Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tying Knots in Particle Physics

Minoru Eto1,2,3, Yu Hamada4,2, and Muneto Nitta5,2,3

  • 1Department of Physics, Yamagata University, Kojirakawa-machi 1-4-12, Yamagata, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan
  • 2Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan
  • 3International Institute for Sustainability with Knotted Chiral Meta Matter (WPI-SKCM2), Hiroshima University, 1-3-2 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8511, Japan
  • 4Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestraße 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
  • 5Department of Physics, Keio University, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 091603 – Published 29 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s3vd-brsn

Abstract

Knots emerge in various fields of mathematics and physics today. We show that knots indeed appear as stable solitons in a realistic extension of the standard model of particle physics that provides the QCD axion and right-handed neutrinos. This result suggests that, during the early Universe, a “knot dominated era” may have existed, where knots were a dominant component of the Universe, and this scenario can be tested through gravitational wave observations. Furthermore, we propose that the end of this era involves the collapse of the knots via quantum tunneling, leading to the generation of matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (149)

  1. W. H. Thomson, Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh 25, 217 (1869).
  2. P. G. Tait, Sci. Papers 1, 273 (1898).
  3. L. H. Kauffman, Knots and Physics, Series on Knots & Everything (World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, Singapore, 1991).
  4. L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, Nature (London) 387, 58 (1997).
  5. H. K. Moffatt, J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117 (1969).
  6. R. L. Ricca and M. A. Berger, Phys. Today 49, No. 12, 28 (1996).
  7. R. L. Ricca, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 32C, 185 (2009).
  8. D. Kleckner and W. T. M. Irvine, Nat. Phys. 9, 253 (2013).
  9. V. I. Arnold and B. A. Khesin, Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics (Springer, Cham, 2021).
  10. E. Babaev, L. D. Faddeev, and A. J. Niemi, Phys. Rev. B 65, 100512(R) (2002).
  11. F. N. Rybakov, J. Garaud, and E. Babaev, Phys. Rev. B 100, 094515 (2019).
  12. D. Proment, M. Onorato, and C. F. Barenghi, Phys. Rev. E 85, 036306 (2012).
  13. D. Kleckner, L. H. Kauffman, and W. T. M. Irvine, Nat. Phys. 12, 650 (2016).
  14. Y. Kawaguchi, M. Nitta, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 180403 (2008); 101, 029902(E) (2008).
  15. D. Hall, M. Ray, K. Tiurev et al., Nat. Phys. 12, 478 (2016).
  16. T. Ollikainen, A. Blinova, M. Möttönen, and D. S. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 163003 (2019).
  17. G. Volovik and V. P. Mineev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 46, 401 (1977).
  18. G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford Scholarship Online (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2009).
  19. BryanGin-ge Chen, P. J. Ackerman, G. P. Alexander, R. D. Kamien, and I. I. Smalyukh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 237801 (2013).
  20. T. Machon and G. P. Alexander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027801 (2014).
  21. P. Ackerman, J. van de Lagemaat, and I. Smalyukh, Nat. Commun. 6, 6012 (2015).
  22. P. Ackerman and I. Smalyukh, Nat. Mater. 16, 426 (2017).
  23. P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011006 (2017).
  24. J.-S. Tai, P. Ackerman, and I. Smalyukh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 921 (2018).
  25. J.-S. B. Tai and I. I. Smalyukh, Science 365, 1449 (2019).
  26. G. P. Alexander, BryanGin-ge Chen, E. A. Matsumoto, and R. D. Kamien, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 497 (2012).
  27. I. I. Smalyukh, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 106601 (2020).
  28. J.-S. Wu and I. I. Smalyukh, Hopfions, Heliknotons, Skyrmions, Torons and Both Abelian and Non-Abelian Vortices in Chiral Liquid Crystals (Taylor & Francis, London, 2022).
  29. N. Kent et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 1562 (2021).
  30. M. R. Dennis, R. P. King, B. Jack, K. O’Holleran, and M. J. Padgett, Nat. Phys. 6, 118 (2010).
  31. A. Trautman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 16, 561 (1977).
  32. A. F. Ranada, Lett. Math. Phys. 18, 97 (1989).
  33. H. Kedia, I. Bialynicki-Birula, D. Peralta-Salas, and W. T. M. Irvine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 150404 (2013).
  34. M. Arrayás, D. Bouwmeester, and J. L. Trueba, Phys. Rep. 667, 1 (2017).
  35. S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022).
  36. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
  37. R. A. Battye and P. M. Sutcliffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4798 (1998).
  38. N. S. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
  39. E. Radu and M. S. Volkov, Phys. Rep. 468, 101 (2008).
  40. M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta, Phys. Lett. B 728, 314 (2014).
  41. Y. M. Shnir, Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2018).
  42. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  43. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977).
  44. If we assume the existence of a UV theory, C is quantized as C=Ng2/32π2 with an integer N.

  45. P. A. Horvathy, arXiv:0704.3220.
  46. P. A. Horvathy and P. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 481, 83 (2009).
  47. N. Yokoi, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 107, 114 (2013).
  48. Formally this is the same as cross helicity in magnetohydro dynamics when we regard ∇→a as the velocity of fluid [47, 49].

  49. H. Nastase and J. Sonnenschein, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 144.
  50. Knots are also discussed in similar systems without the Chern-Simons coupling [51, 52, 53].

  51. E. Babaev, A. Sudbo, and N. W. Ashcroft, Nature (London) 431, 666 (2004).
  52. J. Smiseth, E. Smorgrav, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbo, Phys. Rev. B 71, 214509 (2005).
  53. E. Babaev, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043001 (2004).
  54. A similar vortex loop with the charge/current is known as the vorton [55, 56]. Our knot soliton considered here is different from those as it does not contain internal degrees of freedom on the loop.

  55. R. L. Davis and E. P. S. Shellard, Nucl. Phys. B323, 209 (1989).
  56. R. L. Davis and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Lett. B 209, 485 (1988).
  57. S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. D 101, 065011 (2020).
  58. S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. D 102, 045022 (2020).
  59. J. Ruostekoski and J. R. Anglin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3934 (2001).
  60. R. A. Battye, N. R. Cooper, and P. M. Sutcliffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 080401 (2002).
  61. M. Nitta, K. Kasamatsu, M. Tsubota, and H. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. A 85, 053639 (2012).
  62. M. Eto, K. Kasamatsu, M. Nitta, H. Takeuchi, and M. Tsubota, Phys. Rev. A 83, 063603 (2011).
  63. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/s3vd-brsn for the details of the numerical calculation, which includes Ref. [64]; for the derivation of the number density, which includes Refs. [65–69]; for the details of the alternaive baryogenesis scenario, which includes Refs. [70–84]; for the calculation of the lepton asymmetry, which includes Refs. [85–88]; and for the calculation of the GW spectrum, which includes Refs. [89–98].
  64. M. R. Hestenes, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 4, 303 (1969).
  65. N. Turok, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2625 (1989).
  66. J. Borrill, E. J. Copeland, and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Lett. B 258, 310 (1991).
  67. R. A. Leese and T. Prokopec, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3749 (1991).
  68. A. Vilenkin and E. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
  69. T. Vachaspati and G. B. Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 373 (1994).
  70. J. M. Hyde, A. J. Long, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 89, 065031 (2014).
  71. K. Kamada and A. J. Long, Phys. Rev. D 94, 063501 (2016).
  72. K. Kamada and A. J. Long, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123509 (2016).
  73. I. Affleck and M. Dine, Nucl. Phys. B249, 361 (1985).
  74. R. T. Co and K. Harigaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 111602 (2020).
  75. M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2743 (1988).
  76. W. D. Garretson, G. B. Field, and S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5346 (1992).
  77. M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2006) 018.
  78. K. Kamada, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103506 (2018).
  79. V. Domcke, K. Kamada, K. Mukaida, K. Schmitz, and M. Yamada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 201802 (2021).
  80. M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 281 (1978); 42, 746(E) (1979).
  81. A. Y. Ignatiev, N. V. Krasnikov, V. A. Kuzmin, and A. N. Tavkhelidze, Phys. Lett. 76B, 436 (1978).
  82. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 850 (1979).
  83. A. Maleknejad, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083518 (2021).
  84. Y. Akamatsu and N. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 052002 (2013).
  85. M. Flanz, E. A. Paschos, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B 345, 248 (1995); 384, 487(E) (1996); 382, 447(E) (1996).
  86. L. Covi, E. Roulet, and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 384, 169 (1996).
  87. W. Buchmuller and M. Plumacher, Phys. Lett. B 431, 354 (1998).
  88. S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, Phys. Lett. B 535, 25 (2002).
  89. C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 53, R575 (1996).
  90. C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2535 (1996).
  91. C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 65, 043514 (2002).
  92. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Lett. 107B, 47 (1981).
  93. N. Turok, Nucl. Phys. B242, 520 (1984).
  94. J. M. Quashnock and D. N. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2505 (1990).
  95. J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023512 (2014).
  96. J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104046 (2017).
  97. S. Blasi, V. Brdar, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043321 (2020).
  98. S. Blasi, V. Brdar, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041305 (2021).
  99. The electric flux may cause an instability for a and Ai through the Chern-Simons coupling [100]. Even though our setup has some differences from theirs, this effect still exists in our case and causes oscillating profiles of a and Ai inside the ϕ1 strings. However, the inner profiles are not crucial for the stability because the electric charge is fixed by the linking number unless the strings do not have overlap.

  100. H. Ooguri and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 161803 (2012).
  101. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  102. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  103. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  104. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  105. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979).
  106. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  107. T. Yanagida, Conf. Proc. C 7902131, 95 (1979).
  108. J. E. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
  109. M. A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980).
  110. Because of the couplings of the knot soliton with fermions, they could cause instability on the knot soliton such as Schwinger pair production to screen the electric field [111, 112]. However, when the typical size of the knot solitons are smaller than the typical length scale of the fermions, the knot soliton behaves like a point particle, and hence the electric field inside it, which produces the repulsive force among the ϕ1 strings, is hard to be screened by them. In addition, axion strings can be superconducting due to current/charge carriers [113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118]. This, however, does not affect the stability when the size of the knot solitons is much smaller than localization scale of the carriers. The investigation of the parameter space of the fermion couplings for the stability is beyond the scope of this Letter.

  111. P. Agrawal, A. Hook, J. Huang, and G. Marques-Tavares, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 103.
  112. K. Harigaya, X. Niu, W. Xue, and F. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 063.
  113. G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. 151B, 123 (1985).
  114. A. Iwazaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2927 (1997).
  115. N. Ganoulis and G. Lazarides, Nucl. Phys. B316, 443 (1989).
  116. G. Lazarides, C. Panagiotakopoulos, and Q. Shafi, Nucl. Phys. B296, 657 (1988).
  117. H. Fukuda, A. V. Manohar, H. Murayama, and O. Telem, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 052.
  118. Y. Abe, Y. Hamada, and K. Yoshioka, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 172.
  119. I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018).
  120. J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 051.
  121. K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, K. Yanagi, and J. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103015 (2018).
  122. A. Caputo and G. Raffelt, Proc. Sci. COSMICWISPers (2024) 041 [arXiv:2401.13728].
  123. Giving ϕ2 a small nonzero charge under U(1)B−L, the setup may additionally solve the axion quality problem [124, 125, 126].

  124. H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 771, 327 (2017).
  125. M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, and T. T. Yanagida, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 049.
  126. Y.-C. Qiu, J.-W. Wang, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 071802 (2023).
  127. T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rep. 67, 183 (1980).
  128. W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  129. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (CRC Press in Boca Raton, Florida, 1990), Vol. 69.
  130. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4168 (1999).
  131. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000).
  132. S. Hannestad, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043506 (2004).
  133. T. Asaka, K. Hamaguchi, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 464, 12 (1999).
  134. G. F. Giudice, M. Peloso, A. Riotto, and I. Tkachev, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (1999) 014.
  135. T. Asaka, K. Hamaguchi, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 61, 083512 (2000).
  136. G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B 258, 305 (1991).
  137. K. Kumekawa, T. Moroi, and T. Yanagida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 92, 437 (1994).
  138. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  139. A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5431 (1997).
  140. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, Nucl. Phys. B692, 303 (2004).
  141. Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123505 (2018).
  142. Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 081.
  143. Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2020) 032.
  144. G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L8 (2023).
  145. K. Schmitz, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 097.
  146. S. Kawamura et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A105 (2021).
  147. D. Reitze et al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019).
  148. N. Bartolo et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2016) 026.
  149. G. Janssen et al., Proc. Sci. AASKA14 (2015) 037 [arXiv:1501.00127].

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation