Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Single Cells Can Resolve Graded Stimuli

Mirna Kramar1, Lauritz Hahn2, Aleksandra M. Walczak3,4,*, Thierry Mora3,†, and Mathieu Coppey1,‡

  • *Contact author: aleksandra.walczak@ens.fr
  • †Contact author: thierry.mora@ens.fr
  • ‡Contact author: mathieu.coppey@curie.fr

PRX Life 3, 043016 – Published 2 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pyf8-y4kt

Abstract

Cells use signaling pathways as windows into the environment to gather information, transduce it into their interior, and use it to drive behaviors. MAPK (ERK) is a highly conserved signaling pathway in eukaryotes, directing multiple fundamental cellular behaviors such as proliferation, migration, and differentiation, making it one of few central hubs in the signaling circuitry of cells. Despite this versatility of behaviors, population-level measurements have reported low information content (<1 bit) relayed through the ERK pathway, rendering the population barely able to distinguish the presence or absence of stimuli. Here, we contrast the information transmitted by a single cell and a population of cells. Using a combination of optogenetic experiments, data analysis based on information theory, and numerical simulations, we quantify the amount of information transduced from the receptor to ERK, from responses to singular, brief, and sparse input pulses. We show that single cells are indeed able to resolve between graded stimuli, yielding over 2 bits of information, however showing a large population heterogeneity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (41)

  1. S. J. Gershman, P. E. Balbi, C. R. Gallistel, and J. Gunawardena, Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells, Elife 10, e61907 (2021).
  2. T. J. Perkins and P. S. Swain, Strategies for cellular decision-making, Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 326 (2009).
  3. C. Y. F. Huang and J. E. Ferrell, Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10078 (1996).
  4. A. Ram, D. Murphy, N. DeCuzzi, M. Patankar, J. Hu, M. Pargett, and J. G. Albeck, A guide to ERK dynamics, Part 1: Mechanisms and models, Biochem. J. 148, 887 (2023).
  5. A. Ram, D. Murphy, N. DeCuzzi, M. Patankar, J. Hu, M. Pargett, and J. G. Albeck, A guide to ERK dynamics, Part 2: Downstream decoding, Biochem. J. 480, 1909 (2023).
  6. G. D. Potter, T. A. Byrd, A. Mugler, and B. Sun, Dynamic sampling and information encoding in biochemical networks, Biophys. J. 112, 795 (2017).
  7. F. Grabowski, P. Czyż, M. Kochańczyk, and T. Lipniacki, Limits to the rate of information transmission through the MAPK pathway, J. R. Soc. Interface 16, 20180792 (2019).
  8. R. Cheong, A. Rhee, C. J. Wang, I. Nemenman, and A. Levchenko, Information transduction capacity of noisy biochemical signaling networks, Science 334, 354 (2011).
  9. A. Vazquez-Jimenez and J. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, On information extraction and decoding mechanisms improved by noisy amplification in signaling pathways, Sci. Rep. 9, 14365 (2019).
  10. W. Bialek, Biophysics: Searching for Principles (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012).
  11. M. Bauer, M. D. Petkova, T. Gregor, E. F. Wieschaus, and W. Bialek, Trading bits in the readout from a genetic network, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109011118 (2021).
  12. J. Selimkhanov, B. Taylor, J. Yao, A. Pilko, J. Albeck, A. Hoffmann, L. Tsimring, and R. Wollman, Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks, Science 346, 1370 (2014).
  13. B. A. Kramer, J. S. del Castillo, and L. Pelkmans, Multimodal perception links cellular state to decision-making in single cells, Science 377, 642 (2022).
  14. R. Suderman and E. J. Deeds, Intrinsic limits of information transmission in biochemical signaling motifs, Interface Focus 8, 20180039 (2018).
  15. M. B. Elowitz, A. J. Levine, E. D. Siggia, and P. S. Swain, Stochastic gene expression in a single cell, Science 297, 1183 (2002).
  16. A. Levchenko and I. Nemenman, Cellular noise and information transmission, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 28, 156 (2014).
  17. S. Mitchell and A. Hoffmann, Identifying noise sources governing cell-to-cell variability, Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 8, 39 (2018).
  18. S. Tay, J. J. Hughey, T. K. Lee, T. Lipniacki, S. R. Quake, and M. W. Covert, Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analog information processing, Nature (London) 466, 267 (2010).
  19. M. A. Vis, K. Ito, and S. Hofmann, Impact of culture medium on cellular interactions in in vitro co-culture systems, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 911 (2020).
  20. A. Goetz, H. Akl, and P. Dixit, The ability to sense the environment is heterogeneously distributed in cell populations, Elife 12, RP87747 (2024).
  21. J. E. Toettcher, O. D. Weiner, and W. A. Lim, Using optogenetics to interrogate the dynamic control of signal transmission by the Ras/Erk module, Cell 155, 1422 (2014).
  22. T. Jetka, K. Nienałtowski, T. Winarski, S. Błoński, and M. Komorowski, Information-theoretic analysis of multivariate single-cell signaling responses, PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007132 (2019).
  23. N. Kim, J. M. Kim, M. Lee, C. Y. Kim, K. Y. Chang, and W. D. Heo, Spatiotemporal control of fibroblast growth factor receptor signals by blue light, Chem. Biol. 21, 903 (2014).
  24. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/pyf8-y4kt for additional figures concerning the experimental variability, numerical simulations, data processing, and raw imaging timeseries.
  25. C. Dessauges, J. Mikelson, M. Dobrzyński, M. Jacques, A. Frismantiene, P. A. Gagliardi, M. Khammash, and O. Pertz, Optogenetic actuator–ERK biosensor circuits identify MAPK network nodes that shape ERK dynamics, Mol. Syst. Biol. 18, e10670 (2022).
  26. C. de la Cova, R. Townley, S. Regot, and I. Greenwald, A real-time biosensor for ERK activity reveals signaling dynamics during C. Elegans cell fate specification, Dev. Cell 42, 542 (2017).
  27. K. Aoki, Y. Kumagai, A. Sakurai, N. Komatsu, Y. Fujita, C. Shionyu, and M. Matsuda, Stochastic ERK activation induced by noise and cell-to-cell propagation regulates cell density-dependent proliferation, Mol. Cell 52, 529 (2013).
  28. J. Ish-Horowicz and J. Reid, Mutual information estimation for transcriptional regulatory network inference, bioRxiv (2017), https://doi.org/10.1101/132647.
  29. D. G. Hernández and I. Samengo, Inferring a property of a large system from a small number of samples, Entropy 24, 125 (2022).
  30. M. Z. Wilson, P. T. Ravindran, W. A. Lim, and J. E. Toettcher, Tracing information flow from ERK to target gene induction reveals mechanisms of dynamic and combinatorial control, Mol. Cell 67, 757 (2017).
  31. G. Tkačik, C. G. Callan, and W. Bialek, Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12265 (2008).
  32. D. Ellison, A. Mugler, M. D. Brennan, S. H. Lee, R. J. Huebner, E. R. Shamir, L. A. Woo, J. Kim, P. Amar, I. Nemenman, A. J. Ewald, and A. Levchenko, Cell-cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E679 (2016).
  33. A. Stanoev, A. P. Nandan, and A. Koseska, Organization at criticality enables processing of time‐varying signals by receptor networks, Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e8870 (2020).
  34. T. J. Aikin, A. F. Peterson, M. J. Pokrass, H. R. Clark, and S. Regot, MAPK activity dynamics regulate non-cell autonomous effects of oncogene expression, Elife 9, e60541 (2020).
  35. P. A. Gagliardi, M. Dobrzyński, M. A. Jacques, C. Dessauges, P. Ender, Y. Blum, R. M. Hughes, A. R. Cohen, and O. Pertz, Collective ERK/AKT activity waves orchestrate epithelial homeostasis by driving apoptosis-induced survival, Dev. Cell 56, 1712 (2021).
  36. P. Ender, P. A. Gagliardi, M. Dobrzyński, A. Frismantiene, C. Dessauges, T. Höhener, M. A. Jacques, A. R. Cohen, and O. Pertz, Spatiotemporal control of ERK pulse frequency coordinates fate decisions during mammary acinar morphogenesis, Dev. Cell 57, 2153 (2022).
  37. M. Kramar, L. Hahn, A. M. Walczak, T. Mora, and M. Coppey, Data for “Single cells can resolve graded stimuli,” BioStudies (2025), https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/bioimages/studies/S-BIAD2275.
  38. A. Kraskov, H. Stögbauer, and P. Grassberger, Estimating mutual information, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066138 (2004).
  39. Y. Tang, A. Adelaja, F. X. Ye, E. Deeds, R. Wollman, and A. Hoffmann, Quantifying information accumulation encoded in the dynamics of biochemical signaling, Nat. Commun. 12, 1272 (2021).
  40. L. Hahn, A. M. Walczak, and T. Mora, Dynamical information synergy in biochemical signaling networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 128401 (2023).
  41. J. Mikelson and M. Khammash, Likelihood-free nested sampling for parameter inference of biochemical reaction networks, PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008264 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation