Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonequilibrium Bending Fluctuations Reveal the Mechanics of Microtubules and Mitochondria in Living Cells

Kengo Nishi1,2,*, Sufi Raja1,4,*, An Pham1,3, Ronit Freeman2, Antonina Roll-Mecak5, Fred C. MacKintosh6,7,8,9,10, and Christoph F. Schmidt1,10,†

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: christoph.schmidt@duke.edu

PRX Life 4, 013031 – Published 9 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k75n-57qk

Abstract

Living systems operate far from thermodynamic equilibrium. Movements in cells are always driven by thermal forces but, more importantly, also by motor-generated active forces in the cytoplasm. How intracellular structures respond to these forces depends on their mechanical properties. Intracellular dynamics remain challenging to understand because, in most cases, neither local forces nor local material response properties are known, and imaging of fluctuations is typically not sufficient to measure both. While some subcellular structures such as actin filaments and microtubules, which form the major cytoskeletal networks, have been extensively studied in vitro, their mechanical properties in living cells where they are regulated by post-translational modifications and association with regulatory factors remain poorly understood. Here we present an alternative approach that uses nonequilibrium bending fluctuations of rod-shaped structures to characterize their mechanical properties and those of their surroundings and to estimate driving forces. We demonstrate that, when one of the three factors—two material properties and one driving force—is determined independently, the other two can be derived from observed fluctuations. By applying our method to microtubules in living cells we find that polyglutamylation, a post-translational modification enriched on microtubules that need to withstand large deformation forces like those in axons or cilia, increases microtubule stiffness. In contrast, tubelike mitochondria, lipid membrane-bounded organelles which easily deform, yielded a bending stiffness significantly lower than that of microtubules. Our method opens the door to a quantitative understanding of the effects of cellular factors on the mechanical properties of filaments and organelles in cells.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. P. A. Janmey and C. A. McCulloch, Cell mechanics: Integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 1 (2007).
  2. D. A. Fletcher and R. D. Mullins, Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton, Nature (London) 463, 485 (2010).
  3. M. Guo, A. J. Ehrlicher, M. H. Jensen, M. Renz, J. R. Moore, R. D. Goldman, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, F. C. Mackintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy, Cell 158, 822 (2014).
  4. N. Fakhri, A. D. Wessel, C. Willms, M. Pasquali, D. R. Klopfenstein, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, High-resolution mapping of intracellular fluctuations using carbon nanotubes, Science 344, 1031 (2014).
  5. K. Nishizawa, M. Bremerich, H. Ayade, C. F. Schmidt, T. Ariga, and D. Mizuno, Feedback-tracking microrheology in living cells, Sci. Adv. 3, e1700318 (2017).
  6. S. Hurst, B. E. Vos, M. Brandt, and T. Betz, Intracellular softening and increased viscoelastic fluidity during division, Nat. Phys. 17, 1270 (2021).
  7. T. M. Muenker, G. Knotz, M. Kruger, and T. Betz, Accessing activity and viscoelastic properties of artificial and living systems from passive measurement, Nat. Mater. 23, 1283 (2024).
  8. I. Di Terlizzi, M. Gironella, D. Herraez-Aguilar, T. Betz, F. Monroy, M. Baiesi, and F. Ritort, Variance sum rule for entropy production, Science 383, 971 (2024).
  9. J. Howard, Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2001).
  10. S. Bodakuntla, A. S. Jijumon, C. Villablanca, C. Gonzalez-Billault, and C. Janke, Microtubule-associated proteins: Structuring the cytoskeleton, Trends Cell Biol. 29, 804 (2019).
  11. C. P. Garnham and A. Roll-Mecak, The chemical complexity of cellular microtubules: Tubulin post-translational modification enzymes and their roles in tuning microtubule functions, Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 69, 442 (2012).
  12. D. Wloga and J. Gaertig, Post-translational modifications of microtubules, J. Cell Sci. 123, 3447 (2010).
  13. S. Gadadhar, S. Bodakuntla, K. Natarajan, and C. Janke, The tubulin code at a glance, J. Cell Sci. 130, 1347 (2017).
  14. A. Roll-Mecak, Intrinsically disordered tubulin tails: Complex tuners of microtubule functions? Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 37, 11 (2015).
  15. C. P. Brangwynne, G. H. Koenderink, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Nonequilibrium microtubule fluctuations in a model cytoskeleton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 118104 (2008).
  16. F. Gittes, B. Mickey, J. Nettleton, and J. Howard, Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape, J. Cell Biol. 120, 923 (1993).
  17. J. van Mameren, K. C. Vermeulen, F. Gittes, and C. F. Schmidt, Leveraging single protein polymers to measure flexural rigidity, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3837 (2009).
  18. S. O. Raja, A. I. Chizhik, C. F. Schmidt, J. Enderlein, and A. Ghosh, Mapping activity-dependent quasi-stationary states of mitochondrial membranes with graphene-induced energy transfer imaging, Nano Lett. 21, 8244 (2021).
  19. C. C. Crapart, Z. C. Scott, T. Konno, A. Sharma, P. Parutto, D. M. D. Bailey, L. M. Westrate, E. Avezov, and E. F. Koslover, Luminal transport through intact endoplasmic reticulum limits the magnitude of localized Ca2+ signals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2312172121 (2024).
  20. K. B. Holt, J. Winter, S. Manley, and E. F. Koslover, Spatiotemporal modeling of mitochondrial network architecture, PRX Life 2, 043002 (2024).
  21. Z. C. Scott, S. B. Steen, G. Huber, L. M. Westrate, and E. F. Koslover, The endoplasmic reticulum as an active liquid network, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2409755121 (2024).
  22. H. M. McBride, M. Neuspiel, and S. Wasiak, Mitochondria: More than just a powerhouse, Curr. Biol. 16, R551 (2006).
  23. A. J. Roger, S. A. Munoz-Gomez, and R. Kamikawa, The origin and diversification of mitochondria, Curr. Biol. 27, R1177 (2017).
  24. T. Wai and T. Langer, Mitochondrial dynamics and metabolic regulation, Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 27, 105 (2016).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/k75n-57qk for more details.
  26. G. Lukinavicius, et al., Fluorogenic probes for live-cell imaging of the cytoskeleton, Nat. Methods 11, 731 (2014).
  27. S. R. Aragon and R. Pecora, Dynamics of wormlike chains, Macromolecules 18, 1868 (1985).
  28. K. Nishi, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, Multiscale microrheology using fluctuating filaments as stealth probes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 158001 (2021).
  29. A. W. C. Lau, B. D. Hoffman, A. Davies, J. C. Crocker, and T. C. Lubensky, Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 198101 (2003).
  30. F. C. MacKintosh and A. J. Levine, Nonequilibrium mechanics and dynamics of motor-activated gels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 018104 (2008).
  31. J. Gladrow, C. P. Broedersz, and C. F. Schmidt, Nonequilibrium dynamics of probe filaments in actin-myosin networks, Phys. Rev. E 96, 022408 (2017).
  32. M. E. Janson and M. Dogterom, A bending mode analysis for growing microtubules: Evidence for a velocity-dependent rigidity, Biophys. J. 87, 2723 (2004).
  33. C. M. Waterman-Storer and E. D. Salmon, Actomyosin-based retrograde flow of microtubules in the lamella of migrating epithelial cells influences microtubule dynamic instability and turnover and is associated with microtubule breakage and treadmilling, J. Cell Biol. 139, 417 (1997).
  34. C. P. Brangwynne, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Force fluctuations and polymerization dynamics of intracellular microtubules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16128 (2007).
  35. C. P. Brangwynne, F. C. MacKintosh, S. Kumar, N. A. Geisse, J. Talbot, L. Mahadevan, K. K. Parker, D. E. Ingber, and D. A. Weitz, Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement, J. Cell Biol. 173, 733 (2006).
  36. D. Mizuno, C. Tardin, C. F. Schmidt, and F. C. MacKintosh, Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks, Science 315, 370 (2007).
  37. D. Mizuno, D. A. Head, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, Active and passive microrheology in equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems, Macromolecules 41, 7194 (2008).
  38. B. Fabry, G. N. Maksym, J. P. Butler, M. Glogauer, D. Navajas, and J. J. Fredberg, Scaling the microrheology of living cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 148102 (2001).
  39. D. Stamenovic, N. Rosenblatt, M. Montoya-Zavala, B. D. Matthews, S. Hu, B. Suki, N. Wang, and D. E. Ingber, Rheological behavior of living cells is timescale-dependent, Biophys. J. 93, L39 (2007).
  40. N. Desprat, A. Richert, J. Simeon, and A. Asnacios, Creep function of a single living cell, Biophys. J. 88, 2224 (2005).
  41. P. Bursac, G. Lenormand, B. Fabry, M. Oliver, D. A. Weitz, V. Viasnoff, J. P. Butler, and J. J. Fredberg, Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell, Nat. Mater. 4, 557 (2005).
  42. S. Hu, et al., Long-range self-organization of cytoskeletal myosin II filament stacks, Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 133 (2017).
  43. A. Roll-Mecak, The tubulin code in microtubule dynamics and information encoding, Dev. Cell 54, 7 (2020).
  44. K. K. Mahalingan, E. Keith Keenan, M. Strickland, Y. Li, Y. Liu, H. L. Ball, M. E. Tanner, N. Tjandra, and A. Roll-Mecak, Structural basis for polyglutamate chain initiation and elongation by TTLL family enzymes, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 802 (2020).
  45. M. L. Valenstein and A. Roll-Mecak, Graded control of microtubule severing by tubulin glutamylation, Cell 164, 911 (2016).
  46. S. Audebert, A. Koulakoff, Y. Berwald-Netter, F. Gros, P. Denoulet, and B. Edde, Developmental regulation of polyglutamylated alpha- and beta-tubulin in mouse brain neurons, J. Cell Sci. 107, 2313 (1994).
  47. M. Abal, G. Keryer, and M. Bornens, Centrioles resist forces applied on centrosomes during G2/M transition, Biol. Cell. 97, 425 (2005).
  48. J. Gaertig and D. Wloga, Ciliary tubulin and its post-translational modifications, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 85, 83 (2008).
  49. K. P. Wall, H. Hart, T. Lee, C. Page, T. L. Hawkins, and L. E. Hough, C-terminal tail polyglycylation and polyglutamylation alter microtubule mechanical properties, Biophys. J. 119, 2219 (2020).
  50. J. Chen and A. Roll-Mecak, Glutamylation is a negative regulator of microtubule growth, Mol. Biol. Cell 34, ar70 (2023).
  51. M. Bosch Grau, G. Gonzalez Curto, C. Rocha, M. M. Magiera, P. Marques Sousa, T. Giordano, N. Spassky, and C. Janke, Tubulin glycylases and glutamylases have distinct functions in stabilization and motility of ependymal cilia, J. Cell Biol. 202, 441 (2013).
  52. C. Bonnet, D. Boucher, S. Lazereg, B. Pedrotti, K. Islam, P. Denoulet, and J. C. Larcher, Differential binding regulation of microtubule-associated proteins MAP1A, MAP1B, and MAP2 by tubulin polyglutamylation, J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12839 (2001).
  53. E. Szczesna, E. A. Zehr, S. W. Cummings, A. Szyk, K. K. Mahalingan, Y. Li, and A. Roll-Mecak, Combinatorial and antagonistic effects of tubulin glutamylation and glycylation on katanin microtubule severing, Dev. Cell 57, 2497 (2022).
  54. M. Genova, L. Grycova, V. Puttrich, M. M. Magiera, Z. Lansky, C. Janke, and M. Braun, Tubulin polyglutamylation differentially regulates microtubule-interacting proteins, EMBO J. 42, e112101 (2023).
  55. M. Sirajuddin, L. M. Rice, and R. D. Vale, Regulation of microtubule motors by tubulin isotypes and post-translational modifications, Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 335 (2014).
  56. F. Schlosser, F. Rehfeldt, and C. F. Schmidt, Force fluctuations in three-dimensional suspended fibroblasts, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140028 (2015).
  57. D. Mizuno, R. Bacabac, C. Tardin, D. Head, and C. F. Schmidt, High-resolution probing of cellular force transmission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 168102 (2009).
  58. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1986).
  59. D. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, S. Sart, A. Babataheri, D. Tareste, A. I. Barakat, C. Clanet, and J. Husson, Elastocapillary instability in mitochondrial fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 088102 (2015).
  60. S. Janel, M. Popoff, N. Barois, E. Werkmeister, S. Divoux, F. Perez, and F. Lafont, Stiffness tomography of eukaryotic intracellular compartments by atomic force microscopy, Nanoscale 11, 10320 (2019).
  61. Z. Xu, L. Schaedel, D. Portran, A. Aguilar, J. Gaillard, M. P. Marinkovich, M. Théry, and M. V. Nachury, Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation, Science 356, 328 (2017).
  62. A. K. Coleman, H. C. Joca, G. Shi, W. J. Lederer, and C. W. Ward, Tubulin acetylation increases cytoskeletal stiffness to regulate mechanotransduction in striated muscle, J. Gen. Physiol. 153, e202012743 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation