Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Femtosecond and Attosecond Phase-Space Correlations in Few-Particle Photoelectron Pulses

Rudolf Haindl, Valerio Di Giulio*, Armin Feist, and Claus Ropers†

  • *Contact author: valerio.digiulio@mpinat.mpg.de
  • †Contact author: claus.ropers@mpinat.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 165002 – Published 15 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lylq-m63c

Abstract

Temporal correlations in pulsed electron beams reflect the microscopic dynamics of emission and interparticle interaction. In femtosecond electron emission from nanoscale field emitters, Coulomb interactions result in structured few-electron states with strong correlations in energy, time, and transverse momentum. Interactions with external fields may be used to both probe and further manipulate these correlated states. Here, we combine femtosecond-gated, event-based detection with inelastic electron-light scattering to directly map the photoelectron phase-space distribution of two-electron states. Our experiments demonstrate a bimodal structure in longitudinal phase space, with distinct contributions from interparticle interaction and dispersion. Moreover, we imprint a global phase modulation onto two-electron states and theoretically show that coherent shaping of few-electron phase-space distributions enables attosecond temporal correlations. This controlled phasing of few-electron states can be harnessed to produce tailored excitations and superradiance via two-electron energy postselection.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

synopsis

Putting Few-Electron Pulses to Work

Published 15 October, 2025

Electrostatic repulsion between electrons usually impairs the performance of electron microscopes. Now it can be turned into an advantage.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (71)

  1. H. Boersch, Z. Phys. 139, 115 (1954).
  2. K. H. Loeffler, Z. Angew. Phys. 27, 145 (1969).
  3. S. Borrelli, T. C. H. de Raadt, S. B. van der Geer, P. H. A. Mutsaers, K. A. H. van Leeuwen, and O. J. Luiten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 115001 (2024).
  4. H. Kiesel, A. Renz, and F. Hasselbach, Nature (London) 418, 392 (2002).
  5. T. Kodama, N. Osakabe, and A. Tonomura, Phys. Rev. A 83, 063616 (2011).
  6. M. Kuwahara, Y. Yoshida, W. Nagata, K. Nakakura, M. Furui, T. Ishida, K. Saitoh, T. Ujihara, and N. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 125501 (2021).
  7. S. Keramati, W. Brunner, T. J. Gay, and H. Batelaan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180602 (2021).
  8. R. Haindl, A. Feist, T. Domröse, M. Möller, J. H. Gaida, S. V. Yalunin, and C. Ropers, Nat. Phys. 19, 1410 (2023).
  9. P. Hommelhoff, Y. Sortais, A. Aghajani-Talesh, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077401 (2006).
  10. C. Ropers, D. R. Solli, C. P. Schulz, C. Lienau, and T. Elsaesser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 043907 (2007).
  11. B. Barwick, C. Corder, J. Strohaber, N. Chandler-Smith, C. Uiterwaal, and H. Batelaan, New J. Phys. 9, 142 (2007).
  12. S. Meier, J. Heimerl, and P. Hommelhoff, Nat. Phys. 19, 1402 (2023).
  13. S. A. Koppell, J. W. Simonaitis, M. A. R. Krielaart, W. P. Putnam, K. K. Berggren, and P. D. Keathley, New J. Phys. 27, 023012 (2025).
  14. A. Gover and A. Yariv, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 064801 (2020).
  15. Z. Zhao, X.-Q. Sun, and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233402 (2021).
  16. A. Karnieli, N. Rivera, A. Arie, and I. Kaminer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060403 (2021).
  17. F. J. García de Abajo and V. Di Giulio, ACS Photonics 8, 945 (2021).
  18. D. Rätzel, D. Hartley, O. Schwartz, and P. Haslinger, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023247 (2021).
  19. B. Zhang, D. Ran, R. Ianconescu, A. Friedman, J. Scheuer, A. Yariv, and A. Gover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 244801 (2021).
  20. R. Ruimy, A. Gorlach, C. Mechel, N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233403 (2021).
  21. O. Kfir, V. Di Giulio, F. J. G. de Abajo, and C. Ropers, Sci. Adv. 7, eabf6380 (2021).
  22. V. Di Giulio, O. Kfir, C. Ropers, and F. J. García de Abajo, ACS Nano 15, 7290 (2021).
  23. A. Gorlach, O. Reinhardt, A. Pizzi, R. Ruimy, G. Baranes, N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023722 (2024).
  24. V. Di Giulio, R. Haindl, and C. Ropers, Nanophotonics 14, 1865 (2025).
  25. E. J. VandenBussche and D. J. Flannigan, Nano Lett. 19, 6687 (2019).
  26. J. J. Axelrod, J. T. Zhang, P. N. Petrov, R. M. Glaeser, and H. Müller, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 86, 102805 (2024).
  27. O. Kfir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103602 (2019).
  28. N. Talebi and I. Březinová, New J. Phys. 23, 063066 (2021).
  29. A. Konečná, F. Iyikanat, and F. J. García de Abajo, Sci. Adv. 8, eabo7853 (2022).
  30. E. Kazakevich, H. Aharon, and O. Kfir, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043033 (2024).
  31. J.-W. Henke, H. Jeng, and C. Ropers, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012610 (2025).
  32. A. Preimesberger, S. Bogdanov, I. C. Bicket, P. Rembold, and P. Haslinger, arXiv:2504.13163.
  33. J.-W. Henke, H. Jeng, M. Sivis, and C. Ropers, arXiv:2504.13047.
  34. A. H. Zewail, Science 328, 187 (2010).
  35. A. Feist, N. Bach, N. Rubiano da Silva, T. Danz, M. Möller, K. E. Priebe, T. Domröse, J. G. Gatzmann, S. Rost, J. Schauss, S. Strauch, R. Bormann, M. Sivis, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Ultramicroscopy 176, 63 (2017).
  36. N. Bach, T. Domröse, A. Feist, T. Rittmann, S. Strauch, C. Ropers, and S. Schäfer, Struct. Dyn. 6, 014301 (2019).
  37. P. K. Olshin, M. Drabbels, and U. J. Lorenz, Struct. Dyn. 7, 054304 (2020).
  38. C. Zhu, D. Zheng, H. Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Li, S. Sun, P. Xu, H. Tian, Z. Li, H. Yang, and J. Li, Ultramicroscopy 209, 112887 (2020).
  39. R. Shiloh, T. Chlouba, and P. Hommelhoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 235301 (2022).
  40. J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, A.-C. Zimmermann, A. Ryabov, and P. Baum, Sci. Adv. 10, eadl6543 (2024).
  41. A. Schröder, A. Wendeln, J. T. Weber, M. Mukai, Y. Kohno, and S. Schäfer, Ultramicroscopy 275, 114158 (2025).
  42. D. H. Dowell and J. F. Schmerge, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 074201 (2009).
  43. B. Cook, M. Bronsgeest, K. Hagen, and P. Kruit, Ultramicroscopy 109, 403 (2009).
  44. G. Herink, D. R. Solli, M. Gulde, and C. Ropers, Nature (London) 483, 190 (2012).
  45. M. Krüger, M. Schenk, and P. Hommelhoff, Nature (London) 475, 78 (2011).
  46. G. Hergert, R. Lampe, A. Wöste, and C. Lienau, Nano Lett. 24, 11067 (2024).
  47. B. Cook and P. Kruit, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 151901 (2016).
  48. M. Kuwahara, Y. Nambo, K. Aoki, K. Sameshima, X. Jin, T. Ujihara, H. Asano, K. Saitoh, Y. Takeda, and N. Tanaka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 013108 (2016).
  49. S. Meier and P. Hommelhoff, ACS Photonics 9, 3083 (2022).
  50. C. T. Hebeisen, G. Sciaini, M. Harb, R. Ernstorfer, T. Dartigalongue, S. G. Kruglik, and R. J. D. Miller, Opt. Express 16, 3334 (2008).
  51. M. Kozák, J. McNeur, K. J. Leedle, H. Deng, N. Schönenberger, A. Ruehl, I. Hartl, J. S. Harris, R. L. Byer, and P. Hommelhoff, Nat. Commun. 8, 14342 (2017).
  52. D. Epp, B. Schröder, M. Möller, and C. Ropers, Struct. Dyn. 11, 024306 (2024).
  53. S. T. Park, O.-H. Kwon, and A. H. Zewail, New J. Phys. 14, 053046 (2012).
  54. F. O. Kirchner, A. Gliserin, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Nat. Photonics 8, 52 (2014).
  55. B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, and A. H. Zewail, Nature (London) 462, 902 (2009).
  56. F. J. García de Abajo, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 209 (2010).
  57. A. Feist, K. E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, and C. Ropers, Nature (London) 521, 200 (2015).
  58. R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell, and X. Llopart, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 878, 10 (2018).
  59. J. P. van Schayck, E. van Genderen, E. Maddox, L. Roussel, H. Boulanger, E. Fröjdh, J.-P. Abrahams, P. J. Peters, and R. B. Ravelli, Ultramicroscopy 218, 113091 (2020).
  60. D. A. Plemmons, S. Tae Park, A. H. Zewail, and D. J. Flannigan, Ultramicroscopy 146, 97 (2014).
  61. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/lylq-m63c for additional information on the theoretical treatment of multielectron CL and long-pulse IELS, the influence of experimental parameters on the phase-space correlations and the experimental two-electron phase-space density reconstruction.
  62. S. V. Yalunin, A. Feist, and C. Ropers, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L032036 (2021).
  63. F. J. García de Abajo and C. Ropers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246901 (2023).
  64. O. Tziperman, D. Nabben, R. Ruimy, J. Holder, E. Nussinson, Y. Fang, A. Gorlach, D. Kazenwadel, A. Karnieli, I. Kaminer, and P. Baum, arXiv:2505.03707.
  65. R. Haindl, V. Di Giulio, A. Feist, and C. Ropers, Edmond, 10.17617/3.MJO3RE (2025).
  66. S. T. Park, M. Lin, and A. H. Zewail, New J. Phys. 12, 123028 (2010).
  67. F. J. García de Abajo, A. Asenjo-Garcia, and M. Kociak, Nano Lett. 10, 1859 (2010).
  68. S. T. Park and A. H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 11128 (2012).
  69. G. M. Vanacore, I. Madan, G. Berruto, K. Wang, E. Pomarico, R. J. Lamb, D. McGrouther, I. Kaminer, B. Barwick, F. J. García de Abajo, and F. Carbone, Nat. Commun. 9, 2694 (2018).
  70. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1972).
  71. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation