- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Open Access

Continual Evolution in Nonreciprocal Ecological Models

Aditya Mahadevan

Daniel S. Fisher

PDF

PRX Life 3, 033008 – Published 4 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dv3k-75b9

Abstract

Feedbacks between evolution and ecology are ubiquitous, with ecological interactions determining which mutants are successful, and these mutants in turn modifying community structure. We study the evolutionary dynamics of several ecological models with overlapping niches, including consumer resource and Lotka-Volterra models. Evolution is assumed slow, with ecological dynamics producing a stable community (with some strains going permanently extinct) between successive introductions of an invader or mutant. When new strains are slowly added to the community, either from an external pool or by large-effect mutations of exant strains, an initial evolutionary transient gives way to a diverse eco-evolutionary steady state. In this “Red Queen” phase of continual evolution, the biodiversity continues to turn over without the invasion probability of new variants getting smaller. For resource-mediated interactions, the Red Queen phase obtains for any amount of asymmetry in the interactions between strains, and is robust to “general fitness” differences in the intrinsic growth rates of strains. Via a dynamical mean-field theory framework valid for high-dimensional phenotype space, we analytically characterize the Red Queen eco-evolutionary steady state in a particular limit of model parameters. Scaling arguments enable a more general understanding of the steady state and evolutionary transients toward it. This work therefore establishes simple models of continual evolution in an ecological context without host-pathogen arms races and points to the generality of Red Queen evolution. However, we also find other eco-evolutionary phases in simple models: For generalized Lotka-Volterra models with near-symmetric interactions an “oligarch” phase emerges in which the evolutionary dynamics continually slow down and a substantial fraction of the community's abundance condenses into a handful of slowly turning-over strains.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Viewpoint

Ecology Enables Endless Evolution

Published 4 August, 2025

Biological evolution can be driven indefinitely by the ecological interactions of many diverse species.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (63)

  1. S. Sunagawa, L. P. Coelho, S. Chaffron, J. R. Kultima, K. Labadie, G. Salazar, B. Djahanschiri, G. Zeller, D. R. Mende, A. Alberti et al., Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome, Science 348, 1261359 (2015).
  2. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium, A framework for human microbiome research, Nature (London) 486, 215 (2012).
  3. N. Fierer, Embracing the unknown: Disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579 (2017).
  4. N. Kashtan, S. E. Roggensack, S. Rodrigue, J. W. Thompson, S. J. Biller, A. Coe, H. Ding, P. Marttinen, R. R. Malmstrom, R. Stocker et al., Single-cell genomics reveals hundreds of coexisting subpopulations in wild prochlorococcus, Science 344, 416 (2014).
  5. M. J. Rosen, M. Davison, D. Bhaya, and D. S. Fisher, Fine-scale diversity and extensive recombination in a quasisexual bacterial population occupying a broad niche, Science 348, 1019 (2015).
  6. R. F. Rosenzweig, R. R. Sharp, D. S. Treves, and J. Adams, Microbial evolution in a simple unstructured environment: Genetic differentiation in Escherichia Coli, Genetics 137, 903 (1994).
  7. M. L. Friesen, G. Saxer, M. Travisano, and M. Doebeli, Experimental evidence for sympatric ecological diversification due to frequency-dependent competition in Escherichia Coli, Evolution 58, 245 (2004).
  8. R. Maharjan, S. Seeto, L. Notley-McRobb, and T. Ferenci, Clonal adaptive radiation in a constant environment, Science 313, 514 (2006).
  9. B. H. Good, M. J. McDonald, J. E. Barrick, R. E. Lenski, and M. M. Desai, The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations, Nature (London) 551, 45 (2017).
  10. R. E. Lenski, Experimental evolution and the dynamics of adaptation and genome evolution in microbial populations, ISME J. 11, 2181 (2017).
  11. S. E. Finkel and R. Kolter, Evolution of microbial diversity during prolonged starvation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4023 (1999).
  12. J. C. Ignacio-Espinoza, N. A. Ahlgren, and J. A. Fuhrman, Long-term stability and Red Queen-like strain dynamics in marine viruses, Nat. Microbiol. 5, 265 (2020).
  13. M. F. Marston, F. J. Pierciey Jr, A. Shepard, G. Gearin, J. Qi, C. Yandava, S. C. Schuster, M. R. Henn, and J. B. H. Martiny, Rapid diversification of coevolving marine synechococcus and a virus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4544 (2012).
  14. A. Buckling and P. B. Rainey, Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 269, 931 (2002).
  15. L. Van Valen, A new evolutionary law, Evol. Theory 1, 1 (1973).
  16. L. Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (Macmillan, London, 1871).
  17. J. A. G. M. de Visser and J. Krug, Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution, Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 480 (2014).
  18. D. S. Fisher, Inevitability of Red Queen evolution driven by organismic complexity and simple feedback via environmental modification, bioRxiv 2021.09.26.461893; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.26.461893.
  19. A. Agarwala and D. S. Fisher, Adaptive walks on high-dimensional fitness landscapes and seascapes with distance-dependent statistics, Theor. Popul. Biol. 130, 13 (2019).
  20. G. Bunin, Ecological communities with Lotka-Volterra dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 95, 042414 (2017).
  21. M. Opper and S. Diederich, Phase transition and 1/f noise in a game dynamical model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1616 (1992).
  22. E. Blumenthal, J. W. Rocks, and P. Mehta, Phase transition to chaos in complex ecosystems with nonreciprocal species-resource interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 127401 (2024).
  23. V. Ros, F. Roy, G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and A. M. Turner, Generalized Lotka-Volterra equations with random, nonreciprocal interactions: The typical number of equilibria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 257401 (2023).
  24. M. T. Pearce, A. Agarwala, and D. S. Fisher, Stabilization of extensive fine-scale diversity by ecologically driven spatiotemporal chaos, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14572 (2020).
  25. C. Xue and N. Goldenfeld, Coevolution maintains diversity in the stochastic “kill the winner” model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 268101 (2017).
  26. J. Huisman, A. M. Johansson, E. O. Folmer, and F. J. Weissing, Towards a solution of the plankton paradox: The importance of physiology and life history, Ecol. Lett. 4, 408 (2001).
  27. L. Yan, R. A. Neher, and B. I. Shraiman, Phylodynamic theory of persistence, extinction and speciation of rapidly adapting pathogens, Elife 8, e44205 (2019).
  28. R. A. Armstrong and R. McGehee, Competitive exclusion, Am. Nat. 115, 151 (1980).
  29. N. Shoresh, M. Hegreness, and R. Kishony, Evolution exacerbates the paradox of the plankton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12365 (2008).
  30. P. Schippers, A. M. Verschoor, M. Vos, and W. M. Mooij, Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? Ecol. Lett. 4, 404 (2001).
  31. M. Doebeli and I. Ispolatov, Complexity and diversity, Science 328, 494 (2010).
  32. M. Tikhonov and R. Monasson, Innovation rather than improvement: A solvable high-dimensional model highlights the limitations of scalar fitness, J. Stat. Phys. 172, 74 (2018).
  33. C. A. Serván and S. Allesina, Tractable models of ecological assembly, Ecol. Lett. 24, 1029 (2021).
  34. J. A. Capitán, J. A. Cuesta, and J. Bascompte, Statistical mechanics of ecosystem assembly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 168101 (2009).
  35. J. McEnany and B. H. Good, Predicting the first steps of evolution in randomly assembled communities, Nat. Commun. 15, 8495 (2024).
  36. A. Altieri, F. Roy, C. Cammarota, and G. Biroli, Properties of equilibria and glassy phases of the random Lotka-Volterra model with demographic noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 258301 (2021).
  37. M. Tikhonov and R. Monasson, Collective phase in resource competition in a highly diverse ecosystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 048103 (2017).
  38. W. Cui, R. Marsland III, and P. Mehta, Effect of resource dynamics on species packing in diverse ecosystems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 048101 (2020).
  39. G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and C. Cammarota, Marginally stable equilibria in critical ecosystems, New J. Phys. 20, 083051 (2018).
  40. R. Marsland III, W. Cui, and P. Mehta, The minimum environmental perturbation principle: A new perspective on niche theory, Am. Nat. 196, 291 (2020).
  41. J. A. Bonachela, M. T. Wortel, and N. C. Stenseth, Eco-evolutionary Red Queen dynamics regulate biodiversity in a metabolite-driven microbial system, Sci. Rep. 7, 17655 (2017).
  42. R. Law, P. Marrow, and U. Dieckmann, On evolution under asymmetric competition, Evol. Ecol. 11, 485 (1997).
  43. J. M. Nordbotten and N. C. Stenseth, Asymmetric ecological conditions favor red-queen type of continued evolution over stasis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1847 (2016).
  44. R. M. May, Will a large complex system be stable? Nature (London) 238, 413 (1972).
  45. A. Mahadevan, M. T. Pearce, and D. S. Fisher, Spatiotemporal ecological chaos enables gradual evolutionary diversification without niches or tradeoffs, eLife 12, e82734 (2023).
  46. A. Posfai, T. Taillefumier, and N. S. Wingreen, Metabolic trade-offs promote diversity in a model ecosystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 028103 (2017).
  47. R. Caetano, Y. Ispolatov, and M. Doebeli, Evolution of diversity in metabolic strategies, eLife 10, e67764 (2021).
  48. B. H. Good, S. Martis, and O. Hallatschek, Adaptation limits ecological diversification and promotes ecological tinkering during the competition for substitutable resources, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E10407 (2018).
  49. C. Cockrell, J. D. O'Sullivan, J. C. D. Terry, E. C. Nwankwo, K. Trachenko, and A. G. Rossberg, Self-organization of ecosystems to exclude half of all potential invaders, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013093 (2024).
  50. T. Arnoulx de Pirey and G. Bunin, Many-species ecological fluctuations as a jump process from the brink of extinction, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011037 (2024).
  51. A. J. Daly, J. M. Baetens, and B. De Baets, Ecological diversity: Measuring the unmeasurable, Mathematics 6, 119 (2018).
  52. F. Vrins, Sampling the multivariate standard normal distribution under a weighted sum constraint, Risks 6, 64 (2018).
  53. F. Roy, G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and C. Cammarota, Numerical implementation of dynamical mean field theory for disordered systems: Application to the lotka–volterra model of ecosystems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 484001 (2019).
  54. L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, P. Le Doussal, and L. Peliti, Glassy behaviour in disordered systems with nonrelaxational dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 350 (1997).
  55. M. Bonsma-Fisher and S. Goyal, Dynamics of immune memory and learning in bacterial communities, eLife 12, e81692 (2023).
  56. J. Marchi, M. Lässig, A. M. Walczak, and T. Mora, Antigenic waves of virus-immune coevolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2103398118 (2021).
  57. A. Goyal, L. S. Bittleston, G. E. Leventhal, L. Lu, and O. X. Cordero, Interactions between strains govern the eco-evolutionary dynamics of microbial communities, eLife 11, e74987 (2022).
  58. T. Yoshida, S. P. Ellner, L. E. Jones, B. J. M. Bohannan, R. E. Lenski, and N. G. Hairston, Jr., Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions, PLoS Biol. 5, e235 (2007).
  59. M. Valles-Colomer, A. Blanco-Míguez, P. Manghi, F. Asnicar, L. Dubois, D. Golzato, F. Armanini, F. Cumbo, K. D. Huang, S. Manara et al., The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes, Nature (London) 614, 125 (2023).
  60. W. Zhou, M. Spoto, R. Hardy, C. Guan, E. Fleming, P. J. Larson, J. S. Brown, and J. Oh, Host-specific evolutionary and transmission dynamics shape the functional diversification of staphylococcus epidermidis in human skin, Cell 180, 454 (2020).
  61. A. M. Martin-Platero, B. Cleary, K. Kauffman, S. P. Preheim, D. J. McGillicuddy, E. J. Alm, and M. F. Polz, High resolution time series reveals cohesive but short-lived communities in coastal plankton, Nat. Commun. 9, 266 (2018).
  62. S. Diederich and M. Opper, Replicators with random interactions: A solvable model, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4333 (1989).
  63. L. M. Ricciardi and S. Sato, First-passage-time density and moments of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, J. Appl. Probab. 25, 43 (1988).

Outline

Information

PRX Life 3, 033008– Published 4 August, 2025
  • Received 3 December 2024
  • Accepted 18 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation