Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Simulating the Two-Dimensional t−J Model at Finite Doping with Neural Quantum States

Hannah Lange1,2,3,*,†, Annika Böhler1,2,*,‡, Christopher Roth4, and Annabelle Bohrdt5,2

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: hannah.lange@physik.uni-muenchen.de
  • ‡Contact author: annika.boehler@physik.uni-muenchen.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 136504 – Published 24 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rc31-5hl9

Abstract

Simulating large, strongly interacting fermionic systems remains a major challenge for existing numerical methods. In this Letter, we introduce Gutzwiller projected hidden fermion determinant states (G-HFDS) to simulate the strongly interacting limit of the Fermi-Hubbard model, namely the t−J model, across the entire doping regime. We demonstrate that the G-HFDS achieve energies competitive with matrix product states on lattices as large as 10×10 sites while using several orders of magnitude fewer parameters, suggesting the potential for efficient application to even larger system sizes. This remarkable efficiency enables us to probe low-energy physics across the full doping range, providing new insights into the competition between kinetic and magnetic interactions and the nature of emergent quasiparticles. Starting from the low-doping regime, where magnetic polarons dominate the low energy physics, we track their evolution with increasing doping and different next-nearest neighbor hopping amplitudes through analyses of spin and polaron correlation functions as well as the Fermi surface. Our findings demonstrate the potential of determinant-based neural quantum states with an inherent fermionic sign structure, opening the way for simulating large-scale fermionic systems at any particle filling.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (70)

  1. J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Müller, Z. Phys. B 64, 189 (1986).
  2. L. Bulaevski, É. Nagaev, and D. Khomskii, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 27, 836 (1968).
  3. W. F. Brinkman and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 2, 1324 (1970).
  4. S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12232 (1989).
  5. C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. B 39, 6880 (1989).
  6. F. Grusdt, M. Kánasz-Nagy, A. Bohrdt, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. Greiner, D. Greif, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011046 (2018).
  7. S. M. O’Mahony, W. Ren, W. Chen, Y. X. Chong, X. Liu, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. H. Hamidian, and J. C. S. Davis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2207449119 (2022).
  8. S. Badoux, W. Tabis, F. Laliberté, G. Grissonnanche, B. Vignolle, D. Vignolles, J. Béard, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, N. Doiron-Leyraud, L. Taillefer, and C. Proust, Nature (London) 531, 210 (2016).
  9. S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2109978118 (2021).
  10. B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature (London) 518, 179 (2015).
  11. M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollwöck, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Phys. Rev. X 10, 031016 (2020).
  12. T. Schäfer, N. Wentzell, F. Šimkovic, Y.-Y. He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eckhardt, B. Arzhang et al., Phys. Rev. X 11, 011058 (2021).
  13. H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollwöck, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Science 384, eadh7691 (2024).
  14. D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 239 (2022).
  15. A. Bohrdt, L. Homeier, C. Reinmoser, E. Demler, and F. Grusdt, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 435, 168651 (2021).
  16. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 326, 96 (2011).
  17. F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2017).
  18. G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Science 355, 602 (2017).
  19. O. Sharir, A. Shashua, and G. Carleo, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205136 (2022).
  20. D.-L. Deng, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021021 (2017).
  21. X. Gao and L.-M. Duan, Nat. Commun. 8, 662 (2017).
  22. Z. Denis, A. Sinibaldi, and G. Carleo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 079701 (2025).
  23. Y. Levine, O. Sharir, N. Cohen, and A. Shashua, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 065301 (2019).
  24. R. Rende, L. L. Viteritti, L. Bardone, F. Becca, and S. Goldt, Commun. Phys. 7, 260 (2024).
  25. A. Chen and M. Heyl, Nat. Phys. 20, 1476 (2024).
  26. M. Reh, M. Schmitt, and M. Gärttner, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195115 (2023).
  27. J.-Q. Wang, H.-Q. Wu, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Phys. Rev. B 109, 245120 (2024).
  28. C. Roth, A. Szabó, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054410 (2023).
  29. H. Lange, A. V. de Walle, A. Abedinnia, and A. Bohrdt, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 040501 (2024).
  30. M. Medvidović and J. R. Moreno, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139, 631 (2024).
  31. Y. Nomura and M. Imada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 031001 (2025).
  32. J. Koepsell, D. Bourgund, P. Sompet, S. Hirthe, A. Bohrdt, Y. Wang, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, G. Salomon, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Science 374, 82 (2021).
  33. L. W. Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, K. R. Lawrence, M. Okan, H. Zhang, E. Khatami, N. Trivedi, T. Paiva, M. Rigol, and M. W. Zwierlein, Science 353, 1260 (2016).
  34. J. R. Moreno, G. Carleo, A. Georges, and J. Stokes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2122059119 (2022).
  35. C. Gros, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 189, 53 (1989).
  36. J. B. Marston and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11538 (1989).
  37. B. Dalla Piazza, M. Mourigal, N. B. Christensen, G. J. Nilsen, P. Tregenna-Piggott, T. G. Perring, M. Enderle, D. F. McMorrow, D. A. Ivanov, and H. M. Rønnow, Nat. Phys. 11, 62 (2015).
  38. B. Dalla Piazza, Theories of Experimentally Observed Excitation Spectra of Square Lattice Antiferromagnets, Ph.D. thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, 2014.
  39. R. Jastrow, Phys. Rev. 98, 1479 (1955).
  40. R. P. Feynman and M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. 102, 1189 (1956).
  41. D. Luo and B. K. Clark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 226401 (2019).
  42. J. Hermann, Z. Schätzle, and F. Noé, Nat. Chem. 12, 1755 (2020).
  43. D. Pfau, J. S. Spencer, A. G. D. G. Matthews, and W. M. C. Foulkes, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033429 (2020).
  44. J. Kim, G. Pescia, B. Fore, J. Nys, G. Carleo, S. Gandolfi, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and A. Lovato, arXiv:2305.08831.
  45. I. Romero, J. Nys, and G. Carleo, Commun. Phys. 8, 46 (2025).
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/rc31-5hl9 for a more detailed discussion of different neural quantum state architectures for fermions, as well as more details on the matrix product state calculations and definitions of correlation functions.
  47. J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 34, 1293 (1929).
  48. J. Stokes, J. R. Moreno, E. A. Pnevmatikakis, and G. Carleo, Phys. Rev. B 102, 205122 (2020).
  49. Y. Nomura, A. S. Darmawan, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205152 (2017).
  50. S. Humeniuk, Y. Wan, and L. Wang, SciPost Phys. 14, 171 (2023).
  51. C. Gauvin-Ndiaye, J. Tindall, J. R. Moreno, and A. Georges, arXiv:2311.05749.
  52. Z. Liu and B. K. Clark, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115124 (2024).
  53. B. J. Wurst, D. M. Kennes, and J. B. Profe, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023316 (2025).
  54. T. D. Barrett, A. Malyshev, and A. I. Lvovsky, Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 351 (2022).
  55. K. Inui, Y. Kato, and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043126 (2021).
  56. H. Lange, F. Döschl, J. Carrasquilla, and A. Bohrdt, Commun. Phys. 7, 187 (2024).
  57. N. Yoshioka and R. Hamazaki, Phys. Rev. B 99, 214306 (2019).
  58. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016).
  59. P. Béran, D. Poilblanc, and R. B. Laughlin, Nucl. Phys. B473, 707 (1996).
  60. C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, A. Bohrdt, M. Xu, M. Knap, E. Demler, F. Grusdt, M. Greiner, and D. Greif, Science 365, 251 (2019).
  61. S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 55, 6504 (1997).
  62. S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 60, R753 (1999).
  63. A. Bohrdt, Y. Wang, J. Koepsell, M. Kánasz-Nagy, E. Demler, and F. Grusdt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 026401 (2021).
  64. T. Hartke, B. Oreg, N. Jia, and M. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 113601 (2020).
  65. F. Grusdt, A. Bohrdt, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224422 (2019).
  66. G. Carleo, Lattice fermions, from slater determinants to neural backflow transformations, https://netket.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/lattice-fermions.html.
  67. H. Lange, A. Böhler, C. Roth, and A. Bohrdt, Github repository: Hfdsfortj—simulating the t−j model with hidden fermion determinant states, https://github.com/HannahLange/HFDSfortJ.
  68. C. Hubig, F. Lachenmaier, N.-O. Linden, T. Reinhard, L. Stenzel, A. Swoboda, and M. Grundner, The syten toolkit, https://syten.eu.
  69. C. Hubig, Symmetry-protected tensor networks, https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21348/ (2017).
  70. F. Vicentini, D. Hofmann, A. Szabó, D. Wu, C. Roth, C. Giuliani, G. Pescia, J. Nys, V. Vargas-Calderón, N. Astrakhantsev, and G. Carleo, netket3: Machine Learning Toolbox for Many-Body Quantum Systems, SciPost Phys. Codebases 7 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation