Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Charting the Landscape of Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer Superconductors in Experimentally Known Compounds

Marnik Bercx1,*, Samuel Poncé2,3,†, Yiming Zhang2, Giovanni Trezza4, Amir Ghorbani Ghezeljehmeidan5, Lorenzo Bastonero6, Junfeng Qiao7, Fabian O. von Rohr8, Giovanni Pizzi1 et al.

Eliodoro Chiavazzo4 and Nicola Marzari1,6,7

  • *Contact author: marnik.bercx@psi.ch
  • †Contact author: samuel.ponce@uclouvain.be

PRX Energy 4, 033012 – Published 29 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sb28-fjc9

Abstract

We perform a high-throughput computational search for novel phonon-mediated superconductors, starting from the Materials Cloud three-dimensional structure database of experimentally known inorganic stoichiometric compounds. We first compute the Allen-Dynes critical temperature (TcAD) for 4533 nonmagnetic metals using a direct and progressively finer sampling of the electron-phonon couplings. For the candidates with the largest TcAD value, we use automated Wannierizations and electron-phonon interpolations to obtain a high-quality data set for the most promising 250 dynamically stable structures, for which we calculate spectral functions, superconducting band gaps, and isotropic Migdal-Eliashberg critical temperatures. For 140 of these, we also provide anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg superconducting gaps and critical temperatures. The approach is remarkably successful in finding known superconductors and we find 24 unknown ones with a predicted anisotropic Tc value above 10 K. Among them, we identify a possible double-gap superconductor (p-doped BaB2), a nonmagnetic half-Heusler ZrRuSb, and the perovskite TaRu3C, all exhibiting significant Tc values. Finally, we introduce a sensitivity analysis to estimate the robustness of the predictions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (117)

  1. D. Uglietti, A review of commercial high temperature superconducting materials for large magnets: From wires and tapes to cables and conductors, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 32, 053001 (2019).
  2. L. Boeri, in Handbook of Materials Modeling (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–41.
  3. L. Boeri and G. B. Bachelet, Viewpoint: The road to room-temperature conventional superconductivity, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 31, 234002 (2019).
  4. K. M. Shen and J. S. Davis, Cuprate high-Tc superconductors, Mater. Today 11, 14 (2008).
  5. R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. 10, 97 (2014).
  6. H. Hosono, K. Tanabe, E. Takayama-Muromachi, H. Kageyama, S. Yamanaka, H. Kumakura, M. Nohara, H. Hiramatsu, and S. Fujitsu, Exploration of new superconductors and functional materials, and fabrication of superconducting tapes and wires of iron pnictides, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16, 033503 (2015).
  7. L. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Lv, and Y. Ma, Materials discovery at high pressures, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17005 (2017).
  8. S. M. O’Mahony, W. Ren, W. Chen, Y. X. Chong, X. Liu, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. H. Hamidian, and J. C. S. Davis, On the electron pairing mechanism of copper-oxide high temperature superconductivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2207449119 (2022).
  9. S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001).
  10. F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 019901 (2017).
  11. H. Mori, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, and E. R. Margine, Efficient anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg calculations with an intermediate representation basis and Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064505 (2024).
  12. A. N. Kolmogorov, S. Shah, E. R. Margine, A. F. Bialon, T. Hammerschmidt, and R. Drautz, New superconducting and semiconducting Fe-B compounds predicted with an ab initio evolutionary search, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 217003 (2010).
  13. H. Gou, N. Dubrovinskaia, E. Bykova, A. A. Tsirlin, D. Kasinathan, W. Schnelle, A. Richter, M. Merlini, M. Hanfland, A. M. Abakumov, D. Batuk, G. Van Tendeloo, Y. Nakajima, A. N. Kolmogorov, and L. Dubrovinsky, Discovery of a superhard iron tetraboride superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 157002 (2013).
  14. V. Stanev, C. Oses, A. G. Kusne, E. Rodriguez, J. Paglione, S. Curtarolo, and I. Takeuchi, Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature, npj Comput. Mater. 4, 29 (2018).
  15. S. R. Xie, Y. Quan, A. C. Hire, B. Deng, J. M. DeStefano, I. Salinas, U. S. Shah, L. Fanfarillo, J. Lim, J. Kim, G. R. Stewart, J. J. Hamlin, P. J. Hirschfeld, and R. G. Hennig, Machine learning of superconducting critical temperature from Eliashberg theory, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 14 (2022).
  16. K. Choudhary and K. Garrity, Designing high-TC superconductors with BCS-inspired screening, density functional theory, and deep-learning, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 244 (2022).
  17. H. Tran and T. N. Vu, Machine-learning approach for discovery of conventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 054805 (2023).
  18. D. Wines, T. Xie, and K. Choudhary, Inverse design of next-generation superconductors using data-driven deep generative models, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 6630 (2023).
  19. E. A. Pogue, A. New, K. McElroy, N. Q. Le, M. J. Pekala, I. McCue, E. Gienger, J. Domenico, E. Hedrick, T. M. McQueen, B. Wilfong, C. D. Piatko, C. R. Ratto, A. Lennon, C. Chung, T. Montalbano, G. Bassen, and C. D. Stiles, Closed-loop superconducting materials discovery, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 181 (2023).
  20. J. Li, W. Fang, S. Jin, C. Suo, T. Zhang, Y. Wu, X. Xu, Y. Liu, and D.-X. Yao, AI Sci. 1, 015001 (2025).
  21. X.-Q. Han, Z. Ouyang, P.-J. Guo, H. Sun, Z.-F. Gao, and Z.-Y. Lu, InvDesFlow: An AI-driven materials inverse design workflow to explore possible high-temperature superconductors, Chin. Phys. Lett. 42, 047301 (2025).
  22. S. Lee, J. Hattrick-Simpers, Y.-J. Kim, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, High-Tc superconductor candidates proposed by machine learning, arXiv:2406.14524 [cond-mat.supr-con].
  23. A. M. Shipley, M. J. Hutcheon, R. J. Needs, and C. J. Pickard, High-throughput discovery of high-temperature conventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054501 (2021).
  24. T. F. T. Cerqueira, A. Sanna, and M. A. L. Marques, Sampling the materials space for conventional superconducting compounds, Adv. Mater. 36, 2307085 (2023).
  25. D. Wines, K. Choudhary, A. J. Biacchi, K. F. Garrity, and F. Tavazza, High-throughput DFT-based discovery of next generation two-dimensional (2D) superconductors, Nano Lett. 23, 969 (2023).
  26. H. Tran, H.-C. Dam, C. Kuenneth, V. Ngoc Tuoc, and H. Kino, Superconductor discovery in the emerging paradigm of materials informatics, Chem. Mater. 36, 10939 (2024).
  27. T. Sommer, R. Willa, J. Schmalian, and P. Friederich, 3dsc—a dataset of superconductors including crystal structures, Sci. Data 10, 816 (2023).
  28. E. R. Margine and F. Giustino, Anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory using Wannier functions, Phys. Rev. B 87, 024505 (2013).
  29. S. Poncé, E. R. Margine, C. Verdi, and F. Giustino, epw: Electron-phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 209, 116 (2016).
  30. H. Lee, S. Poncé, K. Bushick, S. Hajinazar, J. Lafuente-Bartolome, J. Leveillee, C. Lian, J.-M. Lihm, F. Macheda, H. Mori, H. Paudyal, W. H. Sio, S. Tiwari, M. Zacharias, X. Zhang, N. Bonini, E. Kioupakis, E. R. Margine, and F. Giustino, Electron-phonon physics from first principles using the epw code, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 156 (2023).
  31. N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012).
  32. A. Damle, L. Lin, and L. Ying, SCDM-k: Localized orbitals for solids via selected columns of the density matrix, J. Comput. Phys. 334, 1 (2017).
  33. S. P. Huber et al., AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance, Sci. Data 7, 300 (2020).
  34. M. Uhrin, S. P. Huber, J. Yu, N. Marzari, and G. Pizzi, Workflows in AiiDA: Engineering a high-throughput, event-based engine for robust and modular computational workflows, Comput. Mater. Sci. 187, 110086 (2021).
  35. Materials Cloud 3D database, available at https://mc3d.materialscloud.org/, accessed: 2024-06-21.
  36. S. Gražulis, A. Daškevič, A. Merkys, D. Chateigner, L. Lutterotti, M. Quirós, N. R. Serebryanaya, P. Moeck, R. T. Downs, and A. Le Bail, Crystallography Open Database (cod): An open-access collection of crystal structures and platform for world-wide collaboration, Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D420 (2011).
  37. Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (2024).
  38. The Pauling file exposed through the Materials Platform for Data Science, 2024, available at https://mpds.io/.
  39. N. Mounet, M. Gibertini, P. Schwaller, D. Campi, A. Merkys, A. Marrazzo, T. Sohier, I. E. Castelli, A. Cepellotti, G. Pizzi, and N. Marzari, Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246 (2018).
  40. A. K. Cheetham and R. Seshadri, Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article: Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Chem. Mater. 36, 3490 (2024).
  41. G. Prandini, A. Marrazzo, I. E. Castelli, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations, npj Comput. Mater. 4, 72 (2018).
  42. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  43. M. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Verstraete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39 (2018).
  44. Materials Cloud archive, 2025, available at https://archive.materialscloud.org/record/2025.39, accessed: 2025-03-13.
  45. See the Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/sb28-fjc9 for more details about the mc3d database of materials, convergence with momentum grids and workflow error rate, comparison with experiment, Hubbard calculations, sensitivity analysis of the superconducting prediction, detailed analysis for BaB2, and full epw pipeline results.
  46. P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975).
  47. P. Giannozzi et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).
  48. M. Wierzbowska, S. de Gironcoli, and P. Giannozzi, Origins of low- and high-pressure discontinuities of Tc in niobium, arXiv:cond-mat/0504077 [cond-mat.supr-con].
  49. I. M. Eremin, J. Knolle, and R. Moessner, in Handbook of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020), pp. 1–31.
  50. C. Lin, S. Poncé, and N. Marzari, General invariance and equilibrium conditions for lattice dynamics in 1D, 2D, and 3D materials, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 236 (2022).
  51. X. Gonze and C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355 (1997).
  52. J. Qiao, G. Pizzi, and N. Marzari, Projectability disentanglement for accurate and automated electronic-structure Hamiltonians, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 208 (2023).
  53. Y. M. Shy, L. E. Toth, and R. Somasundaram, Superconducting properties, electrical resistivities, and structure of NbN thin films, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5539 (1973).
  54. K. R. Babu and G.-Y. Guo, Electron-phonon coupling, superconductivity, and nontrivial band topology in NbN polytypes, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104508 (2019).
  55. M. Kawamura, Y. Hizume, and T. Ozaki, Benchmark of density functional theory for superconductors in elemental materials, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134511 (2020).
  56. L. Reining, The GW approximation: Content, successes and limitations, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1344 (2017).
  57. J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani, and J. Akimitsu, Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride, Nature 410, 63 (2001).
  58. A. Y. Ganin, L. Kienle, and G. V. Vajenine, Synthesis and characterisation of hexagonal molybdenum nitrides, J. Solid State Chem. 179, 2339 (2006).
  59. G. Stewart, Superconductivity in the A15 structure, Physica C: Supercond. Appl. 514, 28 (2015).
  60. X. Xu, A review and prospects for Nb3Sn superconductor development, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 093001 (2017).
  61. J. J. Lin, S. M. Huang, Y. H. Lin, T. C. Lee, H. Liu, X. X. Zhang, R. S. Chen, and Y. S. Huang, Low temperature electrical transport properties of RuO2 and IrO2 single crystals, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 8035 (2004).
  62. T. Skośkiewicz, Superconductivity in the palladium-hydrogen system, Phys. Status Solidi (b) 59, 329 (1973).
  63. J. Harper, Effect of hydrogen concentration on superconductivity and clustering in palladium hydride, Phys. Lett. A 47, 69 (1974).
  64. M. Van Maaren and G. Schaeffer, Some new superconducting group Va dichalcogenides, Phys. Lett. A 24, 645 (1967).
  65. I. Guillamón, H. Suderow, S. Vieira, L. Cario, P. Diener, and P. Rodière, Superconducting density of states and vortex cores of 2H-NbS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 166407 (2008).
  66. J. Eisenstein, Superconducting elements, Rev. Mod. Phys. 26, 277 (1954).
  67. J. Hamlin, Superconductivity in the metallic elements at high pressures, Physica C: Supercond. Appl. 514, 59 (2015).
  68. L. Toth and J. Zbasnik, Low temperature heat capacities of superconducting molybdenum carbides, Acta Metall. 16, 1177 (1968).
  69. S. Ramakrishnan, A. K. Nigam, and G. Chandra, Resistivity and magnetoresistance studies on superconducting A15 V3Ga, V3Au, and V3Pt compounds, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6166 (1986).
  70. W. T. Ziegler and R. A. Young, Studies of compounds for superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 90, 115 (1953).
  71. C. Witteveen, K. Górnicka, J. Chang, M. Månsson, T. Klimczuk, and F. O. von Rohr, Polytypism and superconductivity in the NbS2 system, Dalton Trans. 50, 3216 (2021).
  72. D. W. Murphy, F. J. Di Salvo, G. W. Hull, J. V. Waszczak, S. F. Meyer, G. R. Stewart, S. Early, J. V. Acrivos, and T. H. Geballe, Properties of HxTaS2: Correlation between the superconducting Tc and an electronic instability in layer compounds, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 967 (1975).
  73. E. Navarro-Moratalla, J. O. Island, S. Mañas-Valero, E. Pinilla-Cienfuegos, A. Castellanos-Gomez, J. Quereda, G. Rubio-Bollinger, L. Chirolli, J. A. Silva-Guillén, N. Agraït, G. A. Steele, F. Guinea, H. S. J. van der Zant, and E. Coronado, Enhanced superconductivity in atomically thin TaS2, Nat. Commun. 7, 11043 (2016).
  74. H. Rosner, W. E. Pickett, S.-L. Drechsler, A. Handstein, G. Behr, G. Fuchs, K. Nenkov, K.-H. Müller, and H. Eschrig, Electronic structure and weak electron-phonon coupling in TaB2, Phys. Rev. B 64, 144516 (2001).
  75. T. H. Courtney, G. W. Pearsall, and J. Wulff, Effect of processing history on the superconducting properties and long-range order of Ta3Sn, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3256 (1965).
  76. S. Wada and K. Asayama, Nuclear quadrupole spin-lattice relaxation of Ta181 in type II superconducting Ta3Sn, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 34, 1168 (1973).
  77. R. L. Cappelletti, D. M. Ginsberg, and J. K. Hulm, Far-infrared absorption in superconducting niobium alloys, Phys. Rev. 158, 340 (1967).
  78. B. T. Matthias, T. H. Geballe, and V. B. Compton, Superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 1 (1963).
  79. B. T. Matthias, Empirical relation between superconductivity and the number of valence electrons per atom, Phys. Rev. 97, 74 (1955).
  80. R. Flukiger, A. Paoli, and J. Muller, Electronically “atypical” A15-type compounds based on chromium and molybdenum, Solid State Commun. 14, 443 (1974).
  81. N. Emery, C. Hérold, M. d’Astuto, V. Garcia, C. Bellin, J. F. Marêché, P. Lagrange, and G. Loupias, Superconductivity of bulk CaC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087003 (2005).
  82. G. F. Hardy and J. K. Hulm, The superconductivity of some transition metal compounds, Phys. Rev. 93, 1004 (1954).
  83. R. Müller, R. Shelton, J. Richardson, and R. Jacobson, Superconductivity and crystal structure of a new class of ternary transition metal phosphides TT/t’P (TZr, Nb, Ta and T/t’Ru, Rh), J. Less Common Met. 92, 177 (1983).
  84. A. Simon, M. Bäcker, R. W. Henn, C. Felser, R. K. Kremer, H. Mattausch, and A. Yoshiasa, Supraleitung in Seltenerdmetall-Carbidhalogeniden des Typs SE2X2C2, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 622, 123 (1996).
  85. M. Uehara, A. Uehara, K. Kozawa, T. Yamazaki, and Y. Kimishima, New antiperovskite superconductor ZnNNi3, and related compounds CdNNi3 and InNNi3, Physica C: Supercond. Appl. 470, S688 (2010).
  86. A. Giorgi and E. Szklarz, Superconductivity of technetium and technetium carbide, J. Less Common Met. 11, 455 (1966).
  87. J. Hulm, M. Walker, and N. Pessall, High Tc-experimental achievement, Physica 55, 60 (1971).
  88. R. J. Xiao, K. Q. Li, H. X. Yang, G. C. Che, H. R. Zhang, C. Ma, Z. X. Zhao, and J. Q. Li, Correlations among superconductivity, structural instability, and band filling in Nb1−xB2 at the critical point x≈0.2, Phys. Rev. B 73, 224516 (2006).
  89. M. Mudgel, V. Awana, G. Bhalla, and H. Kishan, Superconductivity of non-stoichiometric intermetallic compound NbB2, Solid State Commun. 147, 439 (2008).
  90. R. Potjan, M. Wislicenus, O. Ostien, R. Hoffmann, M. Lederer, A. Reck, J. Emara, L. Roy, B. Lilienthal-Uhlig, and J. Wosnitza, 300 mm CMOS-compatible superconducting HfN and ZrN thin films for quantum applications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 172602 (2023).
  91. H. Fukuoka, Y. Tomomitsu, and K. Inumaru, High-pressure synthesis and superconductivity of a new binary barium germanide BaGe3, Inorg. Chem. 50, 6372 (2011).
  92. R. Castillo, A. I. Baranov, U. Burkhardt, R. Cardoso-Gil, W. Schnelle, M. Bobnar, and U. Schwarz, Germanium dumbbells in a new superconducting modification of BaGe3, Inorg. Chem. 55, 4498 (2016).
  93. A. R. Moodenbaugh, D. C. Johnston, R. Viswanathan, R. N. Shelton, L. E. DeLong, and W. A. Fertig, Superconductivity of transition metal sulfides, selenides, and phosphides with the NaCl structure, J. Low Temp. Phys. 33, 175 (1978).
  94. D. Campi, S. Kumari, and N. Marzari, Prediction of phonon-mediated superconductivity with high critical temperature in the two-dimensional topological semimetal W2N3, Nano Lett. 21, 3435 (2021).
  95. S. Chen, Z. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Wu, K.-M. Ho, V. Antropov, and Y. Sun, High-throughput screening for boride superconductors, Inorg. Chem. 63, 8654 (2024).
  96. I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, Self-consistent Hubbard parameters from density-functional perturbation theory in the ultrasoft and projector-augmented wave formulations, Phys. Rev. B 103, 045141 (2021).
  97. I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, hp—a code for the calculation of Hubbard parameters using density-functional perturbation theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 279, 108455 (2022).
  98. L. Bastonero et al., First-principles hubbard parameters with automated and reproducible workflows, npj Comput. Mater. 11, 183 (2025).
  99. H. J. Kulik, M. Cococcioni, D. A. Scherlis, and N. Marzari, Density functional theory in transition-metal chemistry: A self-consistent Hubbard U approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 103001 (2006).
  100. N. Marzari, A. Ferretti, and C. Wolverton, Electronic-structure methods for materials design, Nat. Mater. 20, 736 (2021).
  101. A. DePalma, Fast H+-ion implantation enables precise Fermi level engineering in quantum materials, MRS Bull. 49, 1189 (2024).
  102. J. A. Grovogui, T. J. Slade, S. Hao, C. Wolverton, M. G. Kanatzidis, and V. P. Dravid, Implications of doping on microstructure, processing, and thermoelectric performance: The case of PbSe, J. Mater. Res. 36, 1272 (2021).
  103. C. B. Evers, C. G. Richter, K. Hartjes, and W. Jeitschko, Ternary transition metal antimonides and bismuthides with MgAgAs-type and filled NiAs-type structure, J. Alloys Compd. 252, 93 (1997).
  104. J. Winterlik, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, M. Jourdan, K. Grube, F. Hardy, H. von Löhneysen, K. L. Holman, and R. J. Cava, Ni-based superconductor: Heusler compound ZiNi2Ga, Phys. Rev. B 78, 184506 (2008).
  105. S. Anand, K. Xia, V. I. Hegde, U. Aydemir, V. Kocevski, T. Zhu, C. Wolverton, and G. J. Snyder, A valence balanced rule for discovery of 18-electron half-Heuslers with defects, Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1480 (2018).
  106. T. Graf, C. Felser, and S. S. Parkin, Simple rules for the understanding of Heusler compounds, Prog. Solid State Chem. 39, 1 (2011).
  107. N. Hoffmann, T. F. T. Cerqueira, P. Borlido, A. Sanna, J. Schmidt, and M. A. L. Marques, Searching for ductile superconducting Heusler X2YZ compounds, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 138 (2023).
  108. C. Timm, A. P. Schnyder, D. F. Agterberg, and P. M. R. Brydon, Inflated nodes and surface states in superconducting half-Heusler compounds, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094526 (2017).
  109. H. Xiao, T. Hu, W. Liu, Y. L. Zhu, P. G. Li, G. Mu, J. Su, K. Li, and Z. Q. Mao, Superconductivity in the half-Heusler compound TbPdBi, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224511 (2018).
  110. F. F. Tafti, T. Fujii, A. Juneau-Fecteau, S. René de Cotret, N. Doiron-Leyraud, A. Asamitsu, and L. Taillefer, Superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric half-Heusler compound LuPtBi: A candidate for topological superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 87, 184504 (2013).
  111. M. Smidman, M. B. Salamon, H. Q. Yuan, and D. F. Agterberg, Superconductivity and spin-orbit coupling in non-centrosymmetric materials: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 036501 (2017).
  112. M. Kim, G. M. McNally, H.-H. Kim, M. Oudah, A. S. Gibbs, P. Manuel, R. J. Green, R. Sutarto, T. Takayama, A. Yaresko, U. Wedig, M. Isobe, R. K. Kremer, D. A. Bonn, B. Keimer, and H. Takagi, Superconductivity in (Ba, K)SbO3, Nat. Mater. 21, 627 (2022).
  113. N. Hoffmann, T. F. T. Cerqueira, J. Schmidt, and M. A. L. Marques, Superconductivity in antiperovskites, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 150 (2022).
  114. C. P. Poole, Handbook of Superconductivity (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000).
  115. E. Emetere Moses, Microstructural and electronics dynamics of barium diboride as a superconductor from first principles, Results Phys. 19, 103658 (2020).
  116. L. Ponet, E. Di Lucente, and N. Marzari, The energy landscape of magnetic materials, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 151 (2024).
  117. G. Pizzi et al., wannier90 as a community code: New features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation