Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Monopoles from an Atmospheric Fixed Target Experiment

Syuhei Iguro1,2,*, Ryan Plestid3,4,†, and Volodymyr Takhistov5,‡

  • 1Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics (TTP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engesserstraße 7, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 2Institute for Astroparticle Physics (IAP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA
  • 4Theoretical Physics Department, Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 5Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277–8583, Japan

  • *igurosyuhei@gmail.com
  • rpl225@uky.edu
  • volodymyr.takhistov@ipmu.jp

Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 201101 – Published 17 May, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.201101

Abstract

Magnetic monopoles have a long history of theoretical predictions and experimental searches, carrying direct implications for fundamental concepts such as electric charge quantization. We analyze in detail for the first time magnetic monopole production from collisions of cosmic rays bombarding the atmosphere. This source of monopoles is independent of cosmology, has been active throughout Earth’s history, and supplies an irreducible monopole flux for all terrestrial experiments. Using results for robust atmospheric fixed target experiment flux of monopoles, we systematically establish direct comparisons of previous ambient monopole searches with monopole searches at particle colliders and set leading limits on magnetic monopole production in the 5100TeV mass range.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (59)

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field, Proc. R. Soc. A 133, 60 (1931).
  2. A. M. Polyakov, Particle spectrum in quantum field theory, JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974).
  3. G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974).
  4. N. E. Mavromatos and V. A. Mitsou, Magnetic monopoles revisited: Models and searches at colliders and in the Cosmos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2030012 (2020).
  5. V. A. Rubakov, Superheavy magnetic monopoles and proton decay, JETP Lett. 33, 644 (1981).
  6. V. A. Rubakov and M. S. Serebryakov, Anomalous baryon number nonconservation in the presence of SU(5) monopoles, Nucl. Phys. B218, 240 (1983).
  7. C. G. Callan, Jr., Monopole catalysis of baryon decay, Nucl. Phys. B212, 391 (1983).
  8. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Search for GUT monopoles at Super–Kamiokande, Astropart. Phys. 36, 131 (2012).
  9. E. N. Parker, The origin of magnetic fields, Astrophys. J. 160, 383 (1970).
  10. IceCube Collaboration, Searches for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles in IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 133 (2016).
  11. BAIKAL Collaboration, Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with the Baikal Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 29, 366 (2008).
  12. MACRO Collaboration, Final results of magnetic monopole searches with the MACRO experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 511 (2002).
  13. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  14. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?, Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  15. T. W. Kephart, G. K. Leontaris, and Q. Shafi, Magnetic monopoles and free fractionally charged states at accelerators and in cosmic rays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 176.
  16. Y. M. Cho and D. Maison, Monopoles in Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B 391, 360 (1997).
  17. Y. M. Cho, K. Kim, and J. H. Yoon, Finite energy electroweak dyon, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 240 (2015).
  18. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and T. You, The price of an electroweak monopole, Phys. Lett. B 756, 29 (2016).
  19. S. Arunasalam and A. Kobakhidze, Electroweak monopoles and the electroweak phase transition, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 444 (2017).
  20. M. Arai, F. Blaschke, M. Eto, and N. Sakai, Localization of the standard model via the Higgs mechanism and a finite electroweak monopole from non-compact five dimensions, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 083B04 (2018).
  21. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and T. You, Light-by-Light Scattering Constraint on Born-Infeld Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 261802 (2017).
  22. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Magnetic Monopoles and Stable High-Electric-Charge Objects in 13 Tev Proton-Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 031802 (2020).
  23. MoEDAL Collaboration, Magnetic Monopole Search with the Full MoEDAL Trapping Detector in 13 TeV pp Collisions Interpreted in Photon-Fusion and Drell-Yan Production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 021802 (2019).
  24. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  25. Particle Data Group Collaboration, Review of particle physics, Prog. Thoer. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  26. MoEDAL Collaboration, Search for magnetic monopoles with the MoEDAL forward trapping detector in 2.11fb1 of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 782, 510 (2018).
  27. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  28. NNPDF Collaboration, Illuminating the photon content of the proton within a global PDF analysis, SciPost Phys. 5, 008 (2018).
  29. S. Baines, N. E. Mavromatos, V. A. Mitsou, J. L. Pinfold, and A. Santra, Monopole production via photon fusion and Drell–Yan processes: MadGraph implementation and perturbativity via velocity-dependent coupling and magnetic moment as novel features, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 966 (2018); 79, 166(E) (2019).
  30. Recently, symmetry arguments within certain classes of theories have been put forth that question Drell-Yan monopole production [31]. In this work, we remain agnostic about this traditional monopole channel and include it for direct comparison with existing searches.

  31. J. Terning and C. B. Verhaaren, Spurious poles in the scattering of electric and magnetic charges, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 153.
  32. Ultrahigh energy neutrino collisions have been also previously considered, e.g., [33, 34, 35, 36].

  33. L. A. Anchordoqui, J. L. Feng, H. Goldberg, and A. D. Shapere, Black holes from cosmic rays: Probes of extra dimensions and new limits on TeV scale gravity, Phys. Rev. D 65, 124027 (2002).
  34. R. Emparan, M. Masip, and R. Rattazzi, Cosmic rays as probes of large extra dimensions and TeV gravity, Phys. Rev. D 65, 064023 (2002).
  35. J. L. Feng and A. D. Shapere, Black Hole Production by Cosmic Rays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 021303 (2001).
  36. Y. Jho and S. C. Park, Probing new physics with high-multiplicity events: Ultrahigh-energy neutrinos at air-shower detector arrays, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015018 (2021).
  37. P. Coloma, P. Hernández, V. Muñoz, and I. M. Shoemaker, New constraints on heavy neutral leptons from Super-Kamiokande data, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 235 (2020).
  38. R. Plestid, V. Takhistov, Y. D. Tsai, T. Bringmann, A. Kusenko, and M. Pospelov, New constraints on millicharged particles from cosmic-ray production, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115032 (2020).
  39. C. A. Argüelles Delgado, K. J. Kelly, and V. Muñoz Albornoz, Millicharged Particles from the Heavens: Single- and Multiple-Scattering Signatures, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 099.
  40. P. Candia, G. Cottin, A. Méndez, and V. Muñoz, Searching for light long-lived neutralinos at Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055024 (2021).
  41. We note that the resultant cross section is 10 times larger than that of spin-zero model but 10 times smaller than that of spin-one model [23], gD=1, and velocity (β)-independent monopole model.

  42. In order to discuss a wider range of theoretical models, some studies have also advocated for considering a β-dependent coupling gβ=g14M2/s2 (e.g., [43]). The β dependence of the model can suppress the cross section by a factor of 2.

  43. L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C. A. G. Canal, V. A. Mitsou, and V. Vento, Looking for magnetic monopoles at LHC with diphoton events, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 60 (2012).
  44. CDF Collaboration, Direct Search for Dirac Magnetic Monopoles in pp¯ Collisions at s=1.96TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 201801 (2006).
  45. We note that at masses that are larger than the kinematic reach of the LHC, the measurements for ppX have increased uncertainty, stemming from cosmic ray data that has uncertainties on the order of 30% (see, e.g., [25]). We note that σ(s) varies between 40mb and 100mb as s ranges from 10 to 100 TeV.

  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.201101 for details for computation of monopole flux attenuation as well as for obtaining monopole flux intensity relevant for experiments.
  47. J. M. Picone, A. E. Hedin, D. P. Drob, and A. C. Aikin, NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, J. Geophys. Res. 107, SIA 15-1 (2002).
  48. ANITA-II Collaboration, Ultra-relativistic magnetic monopole search with the ANITA-II balloon-borne radio interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 83, 023513 (2011).
  49. The background of cosmic ray muons depends on zenith angle and so experimental cuts are necessarily more severe for down-going monopoles. Because the monopole flux is attenuated at large zenith angles, there is a competition between these two effects such that an optimum zenith angle will be achieved at intermediate values θzπ/6π/3.

  50. We do not consider here searches focusing on GUT monopoles, e.g., Super-Kamiokande [8].

  51. R. Abbasi et al., Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with the AMANDA-II neutrino telescope, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 361 (2010).
  52. MACRO Collaboration, Search for nucleon decays induced by GUT magnetic monopoles with the MACRO experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 26, 163 (2002).
  53. S. Balestra et al., Magnetic monopole Search at high altitude with the SLIM experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 55, 57 (2008).
  54. NOvA Collaboration, Search for slow magnetic monopoles with the NOvA detector on the surface, Phys. Rev. D 103, 012007 (2021).
  55. D. P. Hogan, D. Z. Besson, J. P. Ralston, I. Kravchenko, and D. Seckel, Relativistic magnetic monopole flux constraints from RICE, Phys. Rev. D 78, 075031 (2008).
  56. IceCube Collaboration, Search for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles with Eight Years of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 051101 (2022).
  57. OPAL Collaboration, Search for Dirac magnetic monopoles in e+e collisions with the OPAL detector at LEP2, Phys. Lett. B 663, 37 (2008).
  58. B. Acharya et al., First experimental search for production of magnetic monopoles via the Schwinger mechanism. Nature (London) 602, 63 (2022).
  59. COMPETE Collaboration, Benchmarks for the Forward Observables at RHIC, the Tevatron Run II and the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 201801 (2002).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation