- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

When Vacuum Breaks: A Self-Consistency Test for Astrophysical Environments in Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals

Lorenzo Copparoni*, Rohit S. Chandramouli†, and Enrico Barausse‡

  • *Contact author: lcopparo@sissa.it
  • †Contact author: rchandra@sissa.it
  • ‡Contact author: barausse@sissa.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 021405 – Published 7 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pqcz-cvsv

Abstract

Gravitational-wave signals are typically interpreted under the vacuum hypothesis, i.e., assuming negligible influence from the astrophysical environment. This assumption is expected to break down for low-frequency sources such as extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs), which are prime targets for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and are expected to form, at least in part, in dense environments such as active galactic nuclei or dark-matter spikes or cores. Modeling environmental effects parametrically is challenging due to the large uncertainties in their underlying physics. We propose a nonparametric test for environmental effects in EMRIs, based on assessing the self-consistency of vacuum parameter posteriors inferred from different portions of the signal. Our results demonstrate that this test can reveal statistically significant inconsistencies from vacuum signals—arising from, e.g., incomplete modeling, environmental effects, or deviations from general relativity—without introducing additional parameters or assumptions about the underlying physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (97)

  1. A. G. Abac et al., arXiv:2508.18082.
  2. A. G. Abac et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 993, L25 (2025).
  3. P. Amaro-Seoane et al., arXiv:1702.00786.
  4. M. Colpi et al., arXiv:2402.07571.
  5. L. Barack and C. Cutler, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082005 (2004).
  6. S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 73, 024027 (2006).
  7. S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103012 (2017).
  8. N. Afshordi et al. (LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Living Rev. Relativity 28, 9 (2025).
  9. H. Khalvati, A. Santini, F. Duque, L. Speri, J. Gair, H. Yang, and R. Brito, Phys. Rev. D 111, 082010 (2025).
  10. A. Derdzinski and L. Mayer, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 4522 (2023).
  11. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  12. E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104059 (2014).
  13. A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh, and D. A. Nichols, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043009 (2022).
  14. S. Mitra, N. Speeney, S. Chakraborty, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044030 (2025).
  15. D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 99, 044001 (2019).
  16. E. Berti, R. Brito, C. F. B. Macedo, G. Raposo, and J. L. Rosa, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104039 (2019).
  17. E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D 77, 104027 (2008).
  18. N. Yunes, M. Coleman Miller, and J. Thornburg, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044030 (2011).
  19. J. R. Gair, E. E. Flanagan, S. Drasco, T. Hinderer, and S. Babak, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044037 (2011).
  20. B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024032 (2011).
  21. A. M. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2754 (2019).
  22. B. Deme, B.-M. Hoang, S. Naoz, and B. Kocsis, Astrophys. J. 901, 125 (2020).
  23. A. Caputo, L. Sberna, A. Toubiana, S. Babak, E. Barausse, S. Marsat, and P. Pani, Astrophys. J. 892, 90 (2020).
  24. R. S. Chandramouli and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064009 (2022).
  25. L. Speri, A. Antonelli, L. Sberna, S. Babak, E. Barausse, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021035 (2023).
  26. F. Duque, S. Kejriwal, L. Sberna, L. Speri, and J. Gair, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084006 (2025).
  27. L. Copparoni, E. Barausse, L. Speri, L. Sberna, and A. Derdzinski, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104079 (2025).
  28. S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, G. Khanna, A. J. K. Chua, and M. L. Katz, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104014 (2021); 107, 089901(E) (2023).
  29. L. V. Drummond, P. Lynch, A. G. Hanselman, D. R. Becker, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064030 (2024).
  30. C. E. A. Chapman-Bird et al., Phys. Rev. D 112, 104023 (2025).
  31. L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, and J. R. Gair, Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 9, 1266739 (2024).
  32. Y. Levin, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 374, 515 (2007).
  33. H. Nouri and A. Janiuk, Astron. Astrophys. 687, A184 (2024).
  34. E. Barausse, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382, 826 (2007).
  35. R. Vicente, T. K. Karydas, and G. Bertone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211401 (2025).
  36. A. Hegade K. R., C. F. Gammie, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124012 (2025).
  37. A. Hegade K. R., C. F. Gammie, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124068 (2025).
  38. F. Duque, L. Sberna, A. Spiers, and R. Vicente, Phys. Rev. D 113, 084028 (2026).
  39. S. Kejriwal, L. Speri, and A. J. Chua, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084060 (2024).
  40. M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064047 (2021).
  41. T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064028 (2008).
  42. P. C. Peters, Phys. Rev. 136, B1224 (1964).
  43. N. Yunes, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb, and Z. Haiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171103 (2011).
  44. H. Tanaka and K. Okada, Astrophys. J. 968, 28 (2024).
  45. N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Astron. Astrophys. 24, 337 (1973), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A%26A....24..337S/abstract.
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/pqcz-cvsv for the mismatch and consistency check for different PN oders and parameters, which includes Refs. [47–55].
  47. M Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D 86, 082001 (2012).
  48. A. Antonelli, O. Burke, and J. R Gair, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 507, 5069 (2021).
  49. N. Karnesis, S. Babak, M. Pieroni, N. Cornish, and T. Littenberg, Phys. Rev. D 104, 043019 (2021).
  50. N. Yunes, F. Pretorius, and D. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D 81, 064018 (2010).
  51. A. Toubiana et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 101105 (2021).
  52. L. Sberna et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 064056 (2022).
  53. S. Chandrasekhar, Astrophys. J. 97, 255 (1943).
  54. E. C. Ostriker, Astrophys. J. 513, 252 (1999).
  55. N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D 80, 122003 (2009).
  56. S. Khukhlaev and S. Babak, Phys. Rev. D 112, 123046 (2025).
  57. M. Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082001 (2004).
  58. M. L. Katz, J.-B. Bayle, A. J. K. Chua, and M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D 106, 103001 (2022).

  59. The injection value for r0/M,Φϕ0 are the initial separation and phase corresponding to the 3 yr observation. These injected values change with the observation window.

  60. Z. Pan and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103018 (2021).
  61. Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063007 (2021).
  62. S. Kejriwal, E. Barausse, and A. J. K. Chua, Phys. Rev. D 113, 064001 (2026).
  63. S. Marsat, J. G. Baker, and T. Dal Canton, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083011 (2021).
  64. N. Karnesis, M. L. Katz, N. Korsakova, J. R. Gair, and N. Stergioulas, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 4814 (2023).
  65. M. Tinto, S. Dhurandhar, and D. Malakar, Phys. Rev. D 107, 082001 (2023).
  66. N. Cornish and T. Robson, J. Phys. USSR 840, 012024 (2017).
  67. S. Nissanke, D. E. Holz, S. A. Hughes, N. Dalal, and J. L. Sievers, Astrophys. J. 725, 496 (2010).
  68. M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 191104 (2011).
  69. B. Moore, T. Robson, N. Loutrel, and N. Yunes, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 235006 (2018).
  70. C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994).
  71. E. Baird, S. Fairhurst, M. Hannam, and P. Murphy, Phys. Rev. D 87, 024035 (2013).
  72. A. Toubiana and J. R. Gair, arXiv:2401.06845.
  73. E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4566 (1998).
  74. L. Lindblom, B. J. Owen, and D. A. Brown, Phys. Rev. D 78, 124020 (2008).
  75. K. Chatziioannou, A. Klein, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104004 (2017).
  76. R. S. Chandramouli, K. Prokup, E. Berti, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044026 (2025).
  77. T. Littenberg, N. Cornish, K. Lackeos, and T. Robson, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123021 (2020).
  78. K. Lackeos, T. B. Littenberg, N. J. Cornish, and J. I. Thorpe, Astron. Astrophys. 678, A123 (2023).
  79. T. B. Littenberg and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063004 (2023).
  80. S. Deng, S. Babak, M. Le Jeune, S. Marsat, É. Plagnol, and A. Sartirana, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103014 (2025).
  81. S. H. Strub, L. Ferraioli, C. Schmelzbach, S. C. Stähler, and D. Giardini, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024005 (2024).
  82. M. L. Katz, N. Karnesis, N. Korsakova, J. R. Gair, and N. Stergioulas, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024060 (2025).
  83. N. Cornish, L. Sampson, N. Yunes, and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D 84, 062003 (2011).
  84. M. Vallisneri and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 87, 102002 (2013).
  85. C. J. Moore and J. R. Gair, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 251101 (2014).
  86. C. J. Moore, C. P. L. Berry, A. J. K. Chua, and J. R. Gair, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064001 (2016).
  87. J. S. Read, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 135002 (2023).
  88. C. B. Owen, C.-J. Haster, S. Perkins, N. J. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044018 (2023).
  89. S. Kumar, M. Melching, and F. Ohme, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104071 (2025).
  90. S. Mezzasoma, C.-J. Haster, C. B. Owen, N. J. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044057 (2025).
  91. L. Pompili, A. Buonanno, and M. Pürrer, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044062 (2025).
  92. C. Hoy, S. Akcay, J. Mac Uilliam, and J. E. Thompson, Nat. Astron. 9, 1256 (2025).
  93. A. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, D. A. Nichols, Y. Chen, A. B. Nielsen, C. P. Berry, and L. London, Phys. Rev. D 94, 021101 (2016).
  94. A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, A. Ghosh, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. D. Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. B. Nielsen, and L. London, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 014002 (2018).
  95. S. J. Miller, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, V. Varma, and I. Mandel, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024024 (2024).
  96. R. Das, V. Gayathri, Divyajyoti, S. Jose, I. Bartos, S. Klimenko, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023011 (2025).
  97. E. Seo, X. Shan, J. Janquart, O. A. Hannuksela, M. A. Hendry, and B. Hu, Astrophys. J. 988, 159 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 021405– Published 7 July, 2026
  • Received 10 October 2025
  • Revised 18 March 2026
  • Accepted 2 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation