Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8D

Mirjam Cvetič1,2, Markus Dierigl1, Ling Lin3, and Hao Y. Zhang1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396, USA
  • 2Center for Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
  • 3Department of Theoretical Physics, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 211602 – Published 20 November, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.211602

Abstract

We present a consistency condition for 8D N=1 supergravity theories with nontrivial global structure G/Z for the non-Abelian gauge group, based on an anomaly involving the Z 1-form center symmetry. The interplay with other swampland criteria identifies the majority of 8D theories with gauge group G/Z, which have no string theory realization, as inconsistent quantum theories when coupled to gravity. While this condition is equivalent to geometric properties of elliptic K3 surfaces in F-theory compactifications, it constrains the unexplored landscape of gauge groups in other 8D string models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (37)

  1. C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/0509212.
  2. T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, and C. Vafa, Proc. Sci., TASI2017 (2017) 015 [arXiv:1711.00864]; E. Palti, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  3. A. Adams, W. Taylor, and O. DeWolfe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 071601 (2010).
  4. H.-C. Kim, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, Phys. Rev. D 100, 066006 (2019).
  5. H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, Phys. Rev. D 102, 026003 (2020).
  6. M. Montero and C. Vafa, arXiv:2008.11729.
  7. I. García-Etxebarria, H. Hayashi, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 177.
  8. C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B469, 403 (1996); D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, B473, 74 (1996); B476, 437 (1996).
  9. P. S. Aspinwall and D. R. Morrison, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (1998) 012.
  10. C. Mayrhofer, D. R. Morrison, O. Till, and T. Weigand, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 016.
  11. M. Cvetič and L. Lin, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 157.
  12. R. Miranda and U. Persson, Math. Z. 201, 339 (1989); R. Miranda and U. Perssonin Problems in the Theory of Surfaces and Their Classification (Academic Press, New York, 1991), pp. 167–192; R. Miranda and U. PerssonSympos. Math., XXXII (Academic Press, London, 1991).
  13. I. Shimada, arXiv:math/0505140.
  14. N. Hajouji and P.-K. Oehlmann, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 103.
  15. A. Font, B. Fraiman, M. Graña, C. A. Núñez, and H. Parra, arXiv:2007.10358.
  16. A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 001.
  17. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172; D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, 05 (2017) 091; D. Gaiotto, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, 01 (2018) 110; C. Córdova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, SciPost Phys. 8, 001 (2020).
  18. C. Córdova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, SciPost Phys. 8, 002 (2020).
  19. C. Córdova and K. Ohmori, arXiv:1910.04962.
  20. F. Apruzzi, M. Dierigl, and L. Lin, arXiv:2008.09117.
  21. P. B. Genolini and L. Tizzano, arXiv:2009.07873.
  22. D. R. Morrison, S. Schafer-Nameki, and B. Willett, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 024; F. Albertini, M. Del Zotto, I. García-Etxebarria, and S. S. Hosseini, arXiv:2005.12831; C. Closset, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, arXiv:2007.15600; M. Del Zotto, I. García-Etxebarria, and S. S. Hosseini, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 056; L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, arXiv:2008.09600.
  23. M. Dierigl, P.-K. Oehlmann, and F. Ruehle, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 173.
  24. M. Awada and P. Townsend, Phys. Lett. 156B, 51 (1985).
  25. A. Salam and E. Sezgin, Phys. Lett. 154B, 37 (1985).
  26. W. Taylor, arXiv:1104.2051.
  27. C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura,arXiv:2003.11550.
  28. D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, arXiv:1810.05338.
  29. J. Polchinski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 145 (2004); T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084019 (2011).
  30. S. Katz, H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 080.
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.211602 for technical details on the levels mi and the geometric structures encoding the 1-form anomaly in F-theory.
  32. S. Chaudhuri, G. Hockney, and J. D. Lykken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2264 (1995).
  33. T. Weigand, Proc. Sci., TASI2017 (2018) 016.
  34. M. Cvetič and L. Lin, Proc. Sci., TASI2017 (2018) 020 [arXiv:1809.00012].
  35. A. Mikhailov, Nucl. Phys. B534, 612 (1998).
  36. M. Cvetič, D. Klevers, D. K. M. Peña, P.-K. Oehlmann, and J. Reuter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 087; M. Cvetič, L. Lin, M. Liu, and P.-K. Oehlmann, 09 (2018) 089; M. Cvetič, J. Halverson, L. Lin, M. Liu, and J. Tian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101601 (2019); M. Cvetič, J. Halverson, L. Lin, and C. Long, Phys. Rev. D 102, 026012 (2020).
  37. J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, K. Hori, A. Keurentjes, J. Morgan, D. R. Morrison, and S. Sethi, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 995 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation