Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Gravitational-Wave Induced Freeze-In of Fermionic Dark Matter

Azadeh Maleknejad*

Joachim Kopp†

  • Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and PRISMA Cluster of Excellence and Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Staudingerweg 7, 55099 Mainz, Germany

  • *Contact author: azadeh.maleknejad@swansea.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: jkopp@cern.ch

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 131501 – Published 31 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lr69-45v8

Abstract

The minimal coupling of massless fermions to gravity does not allow for their gravitational production solely based on the expansion of the Universe. We argue that this changes in the presence of realistic and potentially detectable stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds. We compute the resulting energy density of Weyl fermions at 1-loop using in-in formalism. If the initially massless fermions eventually acquire mass, this mechanism can explain the dark matter abundance in the Universe. Remarkably, it may be more efficient than conventional gravitational production of superheavy fermions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2955 (1987).
  2. D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 59, 023501 (1998).
  3. L. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009).
  4. E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045005 (2024).
  5. E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103540 (2017).
  6. Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 060.
  7. M. Garny, M. Sandora, and M. S. Sloth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 101302 (2016).
  8. N. Bernal, M. Dutra, Y. Mambrini, K. Olive, M. Peloso, and M. Pierre, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115020 (2018).
  9. S. Clery, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D 105, 075005 (2022).
  10. M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2014).
  11. P. B. Greene and L. Kofman, Phys. Lett. B 448, 6 (1999).
  12. P. Adshead, L. Pearce, M. Peloso, M. A. Roberts, and L. Sorbo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2018) 020.
  13. A. Maleknejad, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 154.
  14. A. Maleknejad, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083518 (2021).
  15. A. Maleknejad, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 113.
  16. S. H.-S. Alexander, M. E. Peskin, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 081301 (2006).
  17. A. Maleknejad, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2016) 027.
  18. A. Maleknejad, Phys. Rev. D 90, 023542 (2014).
  19. P. Adshead and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 091301 (2016).
  20. R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023532 (2018).
  21. A. Campos and E. Verdaguer, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4428 (1992).
  22. L. Sorbo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2011) 003.
  23. A. Maleknejad, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 104.
  24. E. Komatsu, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 452 (2022).
  25. E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 30, 272 (1984).
  26. P. Schwaller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181101 (2015).
  27. C. Caprini et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2016) 001.
  28. A. Roper Pol, A. Neronov, C. Caprini, T. Boyer, and D. Semikoz, arXiv:2307.10744.
  29. A. Brandenburg, Y. He, T. Kahniashvili, M. Rheinhardt, and J. Schober, Astrophys. J. 911, 110 (2021).
  30. A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, and T. Kahniashvili, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2022) 019.
  31. P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni, and Z. J. Weiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171301 (2020).
  32. D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, N. Loayza, and M. Pieroni, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063522 (2022).
  33. M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995).
  34. P. Auclair et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 034.
  35. C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2009) 024.
  36. C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 163001 (2018).
  37. A. Maleknejad and J. Kopp, companion paper J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 023.
  38. Working with circular GW polarization states is more convenient here than using the plus and cross polarizations as a basis, even though the latter is more common in the GW literature.

  39. Note that at second order in gravitational wave perturbations, the perturbed metric is δgij=a2(hij+12hikhjk) [40].

  40. J. M. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 013.
  41. Given that helicity and chirality are equivalent for free fermions, the zeroth-order solution for left-handed Weyl fermions is similar, but with Ek+ replaced by Ek−.

  42. L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984).
  43. A. Maleknejad, arXiv:2412.09490.
  44. We have already performed the quantum expectation value over the fermionic fields, and the remaining averaging on GW is purely stochastic.

  45. A long-wavelength GW mode (homogeneous tensor mode) hijlong(t,x)≈Cij(t) can be recast as a change in coordinates hijlong↦0 and xi↦xi′=ehijlongxj [46, 47]. In other words, it can be considered as a large gauge transformation. As a result, after this coordinate transformation, a short-wavelength fermion mode in the presence of long-wavelength GWs becomes a free fermion, i.e., Ψshort(t,x)|hijlong=Ψ′(t,x′)|0, which implies ⟨ρψ,short(x)⟩|hijlong=⟨ρψ,short(x′)⟩|0=0.

  46. S. Weinberg, Cosmology (OUP, Oxford, 2008), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
  47. L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 109.
  48. The energy density of GWs is defined as ρgw=(1/32πG)⟨h˙ijh˙ij⟩, and its spectral energy density is Ωgw=(1/MPl2)[dρgw/3H2dlnq].

  49. R. Durrer, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222, 012021 (2010).
  50. A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, A. Neronov, and D. Semikoz, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123502 (2022).
  51. M. Breitbach, J. Kopp, E. Madge, T. Opferkuch, and P. Schwaller, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 007.
  52. M. Breitbach, Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, Master’s thesis, Mainz University, 2018, arXiv:2204.09661.
  53. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  54. C. Caprini, R. Durrer, T. Konstandin, and G. Servant, Phys. Rev. D 79, 083519 (2009).
  55. Note that Ωpeak may be related to T* and the GW background properties in a model-dependent manner. This work focuses on a broadly applicable framework, leaving a detailed exploration to future numerical studies.

  56. M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology (Oxford University Press, New York, 2018).
  57. M. Maggiore et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 050.
  58. M. Evans et al., arXiv:2109.09882.
  59. N. Aggarwal et al., Living Rev. Relativity 24, 4 (2021).
  60. M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).
  61. A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory (2017), arXiv:1703.05448.
  62. https://github.com/koppj/GW-freeze-in/.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation