Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Drops Can Perpetually Bounce over a Vibrating Wettable Solid

Lebo Molefe1,2,*, Tomas Fullana2,*,†, François Gallaire2, and John M. Kolinski1

  • 1Engineering Mechanics of Soft Interfaces (EMSI) Laboratory, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 2Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics and Instabilities (LFMI), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: tomas.fullana@epfl.ch

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 144001 – Published 2 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w3qq-cnj3

Abstract

On the surface of a vibrating liquid bath, instead of coalescing, a drop will continually bounce on a thin film of air between the drop and the free surface, giving rise to rich chaotic dynamics and quantum analog behavior. However, perpetual bouncing is yet to be demonstrated on a vibrating rigid solid, where the control of the drop’s motion is not limited by the bath dynamics. Here we show that vibration of an atomically smooth mica surface prolongs a drop’s hovering state by several orders of magnitude, increasing the time to wet from less than a second to several minutes. The excitation of the second spherical harmonic mode determines a transition between a bouncing state with high-amplitude rebounds, and a bound state, where the drop’s motion is locked onto the vibrating solid above a thin air layer. We further develop a coupled linear spring model, accounting for the drop’s deformation, that predicts bouncing trajectories without fitting parameters. Our results extend the scope of bouncing drop studies beyond the liquid bath and highlight the potential for precision manipulation of small liquid quantities in air.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Video

Drops Hover Indefinitely Above Vibrating Solid Surface

Published 2 October, 2025

An atomically smooth surface that oscillates vertically can host drops that either bounce or hover in place, depending on the oscillation frequency.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (56)

  1. S. Amini, S. Kolle, L. Petrone, O. Ahanotu, S. Sunny, C. N. Sutanto, S. Hoon, L. Cohen, J. C. Weaver, J. Aizenberg, N. Vogel, and A. Miserez, Science 357, 668 (2017).
  2. S. A. McBride, J. R. Lake, and K. K. Varanasi, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 134721 (2023).
  3. C. Antonini, M. Innocenti, T. Horn, M. Marengo, and A. Amirfazli, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 67, 58 (2011).
  4. J. Chen, R. Dou, D. Cui, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, F. Xu, X. Zhou, J. Wang, Y. Song, and L. Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 4026 (2013).
  5. R. Y. Siddiquie, A. Gaddam, A. Agrawal, S. S. Dimov, and S. S. Joshi, Langmuir 36, 5349 (2020).
  6. W. Barthlott and C. Neinhuis, Planta 202, 1 (1997).
  7. M. Zhang, S. Feng, L. Wang, and Y. Zheng, Biotribology 5, 31 (2016).
  8. A.-L. Biance, C. Clanet, and D. Quéré, Phys. Fluids 15, 1632 (2003).
  9. D. Quéré, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 197 (2013).
  10. D. Richard and D. Quéré, Europhys. Lett. 50, 769 (2000).
  11. J. Kolinski, L. Mahadevan, and S. Rubinstein, Europhys. Lett. 108, 24001 (2014).
  12. J. de Ruiter, R. Lagraauw, D. van den Ende, and F. Mugele, Nat. Phys. 11, 48 (2015).
  13. J. de Ruiter, R. Lagraauw, F. Mugele, and D. van den Ende, J. Fluid Mech. 776, 531 (2015).
  14. I. Blekhman, L. Blekhman, L. Vaisberg, V. Vasil’kov, and K. Yakimova, Dokl. Phys. 53, 520 (2008).
  15. B. Apffel, F. Novkoski, A. Eddi, and E. Fort, Nature (London) 585, 48 (2020).
  16. B. Apffel, S. Hidalgo-Caballero, A. Eddi, and E. Fort, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2111214118 (2021).
  17. Y. Couder, E. Fort, C.-H. Gautier, and A. Boudaoud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 177801 (2005).
  18. Y. Couder, S. Protière, E. Fort, and A. Boudaoud, Nature (London) 437, 208 (2005).
  19. S. Protière, A. Boudaoud, and Y. Couder, J. Fluid Mech. 554, 85 (2006).
  20. J. Moláček and J. W. Bush, J. Fluid Mech. 727, 582 (2013).
  21. D. Terwagne, F. Ludewig, N. Vandewalle, and S. Dorbolo, Phys. Fluids 25, 122101 (2013).
  22. Øistein Wind-Willassen, J. Moláček, D. M. Harris, and J. W. M. Bush, Phys. Fluids 25, 082002 (2013).
  23. Y. Couder and E. Fort, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 154101 (2006).
  24. A. Eddi, E. Fort, F. Moisy, and Y. Couder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 240401 (2009).
  25. D. M. Harris, J. Moukhtar, E. Fort, Y. Couder, and J. W. M. Bush, Phys. Rev. E 88, 011001(R) (2013).
  26. P. J. Sáenz, T. Cristea-Platon, and J. W. M. Bush, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay9234 (2020).
  27. P. J. Sáenz, G. Pucci, S. E. Turton, A. Goujon, R. R. Rosales, J. Dunkel, and J. W. M. Bush, Nature (London) 596, 58 (2021).
  28. V. Sanjay, P. Chantelot, and D. Lohse, J. Fluid Mech. 958, A26 (2023).
  29. J. M. Kolinski, S. M. Rubinstein, S. Mandre, M. P. Brenner, D. A. Weitz, and L. Mahadevan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 074503 (2012).
  30. R. Kaviani and J. M. Kolinski, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 103602 (2023).
  31. J. E. Sprittles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 56, 91 (2024).
  32. Lord Rayleigh, Proc. R. Soc. 29, 71 (1879).
  33. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/w3qq-cnj3 for details on methods and additional results, which includes Refs. [34–47].
  34. Bluestar Silicones, BLUESIL TM: FLD 47 V 3 bis 47 V 20 (2011), https://my.elkem.com/product2/bluesil-fld-47v20-a2/01tbI000000UD1RQAW.
  35. L. Molefe, G. A. Zampogna, J. M. Kolinski, and F. Gallaire, J. Fluid Mech. 1001, A59 (2024).
  36. A. Daerr and A. Mogne, J. Open Res. Software 4, 3 (2016).
  37. T. J. Senden and W. A. Ducker, Langmuir 8, 733 (1992).
  38. S. Popinet, J. Comput. Phys. 190, 572 (2003).
  39. S. Afkhami and M. Bussmann, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 57, 453 (2008).
  40. S. Afkhami and M. Bussmann, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 61, 827 (2009).
  41. R. Scardovelli and S. Zaleski, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 567 (1999).
  42. S. Popinet and S. Zaleski, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 30, 775 (1999).
  43. G. Tryggvason, R. Scardovelli, and S. Zaleski, Direct Numerical Simulations of Gas-Liquid Multiphase Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  44. J. U. Brackbill, D. B. Kothe, and C. Zemach, J. Comput. Phys. 100, 335 (1992).
  45. J. B. Bell, P. Colella, and H. M. Glaz, J. Comput. Phys. 85, 257 (1989).
  46. B. Zhang, V. Sanjay, S. Shi, Y. Zhao, C. Lv, X.-Q. Feng, and D. Lohse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 104501 (2022).
  47. P. K. Sharma and H. N. Dixit, Phys. Fluids 32, 112107 (2020).
  48. S. Popinet, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 5838 (2009).
  49. S. Popinet, J. Comput. Phys. 302, 336 (2015).
  50. A. Potnis and A. Saha, J. Fluid Mech. 988, A15 (2024).
  51. C. Miller and L. Scriven, J. Fluid Mech. 32, 417 (1968).
  52. A. Prosperetti, J. Fluid Mech. 100, 333 (1980).
  53. K. Okumura, F. Chevy, D. Richard, D. Quéré, and C. Clanet, Europhys. Lett. 62, 237 (2003).
  54. W. Bouwhuis, K. G. Winkels, I. R. Peters, P. Brunet, D. van der Meer, and J. H. Snoeijer, Phys. Rev. E 88, 023017 (2013).
  55. L. Molefe, T. Fullana, F. Gallaire, and J. M. Kolinski, , 10.5281/zenodo.16875198 (2025).
  56. J. Moláček and J. W. M. Bush, Phys. Fluids 24, 127103 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation