- Open Access
Precision Hypernuclear Structure from Interaction Cross Sections
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 162502 – Published 15 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vzp5-ttyh
Abstract
We establish interaction cross sections as a quantitative structural observable for hypernuclei. Using the hypertriton, , as the most stringent benchmark, microscopic three-body wave functions are combined with a finite-range coupled-channel Glauber calculation and Bayesian inversion. For at , the interaction cross section decreases from about 1150 to 750 mb as the separation energy increases from 0.1 to 0.5 MeV, while propagated reaction-model uncertainties remain near 5%. A measurement therefore supplies a direct inversion , constraining both the matter radius and the separation energy. The framework provides the missing quantitative link between proposed interaction-cross-section measurements and the spatial structure of an already formed hypernucleus. Although demonstrated for the hypertriton, the methodology is readily extendable to other weakly bound hypernuclei.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (22)
- A. Obertelli et al., Matter radius of the hyperhalo candidate from interaction cross-section measurements, GSI/FAIR Experimental Proposal G-22-00073 (2022).
- Simone Velardita, Hector Alvarez-Pol, Thomas Aumann, Yassid Ayyad, Meytal Duer, Hans-Werner Hammer, Liancheng Ji, Alexandre Obertelli, and Yelei Sun, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 139 (2023).
- I. Tanihata, H. Hamagaki, O. Hashimoto, Y. Shida, N. Yoshikawa, K. Sugimoto, O. Yamakawa, T. Kobayashi, and N. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676 (1985).
- A. Ozawa, T. Suzuki, and I. Tanihata, Nucl. Phys. A693, 32 (2001).
- M. Juric et al., Nucl. Phys. B52, 1 (1973).
- D. H. Davis, Nucl. Phys. A754, 3c (2005).
- H.-W. Hammer, C. Ji, and D. R. Phillips, J. Phys. G 44, 103002 (2017).
- C. Ji, D. R. Phillips, and L. Platter, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 327, 1803 (2012).
- F. Hildenbrand and H.-W. Hammer, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034002 (2019).
- J. Adam et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 102, 064905 (2020).
- ALICE Collaboration, arXiv:2604.07949.
- S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 797, 134905 (2019).
- C. Rappold et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 041001(R) (2013).
- J. Adamczewski-Musch et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 015207 (2017).
- E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
- Y. Suzuki and K. Varga, Stochastic Variational Approach to Quantum-Mechanical Few-Body Problems (Springer, New York, 1998).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/vzp5-ttyh for technical details regarding the calculation of the hypertriton three-body wavefunction, the finite-range optical-limit Glauber model with channel decomposition, the Bayesian uncertainty quantification, and the influence of Coulomb breakup.
- M. L. Good and W. D. Walker, Phys. Rev. 120, 1857 (1960).
- C. A. Bertulani and P. Danielewicz, Introduction to Nuclear Reactions (IOP Publishing, Bristol, 2004).
- R. J. Glauber, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by W. E. Brittin and L. G. Dunham (Interscience, New York, 1959), Vol. 1, p. 315.
- C. A. Bertulani and A. Gade, Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 372 (2006).
- E. A. Teixeira, T. Aumann, C. A. Bertulani, and B. V. Carlson, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 205 (2022).