- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Finite-Size Spectral Signatures of Order by Quantum Disorder: A Perspective from Anderson’s Tower of States

Subhankar Khatua1,2,3,*, Griffin C. Howson1,2, Michel J. P. Gingras1,4, and Jeffrey G. Rau2

  • *Contact author: s.khatua@ifw-dresden.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 146702 – Published 8 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rdyh-2fqj

Abstract

In frustrated magnetic systems with a subextensive number of classical ground states, quantum zero-point fluctuations can select a unique long-range ordered state, a celebrated phenomenon referred to as order by quantum disorder (ObQD). For frustrated spin-12 models, unbiased numerical methods able to expose ObQD are necessary. We show that ObQD can be identified from exact diagonalization calculations through an analysis akin to the Anderson tower of states associated with spontaneous symmetry breaking. By defining an effective quantum rotor model, we describe the competition between ObQD-induced localization of the rotor and its tunneling between symmetry-related ground states, identifying the crossover length scale from the finite-size regime where the rotor is delocalized to the infinite system-size limit where it becomes localized. This rotor model relates the characteristic splittings in the exact diagonalization energy spectrum to the ObQD selection energy scale, providing an estimate that can be compared to spin wave calculations. We demonstrate the general applicability of this approach in one-, two-, and three-dimensional frustrated spin models that exhibit ObQD.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (90)

  1. P. W. Anderson, Ordering and antiferromagnetism in ferrites, Phys. Rev. 102, 1008 (1956).
  2. J. Villain, Insulating spin glasses, Z. Phys. B 33, 31 (1979).
  3. J. T. Chalker, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and E. F. Shender, Hidden order in a frustrated system: Properties of the Heisenberg kagomé antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 855 (1992).
  4. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Low-temperature properties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12049 (1998).
  5. S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin ice state in frustrated magnetic pyrochlore materials, Science 294, 1495 (2001).
  6. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  7. M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Quantum spin ice: A search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 056501 (2014).
  8. L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2017).
  9. Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer, Berlin, 2011).
  10. S. Trebst and C. Hickey, Kitaev materials, Phys. Rep. 950, 1 (2022).
  11. E. F. Shender, Antiferromagnetic garnets with fluctuationally interacting sublattices, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 178 (1982), https://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/e/56/1/p178?a=list.
  12. E. Rastelli and A. Tassi, Order produced by quantum disorder in the Heisenberg rhombohedral antiferromagnet, J. Phys. C 20, L303 (1987).
  13. C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a frustrated vector antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2056 (1989).
  14. J. R. Tessman, Magnetic anisotropy at 0 °K, Phys. Rev. 96, 1192 (1954).
  15. K. Kubo and T. Kishi, Ordering due to quantum fluctuations in the frustrated Heisenberg model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 567 (1991).
  16. A. Chubukov, Order from disorder in a kagomé antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 832 (1992).
  17. C. L. Henley, Selection by quantum fluctuations of dipolar order in a diamond lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2788 (1994).
  18. P. A. McClarty, P. Stasiak, and M. J. P. Gingras, Order-by-disorder in the XY pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024425 (2014).
  19. B. Danu, G. Nambiar, and R. Ganesh, Extended degeneracy and order by disorder in the square lattice J1−J2−J3 model, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094438 (2016).
  20. J. G. Rau, P. A. McClarty, and R. Moessner, Pseudo-Goldstone gaps and order-by-quantum disorder in frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 237201 (2018).
  21. R. Schick, T. Ziman, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Quantum versus thermal fluctuations in the fcc antiferromagnet: Alternative routes to order by disorder, Phys. Rev. B 102, 220405 (2020).
  22. S. Khatua, S. Srinivasan, and R. Ganesh, State selection in frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B 103, 174412 (2021).
  23. V. Noculak, D. Lozano-Gómez, J. Oitmaa, R. R. P. Singh, Y. Iqbal, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. Reuther, Classical and quantum phases of the pyrochlore S=12 magnet with Heisenberg and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214414 (2023).
  24. S. Khatua, G. C. Howson, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. G. Rau, Ground state properties of the Heisenberg-compass model on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104426 (2024).
  25. A. Hickey, D. Lozano-Gómez, and M. J. P. Gingras, Order-by-disorder without quantum zero-point fluctuations in the pyrochlore Heisenberg ferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184434 (2025).
  26. A. Hickey, J. G. Rau, S. Khatua, and M. J. P. Gingras, Universal temperature-dependent power law excitation gaps in frustrated quantum spin systems harboring order-by-disorder, arXiv:2505.18253.
  27. T. Brueckel, B. Dorner, A. G. Gukasov, V. P. Plakhty, W. Prandl, E. F. Shender, and O. P. Smirnow, Dynamical interaction of antiferromagnetic subsystems: A neutron scattering study of the spinwave spectrum of the garnet Fe2Ca3(GeO4)3, Z. Phys. B 72, 477 (1988).
  28. Y. J. Kim, A. Aharony, R. J. Birgeneau, F. C. Chou, O. Entin-Wohlman, R. W. Erwin, M. Greven, A. B. Harris, M. A. Kastner, I. Y. Korenblit, Y. S. Lee, and G. Shirane, Ordering due to quantum fluctuations in Sr2Cu3O4Cl2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 852 (1999).
  29. J. D. M. Champion, M. J. Harris, P. C. W. Holdsworth, A. S. Wills, G. Balakrishnan, S. T. Bramwell, E. Čižmár, T. Fennell, J. S. Gardner, J. Lago, D. F. McMorrow, M. Orendáč, A. Orendáčová, D. M. Paul, R. I. Smith, M. T. F. Telling, and A. Wildes, Er2Ti2O7; Evidence of quantum order by disorder in a frustrated antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 68, 020401 (2003).
  30. M. E. Zhitomirsky, M. V. Gvozdikova, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, Quantum order by disorder and accidental soft mode in Er2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 077204 (2012).
  31. L. Savary, K. A. Ross, B. D. Gaulin, J. P. C. Ruff, and L. Balents, Order by quantum disorder in Er2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 167201 (2012).
  32. K. A. Ross, Y. Qiu, J. R. D. Copley, H. A. Dabkowska, and B. D. Gaulin, Order by disorder spin wave gap in the XY pyrochlore magnet Er2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057201 (2014).
  33. C. L. Sarkis, J. G. Rau, L. D. Sanjeewa, M. Powell, J. Kolis, J. Marbey, S. Hill, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, H. S. Nair, D. R. Yahne, S. Säubert, M. J. P. Gingras, and K. A. Ross, Unravelling competing microscopic interactions at a phase boundary: A single-crystal study of the metastable antiferromagnetic pyrochlore Yb2Ge2O7, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134418 (2020).
  34. M. Elliot, P. A. McClarty, D. Prabhakaran, R. D. Johnson, H. C. Walker, P. Manuel, and R. Coldea, Order-by-disorder from bond-dependent exchange and intensity signature of nodal quasiparticles in a honeycomb cobaltate, Nat. Commun. 12, 3936 (2021).
  35. T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
  36. A. Auerbach, Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, New York, 1998).
  37. A. W. Sandvik, Computational studies of quantum spin systems, AIP Conf. Proc. 1297, 135 (2010).
  38. A. M. Läuchli, Numerical simulations of frustrated systems, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 481–511.
  39. A. W. Sandvik and J. Kurkijärvi, Quantum Monte Carlo simulation method for spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 43, 5950 (1991).
  40. O. F. Syljuåsen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002).
  41. N. Kawashima and K. Harada, Recent developments of world-line Monte Carlo methods, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73, 1379 (2004).
  42. F. F. Assaad, M. Bercx, F. Goth, A. Gätz, J. S. Hofmann, E. Huffman, Z. Liu, F. P. Toldin, J. S. E. Portela, and J. Schwab, The ALF (Algorithms for Lattice Fermions) project release 2.0. Documentation for the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo code, SciPost Phys. Codebases 1 (2022).
  43. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  44. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011).
  45. F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys. 57, 143 (2008).
  46. M. Rigol, T. Bryant, and R. R. P. Singh, Numerical linked-cluster approach to quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187202 (2006).
  47. B. Tang, E. Khatami, and M. Rigol, A short introduction to numerical linked-cluster expansions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 557 (2013).
  48. P. W. Anderson, An approximate quantum theory of the antiferromagnetic ground state, Phys. Rev. 86, 694 (1952).
  49. P. W. Anderson, Concepts in Solids (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).
  50. P. W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).
  51. C. Lhuillier, Frustrated quantum magnets, arXiv:cond-mat/0502464.
  52. A. Wietek, M. Schuler, and A. M. Läuchli, Studying continuous symmetry breaking using energy level spectroscopy, arXiv:1704.08622.
  53. H. Neuberger and T. Ziman, Finite-size effects in Heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2608 (1989).
  54. B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Signature of Néel order in exact spectra of quantum antiferromagnets on finite lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2590 (1992).
  55. P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, Finite size and temperature effects in the AF Heisenberg model, Z. Phys. B 92, 91 (1993).
  56. P. Azaria, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2483 (1993).
  57. B. Bernu, P. Lecheminant, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Exact spectra, spin susceptibilities, and order parameter of the quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 50, 10048 (1994).
  58. J. B. Fouet, P. Sindzingre, and C. Lhuillier, An investigation of the quantum J1−J2−J3 model on the honeycomb lattice, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 241 (2001).
  59. P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, J1−J2 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice: A group-symmetry analysis of order by disorder, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6647 (1995).
  60. N.-G. Zhang, C. L. Henley, C. Rischel, and K. Lefmann, Effective Hamiltonian and low-lying eigenenergy clustering patterns of four-sublattice antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 65, 064427 (2002).
  61. S. Khatua, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. G. Rau, Pseudo-Goldstone modes and dynamical gap generation from order by thermal disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 266702 (2023).
  62. Z. Nussinov and J. van den Brink, Compass models: Theory and physical motivations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1 (2015).
  63. E. Lieb and D. Mattis, Ordering energy levels of interacting spin systems, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 749 (1962).
  64. T. Roscilde, T. Comparin, and F. Mezzacapo, Rotor/spin-wave theory for quantum spin models with U(1) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 108, 155130 (2023).

  65. The (N−1) denominator comes from the total number of interaction pairs per spin in this fully symmetric (maximum-spin) subspace.

  66. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/rdyh-2fqj for the details of the effective Lieb-Mattis and beyond-Lieb-Mattis model derivations. It also includes Refs. [20,22,24,35,36,51,52,60,63,64,67–77].
  67. E. Liviotti, S. Carretta, and G. Amoretti, S-mixing contributions to the high-order anisotropy terms in the effective spin Hamiltonian for magnetic clusters, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 3361 (2002).
  68. J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Zigzag magnetic order in the iridium oxide Na2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 097204 (2013).
  69. J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice: Possible exotic phases in iridium oxides A2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027204 (2010).
  70. P. Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
  71. W. Yang, C. Xu, S. Ma, A. Nocera, and I. Affleck, Left-left-right-right magnetic order in spin-12 Kitaev-Heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035104 (2025).
  72. S. Khatua, R. Shankar, and R. Ganesh, Quantum spin quadrumer, Phys. Rev. B 97, 054403 (2018).
  73. S. Khatua, D. Sen, and R. Ganesh, Effective theories for quantum spin clusters: Geometric phases and state selection by singularity, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134411 (2019).
  74. S. Khatua and R. Ganesh, Berry phase in the rigid rotor: Emergent physics of odd antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 105, 184401 (2022).
  75. C. E. Agrapidis, J. van den Brink, and S. Nishimoto, Ordered states in the Kitaev-Heisenberg model: From 1D chains to 2D honeycomb, Sci. Rep. 8, 1815 (2018).
  76. W. Yang, A. Nocera, and I. Affleck, Comprehensive study of the phase diagram of the spin-12 Kitaev-Heisenberg-Gamma chain, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033268 (2020).
  77. A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 321, 2 (2006).

  78. The factor [N/2(N/2+1)]2 is a phenomenological normalization constant. The true N dependence could, in principle, be found from high-order many-body perturbation theory starting from the Heisenberg limit. This is computationally challenging for anisotropic Hamiltonians [67] and beyond the scope of this Letter.

  79. For the same reason that this accidental degeneracy cannot be lifted classically by two-spin interaction terms, the correction to HLM needed to explain the ObQD splittings must be a higher-spin operator.

  80. The disagreement near ξ∼1.5π is due to a nearby competing phase [24] rendering the effective BLM description inapplicable.

  81. S. Wenzel and W. Janke, Monte Carlo simulations of the directional-ordering transition in the two-dimensional classical and quantum compass model, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064402 (2008).
  82. S. Wenzel, W. Janke, and A. M. Läuchli, Re-examining the directional-ordering transition in the compass model with screw-periodic boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. E 81, 066702 (2010).
  83. J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Spin-orbit physics giving rise to novel phases in correlated systems: Iridates and related materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 195 (2016).
  84. M. Schuler, S. Whitsitt, L.-P. Henry, S. Sachdev, and A. M. Läuchli, Universal signatures of quantum critical points from finite-size torus spectra: A window into the operator content of higher-dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210401 (2016).
  85. S. Whitsitt and S. Sachdev, Transition from the Z2 spin liquid to antiferromagnetic order: Spectrum on the torus, Phys. Rev. B 94, 085134 (2016).
  86. S. Whitsitt, M. Schuler, L.-P. Henry, A. M. Läuchli, and S. Sachdev, Spectrum of the Wilson-Fisher conformal field theory on the torus, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035142 (2017).
  87. M. Schuler, S. Hesselmann, S. Whitsitt, T. C. Lang, S. Wessel, and A. M. Läuchli, Torus spectroscopy of the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa quantum field theory: Free Dirac versus chiral Ising fixed point, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125128 (2021).
  88. A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. Läuchli, Quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions as the organizing principle of a triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021010 (2024).
  89. J. G. Rau and M. J. P. Gingras, Frustrated quantum rare-earth pyrochlores, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 357 (2019).
  90. V. S. Maryasin and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Order from structural disorder in the XY pyrochlore antiferromagnet Er2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. B 90, 094412 (2014).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 146702– Published 8 April, 2026
  • Received 18 November 2025
  • Revised 9 February 2026
  • Accepted 12 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation