Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Novel Limits on Dark Photon Mixing from Radiation Safety

Wen Yin

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 131803 – Published 3 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/snnn-wqxg

Abstract

I propose a novel laboratory search for dark photons based on radiation-safety monitoring at synchrotron radiation facilities, including NanoTerasu, SPring-8, the KEK Photon Factory, and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Dark photons can be produced parasitically in undulators or via photon-mirror interactions and subsequently traverse optical systems and shielding. Taking into account quantum effects and the internal structure of undulators, mirrors, and detectors, I show that even a simple Geiger-Müller counter routinely used for radiation-safety monitoring can detect such dark photons outside the shielding and set the strongest purely laboratory limits on the kinetic mixing parameter, χ≲5×10−6, in the mass range 1–50 eV. Since radiation safety is strictly regulated, the resulting limits provide robust and realistic constraints.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (38)

  1. J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, Contemp. Phys. 52, 211 (2011).
  2. K. Ehret et al., Phys. Lett. B 689, 149 (2010).
  3. T. Inada, T. Namba, S. Asai, T. Kobayashi, Y. Tanaka, K. Tamasaku, K. Sawada, and T. Ishikawa, Phys. Lett. B 722, 301 (2013).
  4. M. Betz, F. Caspers, M. Gasior, M. Thumm, and S. W. Rieger, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075014 (2013).
  5. J. W. D. Halliday et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 055001 (2025).
  6. R. Battesti, M. Fouche, C. Detlefs, T. Roth, P. Berceau, F. Duc, P. Frings, G. L. J. A. Rikken, and C. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250405 (2010).
  7. F. Della Valle, A. Ejlli, U. Gastaldi, G. Messineo, E. Milotti, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, and G. Zavattini, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 24 (2016).
  8. T. Inada et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 071803 (2017).
  9. R. Ballou et al. (OSQAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 92, 092002 (2015).
  10. P. Sikivie, D. B. Tanner, and K. van Bibber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 172002 (2007).
  11. P. Carenza, T. Ferreira, and T. T. Q. Nguyen, arXiv:2507.08932.
  12. W. Yin and J. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 111, 036020 (2025).
  13. W. Yin, arXiv:2507.22055.
  14. See also various models and searches that motivate dark photons in this mass range for dark matter production [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22] and for addressing the Hubble tension [23]. In particular, several dark matter production mechanisms point to this mass window [18, 19], given that the matter-radiation equality occurs around the eV temperature scale, similar to the prediction of the hot dark matter paradigm. See also proposals for dark matter decay searches in this mass range [24, 25]. For dark matter searches, one can consider γ′→γϕ with ϕ being a light scalar field, producing a narrow line. Furthermore, multilaser collision experiments may probe dark photons in this mass range via the γ′γγγ coupling, similar to the ALP search proposed in Ref. [26].

  15. T. Moroi and W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 301.
  16. T. Moroi and W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 296.
  17. K. Nakayama and W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 026.
  18. W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 180.
  19. K. Sakurai and W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 202.
  20. T. Fujita, K. Murai, K. Nakayama, and W. Yin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2024) 007.
  21. N. Kitajima and K. Nakayama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2023) 014.
  22. P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103520 (2016).
  23. S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063016 (2023).
  24. T. Bessho, Y. Ikeda, and W. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095025 (2022).
  25. T. Bessho, Y. Ikeda, and W. Yin, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 13096, 1309678 (2024).
  26. A. Nobuhiro, Y. Hirahara, K. Homma, Y. Kirita, T. Ozaki, Y. Nakamiya, M. Hashida, S. Inoue, and S. Sakabe, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 073C01 (2020).
  27. T. Mochizuki, Y. Sakurai, D. Shu, T. Kuzay, and H. Kitamura, Synchrotron Radiat. News 5, 1199 (1998).
  28. https://beamline.harima.riken.jp/en/bl_info/bl43lxu_info_en.html.
  29. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/snnn-wqxg for reviews of the derivations of photon production in an undulator and of the continuity conditions at material boundaries in the photon–dark photon system, which includes Refs. [12,13,30,31].
  30. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).
  31. B. L. Henke, E. M. Gullikson, and J. C. Davis, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 54, 181 (1993).
  32. One can easily see that |M|2 with small m reduces to the usual oscillation form multiplied by the wave packet when I take χmireff=0, corresponding to ImΠmir≫m2, i.e. when the mirror effectively acts as a perfect “wall.”

  33. G. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement (4th ed.) (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010).
  34. H. An, M. Pospelov, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 041302 (2013).
  35. H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Phys. Lett. B 747, 331 (2015).
  36. K. Sakurai and W. Yin, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 498 (2023).
  37. See also https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/EPR-First_Res-PDA/html/ti5.htm. The threshold 1  μSv/h is larger than the actual radiation-safety level adopted in facilities, and thus provides a conservative limit.
  38. A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095029 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation