Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Sea Ice Aging by Diffusion-Driven Desalination

Yihong Du1, Feng Wang1,*, Enrico Calzavarini2, and Chao Sun1,3

  • *Contact author: fengwang2023@tsinghua.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 104201 – Published 5 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mct1-6hbw

Abstract

Sea ice is a key component of Earth’s climate system, making its aging process an essential focus of current research. The age of sea ice is closely linked to its thermal and mechanical properties, which govern its interactions with the surrounding environment. In this study, we combine experimental techniques and modeling to explore the full dynamical process of mushy ice growth and spontaneous aging in saline water, within a natural convective flow system. We show that the aging of newly formed mushy ice in the present system, characterized by a gradual long-term reduction in porosity, is controlled by diffusion-driven desalination. Moreover, we observe that the system eventually transits into a dense freshwater ice layer adjacent to a well-mixed saline water region. The shape of the ice layer in this asymptotic state is well captured by numerical simulations of nonporous ice. Our findings improve the understanding of the complex physics governing phase changes in aqueous systems and provide a framework for studying sea ice aging in laboratory settings, with implications spanning diverse natural and industrial applications.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Focus

Salt Loss Dictates Sea-Ice Structure

Published 5 September, 2025

Experiments on freezing saltwater have teased apart flow dynamics inside ice pores, offering a possible boost to climate models’ predictive power.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. Y. Du, E. Calzavarini, and C. Sun, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 676 (2024).
  2. G. W. Timco and W. F. Weeks, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 60, 107 (2010).
  3. D. Feltham, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 91 (2008).
  4. C. Cenedese and F. Straneo, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 55, 377 (2023).
  5. L. A. Roach, M. M. Smith, A. Herman, and D. Ringeisen, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 17, 355 (2024).
  6. J. Maslanik, J. Stroeve, C. Fowler, and W. Emery, Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L13502 (2011).
  7. A. A. Korosov, P. Rampal, L. T. Pedersen, R. Saldo, Y. Ye, G. Heygster, T. Lavergne, S. Aaboe, and F. Girard-Ardhuin, Cryosphere 12, 2073 (2018).
  8. M. Mori, Y. Kosaka, M. Watanabe, H. Nakamura, and M. Kimoto, Nat. Clim. Change 9, 123 (2019).
  9. J. A. Screen and I. Simmonds, Nature (London) 464, 1334 (2010).
  10. I. Peeken, S. Primpke, B. Beyer, J. Gütermann, C. Katlein, T. Krumpen, M. Bergmann, L. Hehemann, and G. Gerdts, Nat. Commun. 9, 1505 (2018).
  11. E. Post, U. S. Bhatt, C. M. Bitz, J. F. Brodie, T. L. Fulton, M. Hebblewhite, J. Kerby, S. J. Kutz, I. Stirling, and D. A. Walker, Science 341, 519 (2013).
  12. K. R. Arrigo, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 6, 439 (2014).
  13. D. Notz and M. G. Worster, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 114, C05006 (2009).
  14. E. C. Hunke, D. Notz, A. K. Turner, and M. Vancoppenolle, Cryosphere 5, 989 (2011).
  15. F. P. Jardon, F. Vivier, M. Vancoppenolle, A. Lourenço, P. Bouruet-Aubertot, and Y. Cuypers, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 435 (2013).
  16. D. L. Feltham, N. Untersteiner, J. S. Wettlaufer, and M. G. Worster, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L14501 (2006).
  17. M. G. Worster and D. W. Rees Jones, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140166 (2015).
  18. D. M. Anderson and P. Guba, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 93 (2020).
  19. B. Rabbanipour Esfahani, S. C. Hirata, S. Berti, and E. Calzavarini, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 053501 (2018).
  20. R. Yang, C. J. Howland, H. R. Liu, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, PRX Energy 3, 043006 (2024).
  21. Z. Wang, E. Calzavarini, C. Sun, and F. Toschi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2012870118 (2021).
  22. Z. Wang, L. Jiang, Y. Du, C. Sun, and E. Calzavarini, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, L091501 (2021).
  23. Z. Wang, E. Calzavarini, and C. Sun, Europhys. Lett. 135, 54001 (2021).
  24. S. Weady, J. Tong, A. Zidovska, and L. Ristroph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 044502 (2022).
  25. D. Perissutti, C. Marchioli, and A. Soldati, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 181, 105007 (2024).
  26. R. Yang, C. J. Howland, H. R. Liu, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 234002 (2023).
  27. M. E. Wengrove, E. C. Pettit, J. D. Nash, R. H. Jackson, and E. D. Skyllingstad, Nat. Geosci. 16, 871 (2023).
  28. W. P. Fang, J. Z. Wu, Z. L. Huang, B. F. Wang, Q. Zhou, and K. L. Chong, J. Fluid Mech. 1001, A43 (2024).
  29. J. S. Wettlaufer, M. G. Worster, and H. E. Huppert, J. Fluid Mech. 344, 291 (1997).
  30. M. G. Worster, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 91 (1997).
  31. S. S. L. Peppin, P. Aussillous, H. E. Huppert, and M. G. Worster, J. Fluid Mech. 570, 69 (2007).
  32. S. S. L. Peppin, H. E. Huppert, and M. G. Worster, J. Fluid Mech. 599, 465 (2008).
  33. C. A. Middleton, C. Thomas, A. De Wit, and J. L. Tison, J. Glaciol. 62, 1 (2016).
  34. A. J. Wells, J. R. Hitchen, and J. R. G. Parkinson, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377, 20180165 (2019).
  35. Y. Du, Z. Wang, L. Jiang, E. Calzavarini, and C. Sun, J. Fluid Mech. 960, A35 (2023).
  36. M. Mondal, B. Gayen, R. W. Griffiths, and R. C. Kerr, J. Fluid Mech. 863, 545 (2019).
  37. N. J. Wilson, C. A. Vreugdenhil, B. Gayen, and E. W. Hester, Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104396 (2023).
  38. R. Yang, C. J. Howland, H. R. Liu, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, J. Fluid Mech. 969, R2 (2023).
  39. C. S. Ng, A. Ooi, D. Lohse, and D. Chung, J. Fluid Mech. 764, 349 (2015).
  40. O. Shishkina, Phys. Rev. E 93, 051102(R) (2016).
  41. C. J. Howland, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 013501 (2023).
  42. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/mct1-6hbw, which includes Refs. [43–47], for the additional details of experimental setup and data measurements, experiment results for Θi≈3/5, choice of C in the model, numerical simulation, flow chart on the measurement and modeling of porosity, and supplemental movies.
  43. E. Calzavarini, Soft. Impacts 1, 100002 (2019).
  44. L. Jiang, C. Sun, and E. Calzavarini, Phys. Rev. E 99, 013108 (2019).
  45. S. C. Gupta, The Classical Stefan Problem Basic Concepts, Modelling and Analysis with Quasi-Analytical Solutions and Methods (Elsevier, New York, 2017).
  46. B. Gebhart and J. C. Mollendorf, Deep Sea Res. 24, 831 (1977).
  47. D. L. Hall, S. M. Sterner, and R. J. Bodnar, Econ. Geol. 83, 197 (1988).
  48. C. Petrich, P. J. Langhorne, and Z. F. Sun, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 44, 131 (2006).
  49. M. G. Worster and J. S. Wettlaufer, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6132 (1997).
  50. A. W. Rempel, E. D. Waddington, J. S. Wettlaufer, and M. G. Worster, Nature (London) 411, 568 (2001).
  51. P. Hoekstra, T. E. Osterkamp, and W. F. Weeks, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 5035 (1965).
  52. Y. Du, F. Wang, E. Calzavarini, and C. Sun, 10.5281/zenodo.15781015.
  53. A. Bejan and K. R. Khair, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 28, 909 (1985).
  54. K. J. Schneider, in Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Refrigeration (1963), Vol. 247, p. 253.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation