Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Resolving the Negative Effective Neutrino Mass Parameter with Cosmic Birefringence

Toshiya Namikawa

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161004 – Published 15 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qgnn-6hsf

Abstract

The recent measurement of baryonic acoustic oscillations by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument reveals a mild tension with observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) within the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model. This discrepancy leads to a preference for a total neutrino mass that is lower than the minimum value inferred from neutrino oscillation experiments. Alternatively, this tension can be eased within ΛCDM by assuming a higher optical depth (τ≃0.09), but such a value conflicts with large-scale CMB polarization data. We point out that cosmic birefringence, as suggested by recent Planck reanalyses, resolves this discrepancy if the birefringence angle varies significantly during reionization. Specifically, we consider the fact that the measured cosmic birefringence angle β0=0.34±0.09(1σ)  deg has the phase ambiguity, i.e., the measured rotation angle is described by β=β0+180n  deg (n∈Z). We show that cosmic birefringence induced by axionlike particles with nonzero n suppresses the reionization bump, allowing a higher τ consistent with data. We provide a viable parameter space where the birefringence effect simultaneously accounts for the low-ℓ polarization spectra, the Planck EB correlations, and the elevated value of τ, suggesting a key role for cosmic birefringence in current cosmological tensions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Report No. FERMILAB-PUB-25-0169-PPD, Fermilab, 2025, arXiv:2503.14738.
  2. E. Camphuis et al. (SPT-3G Collaboration), Report No. FERMILAB-PUB-25-0144-PPD, Fermilab, 2025, arXiv:2506.20707.
  3. W. Elbers et al. (DESI Collaboration), Report No. FERMILAB-PUB-25-0168-PPD, Fermilab, 2025, arXiv:2503.14744.
  4. N. Craig, D. Green, J. Meyers, and S. Rajendran, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 097.
  5. D. Green and J. Meyers, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083507 (2025).
  6. W. Elbers, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, B. Li, and S. Pascoli, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063534 (2025).
  7. G. P. Lynch and L. Knox, arXiv:2503.14470.
  8. L. Herold and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083518 (2025).
  9. D. Naredo-Tuero, M. Escudero, E. Fernández-Martínez, X. Marcano, and V. Poulin, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123537 (2024).
  10. W. Giarè, E. Di Valentino, and A. Melchiorri, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103519 (2024).
  11. M. Loverde and Z. J. Weiner, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2024) 048.
  12. N. Sailer, G. S. Farren, S. Ferraro, and M. White, arXiv:2504.16932.
  13. T. Jhaveri, T. Karwal, and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043541 (2025).
  14. M. J. Mortonson and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 77, 043506 (2008).
  15. H. Jiang and T. Namikawa, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083555 (2025).
  16. S. Ilic et al., Astron. Astrophys. 700, A26 (2025).
  17. Y. Minami and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221301 (2020).
  18. P. Diego-Palazuelos et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091302 (2022).
  19. J. R. Eskilt, Astron. Astrophys. 662, A10 (2022).
  20. J. R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063503 (2022).
  21. J. R. Eskilt, L. Herold, E. Komatsu, K. Murai, T. Namikawa, and F. Naokawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 121001 (2023).
  22. S. di Serego Alighieri, Proceedings of the XI Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources Workshop (MULTIF15) (2015), p. 009, arXiv:1507.02433.
  23. E. Komatsu, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 452 (2022).
  24. Y. Nakai, R. Namba, I. Obata, Y.-C. Qiu, and R. Saito, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 057.
  25. S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3067 (1998).
  26. G.-C. Liu, S. Lee, and K.-W. Ng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 161303 (2006).
  27. S. Panda, Y. Sumitomo, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 83, 083506 (2011).
  28. T. Fujita, Y. Minami, K. Murai, and H. Nakatsuka, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063508 (2021).
  29. T. Fujita, K. Murai, H. Nakatsuka, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043509 (2021).
  30. G. Choi, W. Lin, L. Visinelli, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 104, L101302 (2021).
  31. I. Obata, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 062.
  32. S. Gasparotto and I. Obata, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 025.
  33. M. Galaverni, F. Finelli, and D. Paoletti, Phys. Rev. D 107, 083529 (2023).
  34. K. Murai, F. Naokawa, T. Namikawa, and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D 107, L041302 (2023).
  35. J. Kochappan, L. Yin, B.-H. Lee, and T. Ghosh, arXiv:2408.09521.
  36. F. Finelli and M. Galaverni, Phys. Rev. D 79, 063002 (2009).
  37. G. Sigl and P. Trivedi, arXiv:1811.07873.
  38. G.-C. Liu and K.-W. Ng, Phys. Dark Universe 16, 22 (2017).
  39. M. A. Fedderke, P. W. Graham, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015040 (2019).
  40. D. Zhang, E. G. M. Ferreira, I. Obata, and T. Namikawa, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103525 (2024).
  41. T. Namikawa, K. Murai, and F. Naokawa, arXiv:2506.20824.
  42. F. Takahashi and W. Yin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2021) 007.
  43. N. Kitajima, F. Kozai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 043.
  44. M. Jain, R. Hagimoto, A. J. Long, and M. A. Amin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 090.
  45. D. Gonzalez, N. Kitajima, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Phys. Lett. B 843, 137990 (2023).
  46. J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043538 (2025).
  47. R. C. Myers and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 211601 (2003).
  48. K. R. S. Balaji, R. H. Brandenberger, and D. A. Easson, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2003) 008.
  49. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010).
  50. F. Naokawa, T. Namikawa, K. Murai, I. Obata, and K. Kamada, Report Nos. RESCEU-11/24, No. TU-1232, University of Tokyo, 2024, arXiv:2405.15538.
  51. G. Gubitosi, M. Martinelli, and L. Pagano, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2014) 020.
  52. S. Lee, G.-C. Liu, and K.-W. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 89, 063010 (2014).
  53. B. D. Sherwin and T. Namikawa, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 3298 (2021).
  54. H. Nakatsuka, T. Namikawa, and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123509 (2022).
  55. F. Naokawa and T. Namikawa, Phys. Rev. D 108, 063525 (2023).
  56. K. Murai, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043514 (2025).
  57. M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1830 (1997).
  58. J. Lesgourgues, Reports No. CERN-PH-TH/2011-081, No. LAPTH-009/11, CERN/LAPTh, 2011, arXiv:1104.2932.
  59. M. Tristram et al., Astron. Astrophys. 647, A128 (2021).
  60. M. Tristram et al., Astron. Astrophys. 682, A37 (2024).
  61. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A11 (2016).
  62. Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020).
  63. M. Berg, J. P. Conlon, F. Day, N. Jennings, S. Krippendorf, A. J. Powell, and M. Rummel, Astrophys. J. 847, 101 (2017).
  64. K. S. Babu, S. M. Barr, and D. Seckel, Phys. Lett. B 336, 213 (1994).
  65. K. Choi and S. H. Im, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 149.
  66. D. E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi, Phys. Rev. D 93, 085007 (2016).
  67. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, F. Rompineve, and A. Tesi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 095.
  68. P. Agrawal, J. Fan, and M. Reece, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 193.
  69. T. Namikawa and I. Obata, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083510 (2023).
  70. C. Cain, A. Van Engelen, K. S. Croker, D. Kramer, A. D’Aloisio, and G. Lopez, Astrophys. J. Lett. 987, L29 (2025).
  71. Y. Li et al. (CLASS Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 986, 111 (2025).
  72. LiteBIRD Collaboration, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023, 042F01 (2022).
  73. E. de la Hoz et al. (LiteBIRD Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 083.
  74. A. Cimatti, S. de Serego Alighieri, G. B. Field, and R. A. E. Fosbury, Astrophys. J. 422, 562 (1994).
  75. S. M. Carroll and G. B. Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2394 (1997).
  76. F. Naokawa, Report No. RESCEU-6/25, University of Tokyo, 2025, arXiv:2504.06709.
  77. W. W. Yin, L. Dai, J. Huang, L. Ji, and S. Ferraro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161001 (2025).
  78. S. C. Hotinli, G. P. Holder, M. C. Johnson, and M. Kamionkowski, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 026.
  79. N. Lee, S. C. Hotinli, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 106, 083518 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation