- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Mesoscopic Rough Electrical Double Layers

Weiqiang Tang1,*,†, Jinwen Liu2,*, Katharina Doblhoff-Dier2,‡, and Jun Huang1,3,§

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Present address: Interdisciplinary Research Center for Sustainable Energy Science and Engineering (IRC4SE), School of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
  • ‡Contact author: k.doblhoff-dier@lic.leidenuniv.nl
  • §Contact author: ju.huang@fz-juelich.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 038001 – Published 21 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bwdx-3yf3

Abstract

Fundamental understanding of electrical double layers (EDL) has been gleaned mostly on ideally planar electrodes, while realistic electrodes usually exhibit surface roughness on multiple scales. The influence of mesoscopic roughness (1–10 nm) is elusive, representing a cutting-edge challenge to theoretical modeling as both quantum- and classical-mechanical effects should be treated efficiently on the same footing. Addressing this challenge, we combine semiclassical models and Kohn-Sham density functional theory calculations to study the influence of mesoscopic roughness on the work function and the potential of zero free charge (PZFC) of silver electrodes. While the work function decreases at rougher electrodes as expected, the change in the PZFC is, unexpectedly, much smaller. The weakened correlation between work function and PZFC is ascribed to the decreased interfacial permittivity in the valley caused by a large, local, electron-spilling-induced electric field. In addition, the rough EDL at PZFC is heterogeneously charged with excess cations in the valley and excess anions near the peak, leading to the deviation of the potential of minimal capacitance from the PZFC.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. L. Jacobse, Y.-F. Huang, M. T. M. Koper, and M. J. Rost, Nat. Mater. 17, 277 (2018).
  2. R. Amirbeigiarab, J. Tian, A. Herzog, C. Qiu, A. Bergmann, B. Roldan Cuenya, and O. M. Magnussen, Nat. Catal. 6, 837 (2023).
  3. R. Qiao, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 3, 33 (2007).
  4. C. Ciracì, F. Vidal-Codina, D. Yoo, J. Peraire, S.-H. Oh, and D. R. Smith, ACS Photonics 7, 908 (2020).
  5. S. Ding, L. Ma, J. Feng, Y. Chen, D. Yang, and Q. Wang, Nano Res. 15, 2715 (2022).
  6. R. G. Mariano, K. McKelvey, H. S. White, and M. W. Kanan, Science 358, 1187 (2017).
  7. K. Oura, V. Lifshits, A. Saranin, A. Zotov, and M. Katayama, Surface Science: An Introduction (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
  8. Y. Jiang, D. Zhong, L. Wang, J. Li, G. Hao, J. Li, and Q. Zhao, Chem. Asian J. 17, e202200380 (2022).
  9. K. Jiang, Y. Huang, G. Zeng, F. M. Toma, W. A. Goddard III, and A. T. Bell, ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1206 (2020).
  10. C. L. Bentley, M. Kang, and P. R. Unwin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2179 (2019).
  11. Y. Yoon, A. S. Hall, and Y. Surendranath, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 15282 (2016).
  12. D. Cheng, K. L. C. Nguyen, V. Sumaria et al. Nat. Commun., 16, 4064 (2025)..
  13. K.-L. C. Nguyen, J. P. Bruce, A. Yoon, J. J. Navarro, F. Scholten, F. Landwehr, C. Rettenmaier, M. Heyde, and B. R. Cuenya, ACS Energy Lett. 9, 644 (2024).
  14. J. Kaur and R. Kant, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 13059 (2017).
  15. G. K. Mishra and R. Kant, J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 25774 (2021).
  16. A. S. Shatla, M. Landstorfer, and H. Baltruschat, ChemElectroChem. 8, 1817 (2021).
  17. A. Chen, J.-B. Le, Y. Kuang, and J. Cheng, J. Chem. Phys. 157, 094702 (2022).
  18. N. L. Fröhlich, J. Liu, K. Ojha, A. Hagopian, K. Doblhoff-Dier, and M. T. M. Koper (to be published).
  19. L. I. Daikhin, A. A. Kornyshev, and M. Urbakh, Phys. Rev. E 53, 6192 (1996).
  20. L. Daikhin, A. Kornyshev, and M. Urbakh, Electrochim. Acta 42, 2853 (1997).
  21. L. Daikhin, A. Kornyshev, and M. Urbakh, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1715 (1998).
  22. T. Aslyamov, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 35, 101104 (2022).
  23. T. Aslyamov, K. Sinkov, and I. Akhatov, Phys. Rev. E 103, L060102 (2021).
  24. S. Xue, P. Chaudhary, M. R. Nouri, E. Gubanova, B. Garlyyev, V. Alexandrov, and A. S. Bandarenka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 3883 (2024).
  25. B. Hagman, A. Posada-Borbón, A. Schaefer, M. Shipilin, C. Zhang, L. R. Merte, A. Hellman, E. Lundgren, H. Grönbeck, and J. Gustafson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 12974 (2018).
  26. K. J. P. Schouten, E. P. Gallent, and M. T. M. Koper, J. Electroanal. Chem. 699, 6 (2013).
  27. J. Wei, Y. Li, D. Dai, F. Zhang, H. Zou, X. Yang, Y. Ji, B. Li, and X. Wei, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 5786 (2020).
  28. G. Palasantzas and G. M. E. A. Backx, Phys. Rev. E 69, 041603 (2004).
  29. H. Li et al., Mater. Horiz. 9, 1788 (2022).
  30. Y. Liu, H. Jiang, and Z. Hou, Angew. Chem. 133, 11233 (2021).
  31. Y. E. Seidel, A. Schneider, Z. Jusys, B. Wickman, B. Kasemo, and R. J. Behm, Faraday Discuss. 140, 167 (2009).
  32. R. E. Goldstein, A. I. Pesci, and V. Romero-Rochn, Phys. Rev. A 41, 5504 (1990).
  33. S. Kondrat and A. Kornyshev, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 022201 (2010).
  34. S. Kondrat, C. R. Pérez, V. Presser, Y. Gogotsi, and A. A. Kornyshev, Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6474 (2012).
  35. J. I. Siepmann and M. Sprik, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 511 (1995).
  36. F.-T. Wang, X. Liu, and J. Cheng, Mater. Futures 3, 041001 (2024).
  37. C. Merlet, C. Péan, B. Rotenberg, P. A. Madden, B. Daffos, P. L. Taberna, P. Simon, and M. Salanne, Nat. Commun. 4, 2701 (2013).
  38. K. G. Reeves, D. Dambournet, C. Laberty-Robert, R. Vuilleumier, and M. Salanne, RSC Adv. 10, 8982 (2020).
  39. L. Scalfi, M. R. Becker, R. R. Netz, and M.-L. Bocquet, Commun. Chem. 6, 236 (2023).
  40. P. Li, Y. Liu, and S. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 104701 (2022).
  41. B. Hammer and J. K. Nørskov, in Advances in Catalysis (Academic Press, New York, 2000), p. 71.
  42. I. T. McCrum and M. J. Janik, ChemElectroChem 3, 1609 (2016).
  43. A. Groß, in Surface and Interface Science, edited by K. Wandelt (Wiley, New York, 2020), p. 471.
  44. J. P. Badiali, M. L. Rosinberg, and J. Goodisman, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 143, 73 (1983).
  45. W. Schmickler, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 150, 19 (1983).
  46. J. Huang, P. Li, and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 101, 125422 (2020).
  47. J. Huang, S. Chen, and M. Eikerling, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2417 (2021).
  48. J. Huang, Electrochim. Acta 389, 138720 (2021).
  49. J. Huang, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 1003 (2023).
  50. M. M. Melander, T. Wu, T. Weckman, and K. Honkala, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 5 (2024).
  51. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/bwdx-3yf3 for technical details of DPFT, Kohn-Sham DFT, AIMD calculations, and additional results and discussions.
  52. G. Valette, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 269, 191 (1989).
  53. R. Smoluchowski, Phys. Rev. 60, 661 (1941).
  54. J. Hölzl, F. K. Schulte, and H. Wagner, Solid Surface Physics (Springer, New York, 2006), Vol. 85.
  55. W. Li and D. Li, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 064708 (2005).
  56. H. Ibach, G. Beltramo, and M. Giesen, Surf. Sci. 605, 240 (2011).
  57. Y. Zhang, T. Binninger, J. Huang, and M. H. Eikerling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 066201 (2025).
  58. S. Trasatti, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 33, 351 (1971).
  59. W. Tang, S. Zhao, and J. Huang, JACS Au 3, 3381 (2023).
  60. F. Deißenbeck, C. Freysoldt, M. Todorova, J. Neugebauer, and S. Wippermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 136803 (2021).
  61. L. Fumagalli et al., Science 360, 1339 (2018).
  62. M. Z. Bazant, B. D. Storey, and A. A. Kornyshev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 046102 (2011).
  63. M. A. Brown, G. V. Bossa, and S. May, Langmuir 31, 11477 (2015).
  64. 10.5281/zenodo.18020211.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 038001– Published 21 January, 2026
  • Received 31 July 2025
  • Accepted 22 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation