Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Observation of Vinen Turbulence During Far-from-Equilibrium Bose-Einstein Condensation

Sebastian J. Morris*, Martin Gazo, Simon M. Fischer, Haoyu Zhang, Christopher J. Ho†, Nigel R. Cooper, Christoph Eigen, and Zoran Hadzibabic

  • *Contact author: sm2357@cam.ac.uk
  • †Present address: Centre for Cold Matter, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 193403 – Published 5 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lywd-gjg9

Abstract

Relaxation of far-from-equilibrium quantum fluids, intimately related to the emergence of long-range order, is theoretically associated with the decay of a turbulent isotropic tangle of vortex lines. We observe and study such decaying quantum turbulence in a homogeneous 3D atomic Bose gas. Using matter-wave techniques to magnify the gas density distribution, and then imaging a thin slice of the magnified cloud, we observe imprints of randomly oriented vortex lines and measure the vortex-line-length density L. The observed decay of L agrees with the prediction for Vinen “ultraquantum” turbulence. Although our weakly interacting gases are highly compressible, their large-scale dynamics are consistent with the behavior of an incompressible hydrodynamic fluid, with the decay of L not depending on the strength of the interatomic interactions and being similar to that in the strongly interacting superfluid helium.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

synopsis

Images Capture Unusual Quantum Turbulence

Published 5 November, 2026

Random tangles of vortex lines have been observed untangling in an ultracold gas.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (88)

  1. L. D. Landau, The theory of superfluidity of helium II, J. Phys. (USSR) 5, 71 (1941).
  2. L. Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento 6, 279 (1949).
  3. R. P. Feynman, Application of quantum mechanics to liquid helium, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics, edited by C. J. Gorter (North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1955), pp. 17–53.
  4. B. V. Svistunov, E. S. Babaev, and N. V. Prokof’ev, Superfluid States of Matter (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 2015).
  5. W. F. Vinen, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II I. Experiments on steady heat currents, Proc. R. Soc. A 240, 114 (1957).
  6. W. F. Vinen, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II III. Theory of the mutual friction, Proc. R. Soc. A 242, 493 (1957).
  7. P. W. Anderson and N. Itoh, Pulsar glitches and restlessness as a hard superfluidity phenomenon, Nature (London) 256, 25 (1975).
  8. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  9. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?, Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  10. G. Blatter, M. V. Feigel’man, V. B. Geshkenbein, A. I. Larkin, and V. M. Vinokur, Vortices in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994).
  11. A. Bulgac, Y.-L. Luo, P. Magierski, K. J. Roche, and Y. Yu, Real-time dynamics of quantized vortices in a unitary Fermi superfluid, Science 332, 1288 (2011).
  12. J. T. Tough, Superfluid turbulence, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics, edited by D. F. Brewer (Elsevier, New York, 1982), Chap. 3, Vol. 8, pp. 133–219.
  13. W. F. Vinen and J. J. Niemela, Quantum turbulence, J. Low Temp. Phys. 128, 167 (2002).
  14. W. F. Vinen, Quantum turbulence: Achievements and challenges, J. Low Temp. Phys. 161, 419 (2010).
  15. L. Skrbek, D. Schmoranzer, Š. Midlik, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Phenomenology of quantum turbulence in superfluid helium, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2018406118 (2021).
  16. C. F. Barenghi, L. Skrbek, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Quantum Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  17. A. L. Gaunt, T. F. Schmidutz, I. Gotlibovych, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Bose-Einstein condensation of atoms in a uniform potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200406 (2013).
  18. C. Eigen, A. L. Gaunt, A. Suleymanzade, N. Navon, Z. Hadzibabic, and R. P. Smith, Observation of weak collapse in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041058 (2016).
  19. P. A. Murthy, D. Kedar, T. Lompe, M. Neidig, M. G. Ries, A. N. Wenz, G. Zürn, and S. Jochim, Matter-wave Fourier optics with a strongly interacting two-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043611 (2014).
  20. L. Asteria, H. P. Zahn, M. N. Kosch, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Quantum gas magnifier for sub-lattice-resolved imaging of 3D quantum systems, Nature (London) 599, 571 (2021).
  21. S. Brandstetter, C. Heintze, P. Hill, P. M. Preiss, M. Gałka, and S. Jochim, Magnifying the wave function of interacting fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 103401 (2025).
  22. M. R. Andrews, C. G. Townsend, H.-J. Miesner, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Observation of interference between two Bose condensates, Science 275, 637 (1997).
  23. A. L. Fetter and A. A. Svidzinsky, Vortices in a trapped dilute Bose–Einstein condensate, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 13, R135 (2001).
  24. B. V. Svistunov, Highly nonequilibrium Bose condensation in a weakly interacting gas, J. Mosc. Phys. Soc. 1, 373 (1991).
  25. B. V. Svistunov, Superfluid turbulence in the low-temperature limit, Phys. Rev. B 52, 3647 (1995).
  26. N. G. Berloff and B. V. Svistunov, Scenario of strongly nonequilibrated Bose-Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. A 66, 013603 (2002).
  27. B. Nowak, J. Schole, D. Sexty, and T. Gasenzer, Nonthermal fixed points, vortex statistics, and superfluid turbulence in an ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043627 (2012).
  28. G. W. Stagg, N. G. Parker, and C. F. Barenghi, Ultraquantum turbulence in a quenched homogeneous Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053632 (2016).
  29. A. Villois, D. Proment, and G. Krstulovic, Evolution of a superfluid vortex filament tangle driven by the Gross–Pitaevskii equation, Phys. Rev. E 93, 061103(R) (2016).
  30. V. Noel, T. Gasenzer, and K. Boguslavski, Kelvin waves in nonequilibrium universal dynamics of relativistic scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033220 (2025).
  31. G. P. Bewley, D. P. Lathrop, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Visualization of quantized vortices, Nature (London) 441, 588 (2006).
  32. M. S. Paoletti, M. E. Fisher, K. R. Sreenivasan, and D. P. Lathrop, Velocity statistics distinguish quantum turbulence from classical turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 154501 (2008).
  33. Y. Tang, W. Guo, H. Kobayashi, S. Yui, M. Tsubota, and T. Kanai, Imaging quantized vortex rings in superfluid helium to evaluate quantum dissipation, Nat. Commun. 14, 2941 (2023).
  34. C. Peretti, J. Vessaire, É. Durozoy, and M. Gibert, Direct visualization of the quantum vortex lattice structure, oscillations, and destabilization in rotating He4, Sci. Adv. 9, eadh2899 (2023).
  35. E. A. L. Henn, J. A. Seman, G. Roati, K. M. F. Magalhães, and V. S. Bagnato, Emergence of turbulence in an oscillating Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 045301 (2009).
  36. K. J. Thompson, G. G. Bagnato, G. D. Telles, M. A. Caracanhas, F. E. A. dos Santos, and V. S. Bagnato, Evidence of power law behavior in the momentum distribution of a turbulent trapped Bose-Einstein condensate, Laser Phys. Lett. 11, 015501 (2013).
  37. W. J. Kwon, G. Moon, J. Y. Choi, S. W. Seo, and Y. I. Shin, Relaxation of superfluid turbulence in highly oblate Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063627 (2014).
  38. N. Navon, A. L. Gaunt, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Emergence of a turbulent cascade in a quantum gas, Nature (London) 539, 72 (2016).
  39. S. W. Seo, B. Ko, J. H. Kim, and Y. Shin, Observation of vortex-antivortex pairing in decaying 2D turbulence of a superfluid gas, Sci. Rep. 7, 4587 (2017).
  40. G. Gauthier, M. T. Reeves, X. Yu, A. S. Bradley, M. A. Baker, T. A. Bell, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, M. J. Davis, and T. W. Neely, Giant vortex clusters in a two-dimensional quantum fluid, Science 364, 1264 (2019).
  41. S. P. Johnstone, A. J. Groszek, P. T. Starkey, C. J. Billington, T. P. Simula, and K. Helmerson, Evolution of large-scale flow from turbulence in a two-dimensional superfluid, Science 364, 1267 (2019).
  42. N. Navon, C. Eigen, J. Zhang, R. Lopes, A. L. Gaunt, K. Fujimoto, M. Tsubota, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Synthetic dissipation and cascade fluxes in a turbulent quantum gas, Science 366, 382 (2019).
  43. X.-P. Liu, X.-C. Yao, Y. Deng, X.-Q. Wang, Y.-X. Wang, C.-J. Huang, X. Li, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Universal dynamical scaling of quasi-two-dimensional vortices in a strongly interacting fermionic superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 185302 (2021).
  44. M. Gałka, P. Christodoulou, M. Gazo, A. Karailiev, N. Dogra, J. Schmitt, and Z. Hadzibabic, Emergence of isotropy and dynamic scaling in 2D wave turbulence in a homogeneous Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 190402 (2022).
  45. L. H. Dogra, G. Martirosyan, T. A. Hilker, J. A. P. Glidden, J. Etrych, A. Cao, C. Eigen, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Universal equation of state for wave turbulence in a quantum gas, Nature (London) 620, 521 (2023).
  46. J. Kim, J. Jung, J. Lee, D. Hong, and Y. Shin, Chaos-assisted turbulence in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032030 (2024).
  47. A. Karailiev, M. Gazo, M. Gałka, C. Eigen, T. Satoor, and Z. Hadzibabic, Observation of an inverse turbulent-wave cascade in a driven quantum gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 243402 (2024).
  48. M. Zhao, J. Tao, and I. B. Spielman, Kolmogorov scaling in turbulent 2D Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 083402 (2025).
  49. M. Gazo, A. Karailiev, T. Satoor, C. Eigen, M. Gałka, and Z. Hadzibabic, Universal coarsening in a homogeneous two-dimensional Bose gas, Science 389, 802 (2025).
  50. G. Martirosyan, M. Gazo, J. Etrych, S. M. Fischer, S. J. Morris, C. J. Ho, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, A universal speed limit for spreading of coherence, Nature (London) 647, 608 (2025).
  51. Y. Jiang, N. Maslov, A. Karailiev, C. Eigen, M. Gazo, and Z. Hadzibabic, A nonequilibrium equation of state for a turbulent 2D Bose gas, arXiv:2602.06131.
  52. M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, D. S. Hall, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2498 (1999).
  53. K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dalibard, Vortex formation in a stirred Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 806 (2000).
  54. J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ketterle, Observation of vortex lattices in Bose-Einstein condensates, Science 292, 476 (2001).
  55. V. Bretin, P. Rosenbusch, F. Chevy, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. Dalibard, Quadrupole oscillation of a single-vortex Bose-Einstein condensate: Evidence for Kelvin modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 100403 (2003).
  56. M. W. Zwierlein, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. Schirotzek, C. H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Nature (London) 435, 1047 (2005).
  57. C. N. Weiler, T. W. Neely, D. R. Scherer, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Spontaneous vortices in the formation of Bose-Einstein condensates, Nature (London) 455, 948 (2008).
  58. D. V. Freilich, D. M. Bianchi, A. M. Kaufman, T. K. Langin, and D. S. Hall, Real-time dynamics of single vortex lines and vortex dipoles in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Science 329, 1182 (2010).
  59. T. W. Neely, E. C. Samson, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Observation of vortex dipoles in an oblate Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160401 (2010).
  60. Mark J. H. Ku, W. Ji, B. Mukherjee, E. Guardado-Sanchez, L. W. Cheuk, T. Yefsah, and M. W. Zwierlein, Motion of a solitonic vortex in the BEC–BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 065301 (2014).
  61. S. Donadello, S. Serafini, M. Tylutki, L. P. Pitaevskii, F. Dalfovo, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Observation of solitonic vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 065302 (2014).
  62. S. Serafini, M. Barbiero, M. Debortoli, S. Donadello, F. Larcher, F. Dalfovo, G. Lamporesi, and G. Ferrari, Dynamics and interaction of vortex lines in an elongated Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 170402 (2015).
  63. W. J. Kwon, G. Del Pace, K. Xhani, L. Galantucci, A. Muzi Falconi, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, and G. Roati, Sound emission and annihilations in a programmable quantum vortex collider, Nature (London) 600, 64 (2021).
  64. R. J. Fletcher, A. Shaffer, C. C. Wilson, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, V. Crépel, B. Mukherjee, and M. W. Zwierlein, Geometric squeezing into the lowest Landau level, Science 372, 1318 (2021).
  65. R. H. Kraichnan, Condensate turbulence in a weakly coupled boson gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 202 (1967).
  66. A. Piñeiro Orioli, K. Boguslavski, and J. Berges, Universal self-similar dynamics of relativistic and nonrelativistic field theories near nonthermal fixed points, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025041 (2015).
  67. I. Chantesana, A. P. Orioli, and T. Gasenzer, Kinetic theory of nonthermal fixed points in a Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043620 (2019).
  68. V. Rosenhaus and G. Falkovich, Weak and strong turbulence in self-focusing and defocusing media, arXiv:2501.12451.
  69. P. M. Walmsley and A. I. Golov, Quantum and quasiclassical types of superfluid turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 245301 (2008).
  70. G. Martirosyan, C. J. Ho, J. Etrych, Y. Zhang, A. Cao, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, Observation of subdiffusive dynamic scaling in a driven and disordered Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 113401 (2024).
  71. J. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, A. Cao, Jake A. P. Glidden, L. H. Dogra, J. M. Hutson, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, Pinpointing Feshbach resonances and testing Efimov universalities in K39, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013174 (2023).
  72. See End Matter for details on our initial state.

  73. I. Shvarchuck, C. Buggle, D. S. Petrov, K. Dieckmann, M. Zielonkovski, M. Kemmann, T. G. Tiecke, W. von Klitzing, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven, Bose-Einstein condensation into nonequilibrium states studied by condensate focusing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 270404 (2002).
  74. S. Tung, G. Lamporesi, D. Lobser, L. Xia, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of the presuperfluid regime in a two-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230408 (2010).
  75. R. J. Fletcher, M. Robert-de-Saint-Vincent, J. Man, N. Navon, R. P. Smith, K. G. H. Viebahn, and Z. Hadzibabic, Connecting Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless and BEC phase transitions by tuning interactions in a trapped gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 255302 (2015).
  76. We use a red-detuned laser beam to realize a harmonic trap, with frequencies ωx≈2π×40  Hz, ωy≈2π×45  Hz, and ωz≈0. The slight anisotropy in the x−y plane limits our resolution to a distance that corresponds to ≈2  μm in situ.

  77. We use a laser beam shaped by a digital micromirror device to optically pump only a slice of the cloud into the highest hyperfine ground state and then image only the atoms in that state.

  78. D. J. Tritton, Physical Fluid Dynamics (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2012).
  79. T. Binzoni, E. Dumonteil, and A. Mazzolo, Universal property of random trajectories in bounded domains, Phys. Rev. E 112, 044105 (2025).
  80. For the data in Figs. 4 and 5, we count imprints in our images within a central circle of radius rD≈52  μm, which corresponds to in situ S≈2800  μm2. None of our results change (within error bars) if we reduce rD to ≈34  μm, which corresponds to S≈1500  μm2.

  81. We exclude clusters with fewer pixels than Nmin=4, which is sufficiently large to avoid counting noise, so Ni vanishes for t→∞; see End Matter for examples of our counting.

  82. In both Figs. 5 and 6, we use the calibrated conversion (the average Ni/A, see Fig. 4) to extract L from A. Directly using Eq. (2) does not change our results within statistical errors.

  83. K. W. Schwarz, Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid He4: Line-line and line-boundary interactions, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5782 (1985).
  84. S. M. Fischer, M. Gazo, S. J. Morris, N. Maslov, H. Zhang, J. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, Weak wave turbulence as a precursor to universal coarsening in a homogeneous Bose gas, arXiv:2605.22906.
  85. M. Tsubota, T. Araki, and S. K. Nemirovskii, Dynamics of vortex tangle without mutual friction in superfluid He4, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11751 (2000).
  86. A. W. Baggaley, L. K. Sherwin, C. F. Barenghi, and Y. A. Sergeev, Thermally and mechanically driven quantum turbulence in helium II, Phys. Rev. B 86, 104501 (2012).
  87. V. Shukla, P. D. Mininni, G. Krstulovic, P. C. di Leoni, and M. E. Brachet, Quantitative estimation of effective viscosity in quantum turbulence, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043605 (2019).
  88. 10.17863/CAM.134385.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation