- Open Access
GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational Wave Detectors
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 071401 – Published 13 August, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/gzrj-mwv3
Abstract
GW240925 and GW250207 are two loud gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole coalescences observed with network signal-to-noise ratios and , respectively, by the LIGO Hanford-LIGO Livingston-Virgo network. Gravitational-wave signals from coalescing binaries have characteristic phase and amplitude evolution predicted by general relativity. These signal waveforms, together with measured instrumental calibration uncertainties, are used to infer source parameters. However, for sufficiently loud detections, it is possible to constrain the calibration of the detectors directly using the signals themselves. We present the first informative astrophysical measurements of gravitational-wave detector calibration. For GW240925, we verify the inference of Hanford calibration from the astrophysical signal through cross-checks with known calibration errors obtained from in situ measurements. At the time of GW250207, the Hanford detector was not fully stabilized, leading to elevated calibration uncertainties; thus, astrophysical calibration is essential to obtain accurate data and to enable source localization. These well-localized, high signal-to-noise observations have the potential to offer precise measurements of source properties, stringent tests of general relativity, and informative dark siren measurements, provided that calibration uncertainties are properly incorporated. As detector sensitivity improves, astrophysical calibration will become an increasingly valuable complement to in situ calibration measurements. Obtaining accurate calibration will be essential for precision gravitational-wave science.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (237)
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
- F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
- T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: An introduction to version 4.0 of the gravitational-wave transient catalog, Astrophys. J. Lett. 995, L18 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, arXiv:2508.18082.
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s area law and the Kerr nature of black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 (2025).
- D. Ganapathy et al. (LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration), Broadband quantum enhancement of the LIGO detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023).
- W. Jia et al. (LIGO Instrument Science Collaboration), Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit, Science 385, 1318 (2024).
- E. Capote et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
- C. Cutler and É. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994).
- M. Pürrer and C.-J. Haster, Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023151 (2020).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), A guide to LIGO–Virgo detector noise and extraction of transient gravitational-wave signals, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 055002 (2020).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Calibration of the Advanced LIGO detectors for the discovery of the binary black-hole merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 95, 062003 (2017).
- C. Cahillane et al. (LIGO Instrument Science Collaboration), Calibration uncertainty for Advanced LIGO’s first and second observing runs, Phys. Rev. D 96, 102001 (2017).
- L. Sun et al., Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 225008 (2020).
- F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Calibration of Advanced Virgo and reconstruction of the detector strain during the observing run O3, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 045006 (2022).
- E. D. Hall, C. Cahillane, K. Izumi, R. J. E. Smith, and R. X. Adhikari, Systematic calibration error requirements for gravitational-wave detectors via the Cramér–Rao bound, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 205006 (2019).
- R. Essick, Calibration uncertainty’s impact on gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 082002 (2022).
- S. Vitale, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, I. Mandel, B. Aylott, and J. Veitch, Effect of calibration errors on Bayesian parameter estimation for gravitational wave signals from inspiral binary systems in the advanced detectors era, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064034 (2012).
- S. Kumar, M. Melching, and F. Ohme, Accounting for the known unknowns: A parametric framework to incorporate systematic waveform errors in gravitational-wave parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104071 (2025).
- Y. Huang, H.-Y. Chen, C.-J. Haster, L. Sun, S. Vitale, and J. S. Kissel, Impact of calibration uncertainties on Hubble constant measurements from gravitational-wave sources, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063034 (2025).
- A. Gupta et al., Possible causes of false general relativity violations in gravitational wave observations, SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. (2024), 10.21468/SciPostPhysCommRep.5.
- M. R. Sinha, L. Sun, and S. Ma, Impact of detector calibration accuracy on black hole spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084038 (2025).
- B. F. Schutz, Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations, Nature (London) 323, 310 (1986).
- R. Essick and D. E. Holz, Calibrating gravitational-wave detectors with GW170817, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 125002 (2019).
- E. Payne, C. Talbot, P. D. Lasky, E. Thrane, and J. S. Kissel, Gravitational-wave astronomy with a physical calibration model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 122004 (2020).
- S. Vitale, C.-J. Haster, L. Sun, B. Farr, E. Goetz, J. Kissel, and C. Cahillane, Physical approach to the marginalization of LIGO calibration uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063016 (2021).
- M. Pitkin, C. Messenger, and L. Wright, Astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 93, 062002 (2016).
- B. F. Schutz and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Self-calibration of networks of gravitational wave detectors, arXiv:2009.10212.
- C. Alléné et al., Relative calibration of the LIGO and Virgo detectors using astrophysical events from their third observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 195019 (2022).
- C. Bond, D. Brown, A. Freise, and K. Strain, Interferometer techniques for gravitational-wave detection, Living Rev. Relativity 19, 3 (2016).
- M. Pitkin, S. Reid, S. Rowan, and J. Hough, Gravitational wave detection by interferometry (ground and space), Living Rev. Relativity 14, 5 (2011).
- A. D. Viets et al., Reconstructing the calibrated strain signal in the Advanced LIGO detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 095015 (2018).
- T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Calibration, detector characterization, physical environmental monitors, and the geophysics interferometer, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A102 (2021).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/gzrj-mwv3 for details, which includes Refs. [37–87].
- C. Grimaud, Virgo interferometer calibration and h(t) strain reconstruction uncertainty during the O4 observing run, Ph. D. thesis, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, 2025.
- A. G. Sullivan et al., Timing system of LIGO discoveries, Phys. Rev. D 108, 022003 (2023).
- F. Aubin, E. Dangelser, D. Estevez, A. Masserot, B. Mours, T. Pradier, A. Syx, and P. Van Hove, The Virgo Newtonian calibration system for the O4 observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 235003 (2024).
- S. Soni et al. (LIGO Instrument Science Collaboration), Reducing scattered light in LIGO’s third observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 025016 (2021).
- J. Glanzer, S. Soni, J. Spoon, A. Effler, and G. González, Noise in the LIGO livingston gravitational wave observatory due to trains, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 195015 (2023).
- S. Soni, J. Glanzer, A. Effler, V. Frolov, G. González, A. Pele, and R. Schofield, Modeling and reduction of high frequency scatter noise at LIGO Livingston, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 135015 (2024).
- P. B. Covas et al. (LIGO Instrument Science Collaboration), Identification and mitigation of narrow spectral artifacts that degrade searches for persistent gravitational waves in the first two observing runs of Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 97, 082002 (2018).
- D. Davis et al. (LIGO Instrument Science Collaboration), LIGO detector characterization in the second and third observing runs, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 135014 (2021).
- F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Virgo detector characterization and data quality: Tools, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 185005 (2023).
- G. Vajente, Y. Huang, M. Isi, J. C. Driggers, J. S. Kissel, M. J. Szczepańczyk, and S. Vitale, Machine-learning nonstationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 101, 042003 (2020).
- S. Hourihane, K. Chatziioannou, M. Wijngaarden, D. Davis, T. Littenberg, and N. Cornish, Accurate modeling and mitigation of overlapping signals and glitches in gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 042006 (2022).
- D. Davis, T. B. Littenberg, I. M. Romero-Shaw, M. Millhouse, J. McIver, F. Di Renzo, and G. Ashton, Subtracting glitches from gravitational-wave detector data during the third LIGO-Virgo observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 245013 (2022).
- B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, FINDCHIRP: An algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012).
- H.-Y. Chen, D. E. Holz, J. Miller, M. Evans, S. Vitale, and J. Creighton, Distance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 055010 (2021).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Low-latency gravitational-wave alerts for multimessenger astronomy during the second Advanced LIGO and Virgo observing run, Astrophys. J. 875, 161 (2019).
- T. Dal Canton, A. H. Nitz, B. Gadre, G. S. Cabourn Davies, V. Villa-Ortega, T. Dent, I. Harry, and L. Xiao, Real-time search for compact binary mergers in Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s third observing run using PyCBC live, Astrophys. J. 923, 254 (2021).
- T. Dal Canton et al., Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star-black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 90, 082004 (2014).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 93, 122003 (2016).
- R. Essick et al., Compact binary coalescence sensitivity estimates with injection campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 112, 102001 (2025).
- L. Blanchet, T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Gravitational radiation damping of compact binary systems to second postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3515 (1995).
- N. Christensen and R. Meyer, Parameter estimation with gravitational waves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025001 (2022).
- T. B. Littenberg and N. J. Cornish, Bayesian inference for spectral estimation of gravitational wave detector noise, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084034 (2015).
- G. Pratten et al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021).
- M. Colleoni, F. A. R. Vidal, C. García-Quirós, S. Akçay, and S. Bera, Fast frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104019 (2025).
- E. Hamilton, L. London, J. E. Thompson, E. Fauchon-Jones, M. Hannam, C. Kalaghatgi, S. Khan, F. Pannarale, and A. Vano-Vinuales, Model of gravitational waves from precessing black-hole binaries through merger and ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124027 (2021).
- E. Hamilton et al., PhenomXPNR: An improved gravitational wave model linking precessing inspirals and NR-calibrated merger-ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 113, 084055 (2026).
- A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estellés, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124037 (2023).
- H. Estellés, A. Buonanno, R. Enficiaud, C. Foo, and L. Pompili, Adding equatorial-asymmetric effects for spin-precessing binaries into the SEOBNRv5PHM waveform model, Phys. Rev. D 113, 044049 (2026).
- G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. Garcia-Quiros, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estelles, and R. Jaume, Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact binaries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasicircular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064001 (2020).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S240925n: Identification of a GW compact binary merger candidate, GCN 37604 (2024), https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37604.
- A. Krolak and B. F. Schutz, Coalescing binaries—Probe of the universe, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 19, 1163 (1987).
- S. Nissanke, D. E. Holz, S. A. Hughes, N. Dalal, and J. L. Sievers, Exploring short gamma-ray bursts as gravitational-wave standard sirens, Astrophys. J. 725, 496 (2010).
- T. Narikawa, M. Kaneyama, and H. Tagoshi, Optimal follow-up observations of gravitational wave events with small optical telescopes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084067 (2017).
- S. A. Usman, J. C. Mills, and S. Fairhurst, Constraining the inclinations of binary mergers from gravitational-wave observations, Astrophys. J. 877, 82 (2019).
- B. S. Sathyaprakash and B. F. Schutz, Physics, astrophysics and cosmology with gravitational waves, Living Rev. Relativity 12, 2 (2009).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Effects of waveform model systematics on the interpretation of GW150914, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 104002 (2017).
- K. S. Thorne, Gravitational radiation, in Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987), Chap. 9, pp. 330–458.
- L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Observing binary inspiral in gravitational radiation: One interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2198 (1993).
- B. F. Schutz, Networks of gravitational wave detectors and three figures of merit, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 125023 (2011).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW170814: A three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
- K. Pearson, Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents, Proc. R. Soc. London 58, 240 (1895).
- R. Essick, S. Vitale, E. Katsavounidis, G. Vedovato, and S. Klimenko, Localization of short duration gravitational-wave transients with the early advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors, Astrophys. J. 800, 81 (2015).
- L. Sampson, N. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Gravitational wave tests of strong field general relativity with binary inspirals: Realistic injections and optimal model selection, Phys. Rev. D 87, 102001 (2013).
- B. Edelman et al., Constraining unmodeled physics with compact binary mergers from GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 103, 042004 (2021).
- L. Pompili et al., Laying the foundation of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124035 (2023).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021).
- E. M. Sänger et al., Tests of general relativity with GW230529: A neutron star merging with a lower mass-gap compact object, Phys. Rev. D 113, 084070 (2026).
- A. Pai and K. G. Arun, Singular value decomposition in parametrised tests of post-Newtonian theory, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 025011 (2013).
- A. A. Shoom, P. K. Gupta, B. Krishnan, A. B. Nielsen, and C. D. Capano, Testing the post-Newtonian expansion with GW170817, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 55, 55 (2023).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO Virgo KAGRA calibration uncertainty (O4), Technical Report No. DCC-T2500288, LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA, 2025, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2500288/public.
- B. Allen, LIGO calibration accuracy, Technical Report No. LIGO-T960189, LIGO, 1996.
- S. Karki et al., The Advanced LIGO photon calibrators, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 114503 (2016).
- D. Estevez, P. Lagabbe, A. Masserot, L. Rolland, M. Seglar-Arroyo, and D. Verkindt, The Advanced Virgo photon calibrators, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 075007 (2021).
- D. Bhattacharjee, Y. Lecoeuche, S. Karki, J. Betzwieser, V. Bossilkov, S. Kandhasamy, E. Payne, and R. L. Savage, Fiducial displacements with improved accuracy for the global network of gravitational wave detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 015009 (2021).
- D. Chen et al., Performance of the KAGRA photon calibrators during the fourth joint observing run with LIGO and Virgo, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 185018 (2025).
- M. Wade et al., Toward low-latency, high-fidelity calibration of the LIGO detectors with enhanced monitoring tools, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 215016 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients, arXiv:2508.18081.
- F. Aubin, C. Grimaud, B. Mours, T. Pradier, L. Rolland, M. Seglar-Arroyo, H. Van Haevermaet, P. Van Hove, and D. Verkindt, From the Virgo interferometer calibration to the bias and uncertainty of the h(t) detector strain during the O4 run, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3177, 012082 (2026).
- J. Betzwieser, Calibration statements on OOOM requests for GW240925 and GW250207, Technical Report No. LIGO-T2500292, LIGO, 2025, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2500292/public.
- S. Chatterji, L. Blackburn, G. Martin, and E. Katsavounidis, Multiresolution techniques for the detection of gravitational-wave bursts, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1809 (2004).
- S. Klimenko, S. Mohanty, M. Rakhmanov, and G. Mitselmakher, Constraint likelihood analysis for a network of gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 72, 122002 (2005).
- S. Klimenko, I. Yakushin, A. Mercer, and G. Mitselmakher, A coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 114029 (2008).
- S. Klimenko et al., Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors, Phys. Rev. D 93, 042004 (2016).
- T. Mishra, S. Bhaumik, V. Gayathri, M. J. Szczepańczyk, I. Bartos, and S. Klimenko, Gravitational waves detected by a burst search in LIGO/Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023054 (2025).
- C. Messick et al., Analysis framework for the prompt discovery of compact binary mergers in gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 95, 042001 (2017).
- S. Sachdev et al., The gstlal search analysis methods for compact binary mergers in Advanced LIGO’s second and Advanced Virgo’s first observing runs, arXiv:1901.08580.
- C. Hanna et al., Fast evaluation of multidetector consistency for real-time gravitational wave searches, Phys. Rev. D 101, 022003 (2020).
- K. Cannon et al., gstlal: A software framework for gravitational wave discovery, SoftwareX 14, 100680 (2021).
- S. Sakon et al., Template bank for compact binary mergers in the fourth observing run of Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044066 (2024).
- B. Ewing et al., Performance of the low-latency gstlal inspiral search towards LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA’s fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 042008 (2024).
- L. Tsukada et al., Improved ranking statistics of the gstlal inspiral search for compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043004 (2023).
- P. Joshi et al., New methods for offline gstlal analyses, arXiv:2506.06497.
- P. Joshi et al., How many times should we matched filter gravitational wave data? A comparison of gstlal’s online and offline performance, arXiv:2505.23959.
- T. Adams, D. Buskulic, V. Germain, G. M. Guidi, F. Marion, M. Montani, B. Mours, F. Piergiovanni, and G. Wang, Low-latency analysis pipeline for compact binary coalescences in the advanced gravitational wave detector era, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 175012 (2016).
- F. Aubin et al., The MBTA pipeline for detecting compact binary coalescences in the third LIGO–Virgo observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 095004 (2021).
- C. Alléné et al., The MBTA pipeline for detecting compact binary coalescences in the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 105009 (2025).
- Q. Chu et al., SPIIR online coherent pipeline to search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024023 (2022).
- L. P. Singer and L. R. Price, Rapid Bayesian position reconstruction for gravitational-wave transients, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024013 (2016).
- L. P. Singer et al., Going the distance: Mapping host galaxies of LIGO and Virgo sources in three dimensions using local cosmography and targeted follow-up, Astrophys. J. Lett. 829, L15 (2016).
GCN Circular archive for S240925n, https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/events/ligovirgokagra-s240925n
- S. Soni et al. (LIGO Instrument Science Collaboration), LIGO detector characterization in the first half of the fourth observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 085016 (2025).
- L. K. Nuttall, Characterizing transient noise in the LIGO detectors, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170286 (2018).
- J. Glanzer et al., Data quality up to the third observing run of Advanced LIGO: Gravity Spy glitch classifications, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 065004 (2023).
- S. Hourihane and K. Chatziioannou, Glitches far from transient gravitational-wave events do not bias inference, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084006 (2025).
GCN Circular archive for S250207bg, https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/events/ligovirgokagra-s250207bg.
- G. Ashton et al., bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 241, 27 (2019).
- I. M. Romero-Shaw et al., Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with bilby: Validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020).
- T. Baka et al., Correcting misspecification of calibration uncertainties in gravitational-wave data analysis with efficient reweighting, Technical Report No. LIGO-T2500295, LIGO, 2025.
- W. Farr, B. Farr, and T. Littenberg, Modelling calibration errors in CBC waveforms, Technical Report No. LIGO-T1400682, LIGO, 2014.
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Properties of the binary black hole merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).
- J. Lin, Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37, 145 (1991).
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Binary black hole mergers in the first Advanced LIGO observing run, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016); 8, 039903(E) (2018).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S240925n: Updated Sky localization and source classification, GCN 37607 (2024), https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37607.
- L. Wen and Y. Chen, Geometrical expression for the angular resolution of a network of gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 81, 082001 (2010).
- S. Fairhurst, Source localization with an advanced gravitational wave detector network, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 105021 (2011).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and Virgo Collaboration), Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA, Living Rev. Relativity 23, 3 (2020).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S250207bg: Updated Sky localization, GCN 39242 (2025), https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/39242.
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Population properties of merging compact binaries, arXiv:2508.18083.
- F. Özel, D. Psaltis, R. Narayan, and J. E. McClintock, The black hole mass distribution in the galaxy, Astrophys. J. 725, 1918 (2010).
- W. M. Farr, N. Sravan, A. Cantrell, L. Kreidberg, C. D. Bailyn, I. Mandel, and V. Kalogera, The mass distribution of stellar-mass black holes, Astrophys. J. 741, 103 (2011).
- J. Casares and P. G. Jonker, Mass measurements of stellar and intermediate mass black-holes, Space Sci. Rev. 183, 223 (2014).
- J. Casares, I. Negueruela, M. Ribó, I. Ribas, J. M. Paredes, A. Herrero, and S. Simón-Díaz, A Be-type star with a black-hole companion, Nature (London) 505, 378 (2014).
- J. M. Corral-Santana, J. Casares, T. Muñoz-Darias, F. E. Bauer, I. G. Martinez-Pais, and D. M. Russell, BlackCAT: A catalogue of stellar-mass black holes in X-ray transients, Astron. Astrophys. 587, A61 (2016).
- J. C. A. Miller-Jones et al., Cygnus X-1 contains a 21–solar mass black hole—Implications for massive star winds, Science 371, 1046 (2021).
- P. Ajith et al., Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101 (2011).
- L. Santamaria et al., Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for non-precessing black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 82, 064016 (2010).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Population properties of compact objects from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific and KAGRA Collaborations), GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring binary formation and fundamental physics with asymmetric, high-spin black hole coalescences, Astrophys. J. Lett. 993, L21 (2025).
- K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980).
- L. Blanchet, Gravitational radiation from post-Newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 2 (2014).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043015 (2020).
- C. Mills and S. Fairhurst, Measuring gravitational-wave higher-order multipoles, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024042 (2021).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GW230814: Investigation of a loud gravitational-wave signal observed with a single detector, arXiv:2509.07348.
- S. Fairhurst, R. Green, C. Hoy, M. Hannam, and A. Muir, Two-harmonic approximation for gravitational waveforms from precessing binaries, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024055 (2020).
- S. Fairhurst, R. Green, M. Hannam, and C. Hoy, When will we observe binary black holes precessing?, Phys. Rev. D 102, 041302 (2020).
- L. P. Singer et al., The first two years of electromagnetic follow-up with Advanced LIGO and Virgo, Astrophys. J. 795, 105 (2014).
- A. Ouzriat, V. Sordini, and F. Di Renzo, Characterizing low-latency sky localization in multi-detector gravitational-wave networks, arXiv:2510.21930.
- J. R. Gair et al., The Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy catalog approach for dark siren gravitational-wave cosmology, Astron. J. 166, 22 (2023).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the cosmic expansion rate and modified gravitational-wave propagation, arXiv:2509.04348.
- W. Del Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. Ghosh, T. S. F. Haines, L. P. Singer, and A. Vecchio, Dirichlet process Gaussian-mixture model: An application to localizing coalescing binary neutron stars with gravitational-wave observations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 601 (2018).
- C. Pankow, M. Rizzo, K. Rao, C. P. L. Berry, and V. Kalogera, Localization of compact binary sources with second generation gravitational-wave interferometer networks, Astrophys. J. 902, 71 (2020).
- M. Emma, T. F. de Nobrega, and G. Ashton, Comparing advanced-era interferometric gravitational-wave detector network configurations: Sky localization and source properties, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064068 (2024).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object, Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, L44 (2020).
- G. Dálya, G. Galgóczi, L. Dobos, Z. Frei, I. S. Heng, R. Macas, C. Messenger, P. Raffai, and R. S. de Souza, GLADE: A galaxy catalogue for multimessenger searches in the advanced gravitational-wave detector era, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 2374 (2018).
- G. Dálya et al., GLADE+: An extended galaxy catalogue for multimessenger searches with advanced gravitational-wave detectors, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 514, 1403 (2022).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025).
- N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, A. Ghosh, S. Ghonge, M. Saleem, N. V. Krishnendu, and J. A. Clark, Investigating the relation between gravitational wave tests of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044020 (2022).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Tests of general relativity. I. Overview and general tests, arXiv:2603.19019.
- A. K. Mehta, A. Buonanno, R. Cotesta, A. Ghosh, N. Sennett, and J. Steinhoff, Tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave observations using a flexible theory-independent method, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044020 (2023).
- T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Sturani, and A. Vecchio, Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence, Phys. Rev. D 85, 082003 (2012).
- M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 89, 082001 (2014).
- J. Meidam et al., Parametrized tests of the strong-field dynamics of general relativity using gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary black holes: Fast likelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044033 (2018).
- S. Roy, M. Haney, G. Pratten, P. T. H. Pang, and C. Van Den Broeck, Improved parametrized test of general relativity using the IMRPhenomX waveform family: Including higher harmonics and precession, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024016 (2026).
- M. Saleem, S. Datta, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using principal component analysis, Phys. Rev. D 105, 084062 (2022).
- P. Mahapatra et al., Confronting general relativity with principal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC-3 events, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104007 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), Black hole spectroscopy and tests of general relativity with GW250114, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 041403 (2026).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Tests of general relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011102 (2019).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Tests of general relativity. II. Parameterized tests, arXiv:2603.19020.
- R. Brito, A. Buonanno, and V. Raymond, Black-hole spectroscopy by making full use of gravitational-wave modeling, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084038 (2018).
- A. Ghosh, R. Brito, and A. Buonanno, Constraints on quasinormal-mode frequencies with LIGO-Virgo binary–black-hole observations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124041 (2021).
- E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, A. Buonanno, and A. Ghosh, Tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime: A parametrized plunge-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024043 (2023).
- A. Toubiana, L. Pompili, A. Buonanno, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Measuring source properties and quasinormal mode frequencies of heavy massive black-hole binaries with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104019 (2024).
- L. Pompili, E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, and A. Buonanno, Parametrized spin-precessing inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model for tests of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 124040 (2025).
- S. Ma, K. Mitman, L. Sun, N. Deppe, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, W. Throwe, N. L. Vu, and Y. Chen, Quasinormal-mode filters: A new approach to analyze the gravitational-wave ringdown of binary black-hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084036 (2022).
- S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Using rational filters to uncover the first ringdown overtone in GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084010 (2023).
- S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Black hole spectroscopy by mode cleaning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 141401 (2023).
- N. Lu, S. Ma, O. J. Piccinni, L. Sun, and E. Finch, Statistical identification of ringdown modes with rational filters, Phys. Rev. D 112, 064047 (2025).
- M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 111102 (2019).
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns, arXiv:2107.05609.
- H. Siegel, M. Isi, and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns. II. Data conditioning, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044070 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-4.0: Tests of general relativity. III. Tests of the remnants, arXiv:2603.19021.
- V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate model of hybridized numerical relativity binary black hole waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064045 (2019).
- F. Di Renzo, F. Fidecaro, M. Razzano, and N. Sorrentino, bristol—a band-limited RMS stationarity test tool for gravitational wave data, in 55th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation (2024), arXiv:2401.15392.
- John Zweizig, The Data Monitor Tool Project, labcit.ligo.caltech.edu/˜jzweizig/DMT-Project.html (2006).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Data quality report user documentation, docs.ligo.org/detchar/data-quality-report/ (2018).
- R. P. Fisher, G. Hemming, M.-A. Bizouard, D. A. Brown, P. F. Couvares, F. Robinet, and D. Verkindt, DQSEGDB: A time-interval database for storing gravitational wave observatory metadata, SoftwareX 14, 100677 (2021).
- L. Vazsonyi and D. Davis, Identifying glitches near gravitational-wave signals from compact binary coalescences using the Q-transform, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 035008 (2023).
- S. Alvarez-Lopez, A. Liyanage, J. Ding, R. Ng, and J. McIver, GSpyNetTree: A signal-vs-glitch classifier for gravitational-wave event candidates, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 085007 (2024).
- A. L. Urban et al., gwdetchar/gwdetchar, 10.5281/zenodo.2575786 (2021).
- J. R. Smith, T. Abbott, E. Hirose, N. Leroy, D. Macleod, J. McIver, P. Saulson, and P. Shawhan, A hierarchical method for vetoing noise transients in gravitational-wave detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 235005 (2011).
- R. Essick, P. Godwin, C. Hanna, L. Blackburn, and E. Katsavounidis, iDQ: Statistical inference of non-Gaussian noise with auxiliary degrees of freedom in gravitational-wave detectors, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 015004 (2020).
- J. S. Areeda, J. R. Smith, A. P. Lundgren, E. Maros, D. M. Macleod, and J. Zweizig, LigoDV-web: Providing easy, secure and universal access to a large distributed scientific data store for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Astron. Comput. 18, 27 (2017).
- R. Macas and A. Lundgren, Sensitive test of non-Gaussianity in gravitational-wave detector data, Phys. Rev. D 108, 063016 (2023).
- F. Robinet, N. Arnaud, N. Leroy, A. Lundgren, D. Macleod, and J. McIver, Omicron: A tool to characterize transient noise in gravitational-wave detectors, SoftwareX 12, 100620 (2020).
- A. Helmling-Cornell, P. Nguyen, R. Schofield, and R. Frey, Automated evaluation of environmental coupling for Advanced LIGO gravitational wave detections, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 145003 (2024).
- Virgo Collaboration, PythonVirgoTools, git.ligo.org/virgo/virgoapp/PythonVirgoTools (2021).
- S. Mozzon, L. K. Nuttall, A. Lundgren, T. Dent, S. Kumar, and A. H. Nitz, Dynamic normalization for compact binary coalescence searches in non-stationary noise, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 215014 (2020).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, LVK Algorithm Library Suite, 10.7935/GT1W-FZ16 (2018).
- K. Wette, SWIGLAL: Python and Octave interfaces to the LALSuite gravitational-wave data analysis libraries, SoftwareX 12, 100634 (2020).
- S. A. Usman et al., The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 215004 (2016).
- A. H. Nitz, T. Dent, T. Dal Canton, S. Fairhurst, and D. A. Brown, Detecting binary compact-object mergers with gravitational waves: Understanding and Improving the sensitivity of the PyCBC search, Astrophys. J. 849, 118 (2017).
- G. S. Davies, T. Dent, M. Tápai, I. Harry, C. McIsaac, and A. H. Nitz, Extending the PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary mergers to a global network, Phys. Rev. D 102, 022004 (2020).
- S. Klimenko and G. Mitselmakher, A wavelet method for detection of gravitational wave bursts, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1819 (2004).
- S. Klimenko, G. Vedovato, M. Drago, G. Mazzolo, G. Mitselmakher, C. Pankow, G. Prodi, V. Re, F. Salemi, and I. Yakushin, Localization of gravitational wave sources with networks of advanced detectors, Phys. Rev. D 83, 102001 (2011).
- M. Drago et al., coherent WaveBurst, a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis, SoftwareX 14, 100678 (2021).
- N. J. Cornish and T. B. Littenberg, BayesWave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 135012 (2015).
- T. B. Littenberg, J. B. Kanner, N. J. Cornish, and M. Millhouse, Enabling high confidence detections of gravitational-wave bursts, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044050 (2016).
- N. J. Cornish, T. B. Littenberg, B. Bécsy, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, S. Ghonge, and M. Millhouse, BayesWave analysis pipeline in the era of gravitational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044006 (2021).
- J. S. Speagle, dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132 (2020).
- D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, L. Pompili, M. Pürrer, and A. Ramos-Buades, pySEOBNR: A software package for the next generation of effective-one-body multipolar waveform models, SoftwareX 30, 102080 (2025).
- C. Hoy and V. Raymond, PESummary: The code agnostic parameter estimation summary page builder, SoftwareX 15, 100765 (2021).
- G. Ashton et al., bilby TGR, 10.5281/zenodo.15676285 (2025).
- R. Gray et al., Cosmological inference using gravitational wave standard sirens: A mock data analysis, Phys. Rev. D 101, 122001 (2020).
- R. Gray, C. Messenger, and J. Veitch, A pixelated approach to galaxy catalogue incompleteness: Improving the dark siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 512, 1127 (2022).
- R. Gray et al., Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave population inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2023) 023.
- S. Mastrogiovanni, D. Laghi, R. Gray, G. C. Santoro, A. Ghosh, C. Karathanasis, K. Leyde, D. A. Steer, S. Perries, and G. Pierra, Joint population and cosmological properties inference with gravitational waves standard sirens and galaxy surveys, Phys. Rev. D 108, 042002 (2023).
- S. Mastrogiovanni, G. Pierra, S. Perriès, D. Laghi, G. Caneva Santoro, A. Ghosh, R. Gray, C. Karathanasis, and K. Leyde, ICAROGW: A Python package for inference of astrophysical population properties of noisy, heterogeneous, and incomplete observations, Astron. Astrophys. 682, A167 (2024).
- D. Williams, J. Veitch, M. L. Chiofalo, P. Schmidt, R. P. Udall, A. Vajpeji, and C. Hoy, Asimov: A framework for coordinating parameter estimation workflows, J. Open Source Software 8, 4170 (2023).
- J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
- M. L. Waskom, seaborn: Statistical data visualization, J. Open Source Software 6, 3021 (2021).
- D. Macleod et al., gwpy/gwpy, 10.5281/zenodo.597016 (2021).
- C. R. Harris et al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
- P. Virtanen et al., SciPy 1.0–fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, Data Release for GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors (2026), 10.5281/zenodo.18600069.
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, GW240925_005809, 10.7935/d2tg-qv58.
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, GW250207_115645, 10.7935/k8et-b503.