Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fifth-Force Constraints from UV-Complete Scalar-Tensor Gravity

Alfio M. Bonanno1,2 and Emiliano M. Glaviano1,2,3

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 201501 – Published 20 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q1gq-sgy3

Abstract

We study an O(N) scalar multiplet nonminimally coupled to gravity and follow its renormalization-group (RG) flow in the vicinity of an interacting, nonperturbatively UV-complete scaling regime of scalar-tensor theory. In the broken phase, the radial mode mediates a universal Yukawa correction to Newtonian gravity, parametrized by a strength αY and range λY. Imposing UV completeness—regular RG trajectories that reach the UV scaling regime—restricts the infrared data to a finite wedge, which maps to a narrow region in the (αY,λY) plane. Its complement is, therefore, ruled out by UV completeness alone. Remarkably, part of this theory-excluded domain lies below current experimental exclusion envelopes, so improved fifth-force searches can directly test and potentially falsify this class of UV-complete scalar-tensor models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. E. Fischbach and C. Talmadge, in 31st Rencontres de Moriond: Dark Matter and Cosmology, Quantum Measurements and Experimental Gravitation (1996), pp. 443–451, arXiv:hep-ph/9606249.
  2. E. Fischbach and C. L. Talmadge, The Search for Non-Newtonian Gravity (Springer, New York, 1998).
  3. E. Fischbach, D. Sudarsky, A. Szafer, C. Talmadge, and S. H. Aronson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 3 (1986).
  4. C. M. Will, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
  5. D. J. Kapner, T. S. Cook, E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, C. D. Hoyle, and H. E. Swanson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 021101 (2007).
  6. E. G. Adelberger, B. R. Heckel, and A. E. Nelson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 102 (2009).
  7. J. D. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1121 (1989).
  8. J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 261101 (2004).
  9. A. Fienga, J. Laskar, P. Kuchynka, H. Manche, G. Desvignes, M. Gastineau, I. Cognard, and G. Theureau, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 111, 363 (2011).
  10. T. Damour and A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B423, 532 (1994).
  11. Y. Fujii and K.-i. Maeda, The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
  12. I. Quiros, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1930012 (2019).
  13. X. Zhang, B. Wang, and R. Niu, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 381 (2024).
  14. L. Huang and X.-M. Deng, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 615 (2024).
  15. R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Proc. Sci. ISFTG2009 (2009) 011 [arXiv:0910.5167].
  16. G. Narain and R. Percacci, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 075001 (2010).
  17. Y. Hamada and M. Yamada, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 070.
  18. R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 188 (2015).
  19. A. Bonanno, E. Glaviano, and G. P. Vacca, arXiv:2508.00807.
  20. N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 060.
  21. E. Palti, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  22. R. Percacci and D. Perini, Phys. Rev. D 68, 044018 (2003).
  23. G. Narain and C. Rahmede, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 075002 (2010).
  24. B. S. Merzlikin, I. L. Shapiro, A. Wipf, and O. Zanusso, Phys. Rev. D 96, 125007 (2017).
  25. P. Labus, R. Percacci, and G. P. Vacca, Phys. Lett. B 753, 274 (2016).
  26. A. Bonanno, S. Lippoldt, R. Percacci, and G. P. Vacca, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 249 (2020).
  27. A. Bonanno and M. Reuter, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2005) 035.
  28. A. Bonanno and D. Zappala, Phys. Lett. B 504, 181 (2001).
  29. Numerically, k0≃1  eV corresponds to a coarse-graining length ℓ0∼(ℏc)/k0≈200  nm, well above microscopic interatomic scales, and therefore, appropriate for a continuum, perfect-fluid description of matter.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation