Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Photoemission spectrum in paramagnetic FeO under pressure: Towards an ab initio description

S. Di Sabatino1,2, J. Koskelo1, J. A. Berger2, and P. Romaniello1,*

  • 1Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS and ETSF, France
  • 2Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS and ETSF, France

  • *pina.romaniello@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr

Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013172 – Published 22 February, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013172

Abstract

In this paper we provide an exhaustive study of the photoemission spectrum of paramagnetic FeO under pressure using a refined version of our recently derived many-body effective energy theory (MEET). We show that, within a nonmagnetic description of the paramagnetic phase, the MEET gives an overall good description of the photoemission spectrum at ambient pressure as well as the changes it undergoes by increasing pressure. In particular at ambient pressure the band gap opens between the mixed Fe t2g and O 2p states and the Fe 4s states and, moreover, a dd gap opens, which is compatible with a high-spin configuration (hence nonzero local magnetic moments as observed in experiment), whereas with decreasing pressure the band gap tends to close, t2g states tend to become fully occupied, and eg states tend to become fully unoccupied, which is compatible with a low-spin configuration (hence a collapse of the magnetic moments as observed in experiment). This is a remarkable result, since, within a nonmagnetic description of the paramagnetic phase, the MEET is capable to correctly describe the photoemission spectrum and the spin configuration at ambient as well as high pressure. For comparison we report the band-gap values obtained using density-functional theory with a hybrid functional containing screened exchange (HSE06) and a variant of the GW method (self-consistent COHSEX), which are reliable for the description of the antiferromagnetic phase. Both methods open a gap at ambient pressure, although, by construction, they give a low-spin configuration; increasing pressure they correctly describe the band-gap closing. We also report the photoemission spectrum of the metallic phase obtained with one-shot fully dynamical GW on top of the local-density approximation, which gives a spectrum very similar to dynamical mean-field theory results from literature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. V. R. Murthy, Early differentiation of the earth and the problem of mantle siderophile elements: A new approach, Science 253, 303 (1991).
  2. M. P. Pasternak, R. D. Taylor, R. Jeanloz, X. Li, J. H. Nguyen, and C. A. McCammon, High Pressure Collapse of Magnetism in Fe0.94O: Mössbauer Spectroscopy Beyond 100 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5046 (1997).
  3. H. Ozawa, K. Hirose, K. Ohta, H. Ishii, N. Hiraoka, Y. Ohishi, and Y. Seto, Spin crossover, structural change, and metallization in NiAs-type FeO at high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 84, 134417 (2011).
  4. K. Ohta, R. E. Cohen, K. Hirose, K. Haule, K. Shimizu, and Y. Ohishi, Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for Pressure-Induced Metallization in FeO with Rocksalt-Type Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 026403 (2012).
  5. T. Atou, M. Kawasaki, and S. Nakajima, Electronic transition of cobalt monoxide under high-pressure, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, L1281 (2004).
  6. J.-P. Rueff, A. Mattila, J. Badro, G. Vankó, and A. Shukla, Electronic properties of transition-metal oxides under high pressure revealed by x-ray emission spectroscopy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S717 (2005).
  7. T. Yagi, T. Suzuki, and S.-I. Akimoto, Static compression of wüstite (Fe0.98O) to 120 GPa, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 90, 8784 (1985).
  8. C. S. Yoo, B. Maddox, J.-H. P. Klepeis, V. Iota, W. Evans, A. McMahan, M. Y. Hu, P. Chow, M. Somayazulu, D. Häusermann, R. T. Scalettar, and W. E. Pickett, First-Order Isostructural Mott Transition in Highly Compressed Mno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 115502 (2005).
  9. A. G. Gavriliuk, I. A. Trojan, and V. V. Struzhkin, Insulator-Metal Transition in Highly Compressed NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 086402 (2012).
  10. D. G. Isaak, R. E. Cohen, M. J. Mehl, and D. J. Singh, Phase stability of wüstite at high pressure from first-principles linearized augmented plane-wave calculations, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7720 (1993).
  11. R. E. Cohen, I. I. Mazin, and D. G. Isaak, Magnetic collapse in transition metal oxides at high pressure: Implications for the earth, Science 275, 654 (1997).
  12. A. O. Shorikov, Z. V. Pchelkina, V. I. Anisimov, S. L. Skornyakov, and M. A. Korotin, Orbital-selective pressure-driven metal to insulator transition in FeO from dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 82, 195101 (2010).
  13. I. Leonov, Metal-insulator transition and local-moment collapse in FeO under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 92, 085142 (2015).
  14. I. Leonov, L. Pourovskii, A. Georges, and I. A. Abrikosov, Magnetic collapse and the behavior of transition metal oxides at high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 94, 155135 (2016).
  15. G. Trimarchi, Z. Wang, and A. Zunger, Polymorphous band structure model of gapping in the antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases of the mott insulators MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035107 (2018).
  16. S. Di Sabatino, J. A. Berger, and P. Romaniello, Many-body effective energy theory: Photoemission at strong correlation, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 5080 (2019).
  17. A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006).
  18. T. L. Gilbert, Hohenberg-Kohn theorem for nonlocal external potentials, Phys. Rev. B 12, 2111 (1975).
  19. S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, N. N. Lathiotakis, and E. K. U. Gross, Reduced density matrix functional for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 78, 201103(R) (2008).
  20. N. N. Lathiotakis, S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, F. G. Eich, M. A. L. Marques, and E. K. U. Gross, Density-matrix-power functional: Performance for finite systems and the homogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. A 79, 040501(R) (2009).
  21. S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, S. Shallcross, and E. K. U. Gross, Spectral Density and Metal-Insulator Phase Transition in Mott Insulators within Reduced Density Matrix Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 116403 (2013).
  22. N. N. Lathiotakis, N. Helbig, and E. K. U. Gross, Performance of one-body reduced density-matrix functionals for the homogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195120 (2007).
  23. S. Di Sabatino, J. A. Berger, L. Reining, and P. Romaniello, Photoemission spectra from reduced density matrices: The band gap in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B 94, 155141 (2016).
  24. R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley, Interacting Electrons: Theory and Computational Approaches (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 2016).
  25. R. Zimmermann, P. Steiner, R. Claessen, F. Reinert, S. Hüfner, P. Blaha, and P. Dufek, Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal oxides: On-site coulomb repulsion versus covalency, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 1657 (1999).
  26. Computer code elk, http://elk.sourceforge.net/.
  27. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  28. M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, Implementation and performance of the frequency-dependent GW method within the paw framework, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035101 (2006).
  29. M. Shishkin, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Accurate Quasiparticle Spectra from Self-Consistent GW Calculations with Vertex Corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246403 (2007).
  30. J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. C. Gerber, and J. G. Ángyán, Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709 (2006).
  31. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  32. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  33. X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, M. Verstraete, J.-M. Beuken, Y. Pouillon, R. Caracas, F. Jollet, M. Torrent, G. Zerah, M. Mikami et al., A brief introduction to the ABINIT software package, Z. Kristallogr. 220, 558 (2005).
  34. X. Gonze, B. Amadon, P.-M. Anglade, J.-M. Beuken, F. Bottin, P. Boulanger, F. Bruneval, D. Caliste, R. Caracas, M. Côté, T. Deutsch, L. Genovese, Ph. Ghosez, M. Giantomassi, S. Goedecker, D. R. Hamann, P. Hermet, F. Jollet, G. Jomard, S. Leroux, M. Mancini, S. Mazevet, M. J. T. Oliveira, G. Onida, Y. Pouillon, T. Rangel, G.-M. Rignanese, D. Sangalli, R. Shaltaf, M. Torrent, M. J. Verstraete, G. Zerah, and J. W. Zwanziger, ABINIT: First-principles approach to material and nanosystem properties, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2582 (2009).
  35. B. Hentschel, Stoichiometric FeO as metastable intermediate of the decomposition of wustite at 225C, Z. Naturforsch. Teil A 25, 1996 (1970).
  36. D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).
  37. M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39 (2018).
  38. S. Lebègue, B. Arnaud, M. Alouani, and P. E. Bloechl, Implementation of an all-electron GW approximation based on the projector augmented wave method without plasmon pole approximation: Application to Si, SiC, AlAs, InAs, NaH, and KH, Phys. Rev. B 67, 155208 (2003).
  39. We notice that the equilibrium volume used in Ref. [13] is the result of a geometry optimization within DMFT, whereas we use the experimental value. Therefore in order to compare our results with the results of Ref. [13] we use an interpolation of the data reported in Ref. [13].
  40. H. K. Bowen, D. Adler, and B. H. Auker, Electrical and optical properties of FeO, J. Solid State Chem. 12, 355 (1975).
  41. C. Rödl, F. Fuchs, J. Furthmüller, and F. Bechstedt, Quasiparticle band structures of the antiferromagnetic transition-metal oxides MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. B 79, 235114 (2009).
  42. S. V. Faleev, M. van Schilfgaarde, and T. Kotani, All-Electron Self-Consistent GW Approximation: Application to Si, MnO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126406 (2004).
  43. S. Das, J. E. Coulter, and E. Manousakis, Convergence of quasiparticle self-consistent GW calculations of transition-metal monoxides, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115105 (2015).
  44. L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle Green's function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965).
  45. M. Gatti and M. Guzzo, Dynamical screening in correlated metals: Spectral properties of SrVo3 in the GW approximation and beyond, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155147 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation