Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing the Solar B8 Neutrino Fog with XENONnT

E. Aprile1, J. Aalbers2, K. Abe3, M. M. Abu Rmeileh4, M. Adrover5, S. Ahmed Maouloud6, L. Althueser7, B. Andrieu6, E. Angelino8,9 et al. (XENON Collaboration**)

E. Angelino8,9, D. Antón Martin9, S. R. Armbruster10, F. Arneodo11, L. Baudis5, M. Bazyk12, V. Beligotti8, L. Bellagamba13, R. Biondi8, A. Bismark5, K. Boese10, R. M. Braun7, G. Bruni13, R. Budnik4, C. Cai14, C. Capelli5, J. M. R. Cardoso15, A. P. Cimental Chávez5, A. P. Colijn16, J. Conrad17, J. J. Cuenca-García5, V. D’Andrea8,*, L. C. Daniel Garcia12, M. P. Decowski16, A. Deisting18, C. Di Donato19,8, P. Di Gangi13, S. Diglio12, K. Eitel20, S. el Morabit16, R. Elleboro19,8, A. Elykov20, A. D. Ferella19,8, C. Ferrari8, H. Fischer21, T. Flehmke17, M. Flierman16, R. Frankel4, D. Fuchs17, W. Fulgione22,8, C. Fuselli16, F. Gao14, R. Giacomobono23, F. Girard6, R. Glade-Beucke21, L. Grandi9, J. Grigat21, H. Guan24, M. Guida10, P. Gyorgy18, R. Hammann10, C. Hils18, L. Hoetzsch5, N. F. Hood25, M. Iacovacci23, Y. Itow3, J. Jakob7, F. Joerg5, Y. Kaminaga3, M. Kara20, S. Kazama26, P. Kharbanda16, M. Kobayashi26, D. Koke7, K. Kooshkjalali18, A. Kopec27, E. Kozlova28, H. Landsman4, R. F. Lang24, L. Levinson4, A. Li25, H. Li29, I. Li30, S. Li28, S. Liang30, Z. Liang28, Y.-T. Lin7, S. Lindemann21, M. Lindner10, K. Liu14,†, M. Liu1, F. Lombardi18, J. A. M. Lopes15,‡, G. M. Lucchetti13, T. Luce21, Y. Ma25, C. Macolino19,8, G. C. Madduri21, J. Mahlstedt17, F. Marignetti23, T. Marrodán Undagoitia10, K. Martens3, J. Masbou12, S. Mastroianni23, V. Mazza13, J. Merz18, M. Messina8, A. Michel20, K. Miuchi31, R. Miyata26, A. Molinario22, S. Moriyama3, M. Murra1, J. Müller21, K. Ni25, C. T. Oba Ishikawa3, U. Oberlack18, K. Otsuzuki3, S. Ouahada5, B. Paetsch4, Y. Pan6, Q. Pellegrini6, R. Peres5, J. Pienaar4, M. Pierre16,§, G. Plante1, T. R. Pollmann16, F. Pompa12, A. Prajapati19,8, L. Principe12, J. Qin30, D. Ramírez García5, A. Ravindran12, A. Razeto8, R. Singh24, L. Sanchez30, J. M. F. dos Santos15, I. Sarnoff11, G. Sartorelli13, M. T. Schiller32, P. Schulte7, H. Schulze Eißing7, M. Schumann21, L. Scotto Lavina6, M. Selvi13, F. Semeria13, F. N. Semler21, P. Shagin8, S. Shi1, H. Simgen10, Z. Song29, A. Stevens21, C. Szyszka18, A. Takeda3, Y. Takeuchi31, P.-L. Tan1, D. Thers12, G. Trinchero22, C. D. Tunnell30, K. Valerius20, S. Vecchi33, S. Vetter20, G. Volta10,∥, B. von Krosigk32, C. Weinheimer7, D. Wenz7, C. Wittweg5, V. H. S. Wu20, Y. Xing6, D. Xu1,¶, Z. Xu1, M. Yamashita26, J. Yang28, L. Yang25, J. Ye29, M. Yoshida3, L. Yuan9, G. Zavattini33, Y. Zhao14, M. Zhong25, and T. Zhu3 (XENON Collaboration**)

  • 1Physics Department, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 2Nikhef and the University of Groningen, Van Swinderen Institute, 9747AG Groningen, Netherlands
  • 3Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, and Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo, Higashi-Mozumi, Kamioka, Hida, Gifu 506-1205, Japan
  • 4Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
  • 5Physik-Institut, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
  • 6LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS/IN2P3, 75005 Paris, France
  • 7Institut für Kernphysik, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
  • 8INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso and Gran Sasso Science Institute, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 9Department of Physics, Enrico Fermi Institute and Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 10Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 11New York University Abu Dhabi-Center for Astro, Particle and Planetary Physics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • 12SUBATECH, IMT Atlantique, CNRS/IN2P3, Nantes Université, Nantes 44307, France
  • 13Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna and INFN-Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
  • 14Department of Physics & Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People’s Republic of China
  • 15LIBPhys, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 16Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam, Science Park, 1098XG Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 17Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden
  • 18Institut für Physik and Exzellenzcluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
  • 19Department of Physics and Chemistry, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 20Institute for Astroparticle Physics and Institute of Experimental Particle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 21Physikalisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
  • 22INAF-Astrophysical Observatory of Torino, Department of Physics, University of Torino and INFN-Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
  • 23Department of Physics “Ettore Pancini,” University of Napoli and INFN-Napoli, 80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 24Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 25Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
  • 26Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe, and Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
  • 27Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
  • 28Department of Physics, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310030, People’s Republic of China
  • 29School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, People’s Republic of China
  • 30Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 31Department of Physics, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
  • 32Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 33INFN-Ferrara and Dip. di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy

  • *Also at INFN-Roma Tre, 00146 Roma, Italy.
  • †Contact author: lkx21@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • ‡Also at Coimbra Polytechnic—ISEC, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal.
  • §Contact author: maxime.pierre@nikhef.nl
  • ∥Contact author: giovanni.volta@mpi-hd.mpg.de
  • Contact author: dacheng.xu@columbia.edu
  • **Contact author: xenon@lngs.infn.it

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 091807 – Published 28 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xvpn-w3q9

Abstract

We report a 3.3σ measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from solar B8 neutrinos using a 6.77  t×yr exposure from the XENONnT experiment, inferring a solar B8 neutrino flux of (5−2+3)×106  cm−2 s−1, consistent with previous measurements. In the presence of the B8 “neutrino fog,” we find no evidence for light dark matter, and observe diminishing returns in sensitivity with increasing exposure. A 93% increase in exposure from the previous search improves the median sensitivity to the nucleon scattering cross section for a 5  GeV/c2 spin-independent weakly interacting massive particle by 10%. The dataset was also used to measure the weak mixing angle at ∼0.02  GeV/c momentum transfer and constrain physics beyond the Standard Model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Article Text

References (63)

  1. R. Davis, Jr., D. S. Harmer, and K. C. Hoffman, Search for neutrinos from the sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1205 (1968).
  2. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Measurements of the solar neutrino flux from Super-Kamiokande’s first 300 days, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1158 (1998); 81, 4279(E) (1998).
  3. B. Aharmim et al. (SNO Collaboration), Combined analysis of all three phases of solar neutrino data from the sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. C 88, 025501 (2013).
  4. G. Bellini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), Measurement of the solar B8 neutrino rate with a liquid scintillator target and 3 MeV energy threshold in the Borexino detector, Phys. Rev. D 82, 033006 (2010).
  5. J. N. Bahcall, E. Lisi, D. E. Alburger, L. De Braeckeleer, S. J. Freedman, and J. Napolitano, Standard neutrino spectrum from B-8 decay, Phys. Rev. C 54, 411 (1996).
  6. D. Z. Freedman, Coherent effects of a weak neutral current, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389 (1974).
  7. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Science 357, 1123 (2017).
  8. N. Ackermann et al., Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering, Nature (London) 643, 1229 (2025).
  9. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First indication of solar B8 neutrinos via coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191002 (2024).
  10. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), First indication of solar B8 neutrinos through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191001 (2024).
  11. M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Reactor antineutrinos CEνNS on germanium: CONUS + and TEXONO as a new gateway to SM and BSM physics, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015007 (2025).
  12. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First search for light dark matter in the neutrino fog with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111802 (2025).
  13. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1 Tonne-Year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  14. J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023524 (2014).
  15. C. A. J. O’Hare, New definition of the neutrino floor for direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021).
  16. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENONnT dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 784 (2024).
  17. V. C. Antochi et al., Improved quality tests of R11410-21 photomultiplier tubes for the XENONnT experiment, J. Instrum. 16, P08033 (2021).
  18. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The neutron veto of the XENONnT experiment: Results with demineralized water, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 695 (2025).
  19. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Conceptual design and simulation of a water Cherenkov muon veto for the XENON1T experiment, J. Instrum. 9, P11006 (2014).
  20. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The triggerless data acquisition system of the XENONnT experiment, J. Instrum. 18, P07054 (2023).
  21. T. Kohonen, Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biol. Cybern. 43, 59 (1982).
  22. J. Aalbers et al., AxFoundation/strax: Stream analysis for xenon tpcs, 10.5281/zenodo.18727696 (2025).
  23. XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/straxen: Streaming analysis for xenon, 10.5281/zenodo.18841409 (2026).
  24. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Design and performance of the field cage for the XENONnT experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 138 (2024).
  25. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022001 (2022).
  26. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for new physics in electronic recoil data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161805 (2022).
  27. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT analysis: Signal reconstruction, calibration, and event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062006 (2025).
  28. J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, and T. I. Rashba, Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 021.
  29. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Low-energy nuclear recoil calibration of XENONnT with a Y88Be photoneutron source, Phys. Rev. D 113, 112017 (2026).
  30. XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/fuse: Refactor xenonnt epix and wfsim code, 10.5281/zenodo.18418865 (2026).
  31. XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/axidence: strax-based data-driven accidental coincidence background simulation and peak-level salting, 10.5281/zenodo.15459357 (2025).
  32. J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996).
  33. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT WIMP search: Signal and background modeling and statistical inference, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103040 (2025).
  34. M. Szydagis et al., A review of NEST models for liquid xenon and an exhaustive comparison with other approaches, Front. Detect. Sci. Tech. 2, 1480975 (2024).
  35. XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/alea: A tool to perform toymc-based inference constructions, 10.5281/zenodo.18840642 (2026).
  36. H. Chernoff, On the distribution of the likelihood ratio, Ann. Math. Stat. 25, 573 (1954).
  37. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); 73, 2501(E) (2013).
  38. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  39. C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium, Science 275, 1759 (1997).
  40. The Jefferson Lab Qweak Collaboration, Precision measurement of the weak charge of the proton, Nature (London) 557, 207 (2018).
  41. P. L. Anthony et al. (SLAC E158 Collaboration), Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005).
  42. C. Y. Prescott et al., Further measurements of parity nonconservation in inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Lett. B 84, 524 (1979).
  43. D. Wang et al., Measurement of parity-violating asymmetry in electron-deuteron inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. C 91, 045506 (2015).
  44. D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, and D. K. Papoulias, Consequences of the Dresden-II reactor data for the weak mixing angle and new physics, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 076.
  45. V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 035.
  46. M. Alpízar-Venegas, L. J. Flores, E. Peinado, and E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, Exploring the standard model and beyond from the evidence of CEνNS with reactor antineutrinos in CONUS+, Phys. Rev. D 111, 053001 (2025).
  47. J. Erler and R. Ferro-Hernández, Weak mixing angle in the Thomson limit, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 196.
  48. M. Zhang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with 259 days of data in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211001 (2025); 136, 069901(E) (2026).
  49. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  50. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide-50 Collaboration), Search for low mass dark matter in DarkSide-50: The Bayesian network approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 322 (2023).
  51. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), preceding Letter, Searches for light dark matter and evidence of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering of solar neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 091806 (2026).
  52. XENON Collaboration, XENONnT/cevns_data_release, 10.5281/zenodo.20576156 (2026).
  53. J. Menendez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Spin-dependent WIMP scattering off nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 86, 103511 (2012).
  54. N. Fornengo, P. Panci, and M. Regis, Long-range forces in direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 84, 115002 (2011).
  55. E. Del Nobile, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Direct detection signatures of self-interacting dark matter with a light mediator, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2015) 055.
  56. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  57. S. Li et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with ionization signals in the PandaX-4T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261001 (2023).
  58. S. Chang, A. Pierce, and N. Weiner, Momentum dependent dark matter scattering, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2010) 006.
  59. P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. P. Pinheiro, and S. Urrea, Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 032.
  60. E. Bertuzzo, G. Grilli di Cortona, and L. M. D. Ramos, Probing light vector mediators with coherent scattering at future facilities, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 075.
  61. C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 531 (2015).
  62. G. Angloher et al., Limits on momentum-dependent asymmetric dark matter with CRESST-II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 021303 (2016).
  63. P. Klos, J. Menéndez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083516 (2013); 89, 029901(E) (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation