- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Open Access
Dark Matter Search Results from of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 – Published 1 July, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4dyc-z8zf
Abstract
We report results of a search for nuclear recoils induced by weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter using the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) two-phase xenon time projection chamber. This analysis uses a total exposure of tonne-years from 280 live days of LZ operation, of which tonne-years and 220 live days are new. A technique to actively tag background electronic recoils from decays is featured for the first time. Enhanced electron-ion recombination is observed in two-neutrino double electron capture decays of , representing a noteworthy new background. After removal of artificial signal-like events injected into the dataset to mitigate analyzer bias, we find no evidence for an excess over expected backgrounds. World-leading constraints are placed on spin-independent (SI) and spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for masses . The strongest SI exclusion set is at the 90% confidence level and the best SI median sensitivity achieved is , both for a mass of .
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Corrections
13 August, 2025
Correction: A typographical error introduced during the production cycle in an inline equation located in the text following Table I has been fixed.
Collections
This article appears in the following collection:

PRL Collection of the Year 2025
For the second year in a row, our editors have curated a set of some of the best papers from the wide range of topics PRL covers in fundamental and applied physical science. Congratulations to all the authors in this collection!
synopsis
Dark Matter Detector Releases Best-Yet Result
Seven metric tons of liquid xenon set some of the strictest constraints ever on dark matter candidates known as WIMPs.
See more in Physics
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (45)
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
- Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39, 137 (2001).
- D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor, and E. Tittley, Science 347, 1462 (2015).
- A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 119, 103865 (2021).
- G. Bertone and D. Hooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
- J. Billard et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056201 (2022).
- D. Akerib et al., arXiv:2203.08084.
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
- Z. Bo et al. (PandaX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
- D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ), arXiv:1509.02910; B. Mount et al., arXiv:1703.09144; D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 953, 163047 (2020).
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 012011 (2024).
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1068, 169712 (2024). 2405.14732.
- C. Faham, V. Gehman, A. Currie, A. Dobi, P. Sorensen, and R. Gaitskell, J. Instrum. 10, P09010 (2015).
- B. López Paredes, H. Araújo, F. Froborg, N. Marangou, I. Olcina, T. Sumner, R. Taylor, A. Tomás, and A. Vacheret, Astropart. Phys. 102, 56 (2018).
- D. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 125, 102480 (2021).
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), J. Instrum. 19, P08027 (2024).
- M. Szydagis et al., Noble Element Simulation Technique, v2.4.0 (2023).
- M. Szydagis, J. Balajthy, G. Block, J. Brodsky, E. Brown, J. Cutter, S. Farrell, J. Huang, E. Kozlova, C. Liebenthal et al., Front. Detect. Sci. Technol. 2 (2025).
- P. Sorensen, arXiv:1702.04805.
- D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 092004 (2020).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/4dyc-z8zf for additional information, which includes Ref. [23].
- J. Xu, S. Pereverzev, B. Lenardo, J. Kingston, D. Naim, A. Bernstein, K. Kazkaz, and M. Tripathi, Phys. Rev. D 99, 103024 (2019).
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012010 (2023).
- D. J. Temples, J. McLaughlin, J. Bargemann, D. Baxter, A. Cottle, C. E. Dahl, W. H. Lippincott, A. Monte, and J. Phelan, Phys. Rev. D 104, 112001 (2021).
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), arXiv:2503.05679.
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), J. Phys. G 52, 015103 (2025).
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 106, 024328 (2022).
- J. R. de Laeter, J. K. Böhlke, P. D. Bièvre, H. Hidaka, H. S. Peiser, K. J. R. Rosman, and P. D. P. Taylor, Pure Appl. Chem. 75, 683 (2003).
- J. Thomas and D. A. Imel, Phys. Rev. A 36, 614 (1987).
- S. Holm, Scand. J. Stat. Theory Appl. 6, 65 (1979).
- G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1 (2011).
- D. Baxter et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1 (2021). Here we employ a power constraint which uses the expected sensitivity of the experiment assuming no signal is present.
- D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021303 (2017).
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
- R. Ajaj et al. (DEAP Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 022004 (2019).
- P. Faulkner et al., J. Phys. G 32, N1 (2006).
- D. Britton et al., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 2447 (2009).
- M. Hoferichter, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074018 (2020).
- P. Pirinen, J. Kotila, and J. Suhonen, Nucl. Phys. A992, 121624 (2019).
- B. S. Hu, J. Padua-Argüelles, S. Leutheusser, T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, and J. D. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 072502 (2022).
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141301 (2019).
- J. Xia et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 792, 193 (2019).
- D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251302 (2017).
- C. Amole et al. (PICO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 022001 (2019).