- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonlinear Respiratory Biomechanics Broadens the Range of Amplified Dynamics During Birdsong

Facundo Fainstein1,2, Franz Goller3,4, and Gabriel B. Mindlin1,2,*

  • *Contact author: gabo@df.uba.ar
PDF

PRX Life 4, 033012 – Published 6 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k495-q61l

Abstract

Evolution has shaped animal bodies, yet to what extent biomechanical systems impose constraints and provide opportunities across different behaviors remains unclear. In birds, quiet breathing operates at a resonance of the respiratory biomechanics, but song, a behavior thought to be shaped by strong sexual selection, requires much higher breathing rates. Combining physiological recordings with a nonlinear biomechanical model, we show in canaries (Serinus canaria) that song production drives the system into a nonlinear regime that broadens the frequency range of amplified responses. This enhancement encompasses the full range of syllabic rates, with an average magnification of ∼94% of the theoretical maximum. Thus, song exploits a broadened regime of high amplification, extending biomechanical support beyond the narrow resonance observed during quiet breathing. Our results illustrate a shared optimization strategy across behavioral states, reveal a deep connection between neural and biomechanical dynamical parameters, and show that sexually selected displays may still rely on optimization strategies.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (51)

  1. P. R. Grant and B. R. Grant, Evolution of character displacement in Darwin's finches, Science 313, 224 (2006).
  2. M. H. Dickinson and J. R. Lighton, Muscle efficiency and elastic storage in the flight motor of Drosophila, Science 268, 87 (1995).
  3. M. H. Dickinson, C. T. Farley, R. J. Full, M. Koehl, R. Kram, and S. Lehman, How animals move: An integrative view, Science 288, 100 (2000).
  4. E. Tytell, P. Holmes, and A. H. Cohen, Spikes alone do not behavior make: Why neuroscience needs biomechanics, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 816 (2011).
  5. S. Kohannim and T. Iwasaki, Analytical insights into optimality and resonance in fish swimming, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131073 (2014).
  6. E. D. Tytell, C.-Y. Hsu, and L. J. Fauci, The role of mechanical resonance in the neural control of swimming in fishes, Zoology 117, 48 (2014).
  7. Q. Zhong, J. Zhu, F. E. Fish, S. J. Kerr, A. Downs, H. Bart-Smith, and D. Quinn, Tunable stiffness enables fast and efficient swimming in fish-like robots, Sci. Robot. 6, eabe4088 (2021).
  8. C. Nguyen and O. Peleg, Where physics meets behavior in animal groups, PRX Life 3, 037001 (2025).
  9. E. C. Crawford Jr. and G. Kampe, Resonant panting in pigeons, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 40, 549 (1971).
  10. G. Kampe and E. C. Crawford Jr., Oscillatory mechanics of the respiratory system of pigeons, Resp. Physiol. 18, 188 (1973).
  11. F. Fainstein, S. M. Geli, A. Amador, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin, Birds breathe at an aerodynamic resonance, Chaos 31, 123132 (2021).
  12. J. H. Bates, C. G. Irvin, R. Farré, and Z. Hantos, Oscillation mechanics of the respiratory system, Compr. Physiol. 1, 1233 (2011).
  13. R. S. Hartley and R. A. Suthers, Airflow and pressure during canary song: Direct evidence for mini-breaths, J. Comp. Physiol. A 165, 15 (1989).
  14. A. Amador, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin, Frequency modulation during song in a suboscine does not require vocal muscles, J. Neurophysiol. 99, 2383 (2008).
  15. R. Alonso, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin, Motor control of sound frequency in birdsong involves the interaction between air sac pressure and labial tension, Phys. Rev. E 89, 032706 (2014).
  16. M. F. Schmidt and F. Goller, Breathtaking songs: Coordinating the neural circuits for breathing and singing, Physiology 31, 442 (2016).
  17. F. Goller, Vocal athletics–from birdsong production mechanisms to sexy songs, Anim. Behav. 184, 173 (2022).
  18. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/k495-q61l for additional text, figures and tables, which includes Refs. [49, 50, 51].
  19. T. I. Drăgănoiu, L. Nagle, and M. Kreutzer, Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2525 (2002).
  20. B. Ballentine, J. Hyman, and S. Nowicki, Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: An experimental test, Behav. Ecol. 15, 163 (2004).
  21. S. Nowicki and W. A. Searcy, Song function and the evolution of female preferences: Why birds sing, why brains matter, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1016, 704 (2004).
  22. S. P. Caro, K. B. Sewall, K. G. Salvante, and K. W. Sockman, Female Lincoln's sparrows modulate their behavior in response to variation in male song quality, Behav. Ecol. 21, 562 (2010).
  23. K. Oberweger and F. Goller, The metabolic cost of birdsong production, J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3379 (2001).
  24. M. Franz and F. Goller, Respiratory patterns and oxygen consumption in singing zebra finches, J. Exp. Biol. 206, 967 (2003).
  25. S. Ward, J. R. Speakman, and P. J. Slater, The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus canaria, Anim. Behav. 66, 893 (2003).
  26. A. Zahavi and A. Zahavi, The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
  27. J. N. Maina and E. R. Schachner, Biology of the avian respiratory system: Development, evolutionary morphology, function and clinical considerations, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20230419 (2025).
  28. M. A. Trevisan, G. B. Mindlin, and F. Goller, Nonlinear model predicts diverse respiratory patterns of birdsong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 058103 (2006).
  29. F. Fainstein, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin, Song-like activation of syringeal and respiratory muscles during sleep in canaries, J. Comp. Physiol. A 211, 135 (2025).
  30. T. Gardner, G. Cecchi, M. Magnasco, R. Laje, and G. B. Mindlin, Simple motor gestures for birdsongs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 208101 (2001).
  31. P. Scheid and J. Piiper, Volume, ventilation and compliance of the respiratory system in the domestic fowl, Respir. Physiol. 6, 298 (1969).
  32. J. M. York, B. A. Chua, C. M. Ivy, L. Alza, R. Cheek, G. R. Scott, K. G. McCracken, P. B. Frappell, N. J. Dawson, S. L. Laguë, et al., Respiratory mechanics of eleven avian species resident at high and low altitude, J. Exp. Biol. 220, 1079 (2017).
  33. R. Suthers, F. Goller, and C. Pytte, The neuromuscular control of birdsong, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354, 927 (1999).
  34. F. Goller and R. A. Suthers, Role of syringeal muscles in gating airflow and sound production in singing brown thrashers, J. Neurophysiol. 75, 867 (1996).
  35. F. Goller and R. A. Suthers, Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song, J. Neurophysiol. 76, 287 (1996).
  36. R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1966), Vol. 1.
  37. F. S. Crawford, Jr., Waves, Berkeley Physics Course, Vol. 3 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  38. C. K. Catchpole and P. J. Slater, Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
  39. J. Podos, A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae), Evolution 51, 537 (1997).
  40. J. Podos and H.-C. Sung, Vocal performance in songbirds: From mechanisms to evolution, in The Neuroethology of Birdsong, edited by J. T. Sakata, S. C. Woolley, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020), pp. 245–268.
  41. H. J. Chiel and R. D. Beer, The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment, TINS 20, 553 (1997).
  42. K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al., Neuromechanics: An integrative approach for understanding motor control, Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 16 (2007).
  43. A. Gomez-Marin and A. A. Ghazanfar, The life of behavior, Neuron 104, 25 (2019).
  44. M. B. Shapiro and R. V. Kenyon, Control variables in mechanical muscle models: A mini-review and a new model, Motor Control 4, 329 (2000).
  45. J. F. Döppler, A. Bush, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin, From electromyographic activity to frequency modulation in zebra finch song, J. Comp. Physiol. A 204, 209 (2018).
  46. K. H. Srivastava, C. M. Holmes, M. Vellema, A. R. Pack, C. P. Elemans, I. Nemenman, and S. J. Sober, Motor control by precisely timed spike patterns, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1171 (2017).
  47. R. J. Campello, D. Moulavi, and J. Sander, Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates, in Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Springer, 2013), pp. 160–172.
  48. F. Fainstein, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin, Data and code for “Nonlinear respiratory biomechanics broadens the range of amplified dynamics during birdsong”, Zenodo, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20645165.
  49. J. M. L. Miller, A. Ansari, D. B. Heinz, Y. Chen, I. B. Flader, D. D. Shin, L. G. Villanueva, and T. W. Kenny, Effective quality factor tuning mechanisms in micromechanical resonators, Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 041307 (2018).
  50. L. P. Claessens, The skeletal kinematics of lung ventilation in three basal bird taxa (emu, tinamou, and guinea fowl), J. Exp. Zool. 311A, 586 (2009).
  51. R. J. Brocklehurst, S. Moritz, J. Codd, W. I. Sellers, and E. L. Brainerd, XROMM kinematics of ventilation in wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb.209783 (2019).

Outline

Information

PRX Life 4, 033012– Published 6 August, 2026
  • Received 9 June 2025
  • Accepted 17 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation