Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fault-Tolerant Stabilizer Measurements in Surface Codes with Three-Qubit Gates

Josias Old1,2,*, Stephan Tasler3,†, Michael J. Hartmann3, and Markus Müller1,2

  • *Contact author: j.old@fz-juelich.de
  • †Contact author: stephan.tasler@fau.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 240601 – Published 9 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sblg-fbq4

Abstract

Stabilizer quantum error correction (QEC) codes, in particular topological surface codes, are prime candidates to enable practical quantum computing. While it is widely believed that strictly fault-tolerant protocols can only be implemented using single- and two-qubit gates, several quantum computing platforms, including trapped ions, neutral atoms, and superconducting qubits, support native multi-qubit operations. In this Letter, we show that stabilizer measurement circuits for unrotated surface codes can be fault tolerant using single auxiliary qubits and three-qubit gates. These gates enable lower-depth circuits with fewer fault locations and potentially shorter QEC cycle times. We find that in an optimistic parameter regime where fidelities of three-qubit gates are the same as those of two-qubit gates, the logical error rate can be up to one order of magnitude lower and the threshold significantly higher, increasing from ≈0.63% to ≈0.83%. Our results, applicable to a wide range of platforms, motivate further investigation into multi-qubit gates for fault-tolerant QEC as they can offer substantial time and physical qubit resource advantages to reach a given target logical error rate.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Low-Depth Quantum Error Correction via Three-Qubit Gates in Rydberg Atom Arrays

Laura Pecorari, Sven Jandura, and Guido Pupillo
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 240602 (2025)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. H. Zurek, Resilient quantum computation: Error models and thresholds, Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 365 (1998).
  2. B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015).
  3. P. Aliferis, D. Gottesman, and J. Preskill, Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes, Quantum Inf. Comput. 6, 97 (2006).
  4. P. Shor, Fault-tolerant quantum computation, in Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, Los Alamitos, California, 1996), pp. 56–65, 10.1109/SFCS.1996.548464.
  5. A. M. Steane, Active stabilization, quantum computation, and quantum state synthesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2252 (1997).
  6. T. J. Yoder and I. H. Kim, The surface code with a twist, Quantum 1, 2 (2017).
  7. R. Chao and B. W. Reichardt, Quantum error correction with only two extra qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 050502 (2018).
  8. C. Chamberland and M. E. Beverland, Flag fault-tolerant error correction with arbitrary distance codes, Quantum 2, 53 (2018).
  9. T. Tansuwannont and D. Leung, Achieving fault tolerance on capped color codes with few ancillas, PRX Quantum 3, 030322 (2022).
  10. A. G. Manes and J. Claes, Distance-preserving stabilizer measurements in hypergraph product codes, Quantum 9, 1618 (2025).
  11. Y. Tomita and K. M. Svore, Low-distance surface codes under realistic quantum noise, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062320 (2014).
  12. N. Berthusen, J. Dreiling, C. Foltz, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, D. Gresh, N. Hewitt, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, P. Siegfried, and D. Hayes, Experiments with the four-dimensional surface code on a quantum charge-coupled device quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062413 (2024).
  13. S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, A. D. Paolo, E. Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Herrmann, G. J. Norris, C. K. Andersen, M. Müller, A. Blais, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature (London) 605, 669 (2022).
  14. Y. Zhao et al., Realization of an error-correcting surface code with superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 030501 (2022).
  15. Google Quantum AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature (London) 614, 676 (2023).
  16. Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Nature (London) 638, 920 (2025).
  17. J. F. Marques, B. M. Varbanov, M. S. Moreira, H. Ali, N. Muthusubramanian, C. Zachariadis, F. Battistel, M. Beekman, N. Haider, W. Vlothuizen, A. Bruno, B. M. Terhal, and L. DiCarlo, Logical-qubit operations in an error-detecting surface code, Nat. Phys. 18, 80 (2022).
  18. J. Zhang, Z.-Y. Chen, Y.-J. Wang, B.-H. Lu, H.-F. Zhang, J.-N. Li, P. Duan, Y.-C. Wu, and G.-P. Guo, Demonstrating a universal logical gate set in error-detecting surface codes on a superconducting quantum processor, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 177 (2025).
  19. S. Burton, E. Durso-Sabina, and N. C. Brown, Genons, double covers and fault-tolerant Clifford gates, arXiv:2406.09951.
  20. D. Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature (London) 626, 58 (2024).
  21. M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).
  22. S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature (London) 622, 268 (2023).
  23. A. Bermudez, X. Xu, R. Nigmatullin, J. O’Gorman, V. Negnevitsky, P. Schindler, T. Monz, U. G. Poschinger, C. Hempel, J. Home, F. Schmidt-Kaler, M. Biercuk, R. Blatt, S. Benjamin, and M. Müller, Assessing the progress of trapped-ion processors towards fault-tolerant quantum computation, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041061 (2017).
  24. D. P. DiVincenzo and F. Solgun, Multi-qubit parity measurement in circuit quantum electrodynamics, New J. Phys. 15, 075001 (2013).
  25. Y. Kim, A. Morvan, L. B. Nguyen, R. K. Naik, C. Jünger, L. Chen, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, High-fidelity three-qubit iToffoli gate for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits, Nat. Phys. 18, 783 (2022).
  26. G. Üstün, A. Morello, and S. Devitt, Single-step parity check gate set for quantum error correction, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 035037 (2024).
  27. M. J. Reagor, T. C. Bohdanowicz, D. R. Perez, E. A. Sete, and W. J. Zeng, Hardware optimized parity check gates for superconducting surface codes, arXiv:2211.06382.
  28. D. Schwerdt, Y. Shapira, T. Manovitz, and R. Ozeri, Comparing two-qubit and multiqubit gates within the toric code, Phys. Rev. A 105, 022612 (2022).
  29. S. Tasler, J. Old, L. Heunisch, V. Feulner, T. Eckstein, M. Müller, and M. J. Hartmann, Optimizing superconducting three-qubit gates for surface-code error correction, arXiv:2506.09028.
  30. S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Surface code stabilizer measurements for Rydberg atoms, arXiv:2405.16621.
  31. D. Gottesman, Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 1997).
  32. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 4452 (2002).
  33. H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Optimal resources for topological two-dimensional stabilizer codes: Comparative study, Phys. Rev. A 76, 012305 (2007).
  34. D. Horsman, A. G. Fowler, S. Devitt, and R. Van Meter, Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery, New J. Phys. 14, 123011 (2012).
  35. D. Gottesman, Surviving as a Quantum Computer in a Classical World (2024), https://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2024/cmsc858G/.
  36. J.-P. Tillich and G. Zémor, Quantum LDPC codes with positive rate and minimum distance proportional to the square root of the blocklength, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60, 1193 (2013).
  37. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/sblg-fbq4 contains details on circuits, on simulation and verification methods, as well as additional simulations related to the czz gate noise strength, which includes Refs. [38–45].
  38. C. Gidney, Decorrelated depolarization, https://algassert.com/post/2001 (2020), accessed: 14-Febuary-2025.
  39. A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).
  40. O. Melchert, autoScale.py—A program for automatic finite-size scaling analyses: A user’s guide, arXiv:0910.5403.
  41. A. Sorge, pyfssa 0.7.6, Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.35293 (2015).
  42. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion, Phys. Rev. A 62, 022311 (2000).
  43. E. Zahedinejad, J. Ghosh, and B. C. Sanders, Designing high-fidelity single-shot three-qubit gates: A machine-learning approach, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 054005 (2016).
  44. C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016).
  45. L. Abdurakhimov et al., Technology and performance benchmarks of IQM’s 20-Qubit quantum computer, arXiv:2408.12433.
  46. C. Gidney, Stim: A fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quantum 5, 497 (2021).
  47. C. Gidney, M. Newman, and M. McEwen, Benchmarking the planar honeycomb code, Quantum 6, 813 (2022).
  48. O. Higgott, T. C. Bohdanowicz, A. Kubica, S. T. Flammia, and E. T. Campbell, Improved decoding of circuit noise and fragile boundaries of tailored surface codes, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031007 (2023).
  49. J. Preskill, Reliable quantum computers, Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 385 (1998).
  50. T. Itoko, M. Malekakhlagh, N. Kanazawa, and M. Takita, Three-qubit parity gate via simultaneous cross-resonance drives, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 034018 (2024).
  51. X. Xu, S. Wang, R. Joshi, R. Hai, and M. H. Ansari, Parity cross-resonance: A multiqubit gate, arXiv:2508.10807.
  52. Q. Xu, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, C. A. Pattison, N. Raveendran, D. Bluvstein, J. Wurtz, B. Vasić, M. D. Lukin, L. Jiang, and H. Zhou, Constant-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation with reconfigurable atom arrays, Nat. Phys. 20, 1084 (2024).
  53. S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature (London) 627, 778 (2024).
  54. J. Old, M. Rispler, and M. Müller, Lift-connected surface codes, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045012 (2024).
  55. L. Pecorari, S. Jandura, and G. Pupillo, following Letter, Low-depth quantum error correction via three-qubit gates in Rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 240602 (2025).
  56. J. Old, oldjosias/three-qubit-ft-sc: v2.0.0, 10.5281/zenodo.17816307 (2025).
  57. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
  58. P.-J. H. S. Derks, A. Townsend-Teague, A. G. Burchards, and J. Eisert, Designing fault-tolerant circuits using detector error models, Quantum 9, 1905 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation