Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Learning Mixed Quantum States in Large-Scale Experiments

Matteo Votto1,*, Marko Ljubotina2,3,4, Cécilia Lancien5, J. Ignacio Cirac6,3, Peter Zoller7,8, Maksym Serbyn4, Lorenzo Piroli9, and Benoît Vermersch1,10

  • *Contact author: votto@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 090801 – Published 4 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rbg2-f61m

Abstract

We present and test a protocol to learn the matrix-product operator (MPO) representation of an experimentally prepared quantum state. The protocol takes as input classical shadows corresponding to local randomized measurements, and outputs the tensors of an MPO maximizing a suitably defined fidelity with the experimental state. The tensor optimization is carried out sequentially, similarly to the well-known density matrix renormalization group algorithm. Our approach is provably efficient under certain technical conditions expected to be met in short-range correlated states and in typical noisy experimental settings. Under the same conditions, we also provide an efficient scheme to estimate fidelities between the learned and the experimental states. We experimentally demonstrate our protocol by learning entangled quantum states of up to N=96 qubits in a superconducting quantum processor. Our method upgrades classical shadows to large-scale quantum computation and simulation experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (106)

  1. R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nat. Phys. 8, 277 (2012).
  2. C. Gross and I. Bloch, Science 357, 995 (2017).
  3. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  4. F. Schäfer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 411 (2020).
  5. M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braumüller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369 (2020).
  6. E. Altman et al., PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021).
  7. M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 023501 (2021).
  8. C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021).
  9. Y. Alexeev et al., PRX Quantum 2, 017001 (2021).
  10. E. Pelucchi, G. Fagas, I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, E. Figueroa, Q. Gong, H. Hannes, J. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, N. Matsuda, J.-W. Pan, F. Schreck, F. Sciarrino, C. Silberhorn, J. Wang, and K. D. Jöns, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 194 (2022).
  11. G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 025003 (2023).
  12. A. Elben, B. Vermersch, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052323 (2019).
  13. A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 9 (2022).
  14. P. Cieśliński, S. Imai, J. Dziewior, O. Gühne, L. Knips, W. Laskowski, J. Meinecke, T. Paterek, and T. Vértesi, Phys. Rep. 1095, 1 (2024).
  15. T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Science 364, 260 (2019).
  16. A. Elben, R. Kueng, H.-Y. R. Huang, R. van Bijnen, C. Kokail, M. Dalmonte, P. Calabrese, B. Kraus, J. Preskill, P. Zoller, and B. Vermersch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200501 (2020).
  17. A. Neven, J. Carrasco, V. Vitale, C. Kokail, A. Elben, M. Dalmonte, P. Calabrese, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, R. Kueng, and B. Kraus, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 152 (2021).
  18. A. Rath, C. Branciard, A. Minguzzi, and B. Vermersch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 260501 (2021).
  19. A. Rath, V. Vitale, S. Murciano, M. Votto, J. Dubail, R. Kueng, C. Branciard, P. Calabrese, and B. Vermersch, PRX Quantum 4, 010318 (2023).
  20. J. Carrasco, M. Votto, V. Vitale, C. Kokail, A. Neven, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, and B. Kraus, Phys. Rev. A 109, 012422 (2024).
  21. B. Vermersch, M. Ljubotina, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, M. Serbyn, and L. Piroli, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031035 (2024).
  22. M. P. da Silva, O. Landon-Cardinal, and D. Poulin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210404 (2011).
  23. S. T. Flammia and Y.-K. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).
  24. A. Elben, B. Vermersch, R. van Bijnen, C. Kokail, T. Brydges, C. Maier, M. K. Joshi, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010504 (2020).
  25. D. Zhu, Z. P. Cian, C. Noel, A. Risinger, D. Biswas, L. Egan, Y. Zhu, A. M. Green, C. H. Alderete, N. H. Nguyen, Q. Wang, A. Maksymov, Y. Nam, M. Cetina, N. M. Linke, M. Hafezi, and C. Monroe, Nat. Commun. 13, 2315 (2022).
  26. H.-Y. Huang, J. Preskill, and M. Soleimanifar, Nat. Phys. 21, 1834 (2025).
  27. H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Nat. Phys. 16, 1050 (2020).
  28. D. E. Koh and S. Grewal, Quantum 6, 776 (2022).
  29. S. Chen, W. Yu, P. Zeng, and S. T. Flammia, PRX Quantum 2, 030348 (2021).
  30. V. Vitale, A. Rath, P. Jurcevic, A. Elben, C. Branciard, and B. Vermersch, PRX Quantum 5, 030338 (2024).
  31. K. Noh, L. Jiang, and B. Fefferman, Quantum 4, 318 (2020).
  32. S. Cheng, C. Cao, C. Zhang, Y. Liu, S.-Y. Hou, P. Xu, and B. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023005 (2021).
  33. F. Verstraete, J. J. García-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004).
  34. T. Kuwahara, A. M. Alhambra, and A. Anshu, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011047 (2021).
  35. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011).
  36. J. Guth Jarkovský, A. Molnár, N. Schuch, and J. I. Cirac, PRX Quantum 1, 010304 (2020).
  37. T. Baumgratz, A. Nüßeler, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, New J. Phys. 15, 125004 (2013).
  38. A. Lidiak, C. Jameson, Z. Qin, G. Tang, M. B. Wakin, Z. Zhu, and Z. Gong, arXiv:2207.06397.
  39. G. Torlai, C. J. Wood, A. Acharya, G. Carleo, J. Carrasquilla, and L. Aolita, Nat. Commun. 14, 2858 (2023).
  40. Y. Guo and S. Yang, Commun. Phys. 7, 322 (2024).
  41. C. Jameson, Z. Qin, A. Goldar, M. B. Wakin, Z. Zhu, and Z. Gong, arXiv:2408.07115.
  42. T. Baumgratz, D. Gross, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 020401 (2013).
  43. M. Holzäpfel, M. Cramer, N. Datta, and M. B. Plenio, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 59, 042201 (2018).
  44. Z. Qin, C. Jameson, Z. Gong, M. B. Wakin, and Z. Zhu, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 70, 5030 (2024).
  45. Z. Qin, C. Jameson, A. Goldar, M. B. Wakin, Z. Gong, and Z. Zhu, arXiv:2410.02583.
  46. M. Fanizza, N. Galke, J. Lumbreras, C. Rouzé, and A. Winter, arXiv:2312.07516.
  47. Z. Qin, J. M. Lukens, B. T. Kirby, and Z. Zhu, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 147 (2025).
  48. B. Swingle and I. H. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 260501 (2014).
  49. A. Anshu, S. Arunachalam, T. Kuwahara, and M. Soleimanifar, Nat. Phys. 17, 931 (2021).
  50. C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Nat. Phys. 17, 936 (2021).
  51. M. K. Joshi, C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, F. Kranzl, T. V. Zache, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 624, 539 (2023).
  52. C. Rouzé and D. Stilck França, Quantum 8, 1319 (2024).
  53. J. Haah, R. Kothari, and E. Tang, Nat. Phys. 20, 1027 (2024).
  54. A. Bakshi, A. Liu, A. Moitra, and E. Tang, Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing STOC 2024 (2024), pp. 1470–1477.
  55. Ángela Capel, Álvaro M. Alhambra, P. Gondolf, A. R. de Alarcón, and S. O. Scalet, arXiv:2402.18500.
  56. A. Anshu and S. Arunachalam, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 59 (2024).
  57. E. Stoudenmire and D. J. Schwab, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 29, 4799 (2016).
  58. Z.-Y. Han, J. Wang, H. Fan, L. Wang, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031012 (2018).
  59. T. Ayral, T. Louvet, Y. Zhou, C. Lambert, E. M. Stoudenmire, and X. Waintal, PRX Quantum 4, 020304 (2023).
  60. R. Jozsa, J. Mod. Opt. 41, 2315 (1994).
  61. Y.-C. Liang, Y.-H. Yeh, P. E. M. F. Mendonça, R. Y. Teh, M. D. Reid, and P. D. Drummond, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 076001 (2019).
  62. S. Sang and T. H. Hsieh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 070403 (2025).
  63. C. Zhang, Y. Xu, J.-H. Zhang, C. Xu, Z. Bi, and Z.-X. Luo, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115137 (2025).
  64. J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  65. M. Cramer, M. B. Plenio, S. T. Flammia, R. Somma, D. Gross, S. D. Bartlett, O. Landon-Cardinal, D. Poulin, and Y.-K. Liu, Nat. Commun. 1, 149 (2010).
  66. B. P. Lanyon, C. Maier, M. Holzäpfel, T. Baumgratz, C. Hempel, P. Jurcevic, I. Dhand, A. S. Buyskikh, A. J. Daley, M. Cramer, M. B. Plenio, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Nat. Phys. 13, 1158 (2017).
  67. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/rbg2-f61m for further details.
  68. K. Koor, Y. Qiu, L. C. Kwek, and P. Rebentrost, arXiv:2312.04858.
  69. M. K. Kurmapu, V. V. Tiunova, E. S. Tiunov, M. Ringbauer, C. Maier, R. Blatt, T. Monz, A. K. Fedorov, and A. I. Lvovsky, PRX Quantum 4, 040345 (2023).
  70. Y. Teng, R. Samajdar, K. Van Kirk, F. Wilde, S. Sachdev, J. Eisert, R. Sweke, and K. Najafi, PRX Quantum 6, 040303 (2025).
  71. F. Altomare and M. Campiti, Korovkin-Type Approximation Theory and Its Applications (De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1994).
  72. M. Ippoliti, Y. Li, T. Rakovszky, and V. Khemani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 230403 (2023).
  73. C. Bertoni, J. Haferkamp, M. Hinsche, M. Ioannou, J. Eisert, and H. Pashayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 020602 (2024).
  74. R. M. S. Farias, R. D. Peddinti, I. Roth, and L. Aolita, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 025044 (2025).
  75. H.-Y. Hu, A. Gu, S. Majumder, H. Ren, Y. Zhang, D. S. Wang, Y.-Z. You, Z. Minev, S. F. Yelin, and A. Seif, Nat. Commun. 16, 2943 (2025).
  76. R. Cioli, E. Ercolessi, M. Ippoliti, X. Turkeshi, and L. Piroli, Quantum 9, 1698 (2025).
  77. T. Schuster, J. Haferkamp, and H.-Y. Huang, Science 389, 92 (2025).
  78. L. Cui, T. Schuster, F. Brandao, and H.-Y. Huang, arXiv:2507.06216.
  79. Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. van den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zaletel, K. Temme, and A. Kandala, Nature (London) 618, 500 (2023).
  80. B. Vermersch, A. Rath, B. Sundar, C. Branciard, J. Preskill, and A. Elben, PRX Quantum 5, 010352 (2024).
  81. We consider the logarithm to be in base 2, such that S2((I/2)N)=N.

  82. T. I. Andersen, N. Astrakhantsev, A. H. Karamlou, J. Berndtsson, J. Motruk, A. Szasz, J. A. Gross, A. Schuckert, T. Westerhout, Y. Zhang et al., Nature (London) 638, 79 (2025).
  83. Z. Cai, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, W. J. Huggins, Y. Li, J. R. McClean, and T. E. O’Brien, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045005 (2023).
  84. E. van den Berg, Z. K. Minev, A. Kandala, and K. Temme, Nat. Phys. 19, 1116 (2023).
  85. T. Giurgica-Tiron, Y. Hindy, R. LaRose, A. Mari, and W. J. Zeng, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (2020), p. 306.
  86. Y. Guo and S. Yang, PRX Quantum 3, 040313 (2022).
  87. S. Filippov, M. Leahy, M. A. C. Rossi, and G. García-Pérez, arXiv:2307.11740.
  88. S. Mangini, M. Cattaneo, D. Cavalcanti, S. Filippov, Matteo A. C. Rossi, and G. García-Pérez, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033217 (2024).
  89. S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, Nat. Phys. 10, 631 (2014).
  90. H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, J. Cotler, S. Chen, J. Li, M. Mohseni, H. Neven, R. Babbush, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, and J. R. McClean, Science 376, 1182 (2022).
  91. B. Koczor, New J. Phys. 23, 123047 (2021).
  92. J. Cotler, S. Choi, A. Lukin, H. Gharibyan, T. Grover, M. E. Tai, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, A. M. Kaufman, M. Greiner, H. Pichler, and P. Hayden, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031013 (2019).
  93. W. J. Huggins, S. McArdle, T. E. O’Brien, J. Lee, N. C. Rubin, S. Boixo, K. B. Whaley, R. Babbush, and J. R. McClean, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041036 (2021).
  94. A. Seif, Z.-P. Cian, S. Zhou, S. Chen, and L. Jiang, PRX Quantum 4, 010303 (2023).
  95. H. Hakoshima, S. Endo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Matsuzaki, and N. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 080601 (2024).
  96. We initialize DMRG with |ψ0|ψRMPS+ϵ|0N where |ψRMPS is a random MPS with small bond dimension, and ε102. For ε=0, we numerically observe that the DMRG algorithm does not update the random MPS.

  97. H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, G. Torlai, V. V. Albert, and J. Preskill, Science 377, eabk3333 (2022).
  98. D. Malz, G. Styliaris, Z.-Y. Wei, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040404 (2024).
  99. S. Fomichev, K. Hejazi, M. S. Zini, M. Kiser, J. Fraxanet, P. A. M. Casares, A. Delgado, J. Huh, A.-C. Voigt, J. E. Mueller, and J. M. Arrazola, PRX Quantum 5, 040339 (2024).
  100. T. Gur, M.-H. Hsieh, and S. Subramanian, arXiv:2111.11139.
  101. A. Luongo and C. Shao, arXiv:2011.06475.
  102. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, arXiv:2504.11049.
  103. A. Javadi-Abhari, M. Treinish, K. Krsulich, C. J. Wood, J. Lishman, J. Gacon, S. Martiel, P. D. Nation, L. S. Bishop, A. W. Cross, B. R. Johnson, and J. M. Gambetta, arXiv:2405.08810.
  104. A. Elben and B. Vermersch, arXiv:2509.12749.
  105. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 4 (2022).
  106. M. Votto, M. Ljubotina, L. Piroli, and B. Vermersch, Data for “Learning mixed quantum states in large-scale experiment”, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18323569 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation