Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Kibble-Zurek Dynamics in the Anisotropic Ising Model of the Si(001) Surface

G. Schaller1, F. Queisser1, S. P. Katoorani1, C. Brand2, C. Kohlfürst1, M. R. Freeman3, A. Hucht2, P. Kratzer2, B. Sothmann2 et al.

M. Horn-von Hoegen2 and R. Schützhold1,4

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246202 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rmc4-xqb3

Abstract

As a simplified description of the nonequilibrium dynamics of buckled dimers on the Si(001) surface, we consider the anisotropic two-dimensional (2D) Ising model and study the freezing of spatial correlations during a cooling quench across the critical point. Depending on the cooling rate, we observe a crossover from one-dimensional (1D) to 2D behavior. For rapid cooling, we find effectively 1D behavior in the strongly coupled direction, for which we provide an exact analytic solution of the nonequilibrium dynamics. For slower cooling rates, we start to see 2D behavior where our numerical simulations show an approach to the usual Kibble–Zurek scaling in 2D.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (70)

  1. P. Bak and M. Paczuski, Complexity, contingency, and criticality, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 6689 (1995).
  2. S. L. Sondhi, S. M. Girvin, J. P. Carini, and D. Shahar, Continuous quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 315 (1997).
  3. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  4. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  5. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?, Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  6. T. W. B. Kibble and G. E. Volovik, On phase ordering behind the propagating front of a second-order transition, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 65, 102 (1997).
  7. W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005).
  8. B. Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the Kibble-Zurek mechanism of topological defect production: Landau-Zener transitions from a new perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 035701 (2005).
  9. L. Cincio, J. Dziarmaga, M. M. Rams, and W. H. Zurek, Entropy of entanglement and correlations induced by a quench: Dynamics of a quantum phase transition in the quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. A 75, 052321 (2007).
  10. A. Dutta, R. R. P. Singh, and U. Divakaran, Quenching through Dirac and semi-Dirac points in optical lattices: Kibble-Zurek scaling for anisotropic quantum critical systems, Europhys. Lett. 89, 67001 (2010).
  11. A. del Campo, G. De Chiara, G. Morigi, M. B. Plenio, and A. Retzker, Structural defects in ion chains by quenching the external potential: The inhomogeneous Kibble-Zurek mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 075701 (2010).
  12. C.-W. Liu, A. Polkovnikov, and A. W. Sandvik, Dynamic scaling at classical phase transitions approached through nonequilibrium quenching, Phys. Rev. B 89, 054307 (2014).
  13. P. M. Chesler, A. M. García-García, and H. Liu, Defect formation beyond Kibble-Zurek mechanism and holography, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021015 (2015).
  14. J. Sonner, A. del Campo, and W. H. Zurek, Universal far-from-equilibrium dynamics of a holographic superconductor, Nat. Commun. 6, 7406 (2015).
  15. P. Silvi, G. Morigi, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Crossover from classical to quantum Kibble-Zurek scaling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 225701 (2016).
  16. D. Jaschke, K. Maeda, J. D. Whalen, M. L. Wall, and L. D. Carr, Critical phenomena and Kibble–Zurek scaling in the long-range quantum Ising chain, New J. Phys. 19, 033032 (2017).
  17. B. Dóra, M. Heyl, and R. Moessner, The Kibble-Zurek mechanism at exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 10, 2254 (2019).
  18. R. Puebla, O. Marty, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Kibble-Zurek physics in long-range transverse-field Ising models, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032115 (2019).
  19. L. Ulčakar, J. Mravlje, and T. Rejec, Kibble-Zurek behavior in disordered Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 216601 (2020).
  20. K. Hódsági and M. Kormos, Kibble–Zurek mechanism in the Ising field theory, SciPost Phys. 9, 055 (2020).
  21. H. Oshiyama, N. Shibata, and S. Suzuki, Kibble–Zurek mechanism in a dissipative transverse Ising chain, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 104002 (2020).
  22. C. J. O. Reichhardt, A. del Campo, and C. Reichhardt, Kibble-Zurek mechanism for nonequilibrium phase transitions in driven systems with quenched disorder, Commun. Phys. 5, 173 (2022).
  23. Á. Bácsi and B. Dóra, Kibble–Zurek scaling due to environment temperature quench in the transverse field Ising model, Sci. Rep. 13, 4034 (2023).
  24. A. Weitzel, G. Schaller, F. Queisser, and R. Schützhold, Continuous dimer angles on the silicon surface: Critical properties and the Kibble-Zurek mechanism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245125 (2024).
  25. V. M. H. Ruutu, V. B. Eltsov, A. J. Gill, T. W. B. Kibble, M. Krusius, Yu G. Makhlin, B. Plaçais, G. E. Volovik, and Wen Xu, Vortex formation in neutron-irradiated superfluid He3 as an analogue of cosmological defect formation, Nature (London) 382, 334 (1996).
  26. V. B. Eltsov, T. W. B. Kibble, M. Krusius, V. M. H. Ruutu, and G. E. Volovik, Composite defect extends analogy between cosmology and He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4739 (2000).
  27. S. Ulm, J. Roßnagel, G. Jacob, C. Degünther, S. T. Dawkins, U. G. Poschinger, R. Nigmatullin, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, Observation of the Kibble-Zurek scaling law for defect formation in ion crystals, Nat. Commun. 4, 2290 (2013).
  28. G. Lamporesi, S. Donadello, S. Serafini, F. Dalfovo, and G. Ferrari, Spontaneous creation of Kibble–Zurek solitons in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Nat. Phys. 9, 656 (2013).
  29. S. Deutschländer, P. Dillmann, G. Maret, and P. Keim, Kibble–Zurek mechanism in colloidal monolayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 6925 (2015).
  30. M. Gong, X. Wen, G. Sun, D.-W. Zhang, D. Lan, Y. Zhou, Y. Fan, Y. Liu, X. Tan, H. Yu, Y. Yu, S.-L. Zhu, S. Han, and P. Wu, Simulating the Kibble-Zurek mechanism of the Ising model with a superconducting qubit system, Sci. Rep. 6, 22667 (2016).
  31. J. Beugnon and N. Navon, Exploring the Kibble–Zurek mechanism with homogeneous Bose gases, J. Phys. B 50, 022002 (2017).
  32. L.-Y. Qiu, H.-Y. Liang, Y.-B. Yang, H.-X. Yang, T. Tian, Y. Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of generalized Kibble-Zurek mechanism across a first-order quantum phase transition in a spinor condensate, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba7292 (2020).
  33. J. Rysti, J. T. Mäkinen, S. Autti, T. Kamppinen, G. E. Volovik, and V. B. Eltsov, Suppressing the Kibble-Zurek mechanism by a symmetry-violating bias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 115702 (2021).
  34. K. Du, X. Fang, C. Won, C. De, F.-T. Huang, W. Xu, H. You, F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, A. del Campo, and S.-W. Cheong, Kibble–Zurek mechanism of Ising domains, Nat. Phys. 19, 1495 (2023).
  35. B.-W. Li, Y.-K. Wu, Q.-X. Mei, R. Yao, W.-Q. Lian, M.-L. Cai, Y. Wang, B.-X. Qi, L. Yao, L. He, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Probing critical behavior of long-range transverse-field Ising model through quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism, PRX Quantum 4, 010302 (2023).
  36. T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two-dimensional Ising model as a soluble problem of many fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 856 (1964).
  37. B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, The Two-Dimensional Ising Model (Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1973).
  38. R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Academic Press, London, 1989).
  39. M. A. Neto, R. A. dos Anjos, and J. R. de Sousa, Anisotropic Ising model in a magnetic field: Effective-field theory analysis, Phys. Rev. B 73, 214439 (2006).
  40. H. Hobrecht and A. Hucht, Anisotropic scaling of the two-dimensional Ising model I: The torus, SciPost Phys. 7, 26 (2019).
  41. H. Hobrecht and A. Hucht, Anisotropic scaling of the two-dimensional Ising model II: surfaces and boundary fields, SciPost Phys. 8, 32 (2020).
  42. A. Hucht, The square lattice Ising model on the rectangle III: Hankel and Toeplitz determinants, J. Phys. A 54, 375201 (2021).
  43. H. J. W. Zandvliet, Phase diagram of the square 2D Ising lattice with nearest neighbor and next-nearest neighbor interactions, Phase Transitions 96, 187 (2023).
  44. A. Saxena, E. T. Gawlinski, and J. D. Gunton, Structural phase transitions on the Si(100) surface, Surf. Sci. 160, 618 (1985).
  45. M. Kubota and Y. Murata, Streak patterns in low-energy electron diffraction on Si(001), Phys. Rev. B 49, 4810 (1994).
  46. Y. Murata and M. Kubota, Order-disorder transition on Si(001), Phase Transitions 53, 125 (1995).
  47. K. Inoue, Y. Morikawa, K. Terakura, and M. Nakayama, Order-disorder phase transition on the Si(001) surface: Critical role of dimer defects, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14774(R) (1994).
  48. Y. Nakamura, H. Kawai, and M. Nakayama, Influence of defects on the order-disorder phase transition of a Si(001) surface, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10549 (1997).
  49. H. Kawai, Y. Nakamura, and M. Nakayama, Kinetic one-dimensional Ising system on a narrow Si(001)SB terrace, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 3936 (1999).
  50. D. Pillay, B. Stewart, C. B. Shin, and G. S. Hwang, Revisit to the Ising model for order–disorder phase transition on Si(001), Surf. Sci. 554, 150 (2004).
  51. H. Kawai, O. Narikiyo, and K. Matsufuji, Structural phase transition between c(4×2) and p(2×2) structures on Si(001) surface under observation by scanning tunneling microscopy, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 034602 (2007).
  52. C. Brand, A. Hucht, G. Jnawali, J. D. Fortmann, B. Sothmann, H. Mehdipour, P. Kratzer, R. Schützhold, and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Dimer coupling energies of the Si(001) surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126203 (2023).
  53. C. Brand, A. Hucht, H. Mehdipour, G. Jnawali, J. D. Fortmann, M. Tajik, R. Hild, B. Sothmann, P. Kratzer, R. Schützhold, and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Critical behavior of the dimerized Si(001) surface: Continuous order-disorder phase transition in the two-dimensional Ising universality class, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134104 (2024).
  54. R. A. Wolkow, Direct observation of an increase in buckled dimers on Si(001) at low temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2636 (1992).
  55. R. G. Zhao and W. S. Yang, Atomic structure of the Si(001) c(4×2) surface, Phys. Rev. B 33, 6780 (1986).
  56. Y. Pennec, M. Horn-von Hoegen, Xiaobin Zhu, D. C. Fortin, and M. R. Freeman, Dynamics of an Ising chain under local excitation: A scanning tunneling microscopy study of Si(100) dimer rows at 5 K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 026102 (2006).
  57. D. S. Fisher, Scaling and critical slowing down in random-field Ising systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 416 (1986).
  58. J. R. Tredicce, G. L. Lippi, Paul Mandel, B. Charasse, A. Chevalier, and B. Picqué, Critical slowing down at a bifurcation, Am. J. Phys. 72, 799 (2004).
  59. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/rmc4-xqb3 for a brief review of the Kibble-Zurek argument, the derivation and solution of the time-dependent 1D Ising model equations, the derivation and approximate solution of the time-dependent 2D Ising model equations, and an exposure of the numerical methods.
  60. J. Dąbrowski, E. Pehlke, and M. Scheffler, Calculation of the surface stress anisotropy for the buckled Si(001)(1×2) and p(2×2) surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4790 (1994).
  61. R. J. Glauber, Time-dependent statistics of the Ising model, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 294 (1963).
  62. Y. Sakai and K. Hukushima, Dynamics of one-dimensional Ising model without detailed balance condition, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 064003 (2013).
  63. A. O. Caldeira, A. H. Castro Neto, and T. Oliveira de Carvalho, Dissipative quantum systems modeled by a two-level-reservoir coupling, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13974 (1993).
  64. C. Timm, Tunneling through molecules and quantum dots: Master-equation approaches, Phys. Rev. B 77, 195416 (2008).
  65. L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. I. A Two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  66. F. M. Bulnes, V. D. Pereyra, and J. L. Riccardo, Collective surface diffusion: n-fold way kinetic Monte Carlo simulation, Phys. Rev. E 58, 86 (1998).
  67. K. Binder and D. W. Heermann, Rejection-Free Monte Carlo (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 179–190.
  68. P. Kratzer, Monte Carlo and Kinetic Monte Carlo methods—A tutorial, in Multiscale Simulation Methods in Molecular Sciences, Volume 42 of NIC Series (John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC), Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 2009), pp. 51–76.
  69. R. M. Tromp and M. C. Reuter, Step morphologies on small-miscut Si(001) surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7598 (1993).
  70. F. Suzuki and W. H. Zurek, Topological defect formation in a phase transition with tunable order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 241601 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation