Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Experimental Evidence of Stress-Induced Critical State in Schooling Fish

Guozheng Lin1,2,3, Ramón Escobedo1, Xu Li1,4, Tingting Xue1,4, Zhangang Han2, Clément Sire5, Vishwesha Guttal6, and Guy Theraulaz1,*

  • *Contact author: guy.theraulaz@univ-tlse3.fr

PRX Life 3, 033018 – Published 4 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nr7p-m4ff

Abstract

How animal groups dynamically adjust their collective behavior in response to environmental changes remains an open and challenging question. Here we investigate the mechanisms that allow fish schools to tune their collective state under stress, testing the hypothesis that these systems operate near criticality, a state that maximizes sensitivity, responsiveness, and adaptability. We combine experiments and data-driven computational modeling to study how group size and stress influence the collective behavior of rummy-nose tetras (Hemigrammus rhodostomus). We quantify the collective state of fish schools using polarization, milling, and cohesion metrics and use a burst-and-coast model to infer the social interaction parameters that drive these behaviors. Our results indicate that group size modulates stress levels, with smaller groups experiencing higher baseline stress, likely due to a reduced social buffering effect. Under stress, fish adjust the strength of their social interactions in a way that leads the group into a critical state, thus enhancing its sensitivity to perturbations and facilitating rapid adaptation. However, while large groups require an external stressor to enter the critical regime, small groups are already near this state. Our findings suggest that adjusting interaction strength is a simple yet effective mechanism that drives collective state transitions while minimizing individual cognitive load. By revealing how stress and group size drive self-organization toward criticality, our study provides fundamental insights into the adaptability of collective biological systems and the emergent properties in animal groups.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (50)

  1. P. Ball, The Self-made Tapestry: Pattern Formation in Nature (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
  2. M. Moussaid, S. Garnier, G. Theraulaz, and D. Helbing, Collective information processing and pattern formation in swarms, flocks, and crowds, Topics Cognitive Sci. 1, 469 (2009).
  3. S. Camazine, J.-L. Deneubourg, N. R. Franks, J. Sneyd, G. Theraulaz, and E. Bonabeau, Self-organization in Biological Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001).
  4. R. Wedlich-Söldner and T. Betz, Self-organization: The fundament of cell biology, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170103 (2018).
  5. E. Karsenti, Self-organization in cell biology: A brief history, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 255 (2008).
  6. C. Wolf and D. E. J. Linden, Biological pathways to adaptability—Interactions between genome, epigenome, nervous system and environment for adaptive behavior, Genes Brain Behav. 11, 3 (2012).
  7. H. E. Stanley, Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, International Series of Monographs on Physics Vol. 46 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971).
  8. T. Mora and W. Bialek, Are biological systems poised at criticality? J. Stat. Phys. 144, 268 (2011).
  9. D. S. Calovi, U. Lopez, P. Schuhmacher, H. Chaté, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, Collective response to perturbations in a data-driven fish school model, J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141362 (2015).
  10. M. A. Munoz, Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 031001 (2018).
  11. P. P. Klamser and P. Romanczuk, Collective predator evasion: Putting the criticality hypothesis to the test, PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008832 (2021).
  12. J. M. Beggs, The criticality hypothesis: How local cortical networks might optimize information processing, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 329 (2008).
  13. J. M. Beggs and N. Timme, Being critical of criticality in the brain, Front. Physiol. 3, 163 (2012).
  14. E. Balleza, E. R. Alvarez-Buylla, A. Chaos, S. Kauffman, I. Shmulevich, and M. Aldana, Critical dynamics in genetic regulatory networks: Examples from four kingdoms, PLoS ONE 3, e2456 (2008).
  15. B. C. Daniels, H. Kim, D. Moore, S. Zhou, H. B. Smith, B. Karas, S. A. Kauffman, and S. I. Walker, Criticality distinguishes the ensemble of biological regulatory networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 138102 (2018).
  16. G. De Palo, D. Yi, and R. G. Endres, A critical-like collective state leads to long-range cell communication in dictyostelium discoideum aggregation, PLoS Biol. 15, e1002602 (2017).
  17. W. Bialek, A. Cavagna, I. Giardina, T. Mora, O. Pohl, E. Silvestri, M. Viale, and A. M. Walczak, Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7212 (2014).
  18. A. Attanasi, A. Cavagna, L. Del Castello, I. Giardina, S. Melillo, L. Parisi, O. Pohl, B. Rossaro, E. Shen, E. Silvestri et al., Finite-size scaling as a way to probe near-criticality in natural swarms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 238102 (2014).
  19. L. Gómez-Nava, R. T. Lange, P. P. Klamser, J. Lukas, L. Arias-Rodriguez, D. Bierbach, J. Krause, H. Sprekeler, and P. Romanczuk, Fish shoals resemble a stochastic excitable system driven by environmental perturbations, Nat. Phys. 19, 663 (2023).
  20. A. Puy, E. Gimeno, D. March-Pons, M. C. Miguel, and R. Pastor-Satorras, Signatures of criticality in turning avalanches of schooling fish, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033270 (2024).
  21. W. Poel, B. C. Daniels, M. M. Sosna, C. R. Twomey, S. P. Leblanc, I. D. Couzin, and P. Romanczuk, Subcritical escape waves in schooling fish, Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6385 (2022).
  22. P. Romanczuk and B. C. Daniels, Phase transitions and criticality in the collective behavior of animals—Self-organization and biological function, in Order, Disorder and Criticality: Advanced Problems of Phase Transition Theory, edited by Y. Holovatch (World Scientific, Singapore, 2023), pp. 179–208.
  23. B. M. Culbert, K. M. Gilmour, and S. Balshine, Social buffering of stress in a group-living fish, Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191626 (2019).
  24. K. M. Gilmour and B. Bard, Social buffering of the stress response: Insights from fishes, Biol. Lett. 18, 20220332 (2022).
  25. D. S. Calovi, A. Litchinko, V. Lecheval, U. Lopez, A. Pérez Escudero, H. Chaté, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, Disentangling and modeling interactions in fish with burst-and-coast swimming reveal distinct alignment and attraction behaviors, PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005933 (2018).
  26. L. Lei, R. Escobedo, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, Computational and robotic modeling reveal parsimonious combinations of interactions between individuals in schooling fish, PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007194 (2020).
  27. K. Tunstrøm, Y. Katz, C. C. Ioannou, C. Huepe, M. J. Lutz, and I. D. Couzin, Collective states, multistability and transitional behavior in schooling fish, PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002915 (2013).
  28. D. S. Calovi, U. Lopez, S. Ngo, C. Sire, H. Chaté, and G. Theraulaz, Swarming, schooling, milling: Phase diagram of a data-driven fish school model, New J. Phys. 16, 015026 (2014).
  29. A. Filella, F. Nadal, C. Sire, E. Kanso, and C. Eloy, Model of collective fish behavior with hydrodynamic interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 198101 (2018).
  30. C. Huang, F. Ling, and E. Kanso, Collective phase transitions in confined fish schools, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2406293121 (2024).
  31. W. Wang, R. Escobedo, S. Sanchez, C. Sire, Z. Han, and G. Theraulaz, The impact of individual perceptual and cognitive factors on collective states in a data-driven fish school model, PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009437 (2022).
  32. W. Wang, R. Escobedo, S. Sanchez, Z. Han, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, Collective phases and long-term dynamics in a fish school model with burst-and-coast swimming, R. Soc. Open Sci. 12, 240885 (2025).
  33. T. Xue, X. Li, G. Lin, R. Escobedo, Z. Han, X. Chen, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, Tuning social interactions' strength drives collective response to light intensity in schooling fish, PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011636 (2023).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nr7p-m4ff for three supplementary figures, two supplementary tables, and eight supplementary movies.
  35. C. Aimon, C. Lebigre, S. Le Floch, and G. Claireaux, Effects of dispersant-treated oil upon behavioural and metabolic parameters of the anti-predator response in juvenile european sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), Sci. Total Environ. 834, 155430 (2022).
  36. R. M. Ross, T. W. Backman, and K. E. Limburg, Group-size-mediated metabolic rate reduction in American shad, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121, 385 (1992).
  37. M. B. Hennessy, S. Kaiser, and N. Sachser, DSocial buffering of the stress response: Diversity, mechanisms, and functions, Front. Neuroendocrinol. 30, 470 (2009).
  38. N. Pagnussat, A. L. Piato, I. C. Schaefer, M. Blank, A. R. Tamborski, L. D. Guerim, C. D. Bonan, M. R. Vianna, and D. R. Lara, One for all and all for one: The importance of shoaling on behavioral and stress responses in zebrafish, Zebrafish 10, 338 (2013).
  39. M. Galesic, D. Barkoczi, A. M. Berdahl, D. Biro, G. Carbone, I. Giannoccaro, R. L. Goldstone, C. Gonzalez, A. Kandler, A. B. Kao et al., Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation, J. R. Soc. Interface 20, 20220736 (2023).
  40. R. E. Reis, Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America (Edipucrs, 2003).
  41. J. Gautrais, F. Ginelli, R. Fournier, S. Blanco, M. Soria, H. Chaté, and G. Theraulaz, Deciphering interactions in moving animal groups, PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002678 (2012).
  42. N. W. F. Bode, J. J. Faria, D. W. Franks, J. Krause, and A. J. Wood, How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups, Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3065 (2010).
  43. M. M. Sosna, C. R. Twomey, J. Bak-Coleman, W. Poel, B. C. Daniels, P. Romanczuk, and I. D. Couzin, Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20556 (2019).
  44. A. Puy, E. Gimeno, J. Torrents, P. Bartashevich, M. C. Miguel, R. Pastor-Satorras, and P. Romanczuk, Selective social interactions and speed-induced leadership in schooling fish, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2309733121 (2024).
  45. H. V. Ribeiro, M. R. Acre, J. D. Faulkner, L. R. da Cunha, K. M. Lawson, J. J. Wamboldt, M. K. Brey, C. M. Woodley, and R. D. Calfee, Effects of shady environments on fish collective behavior, Sci. Rep. 12, 17873 (2022).
  46. B. Lafoux, P. Bernard, B. Thiria, and R. Godoy-Diana, Confinement-driven state transition and bistability in schooling fish, Phys. Rev. E 110, 034613 (2024).
  47. L. Jiang, L. Giuggioli, A. Perna, R. Escobedo, V. Lecheval, C. Sire, Z. Han, and G. Theraulaz, Identifying influential neighbors in animal flocking, PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005822 (2017).
  48. V. Lecheval, L. Jiang, P. Tichit, C. Sire, C. K. Hemelrijk, and G. Theraulaz, Social conformity and propagation of information in collective U-turns of fish schools, Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180251 (2018).
  49. B. Gallois and R. Candelier, Fasttrack: An open-source software for tracking varying numbers of deformable objects, PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008697 (2021).
  50. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29877245.v1.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation