- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Membrane-Anchored Mobile Tethers Modulate Condensate Wetting, Localization, and Migration

Qiwei Yu1,*, Trevor GrandPre1,2,3,*, Andrew G. T. Pyo2,4, Andrej Košmrlj5,6,†, and Ned S. Wingreen1,7,‡

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: andrej@princeton.edu
  • ‡Contact author: wingreen@princeton.edu
PDF

PRX Life 4, 023014 – Published 15 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kxpb-9srd

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates frequently rely on membrane interactions for recruitment, localization, and biochemical substrates. Many of these interactions are mediated by membrane-anchored molecules such as proteins or specific lipids, which we refer to as “mobile tethers” since they can typically diffuse within the membrane while still interacting with the condensate. The presence of mobile tethers creates a surface with dynamic and spatially inhomogeneous wetting properties that are typically overlooked by traditional wetting theories. Here, we propose a general theoretical framework to study how mobile tethers impact both equilibrium and dynamic properties of condensate wetting. We show that a favorable tether-condensate interaction leads to tether enrichment at the condensate-membrane interface, which modifies the equilibrium condensate–membrane surface tension and contact angle. Increasing tether abundance on the membrane can drive transitions between wetting regimes, with only a modest tether density and binding energy required for biologically relevant scenarios. Furthermore, tethers modulate how condensates react to complex membrane geometries. By helping condensates coat membranes, mobile tethers can facilitate condensate localization to junctions of membrane structures, such as the reticulated membranes inside the algal pyrenoid. Both tether abundance and mobility affect how droplets interact with complex membrane geometries, such as droplet migration along membrane tubules of varying radii. These results provide a framework to study the implications of tether-mediated condensate-membrane interactions for cellular organization and function.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

Collection on Physics of Biomolecular Condensates

From the fundamentals of phase separation, dynamics and structure of condensates in biological settings, to advanced imaging methods, this special collection presented by PRX Life showcases exciting and timely work on the physics of biomolecular condensates.

This Invited Collection is coordinated by PRX Life Associate Editor Christoph Weber, in consultation with Jerelle Joseph, Simon Alberti, and Tanja Mittag. Every article published in this collection underwent a rigorous peer review process, adhering to the same high standards applied to all papers handled by the journal. The PRX Life editorial team managed the peer review and made all editorial decisions.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (59)

  1. Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease, Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).
  2. S. F. Banani, H. O. Lee, A. A. Hyman, and M. K. Rosen, Biomolecular condensates: Organizers of cellular biochemistry, Natl. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285 (2017).
  3. X. Su, J. A. Ditlev, E. Hui, W. Xing, S. Banjade, J. Okrut, D. S. King, J. Taunton, M. K. Rosen, and R. D. Vale, Phase separation of signaling molecules promotes T cell receptor signal transduction, Science 352, 595 (2016).
  4. Y. G. Zhao and H. Zhang, Phase separation in membrane biology: The interplay between membrane-bound organelles and membraneless condensates, Dev. Cell 55, 30 (2020).
  5. A. Mangiarotti and R. Dimova, Biomolecular condensates in contact with membranes, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 53, 319 (2024).
  6. L. B. Case, Membranes regulate biomolecular condensates, Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 404 (2022).
  7. H. M. J. Weakly and S. L. Keller, Coupling liquid phases in 3D condensates and 2D membranes: Successes, challenges, and tools, Biophys. J. 123, 1329 (2023).
  8. O. Beutel, R. Maraspini, K. Pombo-García, C. Martin-Lemaitre, and A. Honigmann, Phase separation of zonula occludens proteins drives formation of tight junctions, Cell 179, 923 (2019).
  9. L. Babl, A. Merino-Salomón, N. Kanwa, and P. Schwille, Membrane mediated phase separation of the bacterial nucleoid occlusion protein noc, Sci. Rep. 12, 17949 (2022).
  10. S. He, V. L. Crans, and M. C. Jonikas, The pyrenoid: The eukaryotic CO2-concentrating organelle, Plant Cell 35, 3236 (2023).
  11. V. Swaminathan, R. S. Fischer, and C. M. Waterman, The FAK-Arp2/3 interaction promotes leading edge advance and haptosensing by coupling nascent adhesions to lamellipodia actin, Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 1085 (2016).
  12. Q. Xiao, C. K. McAtee, and X. Su, Phase separation in immune signalling, Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 188 (2022).
  13. J. H. Hennacy, N. Atkinson, A. Kayser-Browne, S. L. Ergun, E. Franklin, L. Wang, S. Eicke, Y. Kazachkova, M. Kafri, F. Fauser, J. Vilarrasa-Blasi, R. E. Jinkerson, S. C. Zeeman, A. J. McCormick, and M. C. Jonikas, SAGA1 and MITH1 produce matrix-traversing membranes in the CO2-fixing pyrenoid, Nat. Plants 10, 2038 (2024).
  14. M. T. Meyer, A. K. Itakura, W. Patena, L. Wang, S. He, T. Emrich-Mills, C. S. Lau, G. Yates, L. C. M. Mackinder, and M. C. Jonikas, Assembly of the algal CO2-fixing organelle, the pyrenoid, is guided by a rubisco-binding motif, Sci. Adv. 6, eabd2408 (2020).
  15. T. Young, III, An essay on the cohesion of fluids, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 95, 65 (1805).
  16. A. B. D. Cassie and S. Baxter, Wettability of porous surfaces, Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546 (1944).
  17. B. Andreotti and J. H. Snoeijer, Statics and dynamics of soft wetting, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 285 (2020).
  18. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/kxpb-9srd for details of the theoretical framework and numerical simulations used in this work as well as additional simulation results, which includes Refs.  [19, 20, 21, 22].
  19. R. J. Leveque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2002).
  20. A. Coco and G. Russo, Finite-difference ghost-point multigrid methods on cartesian grids for elliptic problems in arbitrary domains, J. Comput. Phys. 241, 464 (2013).
  21. M. Oevermann, C. Scharfenberg, and R. Klein, A sharp interface finite volume method for elliptic equations on Cartesian grids, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 5184 (2009).
  22. J. Papac, F. Gibou, and C. Ratsch, Efficient symmetric discretization for the poisson, heat and stefan-type problems with Robin boundary conditions, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 875 (2010).
  23. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977).
  24. S. Mao, D. Kuldinow, M. P. Haataja, and A. Košmrlj, Phase behavior and morphology of multicomponent liquid mixtures, Soft Matter 15, 1297 (2019).
  25. I. Langmuir, The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40, 1361 (1918).
  26. H. Hofmann, A. Soranno, A. Borgia, K. Gast, D. Nettels, and B. Schuler, Polymer scaling laws of unfolded and intrinsically disordered proteins quantified with single-molecule spectroscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16155 (2012).
  27. H. Wang, F. M. Kelley, D. Milovanovic, B. S. Schuster, and Z. Shi, Surface tension and viscosity of protein condensates quantified by micropipette aspiration, Biophys. Rep. 1, 100011 (2021).
  28. D. N. Itzhak, S. Tyanova, J. Cox, and G. H. Borner, Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization, eLife 5, e16950 (2016).
  29. E. S. Freeman Rosenzweig, B. Xu, L. K. Cuellar, A. Martinez-Sanchez, M. Schaffer, M. Strauss, H. N. Cartwright, P. Ronceray, J. M. Plitzko, F. Förster, N. S. Wingreen, B. D. Engel, L. C. M. Mackinder, and M. C. Jonikas, The eukaryotic CO2-concentrating organelle is liquid-like and exhibits dynamic reorganization, Cell 171, 148 (2017).
  30. C. Lv, C. Chen, Y.-C. Chuang, F.-G. Tseng, Y. Yin, F. Grey, and Q. Zheng, Substrate curvature gradient drives rapid droplet motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 026101 (2014).
  31. B. D. Engel, M. Schaffer, L. K. Cuellar, E. Villa, J. M. Plitzko, and W. Baumeister, Native architecture of theChlamydomonas chloroplast revealed by in situ cryo-electron tomography, eLife 4, e04889 (2015).
  32. B. J. Carroll, The accurate measurement of contact angle, phase contact areas, drop volume, and laplace excess pressure in drop-on-fiber systems, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 57, 488 (1976).
  33. G. McHale, M. I. Newton, and B. J. Carroll, The shape and stability of small liquid drops on fibers, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 56, 47 (2001).
  34. J. Van Hulle, F. Weyer, S. Dorbolo, and N. Vandewalle, Capillary transport from barrel to clamshell droplets on conical fibers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 024501 (2021).
  35. H. B. Eral, J. de Ruiter, R. de Ruiter, J. M. Oh, C. Semprebon, M. Brinkmann, and F. Mugele, Drops on functional fibers: From barrels to clamshells and back, Soft Matter 7, 5138 (2011).
  36. T. GrandPre, Y. Zhang, A. G. T. Pyo, B. Weiner, J.-L. Li, M. C. Jonikas, and N. S. Wingreen, Impact of linker length on biomolecular condensate formation, PRX Life 1, 023013 (2023).
  37. T. Litschel, C. F. Kelley, X. Cheng, L. Babl, N. Mizuno, L. B. Case, and P. Schwille, Membrane-induced 2D phase separation of the focal adhesion protein talin, Nat. Commun. 15, 4986 (2024).
  38. L. B. Case, M. De Pasquale, L. Henry, and M. K. Rosen, Synergistic phase separation of two pathways promotes integrin clustering and nascent adhesion formation, eLife 11, e72588 (2022).
  39. S. Sun, T. GrandPre, D. T. Limmer, and J. T. Groves, Kinetic frustration by limited bond availability controls the LAT protein condensation phase transition on membranes, Sci. Adv. 8, eabo5295 (2022).
  40. L. B. Case, X. Zhang, J. A. Ditlev, and M. K. Rosen, Stoichiometry controls activity of phase-separated clusters of actin signaling proteins, Science 363, 1093 (2019).
  41. Z. C. Scott, K. Koning, M. Vanderwerp, L. Cohen, L. M. Westrate, and E. F. Koslover, Endoplasmic reticulum network heterogeneity guides diffusive transport and kinetics, Biophys. J. 122, 3191 (2023).
  42. K. Speckner, L. Stadler, and M. Weiss, Unscrambling exit site patterns on the endoplasmic reticulum as a quenched demixing process, Biophys. J. 120, 2532 (2021).
  43. W. van Leeuwen, D. T. M. Nguyen, R. Grond, T. Veenendaal, C. Rabouille, and G. G. Farías, Stress-induced phase separation of ERES components into sec bodies precedes ER exit inhibition in Mammalian cells, J. Cell Sci. 135, jcs260294 (2022).
  44. C. E. Cornell, A. D. Skinkle, S. He, I. Levental, K. R. Levental, and S. L. Keller, Tuning length scales of small domains in cell-derived membranes and synthetic model membranes, Biophys. J. 115, 690 (2018).
  45. Q. Yu and A. Košmrlj, Pattern formation of lipid domains in bilayer membranes, Soft Matter 21, 4288 (2025).
  46. N. Kaletta, S. Burick, Y. Qudbuddin, and P. Schwille, Designing tunable DNA condensates to control membrane budding transformation in synthetic cells, Adv. Sci. 12, e15510 (2025).
  47. T.-S. Hsieh, V. A. Lopez, M. H. Black, A. Osinski, K. Pawłowski, D. R. Tomchick, J. Liou, and V. S. Tagliabracci, Dynamic remodeling of host membranes by self-organizing bacterial effectors, Science 372, 935 (2021).
  48. B. A. Camley and F. L. H. Brown, Dynamic simulations of multicomponent lipid membranes over long length and time scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 148102 (2010).
  49. B. A. Camley and F. L. H. Brown, Dynamic scaling in phase separation kinetics for quasi-two-dimensional membranes, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 225106 (2011).
  50. B. A. Camley and F. L. H. Brown, Fluctuating hydrodynamics of multicomponent membranes with embedded proteins, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 075103 (2014).
  51. J. W. Cahn, Critical point wetting, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3667 (1977).
  52. H. Nakanishi and M. E. Fisher, Multicriticality of wetting, prewetting, and surface transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1565 (1982).
  53. X. Zhao, G. Bartolucci, A. Honigmann, F. Jülicher, and C. A. Weber, Thermodynamics of wetting, prewetting and surface phase transitions with surface binding, New J. Phys. 23, 123003 (2021).
  54. Y. Bagheri, M. N. Rouches, B. B. Machta, and S. L. Veatch, The membrane transition strongly enhances biopolymer condensation through prewetting, Nat. Chem. Biol. (2026).
  55. S. F. Shimobayashi, P. Ronceray, D. W. Sanders, M. P. Haataja, and C. P. Brangwynne, Nucleation landscape of biomolecular condensates, Nature (London) 599, 503 (2021).
  56. A. J. Tjalma, V. Galstyan, J. Goedhart, L. Slim, N. B. Becker, and P. R. ten Wolde, Trade-offs between cost and information in cellular prediction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303078120 (2023).
  57. D. Hathcock, Q. Yu, B. A. Mello, D. N. Amin, G. L. Hazelbauer, and Y. Tu, A nonequilibrium allosteric model for receptor-kinase complexes: The role of energy dissipation in chemotaxis signaling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303115120 (2023).
  58. D. Hathcock, Q. Yu, and Y. Tu, Time-reversal symmetry breaking in the chemosensory array reveals a general mechanism for dissipation-enhanced cooperative sensing, Nat. Commun. 15, 8892 (2024).
  59. Q. Yu, T. GrandPre, A. G. T. Pyo, A. Košmrlj, and N. S. Wingreen, Data and code for “Membrane-anchored mobile tethers modulate condensate wetting, localization, and migration”, Zenodo (2026), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19829655.

Outline

Information

PRX Life 4, 023014– Published 15 May, 2026
  • Received 28 October 2025
  • Accepted 27 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation