- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Keratin Cortex Stabilizes Cells and Cell-Cell Contacts at High Strains

Ruth Meyer1, Ulla Unkelbach2, Parul Jain3, Ulrike Rölleke1, Nicole Schwarz4, Amaury Perez-Tirado2, Anna V. Schepers1,5, Claudia Geisler3, Andreas Janshoff2,5,6,* et al.

Sarah Köster1,5,6,†

  • *Contact author: andreas.janshoff@chemie.uni-goettingen.de
  • †Contact author: sarah.koester@uni-goettingen.de
PDF

PRX Life 4, 013038 – Published 31 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s24m-n8wc

Abstract

The eukaryotic cytoskeleton consists of three filament types: actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments (IFs). IF proteins are expressed in a cell-type-specific manner, and keratins are found in epithelial cells. In certain cell types, keratin forms a layer close to the membrane which may be referred to as an “IF-cortex.” It is hypothesized that this IF-cortex arranges with radial bundles in a “rim-and-spokes” structure in epithelia. Based on this hypothesis, IFs and actin filaments might add complementary mechanical properties to the cortex. It was previously shown that single IFs in vitro remain undamaged at high strains and display a nonlinear stretching behavior. We now ask whether this unique force-extension behavior of single IFs is also relevant in the context of a filament network within a cell. We show that keratin-deficient (KO) Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells readily form two-dimensional (2D) cell layers and 3D cysts and withstand high equibiaxial strains. High-resolution imaging using STED microscopy reveals altered actin cortex structures in KO cells, presumably in response to the missing keratin. We investigate the influence of the equibiaxial strain on the viscoelastic properties of wild-type (WT) and KO cells using atomic force microscopy. We find that the KO cells exhibit a higher prestress than the WT cells, likely due to the change of the cortical structure. Interestingly, both the prestress and the fluidity of the KO cells are altered already at intermediate strains, whereas the WT cells show a response only at high strain. Upon stretching, the WT cysts retain their intraluminal fluid, i.e., they possess tight cell-cell contacts, whereas a part of the KO cysts release the fluid due to deficient cell-cell contacts. The compressibility modulus is analyzed in a spatially resolved manner and we find this modulus to be increased at the cell rim, compared to the inside region, due to the geometry of the cell layer. Our results indicate that KO cells remodel their actin cytoskeleton to maintain function, but nevertheless the whole tissue is very sensitive to external strain. The intricate interplay between the actin and keratin cortices in WT cells preserves their mechanical state and the cell layer stability.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (74)

  1. A. F. Pegoraro, P. Janmey, and D. A. Weitz, Mechanical properties of the cytoskeleton and cells, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a022038 (2017).
  2. A. R. Harris, L. Peter, J. Bellis, B. Baum, A. J. Kabla, and G. T. Charras, Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16449 (2012).
  3. D. A. Fletcher and R. D. Mullins, Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton, Nature (London) 463, 485 (2010).
  4. J. P. Conboy, I. Istúriz Petitjean, A. Van Der Net, and G. H. Koenderink, How cytoskeletal crosstalk makes cells move: Bridging cell-free and cell studies, Biophys. Rev. 5, 021307 (2024).
  5. N. Wang, Mechanical interactions among cytoskeletal filaments, Hypertension 32, 162 (1998).
  6. P. Chugh and E. K. Paluch, The actin cortex at a glance, J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs186254 (2018).
  7. U. Rölleke, P. Kumari, R. Meyer, and S. Köster, The unique biomechanics of intermediate filaments—From single filaments to cells and tissues, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 85, 102263 (2023).
  8. I. Szeverenyi, A. J. Cassidy, C. W. Chung, B. T. Lee, J. E. Common, S. C. Ogg, H. Chen, S. Y. Sim, W. L. Goh, K. W. Ng, J. A. Simpson, L. L. Chee, G. H. Eng, B. Li, D. P. Lunny, D. Chuon, A. Venkatesh, K. H. Khoo, W. I. McLean, Y. P. Lim, et al., The human intermediate filament database: Comprehensive information on a gene family involved in many human diseases, Hum. Mutat. 29, 351 (2008).
  9. R. A. Quinlan, N. Schwarz, R. Windoffer, C. Richardson, T. Hawkins, J. A. Broussard, K. J. Green, and R. E. Leube, A rim-and-spoke hypothesis to explain the biomechanical roles for cytoplasmic intermediate filament networks, J. Cell Sci. 130, 3437 (2017).
  10. N. Schwarz, R. Windoffer, T. M. Magin, and R. E. Leube, Dissection of keratin network formation, turnover and reorganization in living murine embryos, Sci. Rep. 5, 9007 (2015).
  11. L. Ramms, G. Fabris, R. Windoffer, N. Schwarz, R. Springer, C. Zhou, J. Lazar, S. Stiefel, N. Hersch, U. Schnakenberg, T. M. Magin, R. E. Leube, R. Merkel, and B. Hoffmann, Keratins as the main component for the mechanical integrity of keratinocytes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18513 (2013).
  12. K. M. Stroka and H. Aranda-Espinoza, Effects of morphology vs. cell–cell interactions on endothelial cell stiffness, Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 4, 9 (2011).
  13. E. A-Hassan, W. F. Heinz, M. D. Antonik, N. P. D'Costa, S. Nageswaran, C.-A. Schoenenberger, and J. H. Hoh, Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy, Biophys. J. 74, 1564 (1998).
  14. P. A. Janmey, U. Euteneuer, P. Traub, and M. Schliwa, Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks, J. Cell Biol. 113, 155 (1991).
  15. P. Pawelzyk, H. Herrmann, and N. Willenbacher, Mechanics of intermediate filament networks assembled from keratins K8 and K18, Soft Matter 9, 8871 (2013).
  16. Y.-C. Lin, N. Y. Yao, C. P. Broedersz, H. Herrmann, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Origins of elasticity in intermediate filament networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 058101 (2010).
  17. S. Zafari, S. Schirra, R. Mendozza, S. Lambert, K. A. T. Pajanonot, P. Kumari, P. Sollich, and S. Köster, Vimentin networks at high strains, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 013020 (2026).
  18. J. Block, H. Witt, A. Candelli, E. J. G. Peterman, G. J. L. Wuite, A. Janshoff, and S. Köster, Nonlinear loading-rate-dependent force response of individual vimentin intermediate filaments to applied strain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 048101 (2017).
  19. C. Lorenz, J. Forsting, A. V. Schepers, J. Kraxner, S. Bauch, H. Witt, S. Klumpp, and S. Köster, Lateral subunit coupling determines intermediate filament mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 188102 (2019).
  20. C. Lorenz, J. Forsting, R. W. Style, S. Klumpp, and S. Köster, Keratin filament mechanics and energy dissipation are determined by metal-like plasticity, Matter 6, P2019 (2023).
  21. L. Kreplak, H. Bär, J. F. Leterrier, H. Herrmann, and U. Aebi, Exploring the mechanical behavior of single intermediate filaments, J. Mol. Biol. 354, 569 (2005).
  22. Z. Qin, L. Kreplak, and M. J. Buehler, Hierarchical structure controls nanomechanical properties of vimentin intermediate filaments, PLoS One 4, e7294 (2009).
  23. N. Wang, J. P. Butler, and D. E. Ingber, Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton, Science 260, 1124 (1993).
  24. N. Wang and D. Stamenovic, Mechanics of vimentin intermediate filaments, J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 23, 535 (2002).
  25. D. Fudge, D. Russell, D. Beriault, W. Moore, E. B. Lane, and A. W. Vogl, The intermediate filament network in cultured human keratinocytes is remarkably extensible and resilient, PLoS One 3, e2327 (2008).
  26. K. Pogoda, F. Byfield, P. Deptuła, M. Cieśluk, L. Suprewicz, K. Skłodowski, J. L. Shivers, A. van Oosten, K. Cruz, E. Tarasovetc, E. L. Grishchuk, F. C. Mackintosh, R. Bucki, A. E. Patteson, and P. A. Janmey, Unique role of vimentin networks in compression stiffening of cells and protection of nuclei from compressive stress, Nano Lett. 22, 4725 (2022).
  27. X. Trepat, L. Deng, S. S. An, D. Navajas, D. J. Tschumperlin, W. T. Gerthoffer, J. P. Butler, and J. J. Fredberg, Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell, Nature (London) 447, 592 (2007).
  28. I. Constantinou and E. E. Bastounis, Cell-stretching devices: Advances and challenges in biomedical research and live-cell imaging, Trends Biotechnol. 41, 939 (2023).
  29. J. F. E. Bodenschatz, K. Ajmail, M. Skamrahl, M. Vache, J. Gottwald, S. Nehls, and A. Janshoff, Epithelial cells sacrifice excess area to preserve fluidity in response to external mechanical stress, Commun. Biol. 5, 855 (2022).
  30. S. Nageswaran, J. Haipeter, J. F. E. Bodenschatz, R. Meyer, S. Köster, and C. Steinem, Membrane-bound vimentin filaments reorganize and elongate under strain, Biomacromolecules 24, 2512 (2023).
  31. U. Faust, N. Hampe, W. Rubner, N. Kirchgeßner, S. Safran, B. Hoffmann, and R. Merkel, Cyclic stress at mHz frequencies aligns fibroblasts in direction of zero strain, PLoS One 6, e28963 (2011).
  32. S. Massou, F. Nunes Vicente, F. Wetzel, A. Mehidi, D. Strehle, C. Leduc, R. Voituriez, O. Rossier, P. Nassoy, and G. Giannone, Cell stretching is amplified by active actin remodelling to deform and recruit proteins in mechanosensitive structures, Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 1011 (2020).
  33. I. Andreu, B. Falcones, S. Hurst, N. Chahare, X. Quiroga, A.-L. Le Roux, Z. Kechagia, A. E. M. Beedle, A. Elosegui-Artola, X. Trepat, R. Farré, T. Betz, I. Almendros, and P. Roca-Cusachs, The force loading rate drives cell mechanosensing through both reinforcement and cytoskeletal softening, Nat. Commun. 12, 4229 (2021).
  34. X. Trepat, M. Grabulosa, F. Puig, G. N. Maksym, D. Navajas, and R. Farré, Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch, Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 287, L1025 (2004).
  35. S. Schürmann, S. Wagner, S. Herlitze, C. Fischer, S. Gumbrecht, A. Wirth-Hücking, G. Prölß, L. Lautscham, B. Fabry, W. Goldmann, V. Nikolova-Krstevski, B. Martinac, and O. Friedrich, The IsoStretcher: An isotropic cell stretch device to study mechanical biosensor pathways in living cells, Biosens. Bioelectron. 81, 363 (2016).
  36. J. Duque, A. Bonfanti, J. Fouchard, L. Baldauf, S. R. Azenha, E. Ferber, A. Harris, E. H. Barriga, A. J. Kabla, and G. Charras, Rupture strength of living cell monolayers, Nat. Mater. 23, 1563 (2024).
  37. N. Desprat, A. Richert, J. Simeon, and A. Asnacios, Creep function of a single living cell, Biophys. J. 88, 2224 (2005).
  38. E. Latorre, S. Kale, L. Casares, M. Gómez-González, M. Uroz, L. Valon, R. V. Nair, E. Garreta, N. Montserrat, A. del Campo, B. Ladoux, M. Arroyo, and X. Trepat, Active superelasticity in three-dimensional epithelia of controlled shape, Nature (London) 563, 203 (2018).
  39. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/s24m-n8wc for additional figures and movies.
  40. S. D. Poisson, Traité de Mécanique (Courcier, Paris, 1811).
  41. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics No. 7 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009).
  42. L. Galarneau, A. Loranger, S. Gilbert, and N. Marceau, Keratins modulate hepatic cell adhesion, size and G1/S transition, Exp. Cell Res. 313, 179 (2007).
  43. A. Quaglino, M. Salierno, J. Pellegrotti, N. Rubinstein, and E. C. Kordon, Mechanical strain induces involution-associated events in mammary epithelial cells, BMC Cell Biol. 10, 55 (2009).
  44. X. Trepat, F. Puig, N. Gavara, J. J. Fredberg, R. Farre, and D. Navajas, Effect of stretch on structural integrity and micromechanics of human alveolar epithelial cell monolayers exposed to thrombin, Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 290, L1104 (2006).
  45. N. Gavara, A beginner's guide to atomic force microscopy probing for cell mechanics, Microsc. Res. Tech. 80, 75 (2017).
  46. B. R. Brückner, H. Nöding, and A. Janshoff, Viscoelastic properties of confluent MDCK II cells obtained from force cycle experiments, Biophys. J. 112, 724 (2017).
  47. E. K. Dimitriadis, F. Horkay, J. Maresca, B. Kachar, and R. S. Chadwick, Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope, Biophys. J. 82, 2798 (2002).
  48. A. Cordes, H. Witt, A. Gallemí-Pérez, B. Brückner, F. Grimm, M. Vache, T. Oswald, J. Bodenschatz, D. Flormann, F. Lautenschläger, M. Tarantola, and A. Janshoff, Prestress and area compressibility of actin cortices determine the viscoelastic response of living cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 068101 (2020).
  49. P. Nietmann, J. E. Bodenschatz, A. M. Cordes, J. Gottwald, H. Rother-Nöding, T. Oswald, and A. Janshoff, Epithelial cells fluidize upon adhesion but display mechanical homeostasis in the adherent state, Biophys. J. 121, 361 (2022).
  50. P. Chugh, A. G. Clark, M. B. Smith, D. A. D. Cassani, K. Dierkes, A. Ragab, P. P. Roux, G. Charras, G. Salbreux, and E. K. Paluch, Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension, Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 689 (2017).
  51. A. Pietuch, B. R. Brückner, T. Fine, I. Mey, and A. Janshoff, Elastic properties of cells in the context of confluent cell monolayers: Impact of tension and surface area regulation, Soft Matter 9, 11490 (2013).
  52. G. Salbreux, G. Charras, and E. Paluch, Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis, Trends Cell Biol. 22, 536 (2012).
  53. S. Sen, S. Subramanian, and D. E. Discher, Indentation and adhesive probing of a cell membrane with AFM: Theoretical model and experiments, Biophys. J. 89, 3203 (2005).
  54. G. A. C. Graham, The correspondence principle of linear viscoelasticity theory for mixed boundary value problems involving time-dependent boundary regions, Q. Appl. Math. 26, 167 (1968).
  55. S. Karsch, F. Büchau, T. M. Magin, and A. Janshoff, An intact keratin network is crucial for mechanical integrity and barrier function in keratinocyte cell sheets, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 4397 (2020).
  56. S. Nehls, H. Nöding, S. Karsch, F. Ries, and A. Janshoff, Stiffness of MDCK II cells depends on confluency and cell size, Biophys. J. 116, 2204 (2019).
  57. F. Sauer, S. Grosser, M. Shahryari, A. Hayn, J. Guo, J. Braun, S. Briest, B. Wolf, B. Aktas, L. Horn, I. Sack, and J. A. Käs, Changes in tissue fluidity predict tumor aggressiveness in vivo, Adv. Sci. 10, 2303523 (2023).
  58. R. M. Sarate, J. Hochstetter, M. Valet, A. Hallou, Y. Song, N. Bansaccal, M. Ligare, M. Aragona, D. Engelman, A. Bauduin, O. Campàs, B. D. Simons, and C. Blanpain, Dynamic regulation of tissue fluidity controls skin repair during wound healing, Cell 187, 5298 (2024).
  59. M. W. Tibbitt and K. S. Anseth, Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 103, 655 (2009).
  60. D. M. Bryant, A. Datta, A. E. Rodríguez-Fraticelli, J. Peränen, F. Martín-Belmonte, and K. E. Mostov, A molecular network for de novo generation of the apical surface and lumen, Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1035 (2010).
  61. X. Wang, Q. Zhao, L. Wang, J. Liu, H. Pu, S. Xie, C. Ru, and Y. Sun, Effect of cell inner pressure on deposition volume in microinjection, Langmuir 34, 10287 (2018).
  62. A. Perez-Tirado, U. Unkelbach, T. A. Oswald, J. Rheinlaender, T. E. Schäffer, M. Mukenhirn, A. Honigmann, and A. Janshoff, Differences in apical and basal mechanics regulate compliance of curved epithelia, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 6, 102485 (2025).
  63. P. A. Galie, P. C. Georges, and P. A. Janmey, How do cells stiffen? Biochem. J. 479, 1825 (2022).
  64. A. Cartagena-Rivera, J. Logue, C. Waterman, and R. Chadwick, Actomyosin cortical mechanical properties in nonadherent cells determined by atomic force microscopy, Biophys. J. 110, 2528 (2016).
  65. R. Meyer, U. Unkelbach, P. Jain, U. Rölleke, N. Schwarz, A. Perez-Tirado, A. V. Schepers, C. Geisler, A. Janshoff, and S. Köster, Data for “The keratin cortex stabilizes cells and cell-cell contacts at high strains,” https://doi.org/10.25625/MDCE31 (GRO.data, 2026).
  66. S. Deguchi, J. Hotta, S. Yokoyama, and T. S. Matsui, Viscoelastic and optical properties of four different PDMS polymers, J. Micromec. Microeng. 25, 097002 (2015).
  67. C. M. Cesa, N. Kirchgeßner, D. Mayer, U. S. Schwarz, B. Hoffmann, and R. Merkel, Micropatterned silicone elastomer substrates for high resolution analysis of cellular force patterns, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 034301 (2007).
  68. F. A. Ran, P. D. Hsu, J. Wright, V. Agarwala, D. A. Scott, and F. Zhang, Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281 (2013).
  69. S. Klein, M. Staring, K. Murphy, M. Viergever, and J. Pluim, elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 196 (2010).
  70. D. Shamonin, E. E. Bron, B. P. Lelieveldt, M. Smits, S. Klein, and M. Staring, Fast parallel image registration on CPU and GPU for diagnostic classification of Alzheimer's disease, Front. Neuroinf. 7, 1 (2014).
  71. C. Stringer, T. Wang, M. Michaelos, and M. Pachitariu, Cellpose: A generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation, Nat. Methods 18, 100 (2021).
  72. M. Pachitariu and C. Stringer, Cellpose 2.0: How to train your own model, Nat. Methods 19, 1634 (2022).
  73. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Cardona, Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods 9, 676 (2012).
  74. P. Müller, S. Abuhattum, S. Möllmert, E. Ulbricht, A. V. Taubenberger, and J. Guck, Nanite: Using machine learning to assess the quality of atomic force microscopy-enabled nano-indentation data, BMC Bioinf. 20, 465 (2019).

Outline

Information

PRX Life 4, 013038– Published 31 March, 2026
  • Received 30 August 2025
  • Accepted 2 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation