- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

PRX Life

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Charge distribution of the coating brush drives interchromosome attraction

Valerio Sorichetti1, Paul Robin1, Ivan Palaia1,2, Alberto Hernandez-Armendariz3,4,*, Sara Cuylen-Haering3, and Anđela Šarić1,†

  • *Present addresses: Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
  • †Contact author: andela.saric@ista.ac.at
PDF

PRX Life 3, 033010 – Published 11 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/41fd-r847

Abstract

The condensation of charged polymers is an important driver for the formation of biomolecular condensates. Recent experiments suggest that this mechanism also controls the clustering of eukaryotic chromosomes during the late stages of cell division. In this process, interchromosome attraction is driven by the condensation of cytoplasmic RNA and Ki-67, a charged intrinsically disordered protein that coats the chromosomes as a brush. Attraction between chromosomes has been shown to be specifically promoted by a localized charged patch on Ki-67, although the physical mechanism remains unclear. To elucidate this process, we combine coarse-grained simulations and analytical theory to study the RNA-mediated interaction between charged polymer brushes on the chromosome surfaces. We show that the charged patch on Ki-67 leads to interchromosome attraction via RNA bridging between the two brushes, whereby the RNA preferentially interacts with the charged patches, leading to stable, long-range forces. By contrast, if the brush is uniformly charged, bridging is basically absent due to complete adsorption of RNA onto the brush. Moreover, the RNA dynamics becomes caged in presence of the charged patch while remaining diffusive with uniform charge. Our work sheds light on the physical origin of chromosome clustering, while also suggesting a general mechanism for cells to tune work production by biomolecular condensates via different charge distributions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (95)

  1. J. T. Overbeek and M. J. Voorn, Phase separation in polyelectrolyte solutions. Theory of complex coacervation, J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 49, 7 (1957).
  2. D. Priftis, N. Laugel, and M. Tirrell, Thermodynamic characterization of polypeptide complex coacervation, Langmuir 28, 15947 (2012).
  3. A. B. Kayitmazer, Thermodynamics of complex coacervation, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 239, 169 (2017).
  4. C. E. Sing and S. L. Perry, Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation, Soft Matter 16, 2885 (2020).
  5. C. P. Brangwynne, P. Tompa, and R. V. Pappu, Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions, Nat. Phys. 11, 899 (2015).
  6. C. W. Pak, M. Kosno, A. S. Holehouse, S. B. Padrick, A. Mittal, R. Ali, A. A. Yunus, D. R. Liu, R. V. Pappu, and M. K. Rosen, Sequence determinants of intracellular phase separation by complex coacervation of a disordered protein, Mol. Cell 63, 72 (2016).
  7. W. M. Aumiller Jr. and C. D. Keating, Phosphorylation-mediated RNA/peptide complex coacervation as a model for intracellular liquid organelles, Nat. Chem. 8, 129 (2016).
  8. G. A. Mountain and C. D. Keating, Formation of multiphase complex coacervates and partitioning of biomolecules within them, Biomacromolecules 21, 630 (2020).
  9. A. A. Hyman and C. P. Brangwynne, Beyond stereospecificity: Liquids and mesoscale organization of cytoplasm, Develop. Cell 21, 14 (2011).
  10. D. Zwicker, M. Decker, S. Jaensch, A. A. Hyman, and F. Jülicher, Centrosomes are autocatalytic droplets of pericentriolar material organized by centrioles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2636 (2014).
  11. E. M. Courchaine, A. Lu, and K. M. Neugebauer, Droplet organelles? EMBO J. 35, 1603 (2016).
  12. M. Feric, N. Vaidya, T. S. Harmon, D. M. Mitrea, L. Zhu, T. M. Richardson, R. W. Kriwacki, R. V. Pappu, and C. P. Brangwynne, Coexisting liquid phases underlie nucleolar subcompartments, Cell 165, 1686 (2016).
  13. Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease, Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).
  14. S. F. Banani, H. O. Lee, A. A. Hyman, and M. K. Rosen, Biomolecular condensates: Organizers of cellular biochemistry, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285 (2017).
  15. J. A. Ditlev, L. B. Case, and M. K. Rosen, Who's in and who's out—Compositional control of biomolecular condensates, J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4666 (2018).
  16. J.-M. Choi, A. S. Holehouse, and R. V. Pappu, Physical principles underlying the complex biology of intracellular phase transitions, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 49, 107 (2020).
  17. A. S. Lyon, W. B. Peeples, and M. K. Rosen, A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 215 (2021).
  18. C. M. Fare, A. Villani, L. E. Drake, and J. Shorter, Higher-order organization of biomolecular condensates, Open Biol. 11, 210137 (2021).
  19. N. Galvanetto, M. T. Ivanović, A. Chowdhury, A. Sottini, M. F. Nüesch, D. Nettels, R. B. Best, and B. Schuler, Extreme dynamics in a biomolecular condensate, Nature (London) 619, 876 (2023).
  20. F. Jülicher and C. A. Weber, Droplet physics and intracellular phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 15, 237 (2024).
  21. A. Musacchio, On the role of phase separation in the biogenesis of membraneless compartments, EMBO J. 41, e109952 (2022).
  22. T. Wiegand and A. A. Hyman, Drops and fibers—How biomolecular condensates and cytoskeletal filaments influence each other, Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 4, 247 (2020).
  23. L.-P. Bergeron-Sandoval, S. Kumar, H. K. Heris, C. L. Chang, C. E. Cornell, S. L. Keller, P. François, A. G. Hendricks, A. J. Ehrlicher, R. V. Pappu et al., Endocytic proteins with prion-like domains form viscoelastic condensates that enable membrane remodeling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2113789118 (2021).
  24. T. Quail, S. Golfier, M. Elsner, K. Ishihara, V. Murugesan, R. Renger, F. Jülicher, and J. Brugués, Force generation by protein–DNA co-condensation, Nat. Phys. 17, 1007 (2021).
  25. B. Gouveia, Y. Kim, J. W. Shaevitz, S. Petry, H. A. Stone, and C. P. Brangwynne, Capillary forces generated by biomolecular condensates, Nature (London) 609, 255 (2022).
  26. T. J. Böddeker, K. A. Rosowski, D. Berchtold, L. Emmanouilidis, Y. Han, F. H. Allain, R. W. Style, L. Pelkmans, and E. R. Dufresne, Non-specific adhesive forces between filaments and membraneless organelles, Nat. Phys. 18, 571 (2022).
  27. C. Bussi, A. Mangiarotti, C. Vanhille-Campos, B. Aylan, E. Pellegrino, N. Athanasiadi, A. Fearns, A. Rodgers, T. M. Franzmann, A. Šarić et al., Stress granules plug and stabilize damaged endolysosomal membranes, Nature (London) 623, 1062 (2023).
  28. A. Mangiarotti and R. Dimova, Biomolecular condensates in contact with membranes, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 53, 319 (2024).
  29. A. R. Strom, Y. Kim, H. Zhao, Y.-C. Chang, N. D. Orlovsky, A. Košmrlj, C. Storm, and C. P. Brangwynne, Condensate interfacial forces reposition DNA loci and probe chromatin viscoelasticity, Cell 187, 5282 (2024).
  30. S. C. Weber and C. P. Brangwynne, Getting RNA and protein in phase, Cell 149, 1188 (2012).
  31. S. Boeynaems, A. S. Holehouse, V. Weinhardt, D. Kovacs, J. Van Lindt, C. Larabell, L. Van Den Bosch, R. Das, P. S. Tompa, R. V. Pappu et al., Spontaneous driving forces give rise to protein-RNA condensates with coexisting phases and complex material properties, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7889 (2019).
  32. I. Alshareedah, M. M. Moosa, M. Raju, D. A. Potoyan, and P. R. Banerjee, Phase transition of RNA-protein complexes into ordered hollow condensates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15650 (2020).
  33. S. Cuylen-Haering, M. Petrovic, A. Hernandez-Armendariz, M. W. Schneider, M. Samwer, C. Blaukopf, L. J. Holt, and D. W. Gerlich, Chromosome clustering by Ki-67 excludes cytoplasm during nuclear assembly, Nature (London) 587, 285 (2020).
  34. A. Hernandez-Armendariz, V. Sorichetti, Y. Hayashi, Z. Koskova, A. Brunner, J. Ellenberg, A. Šarić, and S. Cuylen-Haering, A liquid-like coat mediates chromosome clustering during mitotic exit, Mol. Cell 84, 3254 (2024).
  35. R. Verheijen, H. Kuijpers, R. v. Driel, J. Beck, J. v. Dierendonck, G. Brakenhoff, and F. Ramaekers, Ki-67 detects a nuclear matrix-associated proliferation-related antigen: II. Localization in mitotic cells and association with chromosomes, J. Cell Sci. 92, 531 (1989).
  36. D. G. Booth, M. Takagi, L. Sanchez-Pulido, E. Petfalski, G. Vargiu, K. Samejima, N. Imamoto, C. P. Ponting, D. Tollervey, W. C. Earnshaw et al., Ki-67 is a PP1-interacting protein that organises the mitotic chromosome periphery, eLife 3, e01641 (2014).
  37. Y. Hayashi, K. Kato, and K. Kimura, The hierarchical structure of the perichromosomal layer comprises Ki67, ribosomal RNAs, and nucleolar proteins, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 493, 1043 (2017).
  38. S. Cuylen-Haering, C. Blaukopf, A. Z. Politi, T. Müller-Reichert, B. Neumann, I. Poser, J. Ellenberg, A. A. Hyman, and D. W. Gerlich, Ki-67 acts as a biological surfactant to disperse mitotic chromosomes, Nature (London) 535, 308 (2016).
  39. S. T. Milner, Polymer brushes, Science 251, 905 (1991).
  40. T. Kreer, S. Metzger, M. Müller, K. Binder, and J. Baschnagel, Static properties of end-tethered polymers in good solution: A comparison between different models, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4012 (2004).
  41. L.-W. Chang, T. K. Lytle, M. Radhakrishna, J. J. Madinya, J. Vélez, C. E. Sing, and S. L. Perry, Sequence and entropy-based control of complex coacervates, Nat. Commun. 8, 1273 (2017).
  42. J. J. Madinya, L.-W. Chang, S. L. Perry, and C. E. Sing, Sequence-dependent self-coacervation in high charge-density polyampholytes, Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 5, 632 (2020).
  43. N. A. Zervoudis and A. C. Obermeyer, The effects of protein charge patterning on complex coacervation, Soft Matter 17, 6637 (2021).
  44. H. Yamazaki, M. Takagi, H. Kosako, T. Hirano, and S. H. Yoshimura, Cell cycle-specific phase separation regulated by protein charge blockiness, Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 625 (2022).
  45. S. Ranganathan and E. Shakhnovich, The physics of liquid-to-solid transitions in multi-domain protein condensates, Biophys. J. 121, 2751 (2022).
  46. A. N. Semenov and M. Rubinstein, Thermoreversible gelation in solutions of associative polymers. 1. Statics, Macromolecules 31, 1373 (1998).
  47. M. Rubinstein and A. N. Semenov, Thermoreversible gelation in solutions of associating polymers. 2. Linear dynamics, Macromolecules 31, 1386 (1998).
  48. M. Rubinstein and A. N. Semenov, Dynamics of entangled solutions of associating polymers, Macromolecules 34, 1058 (2001).
  49. Y. W. Kim, J. Yi, and P. A. Pincus, Attractions between like-charged surfaces with dumbbell-shaped counterions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 208305 (2008).
  50. A. Dolan and W. F. Edwards, The effect of excluded volume on polymer dispersant action, Proc. R. Soc. London A 343, 427 (1975).
  51. P. G. De Gennes, Polymers at an interface. 2. Interaction between two plates carrying adsorbed polymer layers, Macromolecules 15, 492 (1982).
  52. G. Rossi and P. Pincus, Interactions between unsaturated-polymer adsorbed surfaces, Europhys. Lett. 5, 641 (1988).
  53. G. Rossi and P. A. Pincus, Properties of polymer layers adsorbed on surfaces under nonequilibrium conditions, Macromolecules 22, 276 (1989).
  54. J. Klein and P. Pincus, Interaction between surfaces with adsorbed polymers: Poor solvents, Macromolecules 15, 1129 (1982).
  55. H. Ji, D. Hone, P. Pincus, and G. Rossi, Polymer bridging between two parallel plates, Macromolecules 23, 698 (1990).
  56. F. Leermakers and A. Gorbunov, Polymer-surface interactions in bridging escape and localization transitions, Macromolecules 35, 8640 (2002).
  57. A. Johner and J.-F. Joanny, Adsorption of polymeric brushes: Bridging, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6257 (1992).
  58. A. E. Hafner, J. Krausser, and A. Šarić, Minimal coarse-grained models for molecular self-organisation in biology, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 58, 43 (2019).
  59. K. Maeshima and M. Eltsov, Packaging the genome: The structure of mitotic chromosomes, J. Biochem. 143, 145 (2008).
  60. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/41fd-r847 for (1) details of the simulation model and protocol (2) analytical model of RNA-mediated bridging, and (3) additional simulation data.
  61. J. D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H. C. Andersen, Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971).
  62. I. L. Gonzalez and J. E. Sylvester, Complete sequence of the 43-kb human ribosomal DNA repeat: Analysis of the intergenic spacer, Genomics 27, 320 (1995).
  63. C. Carron, M.-F. O'Donohue, V. Choesmel, M. Faubladier, and P.-E. Gleizes, Analysis of two human pre-ribosomal factors, bystin and hTsr1, highlights differences in evolution of ribosome biogenesis between yeast and mammals, Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 280 (2011).
  64. E. H. McConkey and J. W. Hopkins, Molecular weights of some HeLa ribosomal RNA's, J. Mol. Biol. 39, 545 (1969).
  65. C. Schlüter, M. Duchrow, C. Wohlenberg, M. Becker, G. Key, H.-D. Flad, and J. Gerdes, The cell proliferation-associated antigen of antibody Ki-67: A very large, ubiquitous nuclear protein with numerous repeated elements, representing a new kind of cell cycle-maintaining proteins., J. Cell Biol. 123, 513 (1993).
  66. A. P. Thompson et al., LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  67. A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2009).
  68. A. P. Thompson, S. J. Plimpton, and W. Mattson, General formulation of pressure and stress tensor for arbitrary many-body interaction potentials under periodic boundary conditions, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 154107 (2009).
  69. R. B. Nicklas, Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase., J. Cell Biol. 97, 542 (1983).
  70. S. Dumont and T. J. Mitchison, Force and length in the mitotic spindle, Curr. Biol. 19, R749 (2009).
  71. A. A. Ye, S. Cane, and T. J. Maresca, Chromosome biorientation produces hundreds of piconewtons at a metazoan kinetochore, Nat. Commun. 7, 13221 (2016).
  72. H. Le Roy, J. Song, D. Lundberg, A. V. Zhukhovitskiy, J. A. Johnson, G. H. McKinley, N. Holten-Andersen, and M. Lenz, Valence can control the nonexponential viscoelastic relaxation of multivalent reversible gels, Sci. Adv. 10, eadl5056 (2024).
  73. M. Rubinstein and R. H. Colby, Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
  74. J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids: With Applications to Soft Matter (Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013).
  75. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988).
  76. N. Jiang, H. Zhang, P. Tang, and Y. Yang, Linear viscoelasticity of associative polymers: Sticky Rouse model and the role of bridges, Macromolecules 53, 3438 (2020).
  77. N. Jiang, H. Zhang, Y. Yang, and P. Tang, Molecular dynamics simulation of associative polymers: Understanding linear viscoelasticity from the sticky Rouse model, J. Rheol. 65, 527 (2021).
  78. P. Ronceray, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and N. S. Wingreen, Stoichiometry controls the dynamics of liquid condensates of associative proteins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 038102 (2022).
  79. I. Mahmad Rasid, N. Holten-Andersen, and B. D. Olsen, Anomalous diffusion in associative networks of high-sticker-density polymers, Macromolecules 54, 1354 (2021).
  80. A. Rao, H. Yao, and B. D. Olsen, Bridging dynamic regimes of segmental relaxation and center-of-mass diffusion in associative protein hydrogels, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043369 (2020).
  81. A. Rao, J. Ramirez, and B. D. Olsen, Mechanisms of self-diffusion of linear associative polymers studied by Brownian dynamics simulation, Macromolecules 54, 11212 (2021).
  82. N. Galvanetto, M. T. Ivanović, S. A. D. Grosso, A. Chowdhury, A. Sottini, D. Nettels, R. B. Best, and B. Schuler, Material properties of biomolecular condensates emerge from nanoscale dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2424135122 (2025).
  83. K. Kremer and G. S. Grest, Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts: A molecular-dynamics simulation, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5057 (1990).
  84. L. M. Jawerth, M. Ijavi, M. Ruer, S. Saha, M. Jahnel, A. A. Hyman, F. Jülicher, and E. Fischer-Friedrich, Salt-dependent rheology and surface tension of protein condensates using optical traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 258101 (2018).
  85. L. Jawerth, E. Fischer-Friedrich, S. Saha, J. Wang, T. Franzmann, X. Zhang, J. Sachweh, M. Ruer, M. Ijavi, S. Saha et al., Protein condensates as aging Maxwell fluids, Science 370, 1317 (2020).
  86. R. Takaki, L. Jawerth, M. Popović, and F. Jülicher, Theory of rheology and aging of protein condensates, PRX Life 1, 013006 (2023).
  87. I. Alshareedah, W. M. Borcherds, S. R. Cohen, A. Singh, A. E. Posey, M. Farag, A. Bremer, G. W. Strout, D. T. Tomares, R. V. Pappu et al., Sequence-specific interactions determine viscoelasticity and ageing dynamics of protein condensates, Nat. Phys. 20, 1482 (2024).
  88. P.-G. De Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Quéré, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2003).
  89. S. Cheng and M. O. Robbins, Nanocapillary adhesion between parallel plates, Langmuir 32, 7788 (2016).
  90. L. Leibler, Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules 13, 1602 (1980).
  91. F. Liu and N. Goldenfeld, Dynamics of phase separation in block copolymer melts, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4805 (1989).
  92. A. Likhtman and A. Semenov, Theory of microphase separation in block copolymer/homopolymer mixtures, Macromolecules 30, 7273 (1997).
  93. S. Ren and I. Hamley, Cell dynamics simulations of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules 34, 116 (2001).
  94. G. M. Ong and C. E. Sing, Mapping the phase behavior of coacervate-driven self-assembly in diblock copolyelectrolytes, Soft Matter 15, 5116 (2019).
  95. H. Wennerström, E. Vallina Estrada, J. Danielsson, and M. Oliveberg, Colloidal stability of the living cell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10113 (2020).

Outline

Information

PRX Life 3, 033010– Published 11 August, 2025
  • Received 26 November 2024
  • Accepted 15 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation