Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing Topological Entanglement on Large Scales

Robert Ott1,2, Torsten V. Zache1,2, Nishad Maskara3, Mikhail D. Lukin3, Peter Zoller1,2, and Hannes Pichler1,2

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 090401 – Published 25 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mdsf-wrbj

Abstract

Topologically ordered quantum matter exhibits intriguing long-range patterns of entanglement, which reveal themselves in subsystem entropies. However, measuring such entropies, which can be used to certify topological order, on large partitions is challenging and becomes practically unfeasible for large systems. We propose a protocol based on local adiabatic deformations of the Hamiltonian which extracts the universal features of long-range topological entanglement from measurements on small subsystems of finite size, trading an exponential number of measurements against a polynomial-time evolution. Our protocol is general and readily applicable to various quantum simulation architectures. We apply our method to various string-net models representing both Abelian and non-Abelian topologically ordered phases and illustrate its application to neutral atom tweezer arrays with numerical simulations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phases of Matter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023), 10.1017/9781009212717.
  2. A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B120, 429 (1977).
  3. A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 303, 2 (2003).
  4. T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. Fisher, Science 303, 1490 (2004).
  5. J. McGreevy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57 (2023).
  6. B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, X.-G. Wen et al., Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter (Springer, New York, 2019), 10.1007/978-1-4939-9084-9.
  7. A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006).
  8. M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006).
  9. A. Hamma, R. Ionicioiu, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A 337, 22 (2005).
  10. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar et al., Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  11. J. Léonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Nature (London) 619, 495 (2023).
  12. P. Lunt, P. Hill, J. Reiter, P. M. Preiss, M. Gałka, and S. Jochim, arXiv:2402.14814.
  13. Z. K. Minev, K. Najafi, S. Majumder, J. Wang, A. Stern, E.-A. Kim, C.-M. Jian, and G. Zhu, Nat. Commun. 16, 6225 (2025).
  14. Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Nature (London) 618, 264 (2023).
  15. K. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth et al., Science 374, 1237 (2021).
  16. S. Xu et al., Nat. Phys. 20, 1469 (2024).
  17. M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Campbell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Johansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses et al., Nature (London) 626, 505 (2024).
  18. M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, N. Hewitt, C. V. Horst, M. Matheny et al., Commun. Phys. 7, 205 (2024).
  19. A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 9 (2023).
  20. A. J. Daley, H. Pichler, J. Schachenmayer, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 020505 (2012).
  21. Note that tomography can be made more efficient if assumptions on the quantum state can be made [22].

  22. M. K. Joshi, C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, F. Kranzl, T. V. Zache, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 624, 539 (2023).
  23. A. H. Karamlou, I. T. Rosen, S. E. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett, A. Di Paolo, L. Ding, P. M. Harrington, M. Hays, R. Das, D. K. Kim et al., Nature (London) 629, 561 (2024).
  24. Mechanisms which can destabilize TO in these systems include thermal fluctuations [25, 26, 27] as well as finite coherence or state preparation times [28, 29], and they introduce length scales beyond which TO is absent.

  25. C. Castelnovo and C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. B 76, 184442 (2007).
  26. T.-C. Lu, T. H. Hsieh, and T. Grover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 116801 (2020).
  27. A. Ritz-Zwilling, J.-N. Fuchs, S. H. Simon, and J. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155147 (2024).
  28. R. Sahay, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, arXiv:2211.01381.
  29. G. Giudici, M. D. Lukin, and H. Pichler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 090401 (2022).
  30. M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 71, 045110 (2005).
  31. For gapped boundaries, we can deform the system Hamiltonian without exciting gapless edge modes.

  32. Similarly, as discussed below, one can apply transversal fields to condense m anyons to repel Z loops.

  33. For a TO state, the (long-range) mutual information prior to trivializing the regions is zero for all distant contractible regions, see, e.g., [34].

  34. C.-M. Jian, I. H. Kim, and X.-L. Qi, arXiv:1508.07006.
  35. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/mdsf-wrbj for details on the analytical and numerical calculations, which includes Refs. [36,37].
  36. N. E. Bonesteel and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 86, 165113 (2012).
  37. A. Hahn and R. Wolf, Phys. Rev. B 102, 115154 (2020).
  38. S. Sachdev, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 014001 (2018).
  39. S. Sachdev, Phys. World 12, 33 (1999).
  40. I. Cong, N. Maskara, M. C. Tran, H. Pichler, G. Semeghini, S. F. Yelin, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Nat. Commun. 15, 1527 (2024).
  41. J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  42. N. Schuch, D. Poilblanc, J. I. Cirac, and D. Pérez-García, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115108 (2012).
  43. G. B. Halász and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. A 86, 062330 (2012).
  44. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner et al., Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  45. R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031005 (2021).
  46. To stabilize TO in the presence of long-range interactions, the positions of atoms are deformed with respect to the ruby lattice [10, 45].

  47. A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, A. S. Zibrov, H. Pichler, S. Choi et al., Science 365, 570 (2019).
  48. P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Nature (London) 622, 273 (2023).
  49. G. Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B138, 1 (1978).
  50. K. Fredenhagen and M. Marcu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 223 (1986).
  51. B. Vermersch, M. Ljubotina, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, M. Serbyn, and L. Piroli, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031035 (2024).
  52. Y. Teng, R. Samajdar, K. Van Kirk, F. Wilde, S. Sachdev, J. Eisert, R. Sweke, and K. Najaf, arXiv:2406.00193.
  53. T. V. Zache, C. Kokail, B. Sundar, and P. Zoller, Quantum 6, 702 (2022).
  54. P. Fromholz, G. Magnifico, V. Vitale, T. Mendes-Santos, and M. Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. B 101, 085136 (2020).
  55. X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196402 (2012).
  56. T. Grover, A. M. Turner, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195120 (2011).
  57. Ð. Radičević, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 130.
  58. R. Ott, N. Maskara, T. Zache, M. Lukin, P. Zoller, and H. Pichler, Probing topological entanglement on large scales, Zenodo (2024), 10.5281/zenodo.15910388.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation