- Accepted Paper
Can every set of incompatible measurements lead to genuine multipartite steering?
Phys. Rev. Lett. - Accepted 27 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qdtc-ff2z
Phys. Rev. Lett. - Accepted 27 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qdtc-ff2z
Measurement incompatibility and bipartite quantum steering are known to display a strong connection: a set of measurements is incompatible if and only if it can lead to bipartite steering. Despite such a close link between these concepts in bipartite scenarios, little is known in the multipartite setting, where notions of multipartite correlations play major roles. In this work we prove that, as in the bipartite case, incompatibility is necessary and sufficient for genuine multipartite steering in any multipartite scenario with a single uncharacterised party. Interestingly, genuine multipartite steering can be extracted from any set of incompatible measurements using states which belong to inequivalent entanglement classes under stochastic local operations and classical communication (SLOCC), such as Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) and W states. In contrast, we prove that this result does not hold in scenarios with more than one uncharacterised party, by presenting a set of incompatible measurements that can never lead to genuine multipartite steering in these cases. In order to obtain our main results, we introduce methods tailored for multipartite correlations, paving the way to understanding the role of measurement incompatibility beyond bipartite scenarios.
If the author has provided any supplemental materials with this article they will be available upon publication of the version of record.