Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Learning via Mechanosensitivity and Activity in Cytoskeletal Networks

Deb S. Banerjee1,2, Martin J. Falk1,3, Margaret L. Gardel1,3,4,5, Aleksandra M. Walczak6,1,3, Thierry Mora6,1,3, and Suriyanarayanan Vaikuntanathan1,2,*

  • *Contact author: svaikunt@uchicago.edu

PRX Life 4, 013001 – Published 5 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s7tg-6q4q

Abstract

In this work we show how a network inspired by a coarse-grained description of the cytoskeleton can learn—in a contrastive learning framework—from environmental perturbations if it is endowed with mechanosensitive proteins and motors. Our work is a proof of principle for how force-sensitive proteins and molecular motors can form the basis of a general strategy to learn in biological systems without neurons. Our work identifies a minimal biologically plausible learning mechanism and also explores its implications for commonly occurring phenomenology, such as adaptation and homeostasis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

PRX Life Collection on adaptation and learning

PRX Life presents a special collection on ‘Biological systems that learn’, curated by the organizers of the National Institute for Theory and Mathematics in Biology (NITMB) workshop together with early-career researchers. The papers in this collection illustrate how living systems acquire functions, showing it is useful to describe them as tunable matter with many individually adjustable degrees of freedom characterizing microscopic properties. Drawing inspiration from AI and non-biological systems that can acquire desired functions, the featured research highlights the timeliness of the topic and its potential to drive unifying frameworks for emergent collective function in living tunable matter.

Every article in this collection is subject to a rigorous peer review process, upholding the high standards applied to all papers in the journal. The PRX Life editorial team manages peer review and makes all editorial decisions.

Article Text

References (63)

  1. S. J. Gunst, D. D. Tang, and A. O. Saez, Cytoskeletal remodeling of the airway smooth muscle cell: A mechanism for adaptation to mechanical forces in the lung, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 137, 151 (2003).
  2. A. Nestor-Bergmann, G. A. Stooke-Vaughan, G. K. Goddard, T. Starborg, O. E. Jensen, and S. Woolner, Decoupling the roles of cell shape and mechanical stress in orienting and cueing epithelial mitosis, Cell Rep. 26, 2088 (2019).
  3. C. Guillot and T. Lecuit, Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis, Science 340, 1185 (2013).
  4. S. Arzash, I. Tah, A. J. Liu, and M. L. Manning, Rigidity of epithelial tissues as a double optimization problem, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013157 (2025).
  5. I. Tah, D. Haertter, J. M. Crawford, D. P. Kiehart, C. F. Schmidt, and A. J. Liu, A minimal vertex model explains how the amnioserosa avoids fluidization during Drosophila dorsal closure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2322732121 (2025).
  6. Y. Kalukula, M. Luciano, G. Simanov, G. Charras, D. B. Brückner, and S. Gabriele, The actin cortex acts as a mechanical memory of morphology in confined migrating cells, Nat. Phys. 21, 1451 (2025).
  7. J. F. Fuhrmann, A. Krishna, J. Paijmans, C. Duclut, G. Cwikla, S. Eaton, M. Popović, F. Jülicher, C. D. Modes, and N. A. Dye, Active shape programming drives drosophila wing eversion, Sci. Adv. 10, eadp0860 (2024).
  8. M. Stern and A. Murugan, Learning without neurons in physical systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 417 (2023).
  9. J. W. Rocks, N. Pashine, I. Bischofberger, C. P. Goodrich, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Designing allostery-inspired response in mechanical networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2520 (2017).
  10. N. Pashine, D. Hexner, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Directed aging, memory, and nature's greed, Sci. Adv. 5, eaax4215 (2019).
  11. M. Stern, D. Hexner, J. W. Rocks, and A. J. Liu, Supervised learning in physical networks: From machine learning to learning machines, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021045 (2021).
  12. M. J. Falk, A. T. Strupp, B. Scellier, and A. Murugan, Temporal contrastive learning through implicit non-equilibrium memory, Nat. Commun. 16, 2163 (2025).
  13. I. Linsmeier, S. Banerjee, P. W. Oakes, W. Jung, T. Kim, and M. P. Murrell, Disordered actomyosin networks are sufficient to produce cooperative and telescopic contractility, Nat. Commun. 7, 12615 (2016).
  14. C. P. Broedersz and F. C. MacKintosh, Molecular motors stiffen non-affine semiflexible polymer networks, Soft Matter 7, 3186 (2011).
  15. C. P. Broedersz and F. C. MacKintosh, Modeling semiflexible polymer networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 995 (2014).
  16. K. Hayakawa, N. Sato, and T. Obinata, Dynamic reorientation of cultured cells and stress fibers under mechanical stress from periodic stretching, Exp. Cell Res. 268, 104 (2001).
  17. N. Noll, M. Mani, I. Heemskerk, S. J. Streichan, and B. I. Shraiman, Active tension network model suggests an exotic mechanical state realized in epithelial tissues, Nat. Phys. 13, 1221 (2017).
  18. F. Rückerl, M. Lenz, T. Betz, J. Manzi, J.-L. Martiel, M. Safouane, R. Paterski-Boujemaa, L. Blanchoin, and C. Sykes, Adaptive response of actin bundles under mechanical stress, Biophys. J. 113, 1072 (2017).
  19. K. E. Cavanaugh, M. F. Staddon, E. Munro, S. Banerjee, and M. L. Gardel, Rhoa mediates epithelial cell shape changes via mechanosensitive endocytosis, Dev. Cell 52, 152 (2020).
  20. M. F. Staddon, K. E. Cavanaugh, E. M. Munro, M. L. Gardel, and S. Banerjee, Mechanosensitive junction remodeling promotes robust epithelial morphogenesis, Biophys. J. 117, 1739 (2019).
  21. C. A. Anderson, D. R. Kovar, M. L. Gardel, and J. D. Winkelman, Lim domain proteins in cell mechanobiology, Cytoskeleton 78, 303 (2021).
  22. H. B. Schiller, C. C. Friedel, C. Boulegue, and R. Fässler, Quantitative proteomics of the integrin adhesome show a myosin II-dependent recruitment of lim domain proteins, EMBO Rep. 12, 259 (2011).
  23. T. P. Lele, J. A. Y. Pendse, S. Kumar, M. Salanga, J. Karavitis, and D. E. Ingber, Mechanical forces alter zyxin unbinding kinetics within focal adhesions of living cells, J. Cell. Physiol. 207, 187 (2006).
  24. M. A. Smith, L. M. Hoffman, and M. C. Beckerle, Lim proteins in actin cytoskeleton mechanoresponse, Trends Cell Biol. 24, 575 (2014).
  25. K. Nishizawa, S.-Z. Lin, C. Chardès, J.-F. Rupprecht, and P.-F. Lenne, Two-point optical manipulation reveals mechanosensitive remodeling of cell–cell contacts in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2212389120 (2023).
  26. J. Xu, Y. Tseng, and D. Wirtz, Strain hardening of actin filament networks: Regulation by the dynamic cross-linking protein α-actinin, J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35886 (2000).
  27. P. A. Janmey, S. Hvidt, J. Käs, D. Lerche, A. Maggs, E. Sackmann, M. Schliwa, and T. P. Stossel, The mechanical properties of actin gels. Elastic modulus and filament motions, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32503 (1994).
  28. M. A. Crisfield, Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures (Wiley, New York, NY, 1991).
  29. R. W. Ogden, Non-linear Elastic Deformations (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA, 1997).
  30. T. J. Perkins and P. S. Swain, Strategies for cellular decision-making, Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 326 (2009).
  31. D. E. Discher, D. J. Mooney, and P. W. Zandstra, Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells, Science 324, 1673 (2009).
  32. Z. Chen, J. M. Linton, S. Xia, X. Fan, D. Yu, J. Wang, R. Zhu, and M. B. Elowitz, A synthetic protein-level neural network in mammalian cells, Science 386, 1243 (2024).
  33. F. Yang, P. Chen, H. Jiang, T. Xie, Y. Shao, D.-H. Kim, B. Li, and Y. Sun, Directional cell migration guided by a strain gradient, Small 20, 2302404 (2024).
  34. G. Reig, M. Cerda, N. Sepúlveda, D. Flores, V. Castaneda, M. Tada, S. Härtel, and M. L. Concha, Extra-embryonic tissue spreading directs early embryo morphogenesis in killifish, Nat. Commun. 8, 15431 (2017).
  35. K. Hayakawa, H. Tatsumi, and M. Sokabe, Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament, J. Cell Biol. 195, 721 (2011).
  36. K. Sato, T. Adachi, M. Matsuo, and Y. Tomita, Quantitative evaluation of threshold fiber strain that induces reorganization of cytoskeletal actin fiber structure in osteoblastic cells, J. Biomech. 38, 1895 (2005).
  37. A. C. Martin, M. Kaschube, and E. F. Wieschaus, Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction, Nature (London) 457, 495 (2009).
  38. A. Munjal, J.-M. Philippe, E. Munro, and T. Lecuit, A self-organized biomechanical network drives shape changes during tissue morphogenesis, Nature (London) 524, 351 (2015).
  39. D. S. Banerjee, A. Munjal, T. Lecuit, and M. Rao, Actomyosin pulsation and flows in an active elastomer with turnover and network remodeling, Nat. Commun. 8, 1121 (2017).
  40. N. Balaghi and R. Fernandez-Gonzalez, Waves of change: Dynamic actomyosin networks in embryonic development, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 91, 102435 (2024).
  41. M. Rauzi, Cell intercalation in a simple epithelium, Philos Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190552 (2020).
  42. M. Rauzi, P.-F. Lenne, and T. Lecuit, Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling, Nature (London) 468, 1110 (2010).
  43. J. Gunawardena, Learning outside the brain: Integrating cognitive science and systems biology, Proc. IEEE 110, 590 (2022).
  44. K. Haase, J. K. L. Macadangdang, C. H. Edrington, C. M. Cuerrier, S. Hadjiantoniou, J. L. Harden, I. S. Skerjanc, and A. E. Pelling, Extracellular forces cause the nucleus to deform in a highly controlled anisotropic manner, Sci. Rep. 6, 21300 (2016).
  45. P. Shah, C. M. Hobson, S. Cheng, M. J. Colville, M. J. Paszek, R. Superfine, and J. Lammerding, Nuclear deformation causes DNA damage by increasing replication stress, Curr. Biol. 31, 753 (2021).
  46. C. M. Denais, R. M. Gilbert, P. Isermann, A. L. McGregor, M. Te Lindert, B. Weigelin, P. M. Davidson, P. Friedl, K. Wolf, and J. Lammerding, Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration, Science 352, 353 (2016).
  47. A. C. Rowat, J. Lammerding, and J. H. Ipsen, Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus and the effect of emerin deficiency, Biophys. J. 91, 4649 (2006).
  48. X. Wang, H. Liu, M. Zhu, C. Cao, Z. Xu, Y. Tsatskis, K. Lau, C. Kuok, T. Filleter, H. McNeill et al., Mechanical stability of the cell nucleus–roles played by the cytoskeleton in nuclear deformation and strain recovery, J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs209627 (2018).
  49. A. Haupt and N. Minc, How cells sense their own shape–mechanisms to probe cell geometry and their implications in cellular organization and function, J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs214015 (2018).
  50. D. Rajan, T. Makushok, A. Kalish, L. Acuna, A. Bonville, K. C. Almanza, B. Garibay, E. Tang, M. Voss, A. Lin et al., Single-cell analysis of habituation in stentor coeruleus, Curr. Biol. 33, 241 (2023).
  51. L. Eckert, M. S. Vidal-Saez, Z. Zhao, J. Garcia-Ojalvo, R. Martinez-Corral, and J. Gunawardena, Biochemically plausible models of habituation for single-cell learning, Curr. Biol. 34, 5646 (2024).
  52. B. Gelber, Investigations of the behavior of paramecium aurelia: I. Modification of behavior after training with reinforcement, J. Compar. Physiol. Psychol. 45, 58 (1952).
  53. S. J. Gershman, P. E. M. Balbi, C. R. Gallistel, and J. Gunawardena, Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells, Elife 10, e61907 (2021).
  54. B. T. Larson, J. Garbus, J. B. Pollack, and W. F. Marshall, A unicellular walker controlled by a microtubule-based finite-state machine, Curr. Biol. 32, 3745 (2022).
  55. R. Farhadifar, J.-C. Röper, B. Aigouy, S. Eaton, and F. Jülicher, The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing, Curr. Biol. 17, 2095 (2007).
  56. S. Alt, P. Ganguly, and G. Salbreux, Vertex models: From cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 372, 20150520 (2017).
  57. D. S. Banerjee, Learning-in-cytoskeletal-networks, https://github.com/DebsankarBanerjee/Learning-in-Cytoskeletal-Networks, Year of last significant update or creation, Accessed: 2025-06-02.
  58. D. H. Ackley, G. E. Hinton, and T. J. Sejnowski, A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines, Cognit. Sci. 9, 147 (1985).
  59. G. E. Hinton, Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence, Neural Comput. 14, 1771 (2002).
  60. J. R. Movellan, Contrastive Hebbian learning in the continuous hopfield model, in Connectionist Models (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991), pp. 10–17.
  61. B. Scellier and Y. Bengio, Equilibrium propagation: Bridging the gap between energy-based models and backpropagation, Front. Comput. Neurosci. 11, 24 (2017).
  62. S. Dillavou, M. Stern, A. J. Liu, and D. J. Durian, Demonstration of decentralized physics-driven learning, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 014040 (2022).
  63. V. R. Anisetti, B. Scellier, and J. M. Schwarz, Learning by non-interfering feedback chemical signaling in physical networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023024 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation