- Open Access
Optical Injection and Detection of Long-Lived Interlayer Excitons in van der Waals Heterostructures
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 246502 – Published 10 December, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/stgs-2s58
Abstract
Interlayer excitons in semiconducting bilayers separated by insulating hexagonal boron nitride (-BN) layers constitute a promising platform for investigation of strongly correlated bosonic phases. Here, we report an optical method for the generation and characterization of long-lived interlayer excitons. We confirm the presence of tightly bound interlayer excitons by measuring 1s and 2s intralayer excitons in each layer concurrently. Using a pump-probe technique, we find interlayer exciton lifetimes up to , increasing with the thickness of the -BN. With optical access to long-lived interlayer excitons, our approach provides a new route to explore degenerate Bose–Fermi mixtures of excitons and itinerant electrons with high spatial and temporal resolution.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (45)
- M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 190401 (2011).
- K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, A. Rietzler, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 210401 (2012).
- M. Alloing, M. Beian, M. Lewenstein, D. Fuster, Y. González, L. González, R. Combescot, M. Combescot, and F. Dubin, Europhys. Lett. 107, 10012 (2014).
- M. Combescot, R. Combescot, and F. Dubin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 066501 (2017).
- C. Zerba, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Imamoǧlu, and M. Knap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056902 (2024).
- J. von Milczewski, X. Chen, A. Imamoglu, and R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 226903 (2024).
- A. A. High, J. R. Leonard, A. T. Hammack, M. M. Fogler, L. V. Butov, A. V. Kavokin, K. L. Campman, and A. C. Gossard, Nature (London) 483, 584 (2012).
- L. Ma, P. X. Nguyen, Z. Wang, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature (London) 598, 585 (2021).
- R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, Z. Zhang, Y. Zeng, T. Zheng, Q. Feng, J. Xie, E. Regan, Z. Lu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, M. F. Crommie, A. H. MacDonald, and F. Wang, Nat. Commun. 14, 8264 (2023).
- P. X. Nguyen, L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Science 388, 274 (2025).
- R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, Z. Zhang, J. Xie, Q. Feng, Z. Lu, Z. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, and F. Wang, Science 388, 278 (2025).
- P. Rivera, J. R. Schaibley, A. M. Jones, J. S. Ross, S. Wu, G. Aivazian, P. Klement, K. Seyler, G. Clark, N. J. Ghimire et al., Nat. Commun. 6, 6242 (2015).
- L. A. Jauregui, A. Y. Joe, K. Pistunova, D. S. Wild, A. A. High, Y. Zhou, G. Scuri, K. De Greve, A. Sushko, C.-H. Yu et al., Science 366, 870 (2019).
- Y. Shimazaki, I. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, and A. Imamoǧlu, Nature (London) 580, 472 (2020).
- F. Mahdikhanysarvejahany, D. N. Shanks, M. Klein, Q. Wang, M. R. Koehler, D. G. Mandrus, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, O. L. Monti, B. J. LeRoy et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 5354 (2022).
- J. Cutshall, F. Mahdikhany, A. Roche, D. N. Shanks, M. R. Koehler, D. G. Mandrus, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Q. Zhu, B. J. LeRoy et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eadr1772 (2025).
- D. Snoke, Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2011, 938609 (2011).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/stgs-2s58 for experimental details, additional figures and further discussion, which includes Refs. [19–27].
- A. Reinhard, Strong photon-photon interactions in solid state cavity QED, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, 2013.
- J. G. Roch, D. Miserev, G. Froehlicher, N. Leisgang, L. Sponfeldner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, and R. J. Warburton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 187602 (2020).
- T. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Lu, Y. Li, S. Miao, Z. Lian, Y. Meng, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe et al., Phys. Rev. X 10, 021024 (2020).
- E. Liu, J. van Baren, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y.-C. Chang, and C. H. Lui, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205420 (2019).
- T. Smoleński, O. Cotlet, A. Popert, P. Back, Y. Shimazaki, P. Knüppel, N. Dietler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Kroner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097403 (2019).
- J. Kang, S. Tongay, J. Zhou, J. Li, and J. Wu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 012111 (2013).
- P. Rivera, H. Yu, K. L. Seyler, N. P. Wilson, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 1004 (2018).
- Y. Yoon, Z. Zhang, R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, R. Sailus, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, and F. Wang, Nano Lett. 22, 10140 (2022).
- T. Handa, M. Holbrook, N. Olsen, L. N. Holtzman, L. Huber, H. I. Wang, M. Bonn, K. Barmak, J. C. Hone, A. N. Pasupathy et al., Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4060 (2024).
Device 1 shows very weak interlayer PL, whereas no interlayer PL is observed in Device 2 or 3; see Fig. S2 in Supplemental Material [18].
- M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu, Nat. Phys. 13, 255 (2017).
We emphasize that the two types of doping can be spectrally distinguished in [21]: the presence of a single attractive polaron (AP) resonance in the spectrum unequivocally indicates hole doping since electron doping of leads to two AP features associated with the singlet and triplet trions. By contrast, displays a single AP peak under both electron and hole doping. Additional confirmation comes from Device 3, a heterostructure, where the layer clearly exhibits two AP features under electron doping, consistent with our interpretation of the spectra in Devices 1 and 2 (see Fig. S6 [18]).
- I. Amelio, N. D. Drummond, E. Demler, R. Schmidt, and A. Imamoglu, Phys. Rev. B 107, 155303.
- Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature (London) 587, 214 (2020).
- A. Popert, Y. Shimazaki, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Imamoǧlu, and T. Smoleński, Nano Lett. 22, 7363 (2022).
- J. Kim, H. Dery, and D. Van Tuan, Phys. Rev. B 112, L041301 (2025).
- A. Christianen, A. M. Seiler, A. Tüǧen, and A. İmamoǧlu (to be published).
- N. Kiper, H. S. Adlong, A. Christianen, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. İmamoǧlu, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011049 (2025).
The parabolic trend in the logarithmic plot in Fig. 4 is clearly visible; similar nonexponential time dependence has also been observed by Cutshall et al. [16] in a time-resolved PL measurement.
- T. Uto, B. Evrard, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, and A. İmamoǧlu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056901 (2024).
- B. Khorana, Phys. Rev. 185, 299 (1969).
- K. G. Lagoudakis, B. Pietka, M. Wouters, R. André, and B. Deveaud-Plédran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 120403 (2010).
- M. Abbarchi, A. Amo, V. Sala, D. Solnyshkov, H. Flayac, L. Ferrier, I. Sagnes, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, G. Malpuech et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 275 (2013).
- R. Rapaport, G. Chen, S. Simon, O. Mitrofanov, L. Pfeiffer, and P. M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075428 (2005).
- A. Gärtner, L. Prechtel, D. Schuh, A. W. Holleitner, and J. P. Kotthaus, Phys. Rev. B 76, 085304 (2007).
- E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yumigeta et al., Nature (London) 579, 359 (2020).
- A. Tüǧen and A. M. Seiler, 2025, 10.3929/ethz-c-000785878.