- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Open Access
Stimulated Emission or Absorption of Gravitons by Light
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 171501 – Published 22 October, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xd97-c6d7
Abstract
We study the exchange of energy between gravitational and electromagnetic waves in an extended Mach-Zehnder or Sagnac type geometry that is analogous to an “optical Weber bar.” In the presence of a gravitational wave (such as the ones measured by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory), we find that it should be possible to observe (via interference or beating effects after a delay line) signatures of stimulated emission or absorption of gravitons with present-day technology. Apart from marking the transition from passively observing to actively manipulating such a natural phenomenon, this could also be used as a complementary detection scheme. Nonclassical photon states may improve the sensitivity and might even allow us to test certain quantum aspects of the gravitational field.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Viewpoint
Seeking Signatures of Graviton Emission and Absorption
A proposed experiment may deliver evidence for the emission or absorption of gravitons—an advance that might one day enable gravity to be controlled much like electromagnetism is today.
See more in Physics
Article Text
References (54)
- A. Einstein, Näherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Sitzungsber. König. Preuß. Akad. Wiss. 1, 688 (1916).
- A. Einstein, Über Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber. König. Preuß. Akad. Wiss. 1, 154 (1918).
- R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system, Astrophys. J. Lett. 195, L51 (1975).
- J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, A new test of general relativity: Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR , Astrophys. J. 253, 908 (1982).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- See https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/.
- R. M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1984).
In view of the scaling of the emitted power [Eq. (1)], going to much higher frequencies could help, but imagining masses oscillating with amplitudes at frequencies in the kilohertz regime (and detecting small energy shifts of ) shows that such an experiment is also extremely challenging.
Charged particles such as protons and electrons can also be accelerated to nearly the speed of light, but in this case the electromagnetic radiation would dominate any gravitational effects by far.
Note that this applies to the standard coupling to the energy-momentum tensor in linearized general relativity. For other (hypothetical) coupling terms between photons and gravitons, the situation might be different. However, even in those cases, symmetries such as Lorentz invariance restrict such photon-graviton conversion processes strongly.
- F. Spengler, D. Rätzel, and D. Braun, Perspectives of measuring gravitational effects of laser light and particle beams, New J. Phys. 24, 053021 (2022).
- See https://lasers.llnl.gov/.
- S. Boughn and T. Rothman, Aspects of graviton detection: Graviton emission and absorption by atomic hydrogen, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 5839 (2006).
- T. Rothman and S. Boughn, Can gravitons be detected?, Found. Phys. 36, 1801 (2006).
- M. Giovannini, Stimulated emission of relic gravitons and their super-Poissonian statistics, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950185 (2019).
- J. Gräfe, F. Adamietz, and R. Schützhold, Energy transfer between gravitational waves and quantum matter, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064056 (2023).
- J. Weber, Gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 498 (1967).
- J. Weber, Gravitational-wave-detector events, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1307 (1968).
- J. Weber, Evidence for discovery of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1320 (1969).
Even though the renormalized expectation values or could also become negative in some regions of space-time, the total volume integral of them must be non-negative.
These mirrors, however, change the propagation direction not from to but rather from to or from to , and thus they do not change the sign of in Eq. (5).
- K. X. Sun, M. M. Fejer, E. Gustafson, and R. L. Byer, Sagnac interferometer for gravitational wave detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3053 (1996).
- C. J. Hogan and P. L. Bender, Estimating stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with Sagnac calibration, Phys. Rev. D 64, 062002 (2001).
- Y. b. Chen, Sagnac interferometer as a speed meter type, quantum nondemolition gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D 67, 122004 (2003).
- T. Eberle, S. Steinlechner, J. Bauchrowitz, V. Handchen, H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, H. Muller-Ebhardt, and R. Schnabel, Quantum enhancement of the zero-area Sagnac interferometer topology for gravitational wave detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 251102 (2010).
- R. Lieu, Exclusion of standard gravitons by LIGO observation, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 19LT02 (2018).
- V. B. Braginskii and Y. I. Vorontsov, Quantum-mechanical limitations in macroscopic experiments and modern experimental techniques, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 114, 41 (1974).
- W. G. Unruh, Analysis of quantum nondemolition measurement, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1764 (1978).
- W. G. Unruh, Quantum nondemolition and gravity-wave detection, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2888 (1979).
- J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nat. Photonics 7, 613 (2013).
- M. Bailes, B. K. Berger, P. R. Brady, M. Branchesi, K. Danzmann, M. Evans, K. Holley-Bockelmann, B. R. Iyer, T. Kajita, S. Katsanevas et al., Gravitational-wave physics and astronomy in the 2020s and 2030s, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 344 (2021).
- J. P. Dowling, Quantum optical metrology—The lowdown on high-NOON states, Contemp. Phys. 49, 125 (2008).
- G. Tobar, S. K. Manikandan, T. Beitel, and I. Pikovski, Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing, Nat. Commun. 15, 7229 (2024).
- G. Tobar, I. Pikovski, and M. E. Tobar, Detecting kHz gravitons from a neutron star merger with a multi-mode resonant mass detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 055017 (2025).
- G. Baym and T. Ozawa, Two-slit diffraction with highly charged particles: Niels Bohr’s consistency argument that the electromagnetic field must be quantized, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3035 (2009).
- O. Romero-Isart, Quantum superposition of massive objects and collapse models, Phys. Rev. A 84, 052121 (2011).
- A. Mari, G. De Palma, and V. Giovannetti, Experiments testing macroscopic quantum superpositions must be slow, Sci. Rep. 6, 22777 (2016).
- A. Belenchia, R. M. Wald, F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, Č. Brukner, and M. Aspelmeyer, Quantum superposition of massive objects and the quantization of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 98, 126009 (2018).
- N. Altamirano, P. Corona-Ugalde, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Gravity is not a pairwise local classical channel, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 145005 (2018).
- C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017).
- D. L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran, and R. M. Wald, Gravitationally mediated entanglement: Newtonian field versus gravitons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 086001 (2022).
- M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, T. C. Ralph, and C. Brukner, General relativistic effects in quantum interference of photons, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 224010 (2012).
- I. Pikovski, M. Zych, F. Costa, and C. Brukner, Universal decoherence due to gravitational time dilation, Nat. Phys. 11, 668 (2015).
- M. P. Blencowe, Effective field theory approach to gravitationally induced decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021302 (2013).
- C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, A master equation for gravitational decoherence: Probing the textures of spacetime, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 165007 (2013).
- A. Bassi, A. Großardt, and H. Ulbricht, Gravitational decoherence, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 193002 (2017).
- G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems, Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).
- L. Diósi, Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1165 (1989).
- R. Penrose, On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 28, 581 (1996).
- G. Amelino-Camelia, Gravity-wave interferometers as quantum-gravity detectors, Nature (London) 398, 216–218 (1999).
- D. Kafri, J. M. Taylor, and G. J. Milburn, A classical channel model for gravitational decoherence, New J. Phys. 16, 065020 (2014).
- D. Carney, P. C. E. Stamp, and J. M. Taylor, Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: A user’s manual, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 034001 (2019).
- For theories modifying the standard rules of quantum mechanics in gravity, the resulting experimental implications depend on the specific model under consideration. Furthermore, for each specific model, one should first study whether it does or does not contradict the known experimental results and observations. For example, if one takes the naive semiclassical Einstein equations seriously, one would get averaged gravitational fields for statistical mixtures of a mass at different positions, which is not correct [, Indirect evidence for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 979–982 (1981)].
In principle, the stimulated emission or absorption of gravitons could also be achieved via mechanical means, e.g., via a rotating and vibrating barbell; see [16]. However, somewhat similar to a comment in [8], the required parameters make such an experiment quite challenging.