Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Decay and Fission of Magnetic Quivers

Antoine Bourget1, Marcus Sperling2, and Zhenghao Zhong3

  • 1Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CEA, Institut de physique théorique, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Fakultät für Physik, Universität Wien, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Wien, Austria
  • 3Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Andrew Wiles Building, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 221603 – Published 31 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.221603

Abstract

In exploring supersymmetric theories with eight supercharges, the Higgs branches present an intriguing window into strong coupling dynamics. Magnetic quivers serve as crucial tools for understanding these branches. Here, we introduce the decay and fission algorithm for unitary magnetic quivers. It efficiently derives complete phase diagrams (Hasse diagrams) through convex linear algebra. It allows magnetic quivers to undergo decay or fission, reflecting Higgs branch RG flows in the theory. Importantly, the algorithm generates magnetic quivers for the RG fixed points and simplifies the understanding of transverse slice geometry with no need for a list of minimal transitions. In contrast, the algorithm hints to the existence of a new minimal transition, whose geometry and physics need to be explored.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. F. Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964).
  2. P. W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964).
  3. G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964).
  4. T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. 155, 1554 (1967).
  5. A. Bourget, S. Cabrera, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, A. Zajac, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 157.
  6. S. Cabrera, A. Hanany, and F. Yagi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 068.
  7. S. Cabrera, A. Hanany, and M. Sperling, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 071; 07 (2019) 137(E).
  8. A. Bourget, S. Cabrera, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 176.
  9. S. Cabrera, A. Hanany, and M. Sperling, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 184.
  10. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 204.
  11. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, G. Zafrir, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 189.
  12. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, R. Kalveks, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 092.
  13. C. Closset, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 003.
  14. M. Akhond, F. Carta, S. Dwivedi, H. Hayashi, S.-S. Kim, and F. Yagi, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 164.
  15. M. van Beest, A. Bourget, J. Eckhard, and S. Schafer-Nameki, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 124.
  16. S. Giacomelli, M. Martone, Y. Tachikawa, and G. Zafrir, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 054.
  17. A. Bourget, S. Giacomelli, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 054.
  18. M. Van Beest, A. Bourget, J. Eckhard, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 241.
  19. C. Closset, S. Giacomelli, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 274.
  20. M. Akhond, F. Carta, S. Dwivedi, H. Hayashi, S.-S. Kim, and F. Yagi, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 269.
  21. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, M. Martone, and G. Zafrir, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 208.
  22. M. van Beest and S. Giacomelli, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 202.
  23. M. Sperling and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 145.
  24. S. Nawata, M. Sperling, H. E. Wang, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 174.
  25. M. Akhond, F. Carta, S. Dwivedi, H. Hayashi, S.-S. Kim, and F. Yagi, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 054.
  26. S. Giacomelli, M. Moleti, and R. Savelli, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 163.
  27. A. Hanany and M. Sperling, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 010.
  28. M. Fazzi and S. Giri, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 076.
  29. A. Bourget and J. F. Grimminger, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 159.
  30. M. Fazzi, S. Giacomelli, and S. Giri, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 089.
  31. S. Nawata, M. Sperling, H. E. Wang, and Z. Zhong, SciPost Phys. 15, 033 (2023).
  32. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, R. Kalveks, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 073.
  33. M. Del Zotto, M. Fazzi, and S. Giri, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 167.
  34. C. Lawrie and L. Mansi, arXiv:2312.05306.
  35. The Coulomb branch of an SQFT with eight supercharges is another maximal branch of the space of supersymmetric vacua. For 3D N=4 the Coulomb branch is parametrized by VEVs of (dressed) monopole operators [36, 37] and is geometrically a symplectic singularity.

  36. V. Borokhov, A. Kapustin, and X.-k. Wu, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 044.
  37. V. Borokhov, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2004) 008.
  38. S. Cabrera and A. Hanany, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 008.
  39. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, and Z. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 283.
  40. A. Bourget, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, companion paper, arXiv:2401.08757 [Phys. Rev. D (to be published)].
  41. In mathematics, a quiver is a directed graph, defined as a set of vertices connected by arrows. The double quiver is obtained by adjoining the reverse arrow for each arrow—thus, an undirected edge arises. In physics, quivers (in string theory [42]) or mooses (in particle physics [43]) are graphs representing the matter content of (usually supersymmetric) gauge theories. Quivers Q for eight supercharge theories are undirected by convention. Expressing Q in four supercharges (e.g., a hyper becomes two chirals), Q becomes a double quiver.

  42. M. R. Douglas and G. W. Moore, arXiv:hep-th/9603167.
  43. H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B266, 274 (1986).
  44. A. Hanany and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B492, 152 (1997).
  45. D. Gaiotto and P. Koroteev, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 126.
  46. S. Cabrera and A. Hanany, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 175.
  47. J. Gu, Y. Jiang, and M. Sperling, SciPost Phys. 14, 034 (2023).
  48. T. Braden, A. Licata, N. Proudfoot, and B. Webster, Asterisque 384, 75 (2016).
  49. This generalization was proposed in [50], in analogy with Dynkin diagrams. Each node can be given a length, and the nodes with maximal length are called long. Although this has no known Lagrangian description yet, it is motivated by brane systems with orientifolds [51], and the Coulomb branch has a working definition in terms of Hilbert series [50] and is mathematically understood [62].

  50. S. Cremonesi, G. Ferlito, A. Hanany, and N. Mekareeya, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 103.
  51. A. Hanany and J. Troost, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 021.
  52. Condition (i) means that every single unitary gauge node is good, i.e., having enough charged matter fields. Condition (ii) eliminates quivers that are a single U(1) node (plus some adjoint hypermultiplets). Condition (iii) detects moduli spaces of instantons on C2, which come with a free hypermultiplet and therefore have two monopole operators that saturate the unitarity bound [50]. With our definition, an affine Dynkin quiver for the simple algebra g wherein all ranks equal the k fold of the dual Coxeter labels, which we denote k·Q(g^), is good.

  53. D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13, 721 (2009).
  54. H. Kraft and C. Procesi, Commentarii mathematici Helvetici 57, 539 (1982).
  55. B. Fu, D. Juteau, P. Levy, and E. Sommers, Adv. Math. 305, 1 (2017).
  56. O. Aharony and A. Hanany, Nucl. Phys. B504, 239 (1997).
  57. O. Aharony, A. Hanany, and B. Kol, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1998) 002.
  58. O. Bergman and G. Zafrir, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 163.
  59. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B460, 541 (1996).
  60. M. R. Douglas, NATO Sci. Ser. C 520, 267 (1999), https://inspirehep.net/literature/403476.
  61. H. Nakajima, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 20, 595 (2016).
  62. H. Nakajima and A. Weekes, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 25, 203 (2021).
  63. A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 88, 331 (2023).
  64. G. Bellamy, C. Bonnafé, B. Fu, D. Juteau, P. Levy, and E. Sommers, Proc. London Math. Soc. 126, 1496 (2023).
  65. P. Argyres, M. Lotito, Y. Lü, and M. Martone, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 001.
  66. P. C. Argyres, M. Lotito, Y. Lü, and M. Martone, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 088.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation