Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Holographic Absolutely Maximally Entangled States in Black Hole Interiors

Takanori Anegawa*

Kotaro Tamaoka†

  • Department of Physics, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Sakura-josui, Tokyo 156-8550, Japan

  • *Contact author: takanegawa@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: tamaoka.kotaro@nihon-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 261601 – Published 29 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w7nc-l9s5

Abstract

We argue that the special extremal slice inside an AdS black hole is dual to an absolutely maximally entangled (AME) state. We demonstrate this by confirming the n-independence of holographic nth Renyi entropies for any bipartite subsystems. Our result gives an AME state in an infinite-volume system, where the local bond dimension is set by the black hole entropy. In particular, our construction provides concrete support from the gravity side for the emergence of random structures and an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space in recent nonisometric holographic codes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  2. G. ’t Hooft, Conf. Proc. C 930308, 284 (1993).
  3. L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377 (1995).
  4. J. M. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 021.
  5. L. Fidkowski, V. Hubeny, M. Kleban, and S. Shenker, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2004) 014.
  6. D. Harlow and P. Hayden, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 085.
  7. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 120.
  8. A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, G. Penington, and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 121.
  9. A. B. Zamolodchikov, arXiv:hep-th/0401146.
  10. F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B915, 363 (2017).
  11. L. McGough, M. Mezei, and H. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 010.
  12. G. Araujo-Regado, R. Khan, and A. C. Wall, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 026.
  13. R. M. Soni and A. C. Wall, arXiv:2407.16769.
  14. S. Ali Ahmad, A. Almheiri, and S. Lin, arXiv:2503.19854.
  15. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 014.
  16. W. Helwig, W. Cui, A. Riera, J. I. Latorre, and H.-K. Lo, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052335 (2012).
  17. W. Helwig, arXiv:1306.2879.
  18. A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 163.
  19. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 149.
  20. X. Dong, D. Harlow, and D. Marolf, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 240.
  21. X. Dong, Nat. Commun. 7, 12472 (2016).
  22. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743 (1993).
  23. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  24. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington, and S. Vardhan, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 155.
  25. M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992).
  26. A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 034.
  27. E. Witten, in Strings 2001: International Conference (2001).
  28. J. M. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 013.
  29. V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2007) 062.
  30. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  31. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 090.
  32. This slice generally differs from the maximal-volume slice used in holographic complexity, as the maximization is performed over different codimension objects.

  33. L. Susskind, Universe 7, 464 (2021).
  34. L. Andersson, G. J. Galloway, and R. Howard, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 51, 581 (1998).
  35. To use the theorem, we need to assume κ to be C1 for each variable and restrict κ to 0<κ<κ0<π/d.

  36. Here we suppress auxiliary qubits for interior Hilbert space in order to align degrees of freedom for input and output. These qubits are not important in the present context.

  37. The hierarchy was originally motivated in the entropy of evaporating black hole: if radiation is collected for a time interval T>tPage, the radiation entropy grows linearly in time, SR∝T, and can greatly exceed SBH=log dim HB. In our framework, the interior entanglement entropy SA∝T reproduces this growth, suggesting existence of the null states inside the black hole.

  38. Z. Li, T. Mori, and B. Yoshida, arXiv:2502.04437.
  39. C. Akers and P. Rath, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 208.
  40. S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 178.
  41. A. J. Scott, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052330 (2004).
  42. F. Huber, O. Gühne, and J. Siewert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 200502 (2017).
  43. F. Huber, C. Eltschka, J. Siewert, and O. Gühne, J. Phys. A 51, 175301 (2018).
  44. Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka, and Z. Wei, Phys. Rev. D 103, 026005 (2021).
  45. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031601 (2023).
  46. Y. Ishiyama, R. Kojima, S. Matsui, and K. Tamaoka, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 093B10 (2022).
  47. P. Kraus, J. Liu, and D. Marolf, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 027.
  48. T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 004.
  49. M. Guica and R. Monten, SciPost Phys. 10, 024 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation