Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Local Structural Coherence and Interfacial Charge Transfer in Cu2S/MoS2 Heterostructure

Ankita Kumari1, S. Avery Vigil2, Konstantina G. Mason3, Saurabh Sivakumar4, Ahmed H. Biby5, Pranay Ninawe3, Charles B. Musgrave6,7,*, Ambarish R. Kulkarni4,†, Ivan A. Moreno-Hernandez2,‡ et al.

Jesús M. Velázquez1,3,4,§

  • *Contact author: charles.musgrave@utah.edu
  • †Contact author: arkulkarni@ucdavis.edu
  • ‡Contact author: ivan.moreno-hernandez@duke.edu
  • §Contact author: jevelazquez@ucdavis.edu

PRX Energy 5, 023009 – Published 9 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/84s6-812t

Abstract

Precise control over electronic coupling at nanoscale interfaces is critical for designing materials with tunable charge-transfer behavior and catalytic function. Heterostructures with locally coherent interfaces provide a platform for interrogating interfacial charge redistribution in coupled material systems. Here, we report Cu2S/MoS2 heterostructures exhibiting nanoscale crystallographic alignment, which are synthesized through a rapid thermal transformation pathway. We employed electrochemical reduction reactions to probe interfacial charge transfer, revealing shifts in product distribution attributable to modified interfacial energetics, even in the absence of optimized catalytic performance. The observed formate Faradaic efficiency suggests that interfacial electronic modulation in the heterostructure shifts product selectivity towards formate, highlighting how interface-driven electronic modulation can direct reaction pathways and influence product selectivity. Optimizing catalyst loading, architecture, and reactor configuration will be critical for future improvement. Structural and compositional integrity were confirmed through powder x-ray diffraction, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Electron transfer between Cu2S and MoS2 domains was further evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, while selected-area electron diffraction revealed local crystallographic alignment consistent with a local epitaxial relationship at the Cu2S/MoS2 heterointerface. To illustrate the broader applicability of this approach, a ZnS/MoS2 heterostructure was also synthesized using the same microwave strategy, confirming the generalizability of interfacial engineering principles across metal sulfide-MoS2 systems. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that controlled local epitaxial alignment serves as an effective design principle for tuning interfacial energetics and catalytic reactivity in complex heterostructure materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

PRX Energy collection on carbon capture, utilization, and storage

This PRX Energy Collection showcases the latest advances and ideas in carbon capture, utilization, and storage, including modeling, materials- and chemistry-based research, techno-economic analysis, and more. This collection amplifies advancements related to Sustainable Development Goals #7 and #13.

The guest editors for this Collection are Maria Escudero-Escribano of Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Ewa Marek of University of Cambridge, and Jesús Velázquez of University of California-Davis.

Every article in this Collection was subjected to a rigorous peer review process, upholding the high standards applied to all papers. The PRX Energy editorial team managed the peer review and made all editorial decisions.

Popular Summary

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (94)

  1. E. Pomerantseva and Y. Gogotsi, Two-dimensional heterostructures for energy storage, Nat. Energy 2, 17089 (2017).
  2. X. Ouyang, B. Huo, S. Peng, M. Xu, D. Deng, Y. Li, and L. Luo, Heterojunction CuS@Cu2MoS4 nanocubes for nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensing, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 8, 7132 (2025).
  3. A. Li, X. Chang, Z. Huang, C. Li, Y. Wei, L. Zhang, T. Wang, and J. Gong, Thin heterojunctions and spatially separated cocatalysts to simultaneously reduce bulk and surface recombination in photocatalysts, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 13734 (2016).
  4. K. Chen, X. Wan, J. Wen, W. Xie, Z. Kang, X. Zeng, H. Chen, and J.-B. Xu, Electronic properties of MoS2–WS2 heterostructures synthesized with two-step lateral epitaxial strategy, ACS Nano 9, 9868 (2015).
  5. J. W. Fu, J. G. Yu, C. J. Jiang, and B. Cheng, g−C3N4-based heterostructured photocatalysts, Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701503 (2018).
  6. S. Gbadamasi, M. Mohiuddin, V. Krishnamurthi, R. Verma, M. W. Khan, S. Pathak, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, and N. Mahmood, Interface chemistry of two-dimensional heterostructures – fundamentals to applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 4684 (2021).
  7. P. Aggarwal, D. Sarkar, P. K. Dwivedi, P. W. Menezes, and K. Awasthi, Deciphering the influence of morphology and crystal structure on alkaline hydrogen evolution activity in polymorphic cobalt diselenide, ACS Appl., Energy Mater. 7, 1550 (2024).
  8. J. Linnemann, K. Kanokkanchana, and K. Tschulik, Design strategies for electrocatalysts from an electrochemist’s perspective, ACS Catal. 11, 5318 (2021).
  9. X. Peng, Y. Yan, X. Jin, C. Huang, W. Jin, B. Gao, and P. K. Chu, Recent advance and prospectives of electrocatalysts based on transition metal selenides for efficient water splitting, Nano Energy 78, 105234 (2020).
  10. J. Zhang, S. Xia, Y. Wang, J. Wu, and Y. Wu, Recent advances in dynamic reconstruction of electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide reduction, iScience 27, 110005 (2024).
  11. Z. Zhang, P. Chen, X. Duan, K. Zang, J. Luo, and X. Duan, Robust epitaxial growth of two-dimensional heterostructures, multiheterostructures, and superlattices, Science 357, 788 (2017).
  12. Weiqing Zhang and Xianmao Lu, Morphology control of bimetallic nanostructures for electrochemical catalysts, Nanotechnol. Rev. 2, 1 (2013).
  13. Q. Li, G. Fang, Z. Wu, J. Guo, Y. You, H. Jin, and J. Wan, Advanced microwave strategies facilitate structural engineering for efficient electrocatalysis, ChemSusChem 17, e202301874 (2024).
  14. Y. You, G. Fang, M. Fan, J. Guo, Q. Li, and J. Wan, Leveraging novel microwave techniques for tailoring the microstructure of energy storage materials, Microstructures 4, 2024035 (2024).
  15. J. C. Ortiz-Rodríguez and J. M. Velázquez, Structure–reactivity relationships in Chevrel phase electrocatalysts for small-molecule reduction reactions, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 34, 101002 (2022).
  16. Z. Chen, X. Wang, J. P. Mills, C. Du, J. Kim, J. Wen, and Y. A. Wu, Two-dimensional materials for electrochemical CO2 reduction: Materials, in situ/operando characterizations, and perspective, Nanoscale 13, 19712 (2021).
  17. N. Hussain, M. A. Abdelkareem, H. Alawadhi, K. Elsaid, and A. Olabi, Synthesis of Cu-g-C3N4/MoS2 composite as a catalyst for electrochemical CO2 reduction to alcohols, Chem. Eng. Sci. 258, 117757 (2022).
  18. Q. Yun, L. Li, Z. Hu, Q. Lu, B. Chen, and H. Zhang, Layered transition metal dichalcogenide-based nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage, Adv. Mater. 32, 1903826 (2020).
  19. P. Kour, Deeksha, S. Kour, A. L. Sharma, and K. Yadav, MoS2-based core-shell nanostructures: Highly efficient materials for energy storage and conversion applications, J. Energy Storage 66, 107393 (2023).
  20. D. Lal, T. Konnur, A. M. Verma, M. Shaneeth, and A. Govind Rajan, Unraveling low overpotential pathways for electrochemical CO2 reduction to CH4 on pure and doped MoS2 edges, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62, 21191 (2023).
  21. R. Ganatra and Q. Zhang, Few-layer MoS2: A promising layered semiconductor, ACS Nano 8, 4074 (2014).
  22. P. Fu, Y. Xu, P. Ge, X. Li, J. Yang, G. Ge, and X. Yang, Highly efficient MoS2/WS2 heterojunctions for the CO2 reduction reaction: Strong electronic transmission, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 32093 (2023).
  23. Z. He and W. Que, Molybdenum disulfide nanomaterials: Structures, properties, synthesis and recent progress on hydrogen evolution reaction, Appl. Mater. Today 3, 23 (2016).
  24. Y. Pan, E. Yu, D. Wang, and H. Deng, Sulfur vacancy enhances the electronic and optical properties of FeS2 as the high performance electrode material, J. Alloys Compd. 858, 157662 (2021).
  25. S. Yang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Liu, L. Fang, X. Yang, X. Gu, and Y. Wang, Unique three-dimensional Mo2C@MoS2 heterojunction nanostructure with S vacancies as outstanding all-pH range electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution, J. Catal. 371, 20 (2019).
  26. A. Kumari, P. Ninawe, and J. M. Velázquez, Tailoring MoS2 for small-molecule electroreduction: The role of metal doping and heterostructures, ACS Nanosci. 5, 442 (2025).
  27. A. Mukherjee, M. Abdinejad, S. Sinha Mahapatra, and B. C. Ruidas, Controlled synthesis of copper sulfide-based catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid and beyond: A review, Energy Adv. 3, 2704 (2024).
  28. E. Cui, W. Zhang, X. Zhou, L. Lv, W. Chen, L. Zhou, and L. Mai, Cu2S nanoparticle-modified copper hydroxide nanowire arrays for optimized electrochemical CO2 reduction selectivity, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6, 9361 (2023).
  29. M. Asadi, Bijandra Kumar, Amirhossein Behranginia, Brian A. Rosen, Artem Baskin, Nikita Repnin, Davide Pisasale, Patrick Phillips, Wei Zhu, Richard Haasch, Robert F. Klie, Petr Král, Jeremiah Abiade, and Amin Salehi-Khojin, Robust carbon dioxide reduction on molybdenum disulphide edges, Nat. Commun. 5, 4470 (2014).
  30. E. J. Miller, K. P. Robinson, E. Lara, A. Berzansky, A. Baac, J. M. Velázquez, and L. Whittaker-Brooks, Atomically engineered active sites in metal trichalcogenides via dual sublattice modulation for electrocatalysis applications, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 8, 15869 (2025).
  31. J.-C. Yan, F.-M. Wang, S. Yin, J. Zhang, W. Jiang, and G.-G. Liu, Copper/metal oxide heterostructures for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction, Rare Met. 44, 2239 (2025).
  32. F. Chang, M. Xiao, R. Miao, Y. Liu, M. Ren, Z. Jia, D. Han, Y. Yuan, Z. Bai, and L. Yang, Copper-based catalysts for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction to multicarbon products, Electrochem. Energy Rev. 5, 4 (2022).
  33. J. Parsons and M. Alotaibi, The application of transition metal sulfide nanomaterials and their composite nanomaterials in the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2: A review, Appl. Sci. 13, 3023 (2023).
  34. J. Kundu, B. R. Anne, J. Cho, H. Huang, D. Cho, and S. Choi, Heterostructure engineering in metal sulfides for electrochemical CO2 reduction: Advancing performance and stability, Small 21, e05185 (2025).
  35. T. Shinagawa, G. O. Larrazábal, A. J. Martín, F. Krumeich, and J. Pérez-Ramírez, Sulfur-modified copper catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate, ACS Catal. 8, 837 (2018).
  36. Y. Li, J. Xu, X. Luo, F. Wang, Z. Dong, K.-J. Huang, C. Hu, M. Hou, and R. Cai, Novel hollow MoS2@C@Cu2S heterostructures for high zinc storage performance, Nanoscale 16, 657 (2024).
  37. X. Wang, J. Wang, X. Zhang, Q. Tian, M. Liu, N. Cai, Y. Xue, W. Chen, W. Li, and F. Yu, Nitrogen-doped Cu2S/MoS2 heterojunction nanorod arrays on copper foam for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction, ChemCatChem 11, 1354 (2019).
  38. W. Zhao, J. Cao, J. Liao, Y. Liu, X. Zeng, J. Shen, X. Hong, Y. Guo, H. Zeng, and Y. Liu, Insights into photocatalytic mechanism over a novel Cu2 WS4/MoS2 S-scheme heterojunction, Rare Met. 43, 3118 (2024).
  39. Sk. Khaja Hussain, B. N. Vamsi Krishna, G. Nagaraju, S. Chandra Sekhar, D. Narsimulu, and J. S. Yu, Porous Co-MoS2@Cu2MoS4 three-dimensional nanoflowers via in situ sulfurization of Cu2O nanospheres for electrochemical hybrid capacitors, Chem. Eng. J. 403, 126319 (2021).
  40. W. Chen, Hangtian Zhu, Qingqing Gao, Jun Luo, Yu Wang, Shuo Zhang, Ke Zhang, Chengming Wang, Yujie Xiong, Yanfei Wu, Xusheng Zheng, Wangsheng Chu, Li Song, and Ziyu Wu, Solvothermal synthesis of ternary Cu2 MoS4 nanosheets: Structural characterization at the atomic level, Small 10, 4637 (2014).
  41. P. D. Tran, Mai Nguyen, Stevin S. Pramana, Anirban Bhattacharjee, Sing Yang Chiam, Jennifer Fize, Martin J. Field, Vincent Artero, Lydia H. Wong, Joachim Loo, and James Barber, Copper molybdenum sulfide: A new efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen production from water, Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8912 (2012).
  42. R. H. Xu, P. P. Ma, G. F. Liu, Y. Qiao, R. Y. Hu, L. Y. Liu, M. Demir, and G. H. Jiang, Dual-phase coexistence design and advanced electrochemical performance of Cu2MoS4 electrode materials for supercapacitor application, Energy Fuels 37, 6158 (2023).
  43. J. Zhou, G. Xu, Z. Zhang, and H. Wang, Facile synthesis of Cu2MoS4 nanosheet/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites as a high-efficiency electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution, New J. Chem. 43, 9574 (2019).
  44. B. Zhao, X. Qiu, Y. Song, S. Li, K. Zhang, Z. Mou, Q. Wang, B. Zhang, and Z. Wang, Regulating asymmetric charge distribution in Cu2MoS4 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction, Small 21, 2500877 (2025).
  45. A. Ejaz, J. H. Han, and R. Dahiya, Influence of solvent molecular geometry on the growth of nanostructures, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 570, 322 (2020).
  46. S. Bahramzadeh, H. Abdizadeh, and M. R. Golobostanfard, Controlling the morphology and properties of solvothermal synthesized Cu2ZnSnS4 nanoparticles by solvent type, J. Alloys Compd. 642, 124 (2015).
  47. I. Ali, Z. Ullah, I. Rehan, A. Khalil, M. Habib, H. T. Masood, Y. Sohail, and M. Waseem, Annealing disintegrates Cu2MoS4 nanosheets into MoS2 and Cu2S nanoheterostructures, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28, 15936 (2017).
  48. L. T. Le, T. T. T. Nguyen, T. T. T. Nguyen, M. T. T. Nguyen, T. T. D. Ung, and P. D. Tran, Investigation on the growth mechanism of Cu2MoS4 nanotube, nanoplate and its use as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution in water, Chem.: Asian J. 15, 1873 (2020).
  49. C. F. Holder and R. E. Schaak, Tutorial on powder x-ray diffraction for characterizing nanoscale materials, ACS Nano 13, 7359 (2019).
  50. H. Tianou, W. Wang, X. Yang, Z. Cao, Q. Kuang, Z. Wang, Z. Shan, M. Jin, and Y. Yin, Inflating hollow nanocrystals through a repeated Kirkendall cavitation process, Nat. Commun. 8, 1261 (2017).
  51. J. Azevedo, M. P. Fernández-García, C. Magén, A. Mendes, J. P. Araújo, and C. T. Sousa, Double-walled iron oxide nanotubes via selective chemical etching and Kirkendall process, Sci. Rep. 9, 11994 (2019).
  52. L. Zhang, A. Xu, X. Shi, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. Shen, J. Zhang, and W. Zhong, Electron transfer at the heterojunction interface of CoP/MoS2 for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction, RSC Adv. 14, 19294 (2024).
  53. G. F. Harrington and J. Santiso, Back-to-basics tutorial: X-ray diffraction of thin films, J. Electroceramics 47, 141 (2021).
  54. J. Kim, M. Ike, and K. Tokuda, Controlling the orientation of MoS2 films on Mo metal thin film through sulfur flux regulation: A novel reaction-diffusion model, Nanomaterials 15, 1783 (2025).
  55. F. Han, W. Li, D. Li, and A. Lu, In situ electrochemical generation of mesostructured Cu2S/C composite for enhanced lithium storage: Mechanism and material properties, ChemElectroChem 1, 733 (2014).
  56. Y. Cao, C. Zhuang, B. Wang, J. Wang, S. Chen, Q. Zhang, W. Ye, and H. Jing, Photoelectrothermocatalytic reduction of CO2 to glycol via Cu2S/MoS2-Vs octahedral heterostructure with synergistic mechanism, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 666, 141 (2024).
  57. Y. Liu, S. Jiang, S. Li, L. Zhou, Z. Li, J. Li, and M. Shao, Interface engineering of (Ni,Fe)S2@MoS2 heterostructures for synergetic electrochemical water splitting, Appl. Catal. B 247, 107 (2019).
  58. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  59. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  60. S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis, Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314 (2013).
  61. D. Zagorac, H. Müller, S. Ruehl, J. Zagorac, and S. Rehme, Recent developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database: Theoretical crystal structure data and related features, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 52, 918 (2019).
  62. J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003).
  63. J. Neugebauer and M. Scheffler, Adsorbate-substrate and adsorbate-adsorbate interactions of Na and K adlayers on Al(111), Phys. Rev. B 46, 16067 (1992).
  64. J. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. A, Z. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Guo, Z. Zhang, and M. Du, Interfacial electronic engineering of the 2D/2D Cu-MoS2/Cu3(HIB)2 heterojunction for bifunctional ammonia electrolysis: Synergistic hydrogen production and wastewater detoxification, Adv. Funct. Mater. 36, e14112 (2025).
  65. M. Hanušová, Luka Pirker, Martin Vondráček, Václav Valeš, Casey K. Cheung, Noel Natera Cordero, Amy Carl, Viktor Zólyomi, János Koltai, Ilias Sotiriou, Jens Zscharschuch, Artur Erbe, Roman Gorbachev, Jan Honolka, Otakar Frank, and Matěj Velický, Hybridization directionality governs the interaction strength between MoS2 and metals, Nano Lett. 25, 12995 (2025).
  66. W. Li, Z. Zhenyu Zhang, Wenjun Zhang, and Shouzhong Zou, MoS2 nanosheets supported on hollow carbon spheres as efficient catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction, ACS omega 2, 5087 (2025).
  67. J. Wang, Y. Cui, and D. Wang, Design of hollow nanostructures for energy storage, conversion and production, Adv. Mater. 31, 1801993 (2019).
  68. X. Li, N. Li, Y. Gao, and L. Ge, Design and applications of hollow-structured nanomaterials for photocatalytic H2 evolution and CO2 reduction, Chin, J. Catal. 43, 679 (2022).
  69. H. Chen, J. Iyer, Y. Liu, S. Krebs, F. Deng, A. Jentys, D. J. Searles, M. A. Haider, R. Khare, and J. A. Lercher, Mechanism of electrocatalytic H2 evolution, carbonyl hydrogenation, and carbon–carbon coupling on Cu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 13949 (2024).
  70. Y. Shi, Y. Zhou, D.-R. Yang, W.-X. Xu, C. Wang, F.-B. Wang, J.-J. Xu, X.-H. Xia, and H.-Y. Chen, Energy level engineering of MoS2 by transition-metal doping for accelerating hydrogen evolution reaction, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15479 (2017).
  71. M. Zeng and Y. Li, Recent advances in heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction, J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 14942 (2015).
  72. H. Xu, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, Z. Yang, J. Xu, and J. Liu, Cu2S/MoS2 nanospheres on conductive molecule modified reduced graphene oxide for supercapacitors, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7, 21340 (2024).
  73. H. Wang, X. Xu, and A. Neville, Facile synthesis of vacancy-induced 2H-MoS2 nanosheets and defect investigation for supercapacitor application, RSC Adv. 11, 26273 (2021).
  74. J. C. Ortiz-Rodríguez, J. T. Perryman, and J. M. Velázquez, Charge transport dynamics in microwave synthesized one-dimensional molybdenum chalcogenides, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 16153 (2021).
  75. H. Vrubel, T. Moehl, M. Grätzel, and X. Hu, Revealing and accelerating slow electron transport in amorphous molybdenum sulphide particles for hydrogen evolution reaction, Chem. Commun. 49, 8985 (2013).
  76. B.-A. Mei, J. Lau, T. Lin, S. H. Tolbert, B. S. Dunn, and L. Pilon, Physical interpretations of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of redox active electrodes for electrical energy storage, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 24499 (2018).
  77. Y. Ouyang, Y. Zhang, P. S. Rice, L. Shi, J. Wang, and P. Hu, Electrochemical CO2 reduction: Water/catalyst interface versus polymer/catalyst interface, J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 17474 (2021).
  78. K. G. Mason, Natalia Mosqueda, S. Avery Vigil, Paola N. Del Pozo-Gonzalez, Saxton Feiner, Kingston P. Robinson, Jenna M. Ynzunza, Ankita Kumari, Rose E. Smiley, Erika La Plante, George Agbeworvi, Ivan A. Moreno-Hernandez, and Jesús M. Velázquez, Heterointercalation in Chevrel-phase sulfides: A model periodic solid for the investigation of chain electron transfer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 18155 (2025).
  79. S. Dongare, et al., Reactive capture and electrochemical conversion of CO2 with ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents, Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 8563 (2024).
  80. A. Hasani, M. A. Teklagne, H. H. Do, S. H. Hong, Q. Van Le, S. H. Ahn, and S. Y. Kim, Graphene-based catalysts for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction, Carbon Energy 2, 158 (2020).
  81. S. A. Francis, Jesus M. Velazquez, Ivonne M. Ferrer, Daniel A. Torelli, Dan Guevarra, Matthew T. McDowell, Ke Sun, Xinghao Zhou, Fadl H. Saadi, Jimmy John, Matthias H. Richter, Forrest P. Hyler, Kimberly M. Papadantonakis, Bruce S. Brunschwig, and Nathan S. Lewis, Reduction of aqueous CO2 to 1-propanol at MoS2 electrodes, Chem. Mater. 30, 4902 (2018).
  82. J. T. Feaster, C. Shi, E. R. Cave, T. Hatsukade, D. N. Abram, K. P. Kuhl, C. Hahn, J. K. Nørskov, and T. F. Jaramillo, Understanding selectivity for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid and carbon monoxide on metal electrodes, ACS Catal. 7, 4822 (2017).
  83. S. Wang, T. Kou, J. B. Varley, S. A. Akhade, S. E. Weitzner, S. E. Baker, E. B. Duoss, and Y. Li, Cu2O/CuS nanocomposites show excellent selectivity and stability for formate generation via electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide, ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 100 (2021).
  84. T. Doulassiramane, N. Arumugam, A. I. Almansour, S. M. Mahalingam, and R. Padmanaban, An effective strategy for CO2 reduction to C1 products using Cu-embedded MoS2 electrocatalyst: DFT study, New J. Chem. 47, 6932 (2023).
  85. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  86. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  87. S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory, J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456 (2011).
  88. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
  89. K. Mathew, R. Sundararaman, K. Letchworth-Weaver, T. A. Arias, and R. G. Hennig, Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084106 (2014).
  90. K. Mathew, V. S. C. Kolluru, S. Mula, S. N. Steinmann, and R. G. Hennig, Implicit self-consistent electrolyte model in plane-wave density-functional theory, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 234101 (2019).
  91. S. M. R. Islam, F. Khezeli, S. Ringe, and C. Plaisance, An implicit electrolyte model for plane wave density functional theory exhibiting nonlinear response and a nonlocal cavity definition, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 234117 (2023).
  92. Y. Ren, X. Sun, K. Qi, and Z. Zhao, Single atom supported on MoS2 as efficient electrocatalysts for the CO2 reduction reaction: A DFT study, Appl. Surf. Sci. 602, 154211 (2022).
  93. A. Hjorth Larsen, et al., The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).
  94. See the Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/84s6-812t. The supplemental file includes all the structural, morphological, and electrochemical analyses that support the findings of the article.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation