Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraints on Solar Reflected Dark Matter from XENON1T and XENONnT Data

E. Aprile1, J. Aalbers2, K. Abe3, M. Adrover4, S. Ahmed Maouloud5, L. Althueser6, B. Andrieu5, E. Angelino7, D. Antón Martin8 et al. (XENON Collaboration)

D. Antón Martin8, S. R. Armbruster9, F. Arneodo10, L. Baudis4, M. Bazyk11, L. Bellagamba12, R. Biondi7, A. Bismark4, K. Boese9, R. M. Braun6, G. Bruni12, G. Bruno11, R. Budnik13, C. Cai14, C. Capelli4, J. M. R. Cardoso15, A. P. Cimental Chávez4, A. P. Colijn16, J. Conrad17,*, J. J. Cuenca-García4, V. D’Andrea7,†, L. C. Daniel Garcia5, M. P. Decowski16, A. Deisting18, C. Di Donato19,7, P. Di Gangi12, S. Diglio11, K. Eitel20, S. el Morabit16, R. Elleboro19, A. Elykov20, A. D. Ferella19,7, C. Ferrari7, H. Fischer21, T. Flehmke17, M. Flierman16, R. Frankel13, D. Fuchs17, W. Fulgione22,7, C. Fuselli16, R. Gaior5, F. Gao14, R. Giacomobono23, F. Girard5, R. Glade-Beucke21, L. Grandi8, J. Grigat21, H. Guan24, M. Guida9, P. Gyorgy18, R. Hammann9, A. Higuera25, C. Hils18, L. Hoetzsch4, N. F. Hood26, M. Iacovacci23, Y. Itow27, J. Jakob6, F. Joerg4, Y. Kaminaga3, M. Kara20, S. Kazama27, P. Kharbanda16, M. Kobayashi27, D. Koke6, K. Kooshkjalali18, A. Kopec26,‡, H. Landsman13, R. F. Lang24, L. Levinson13, I. Li25, S. Li28, S. Liang25, Z. Liang28, Y.-T. Lin9,6, S. Lindemann21, M. Lindner9, K. Liu14, M. Liu1, J. Loizeau11, F. Lombardi18, J. A. M. Lopes15,§, G. M. Lucchetti12, T. Luce21, Y. Ma26, C. Macolino19,7, J. Mahlstedt17, F. Marignetti23, T. Marrodán Undagoitia9, K. Martens3, J. Masbou11, S. Mastroianni23, V. Mazza12, A. Melchiorre19,7, J. Merz18, M. Messina7, A. J. P. Michel20, K. Miuchi29, A. Molinario22, S. Moriyama3, K. Morå1, M. Murra1, J. Müller21, K. Ni26, C. T. Oba Ishikawa3, U. Oberlack18, S. Ouahada4, B. Paetsch13, Y. Pan5, Q. Pellegrini5, R. Peres4, J. Pienaar13, M. Pierre16, G. Plante1, T. R. Pollmann16, A. Prajapati19, L. Principe11, J. Qin25, D. Ramírez García4, A. Ravindran11, A. Razeto7, R. Singh24, L. Sanchez25, J. M. F. dos Santos15, I. Sarnoff10, G. Sartorelli12, J. Schreiner9, P. Schulte6, H. Schulze Eißing6, M. Schumann21, L. Scotto Lavina5, M. Selvi12, F. Semeria12, F. N. Semler21, P. Shagin18, S. Shi1, H. Simgen9, Z. Song30, A. Stevens21, C. Szyszka18, A. Takeda3, Y. Takeuchi29, P.-L. Tan1,∥, D. Thers11, G. Trinchero22, C. D. Tunnell25, K. Valerius20, S. Vecchi31, S. Vetter20, G. Volta9, C. Weinheimer6, M. Weiss13, D. Wenz6, C. Wittweg4, V. H. S. Wu20, Y. Xing11, D. Xu1, Z. Xu1, M. Yamashita3, J. Yang28, L. Yang26, J. Ye30, M. Yoshida3, L. Yuan8, G. Zavattini31, Y. Zhao14, M. Zhong26, and T. Zhu3 (XENON Collaboration)

  • 1Physics Department, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 2Nikhef and the University of Groningen, Van Swinderen Institute, 9747AG Groningen, Netherlands
  • 3Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, and Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo, Higashi-Mozumi, Kamioka, Hida, Gifu 506-1205, Japan
  • 4Physik-Institut, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
  • 5LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS/IN2P3, 75005 Paris, France
  • 6Institut für Kernphysik, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
  • 7INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso and Gran Sasso Science Institute, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 8Department of Physics, Enrico Fermi Institute and Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 9Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 10New York University Abu Dhabi—Center for Astro, Particle and Planetary Physics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • 11SUBATECH, IMT Atlantique, CNRS/IN2P3, Nantes Université, Nantes 44307, France
  • 12Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna and INFN-Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
  • 13Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
  • 14Department of Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People’s Republic of China
  • 15LIBPhys, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 16Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam, Science Park, 1098XG Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 17Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden
  • 18Institut für Physik and Exzellenzcluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
  • 19Department of Physics and Chemistry, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 20Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 21Physikalisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
  • 22INAF-Astrophysical Observatory of Torino, Department of Physics, University of Torino and INFN-Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
  • 23Department of Physics “Ettore Pancini,” University of Napoli and INFN-Napoli, 80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 24Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 25Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 26Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
  • 27Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe, and Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
  • 28Department of Physics, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310030, People’s Republic of China
  • 29Department of Physics, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
  • 30School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, People’s Republic of China
  • 31INFN-Ferrara and Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy

  • *Contact author: conrad@fysik.su.se
  • †Also at INFN-Roma Tre, 00146 Roma, Italy.
  • ‡Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • §Also at Coimbra Polytechnic—ISEC, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal.
  • ∥Contact author: plt2120@columbia.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 121001 – Published 14 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yknv-rhw9

Abstract

We report on a search for sub-GeV dark matter upscattered via the solar reflection mechanism in the heavy mediator scenario. Under the standard halo model, keV–MeV dark matter produces nuclear recoils with energies below the detection threshold of liquid xenon time projection chambers. We enhance sensitivity to low-mass dark matter (DM) by considering dark matter–electron scattering, employing dedicated event selections to reduce the detection threshold and exploiting the additional kinetic energy imparted to the dark matter particle by solar upscattering. Using XENON1T ionization-only and XENONnT low-energy electronic recoil datasets, we exclude previously unconstrained DM-electron scattering cross section for masses between 4.6 and 20  keV/c2 and between 0.2 and 2  MeV/c2, reaching a minimum of 3.41×10−39  cm2 for a mass of 0.3  MeV/c2 at 90% confidence level.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  2. L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—Current status and future prospects, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 066201 (2018).
  3. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1 tonne-year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  4. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  5. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 1.54  Tonne·year exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  6. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENON1T dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 881 (2017).
  7. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Conceptual design and simulation of a water Cherenkov muon veto for the XENON1T experiment, J. Instrum. 9, P11006 (2014).
  8. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The neutron veto of the XENONnT experiment: Results with demineralized water, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 695 (2025).
  9. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT analysis: Signal reconstruction, calibration, and event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062006 (2025).
  10. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENONnT dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 784 (2024).
  11. G. Plante, E. Aprile, J. Howlett, and Y. Zhang, Liquid-phase purification for multi-tonne xenon detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 860 (2022).
  12. M. Murra, D. Schulte, C. Huhmann, and C. Weinheimer, Design, construction and commissioning of a high-flow radon removal system for XENONnT, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1104 (2022).
  13. K. Fujii, Y. Endo, Y. Torigoe, S. Nakamura, T. Haruyama, K. Kasami, S. Mihara, K. Saito, S. Sasaki, and H. Tawara, High-accuracy measurement of the emission spectrum of liquid xenon in the vacuum ultraviolet region, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 795, 293 (2015).
  14. A. Lansiart, A. Seigneur, J.-L. Moretti, and J.-P. Morucci, Development research on a highly luminous condensed xenon scintillator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 135, 47 (1976).
  15. N. W. Evans, C. A. J. O’Hare, and C. McCabe, Refinement of the standard halo model for dark matter searches in light of the Gaia Sausage, Phys. Rev. D 99, 023012 (2019).
  16. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for new physics in electronic recoil data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161805 (2022).
  17. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for light dark matter in low-energy ionization signals from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161004 (2025).
  18. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019).
  19. J.-W. Wang, A. Granelli, and P. Ullio, Direct detection constraints on blazar-boosted dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 221104 (2022).
  20. A. Das and M. Sen, Boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075029 (2021).
  21. T. Emken, C. Kouvaris, and N. G. Nielsen, The Sun as a sub-GeV dark matter accelerator, Phys. Rev. D 97, 063007 (2018).
  22. H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Directly detecting MeV-scale dark matter via solar reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141801 (2018); 121, 259903(E) (2018).
  23. T. Emken, Solar reflection of light dark matter with heavy mediators, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063020 (2022).
  24. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz, and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80, 083502 (2009).
  25. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  26. T. Emken, Dark matter simulation code for underground scatterings—Sun edition (damascus-sun) [Code, v0.1.1], Astrophysics Source Code Library Record [ascl:2102.018]. The code can be found under https://github.com/temken/damascus-sun. Version 1.0.0 is archived as 10.5281/zenodo.10948125 (2021).
  27. R. Catena, T. Emken, N. A. Spaldin, and W. Tarantino, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033195 (2020); 7, 019001(E) (2025).
  28. M. K. Pandey, L. Singh, C.-P. Wu, J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, C.-C. Hsieh, C. P. Liu, and H. T. Wong, Constraints from a many-body method on spin-independent dark matter scattering off electrons using data from germanium and xenon detectors, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123025 (2020).
  29. C. P. Liu, M. K. Pandey, L. Singh, C.-P. Wu, J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, and H. T. Wong, Many-body atomic response functions of xenon and germanium for leading-order sub-GeV dark matter-electron interactions in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 113, 123061 (2026).
  30. A. Serenelli, S. Basu, J. W. Ferguson, and M. Asplund, New solar composition: The problem with solar models revisited, Astrophys. J. Lett. 705, L123 (2009).
  31. M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, A. J. Sauval, and P. Scott, The chemical composition of the Sun, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 481 (2009).
  32. M. Crisler, R. Essig, J. Estrada, G. Fernandez, J. Tiffenberg, M. Sofo haro, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu (SENSEI Collaboration), SENSEI: First direct-detection constraints on sub-GeV dark matter from a surface run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061803 (2018).
  33. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First search for light dark matter in the neutrino fog with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111802 (2025).
  34. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENON1T S2-only data release, https://github.com/XENON1T/s2only_data_release (2020).
  35. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  36. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022001 (2022); 110, 109903(E) (2024).
  37. M. Szydagis et al., A review of basic energy reconstruction techniques in liquid xenon and argon detectors for dark matter and neutrino physics using NEST, Instruments 5, 13 (2021).
  38. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Discrimination of electronic recoils from nuclear recoils in two-phase xenon time projection chambers, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112002 (2020).
  39. S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of an unknown background, Phys. Rev. D 66, 032005 (2002).
  40. P. L. Tan, yellinpmax: python package to compute Yellin’s optimal interval with pmax test statistic, https://github.com/plt109/yellinpmax (2024).
  41. G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998).
  42. D. Baxter et al., Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 907 (2021).
  43. S. S. Wilks, The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, Ann. Math. Stat. 9, 60 (1938).
  44. G. Shen et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for solar boosted dark matter particles at the PandaX-4T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161003 (2025).
  45. Z. Y. Zhang et al. (CDEX Collaboration), Experimental limits on solar reflected dark matter with a new approach on accelerated-dark-matter–electron analysis in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 171001 (2024).
  46. H. An, H. Nie, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Solar reflection of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103026 (2021).
  47. J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and A. Reinert, Light(ly)-coupled dark matter in the keV range: Freeze-in and constraints, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 141.
  48. https://zenodo.org/records/7992017.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation