initiation rates and polysome size regulation, PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002866 (2013).
  28. R. Milo and R. Phillips, Cell Biology by the Numbers (Garland Science, New York, 2015).
  29. R. Balakrishnan, M. Mori, I. Segota, Z. Zhang, R. Aebersold, C. Ludwig, and T. Hwa, Principles of gene regulation quantitatively connect DNA to RNA and proteins in bacteria, Science 378, eabk2066 (2022).
  30. H. Chen, K. Shiroguchi, H. Ge, and X. S. Xie, Genome-wide study of mRNA degradation and transcript elongation in Escherichia coli, Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 781 (2015).
  31. P. Greulich, M. Scott, M. R. Evans, and R. J. Allen, Growth-dependent bacterial susceptibility to ribosome-targeting antibiotics, Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 796 (2015).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/vrqp-4y74 for the theory without lattice degradation, additional simulation comparisons, and the finite-cluster batch-size calculation, which includes Ref. [51].
  33. A. B. Kolomeisky, G. M. Schütz, E. B. Kolomeisky, and J. P. Straley, Phase diagram of one-dimensional driven lattice gases with open boundaries, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 6911 (1998).
  34. L. Santen and C. Appert, The asymmetric exclusion process revisited: Fluctuations and dynamics in the domain wall picture, J. Stat. Phys. 106, 187 (2002).
  35. J. Cividini, H. J. Hilhorst, and C. Appert-Rolland, Exact domain wall theory for deterministic TASEP with parallel update, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 222001 (2014).
  36. J. Szavits-Nossan and M. R. Evans, Dynamics of ribosomes in mRNA translation under steady- and nonsteady-state conditions, Phys. Rev. E 101, 062404 (2020).
  37. J. F. C. Kingman, Poisson Processes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1993).
  38. S. M. Ross, Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1996).
  39. C. Wu, R. Balakrishnan, N. Braniff, M. Mori, G. Manzanarez, Z. Zhang, and T. Hwa, Cellular perception of growth rate and the mechanistic origin of bacterial growth law, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2201585119 (2022).
  40. J. Keisers and J. Krug, Exclusion model of mRNA translation with collision-induced ribosome drop-off, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 385601 (2023).
  41. A. R. Subramaniam, B. M. Zid, and E. K. O'Shea, An integrated approach reveals regulatory controls on bacterial translation elongation, Cell 159, 1200 (2014).
  42. K. Saito, H. Kratzat, A. Campbell, R. Buschauer, A. M. Burroughs, O. Berninghausen, L. Aravind, R. Green, R. Beckmann, and A. R. Buskirk, Ribosome collisions induce mRNA cleavage and ribosome rescue in bacteria, Nature (London) 603, 503 (2022).
  43. S. Filbeck, F. Cerullo, S. Pfeffer, and C. A. Joazeiro, Ribosome-associated quality-control mechanisms from bacteria to humans, Mol. Cell 82, 1451 (2022).
  44. L. D. Fernandes, A. P. de Moura, and L. Ciandrini, Gene length as a regulator for ribosome recruitment and protein synthesis: Theoretical insights, Sci. Rep. 7, 17409 (2017).
  45. K. Ikeuchi, T. Izawa, and T. Inada, Recent progress on the molecular mechanism of quality controls induced by ribosome stalling, Front. Genet. 9, 743 (2019).
  46. S. Uemura, C. E. Aitken, J. Korlach, B. A. Flusberg, S. W. Turner, and J. D. Puglisi, Real-time tRNA transit on single translating ribosomes at codon resolution, Nature (London) 464, 1012 (2010).
  47. K. C. Neuman, E. A. Abbondanzieri, R. Landick, J. Gelles, and S. M. Block, Ubiquitous transcriptional pausing is independent of RNA polymerase backtracking, Cell 115, 437 (2003).
  48. R. Janissen, B. Eslami-Mossallam, I. Artsimovitch, M. Depken, and N. H. Dekker, High-throughput single-molecule experiments reveal heterogeneity, state switching, and three interconnected pause states in transcription, Cell Rep. 39, 110749 (2022).
  49. M. H. Moreira, G. C. Barros, R. D. Requião, S. Rossetto, T. Domitrovic, and F. L. Palhano, From reporters to endogenous genes: The impact of the first five codons on translation efficiency in Escherichia coli, RNA Biol. 16, 1806 (2019).
  50. P. Shah, Y. Ding, M. Niemczyk, G. Kudla, and J. B. Plotkin, Rate-limiting steps in yeast protein translation, Cell 153, 1589 (2013).
  51. J. Keisers, L. V. Dal Zovo, N. Kern, and L. Ciandrini, companion paper, Biologically relevant finite-size effects in a driven lattice gas with particle pausing and dynamical defects, Phys. Rev. E 113, 064114 (2026).
  52. P. Greulich, L. Ciandrini, R. J. Allen, and M. C. Romano, Mixed population of competing totally asymmetric simple exclusion processes with a shared reservoir of particles, Phys. Rev. E 85, 011142 (2012).
  53. D. T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 403 (1976).

Outline

Information

PRX Life 4, 023024– Published 3 June, 2026
  • Received 31 July 2025
  • Accepted 1 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation