Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Charging Dynamics of Overlapping Double Layers in a Cylindrical Nanopore

Ankur Gupta1,†, Pawel J. Zuk1,2,‡, and Howard A. Stone1,*

  • 1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 2Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5b, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland

  • *hastone@princeton.edu
  • †ankur@princeton.edu
  • ‡pjzuk@ippt.pan.pl

Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 076001 – Published 11 August, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.076001

Abstract

The charging of electrical double layers inside a cylindrical pore has applications to supercapacitors, batteries, desalination and biosensors. The charging dynamics in the limit of thin double layers, i.e., when the double layer thickness is much smaller than the pore radius, is commonly described using an effective RC transmission line circuit. Here, we perform direct numerical simulations (DNS) of the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations to study the double layer charging for the scenario of overlapping double layers, i.e., when the double layer thickness is comparable to the pore radius. We develop an analytical model that accurately predicts the results of DNS. Also, we construct a modified effective circuit for the overlapping double layer limit, and find that the modified circuit is identical to the RC transmission line but with different values and physical interpretation of the capacitive and resistive elements. In particular, the effective surface potential is reduced, the capacitor represents a volumetric current source, and the charging timescale is weakly dependent on the ratio of the pore radius and the double layer thickness.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. P. Simon and Y. Gogotsi, Materials for electrochemical capacitors, Nat. Mater. 7, 845 (2008).
  2. V. Presser, C. R. Dennison, J. Campos, K. W. Knehr, E. C. Kumbur, and Y. Gogotsi, The electrochemical flow capacitor: A new concept for rapid energy storage and recovery, Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 895 (2012).
  3. J. Newman and K. E. Thomas-Alyea, Electrochemical Systems (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2012).
  4. P. M. Biesheuvel, Y. Fu, and M. Z. Bazant, Diffuse charge and faradaic reactions in porous electrodes, Phys. Rev. E 83, 061507 (2011).
  5. P. M. Biesheuvel and M. Bazant, Nonlinear dynamics of capacitive charging and desalination by porous electrodes, Phys. Rev. E 81, 031502 (2010).
  6. P. Takhistov, Electrochemical synthesis and impedance characterization of nano-patterned biosensor substrate, Biosens. Bioelectron. 19, 1445 (2004).
  7. R. de Levie, On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions: I. Capacitance effects, Electrochim. Acta 8, 751 (1963).
  8. H. A. Andreas, Self-discharge in electrochemical capacitors: a perspective article, J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A5047 (2015).
  9. M. Kaus, J. Kowal, and D. U. Sauer, Modelling the effects of charge redistribution during self-discharge of supercapacitors, Electrochim. Acta 55, 7516 (2010).
  10. J. Kowal, E. Avaroglu, F. Chamekh, A. Šenfelds, T. Thien, D. Wijaya, and D. U. Sauer, Detailed analysis of the self-discharge of supercapacitors, J. Power Sources 196, 573 (2011).
  11. J. M. Black and H. A. Andreas, Pore shape affects spontaneous charge redistribution in small pores, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 12030 (2010).
  12. J. W. Graydon, M. Panjehshahi, and D. W. Kirk, Charge redistribution and ionic mobility in the micropores of supercapacitors, J. Power Sources 245, 822 (2014).
  13. J. Huang, B. G. Sumpter, and V. Meunier, A universal model for nanoporous carbon supercapacitors applicable to diverse pore regimes, carbon materials, and electrolytes, Chem. Eur. J. 14, 6614 (2008).
  14. J. Huang, B. G. Sumpter, and V. Meunier, Theoretical model for nanoporous carbon supercapacitors, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 520 (2008).
  15. M. Kroupa, G. J. Offer, and J. Kosek, Modelling of supercapacitors: Factors influencing performance, J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A2475 (2016).
  16. C. Largeot, C. Portet, J. Chmiola, P.-L. Taberna, Y. Gogotsi, and P. Simon, Relation between the ion size and pore size for an electric double-layer capacitor, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2730 (2008).
  17. M. W. Verbrugge and P. Liu, Microstructural analysis and mathematical modeling of electric double-layer supercapacitors, J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, D79 (2005).
  18. M. Yaniv and A. Soffer, The transient behavior of an ideally polarized porous carbon electrode at constant charging current, J. Electrochem. Soc. 123, 506 (1976).
  19. W. G. Pell and B. E. Conway, Voltammetry at a de levie brush electrode as a model for electrochemical supercapacitor behaviour, J. Electroanal. Chem. 500, 121 (2001).
  20. W. Pell, B. Conway, and N. Marincic, Analysis of non-uniform charge/discharge and rate effects in porous carbon capacitors containing sub-optimal electrolyte concentrations, J. Electroanal. Chem. 491, 9 (2000).
  21. B. Conway and W. Pell, Power limitations of supercapacitor operation associated with resistance and capacitance distribution in porous electrode devices, J. Power Sources 105, 169 (2002).
  22. G. Madabattula and S. Kumar, Insights into charge-redistribution in double layer capacitors, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A636 (2018).
  23. H. Wang, J. Fang, and L. Pilon, Scaling laws for carbon-based electric double layer capacitors, Electrochim. Acta 109, 316 (2013).
  24. H. Wang and L. Pilon, Physical interpretation of cyclic voltammetry for measuring electric double layer capacitances, Electrochim. Acta 64, 130 (2012).
  25. L. Pilon, H. Wang, and A. d’Entremont, Recent advances in continuum modeling of interfacial and transport phenomena in electric double layer capacitors, J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A5158 (2015).
  26. C. Lian, M. Janssen, H. Liu, and R. van Roij, Blessing and curse: How a supercapacitors large capacitance causes its slow charging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076001 (2020).
  27. M. A. Gebbie, M. Valtiner, X. Banquy, E. T. Fox, W. A. Henderson, and J. N. Israelachvili, Ionic liquids behave as dilute electrolyte solutions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 9674 (2013).
  28. N. Gavish, D. Elad, and A. Yochelis, From solvent-free to dilute electrolytes: Essential components for a continuum theory, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 36 (2018).
  29. A. A. Lee, C. S. Perez-Martinez, A. M. Smith, and S. Perkin, Scaling Analysis of the Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 026002 (2017).
  30. J. M. Huyghe and J. Janssen, Quadriphasic mechanics of swelling incompressible porous media, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 35, 793 (1997).
  31. See the Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.076001 for the detailed description of experimental, theoretical and numerical methods, which includes Refs. [32–36].
  32. H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, J. Comput. Phys. 12, 620 (1998).
  33. H. Jasak, A. Jemcov, and Z. Tukovic, OpenFOAM: A C++ library for complex physics simulations, in International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics (IUC Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007), Vol. 1000, pp. 1–20.
  34. R. Eymard, T. Gallouët, and R. Herbin, Finite volume methods, Handbook Numer. Anal. 7, 713 (2000).
  35. H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method (Pearson Education, 2007), http://ftp.demec.ufpr.br/disciplinas/TM702/Versteeg_Malalasekera_2ed.pdf.
  36. R. I. Issa, Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting, J. Comput. Phys. 62, 40 (1986).
  37. R. Tivony, S. Safran, P. Pincus, G. Silbert, and J. Klein, Charging dynamics of an individual nanopore, Nat. Commun. 9, 1 (2018).
  38. S. Faucher, N. Aluru, M. Z. Bazant, D. Blankschtein, A. H. Brozena, J. Cumings, J. Pedro de Souza, M. Elimelech, R. Epsztein, J. T. Fourkas et al., Critical knowledge gaps in mass transport through single-digit nanopores: A review and perspective, J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 21309 (2019).
  39. R. B. Schoch, J. Han, and P. Renaud, Transport phenomena in nanofluidics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 839 (2008).
  40. J. Cervera, B. Schiedt, and P. Ramirez, A poisson/nernst-planck model for ionic transport through synthetic conical nanopores, Europhys. Lett. 71, 35 (2005).
  41. D. Gillespie, A review of steric interactions of ions: Why some theories succeed and others fail to account for ion size, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 18, 717 (2015).
  42. Y. Nakayama and D. Andelman, Differential capacitance of the electric double layer: The interplay between ion finite size and dielectric decrement, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 044706 (2015).
  43. A. Gupta and H. A. Stone, Electrical double layers: effects of asymmetry in electrolyte valence on steric effects, dielectric decrement, and ion–ion correlations, Langmuir 34, 11971 (2018).
  44. A. Gupta, B. Rallabandi, and H. A. Stone, Diffusiophoretic and diffusioosmotic velocities for mixtures of valence-asymmetric electrolytes, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 043702 (2019).
  45. A. Gupta, S. Shim, L. Issah, C. McKenzie, and H. A. Stone, Diffusion of multiple electrolytes cannot be treated independently: model predictions with experimental validation, Soft Matter 15, 9965 (2019).
  46. S. H. Amrei, S. C. Bukosky, S. P. Rader, W. D. Ristenpart, and G. H. Miller, Oscillating Electric Fields in Liquids Create a Long-Range Steady Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 185504 (2018).
  47. D. Jiang, Z. Jin, and J. Wu, Oscillation of capacitance inside nanopores, Nano Lett. 11, 5373 (2011).
  48. G. Feng and P. T. Cummings, Supercapacitor capacitance exhibits oscillatory behavior as a function of nanopore size, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2859 (2011).
  49. I. Rubinstein and B. Zaltzman, Dynamics of extended space charge in concentration polarization, Phys. Rev. E 81, 061502 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation