Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

New Angles on Energy Correlators

Samuel Alipour-fard1,*, Ankita Budhraja2,†, Jesse Thaler1,‡, and Wouter J. Waalewijn2,3,§

  • *Contact author: samuelaf@mit.edu
  • †Contact author: abudhraj@nikhef.nl
  • ‡Contact author: jthaler@mit.edu
  • §Contact author: w.j.waalewijn@uva.nl

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 231902 – Published 10 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l6nj-2gsh

Abstract

Energy correlators have recently come to the forefront of jet substructure studies at colliders due to their remarkable properties: they naturally separate physics at different scales, are robust to contamination from soft radiation, and offer a direct connection with quantum field theory. The current parametrization used for energy correlators, however, is based on redundant pairwise angles with complex phase space restrictions. In this Letter, we introduce a new parametrization of energy correlators that features a simpler phase space structure and preserves information about the orientation of jet constituents. Further, our parametrization drastically reduces the computational cost to compute energy correlators on experimental data; whereas the time to compute a traditional projected N-point energy correlator scales as MN/N! on a jet with M particles, our new parametrization achieves a scaling of M2lnM, remarkably independently of N. Even for N=3, this improved scaling is particularly important for studies of heavy ion collisions, and higher values of N will enable new qualitative understanding of gauge theories. Theoretical calculations for our new energy correlators differ from those of traditional parametrizations only at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy and beyond, and we expect that our simpler phase space structure will simplify those calculations. We also discuss how to extend our parametrization to resolved N-point energy correlators that encode angular distances between greater numbers of particles, yielding intuitive visualizations of jet substructure that are qualitatively different for different jet samples. We propose two possible generalizations for probing multiprong jets and testing jet scaling behavior.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (77)

  1. James D. Bjorken and Stanley J. Brodsky, Statistical model for electron-positron annihilation into hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 1, 1416 (1970).
  2. Howard Georgi and Marie Machacek, Simple quantum-chromodynamics prediction of jet structure in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1237 (1977).
  3. Edward Farhi, Quantum chromodynamics test for jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1587 (1977).
  4. G. Parisi, Superinclusive cross sections, Phys. Lett. 74B, 65 (1978).
  5. John F. Donoghue, F. E. Low, and So-Young Pi, Tensor analysis of hadronic jets in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2759 (1979).
  6. P. E. L. Rakow and B. R. Webber, Transverse momentum moments of hadron distributions in QCD jets, Nucl. Phys. B191, 63 (1981).
  7. George F. Sterman, Jet structure in e+e− annihilation with massless hadrons, Report No. ILL-TH-75-32, 1975, https://inspirehep.net/literature/100933.
  8. C. Louis Basham, Lowell S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Electron-positron annihilation energy pattern in quantum chromodynamics: Asymptotically free perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2298 (1978).
  9. C.Louis Basham, Lowell S. Brown, Stephen D. Ellis, and Sherwin T. Love, Energy correlations in electron-positron annihilation: Testing QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1585 (1978).
  10. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Energy correlations in electron-positron annihilation in quantum chromodynamics: Asymptotically free perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2018 (1979).
  11. C. Louis Basham, Lowell S. Brown, Stephen D. Ellis, and Sherwin T. Love, Energy correlations in perturbative quantum chromodynamics: A conjecture for all orders, Phys. Lett. 85B, 297 (1979).
  12. Marianna Mazzilli (ALICE Collaboration), Measurements of HF-tagged jet substructure and energy-energy correlators with ALICE, Proc. Sci. EPS-HEP2023 (2024) 262.
  13. Aram Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of energy correlators inside jets and determination of the strong coupling αS(mZ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 071903 (2024).
  14. Andrew Tamis (STAR Collaboration), Measurement of two-point energy correlators within1 jets in p p collisions at s=200  GeV at STAR, Proc. Sci. HardProbes2023 (2024) 175 [arXiv:2309.05761].
  15. N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov, Jets and quantum field theory, Phys. Lett. B 382, 403 (1996).
  16. Fyodor V. Tkachov, Measuring multi-jet structure of hadronic energy flow or what is a jet?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 5411 (1997).
  17. Gregory P. Korchemsky and George F. Sterman, Power corrections to event shapes and factorization, Nucl. Phys. B555, 335 (1999).
  18. Christopher Lee and George F. Sterman, Momentum flow correlations from event shapes: Factorized soft gluons and soft-collinear effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 75, 014022 (2007).
  19. Diego M. Hofman and Juan Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2008) 012.
  20. A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, From correlation functions to event shapes, Nucl. Phys. B884, 305 (2014).
  21. A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, Event shapes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B884, 206 (2014).
  22. Petr Kravchuk and David Simmons-Duffin, Light-ray operators in conformal field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 102.
  23. Murat Kologlu, Petr Kravchuk, David Simmons-Duffin, and Alexander Zhiboedov, The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 128.
  24. Lance J. Dixon, Ian Moult, and Hua Xing Zhu, Collinear limit of the energy-energy correlator, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014009 (2019).
  25. Hao Chen, Ian Moult, XiaoYuan Zhang, and Hua Xing Zhu, Rethinking jets with energy correlators: Tracks, resummation, and analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054012 (2020).
  26. Hao Chen, Ming-Xing Luo, Ian Moult, Tong-Zhi Yang, Xiaoyuan Zhang, and Hua Xing Zhu, Three point energy correlators in the collinear limit: Symmetries, dualities and analytic results, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 028.
  27. Hao Chen, Ian Moult, and Hua Xing Zhu, Quantum interference in jet substructure from spinning gluons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 112003 (2021).
  28. Hao Chen, Ian Moult, and Hua Xing Zhu, Spinning gluons from the QCD light-ray OPE, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 233.
  29. Stella T. Schindler, Iain W. Stewart, and Zhiquan Sun, Renormalons in the energy-energy correlator, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 187.
  30. Anjie Gao, Hai Tao Li, Ian Moult, and Hua Xing Zhu, The transverse energy-energy correlator at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithm, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 072.
  31. Wen Chen, Jun Gao, Yibei Li, Zhen Xu, Xiaoyuan Zhang, and Hua Xing Zhu, NNLL resummation for projected three-point energy correlator, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 043.
  32. Dmitry Chicherin, Ian Moult, Emery Sokatchev, Kai Yan, and Yunyue Zhu, The collinear limit of the four-point energy correlator in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, L091901 (2024).
  33. Hao Chen, Pier Francesco Monni, Zhen Xu, and Hua Xing Zhu, Scaling violation in power corrections to energy correlators from the light-ray OPE, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 231901 (2024).
  34. Cyuan-Han Chang and David Simmons-Duffin, Three-point energy correlators and the celestial block expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 126.
  35. Ankita Budhraja and Wouter J. Waalewijn, fasteec: Fast evaluation of N-point energy correlators, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139276 (2025).
  36. Ankita Budhraja, Hao Chen, and Wouter J. Waalewijn, ν-point energy correletors with fasteec: Small-x physics from LHC jets, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139239 (2025).
  37. Kyle Lee, Francesco Turro, and Xiaojun Yao, Quantum computing for energy correlators, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054514 (2025).
  38. Jack Holguin, Ian Moult, Aditya Pathak, and Massimiliano Procura, New paradigm for precision top physics: Weighing the top with energy correlators, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114002 (2023).
  39. Jack Holguin, Ian Moult, Aditya Pathak, Massimiliano Procura, Robert Schöfbeck, and Dennis Schwarz, Using the W as a standard candle to reach the top: Calibrating energy correlator based top mass measurements, arXiv:2311.02157.
  40. Jack Holguin, Ian Moult, Aditya Pathak, Massimiliano Procura, Robert Schöfbeck, and Dennis Schwarz, Top quark mass extractions from energy correlators: A feasibility study, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 072.
  41. Patrick T. Komiske, Ian Moult, Jesse Thaler, and Hua Xing Zhu, Analyzing N-point energy correlators inside jets with CMS open data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051901 (2023).
  42. Kyle Lee, Aditya Pathak, Iain Stewart, and Zhiquan Sun, Nonperturbative effects in energy correlators: From characterizing confinement transition to improving αs extraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 231902 (2024).
  43. Evan Craft, Kyle Lee, Bianka Meçaj, and Ian Moult, Beautiful and charming energy correlators, arXiv:2210.09311.
  44. Carlota Andres, Fabio Dominguez, Raghav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, Jack Holguin, Cyrille Marquet, and Ian Moult, Resolving the scales of the quark-gluon plasma with energy correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 262301 (2023).
  45. Carlota Andres, Fabio Dominguez, Jack Holguin, Cyrille Marquet, and Ian Moult, A coherent view of the quark-gluon plasma from energy correlators, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 088.
  46. João Barata, José Guilherme Milhano, and Andrey V. Sadofyev, Picturing QCD jets in anisotropic matter: from jet shapes to energy energy correlators, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 174 (2024).
  47. João Barata, Paul Caucal, Alba Soto-Ontoso, and Robert Szafron, Advancing the understanding of energy-energy correlators in heavy-ion collisions, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 060.
  48. Carlota Andres, Fabio Dominguez, Jack Holguin, Cyrille Marquet, and Ian Moult, Seeing beauty in the quark-gluon plasma with energy correlators, Phys. Rev. D 110, L031503 (2024).
  49. Balbeer Singh and Varun Vaidya, Factorization for energy-energy correlator in heavy ion collision, arXiv:2408.02753.
  50. CMS Collaboration, Energy-energy correlators from PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV, Report No. CMS-PAS-HIN-23-004, 2024, https://inspirehep.net/literature/2817909.
  51. Hannah Bossi, Arjun Srinivasan Kudinoor, Ian Moult, Daniel Pablos, Ananya Rai, and Krishna Rajagopal, Imaging the wakes of jets with energy-energy-energy correlators, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 073.
  52. Yibei Li, Ian Moult, Solange Schrijnder van Velzen, Wouter J. Waalewijn, and Hua Xing Zhu, Extending precision perturbative QCD with track functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 182001 (2022).
  53. Hao Chen, Max Jaarsma, Yibei Li, Ian Moult, Wouter J. Waalewijn, and Hua Xing Zhu, Collinear parton dynamics beyond DGLAP, Phys. Rev. D 111, 076021 (2025).
  54. Hao Chen, Max Jaarsma, Yibei Li, Ian Moult, Wouter J. Waalewijn, and Hua Xing Zhu, Multi-collinear splitting kernels for track function evolution, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 185.
  55. Max Jaarsma, Yibei Li, Ian Moult, Wouter J. Waalewijn, and Hua Xing Zhu, Energy correlators on tracks: Resummation and non-perturbative effects, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 087.
  56. G. Karapetyan, Nuclear configurational entropy of the energy-energy correlation in e+e− annihilation processes, Europhys. Lett. 125, 58001 (2019).
  57. Xiaohui Liu and Hua Xing Zhu, Nucleon energy correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091901 (2023).
  58. Hao-Yu Liu, Xiaohui Liu, Ji-Chen Pan, Feng Yuan, and Hua Xing Zhu, Nucleon energy correlators for the color glass condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181901 (2023).
  59. Zhong-Bo Kang, Kyle Lee, Ding Yu Shao, and Fanyi Zhao, Collins-type energy-energy correlators and nucleon structure, in Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (2023), arXiv:2307.06935.
  60. Haotian Cao, Xiaohui Liu, and Hua Xing Zhu, Toward precision measurements of nucleon energy correlators in lepton-nucleon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114008 (2023).
  61. Ankita Budhraja and Wouter Waalewijn, fasteec 0.2 (2024), https://github.com/abudhraj/FastEEC/releases/tag/0.2.
  62. Samuel Alipour-fard, ResolvedEnergyCorrelators (RENCs), https://github.com/samcaf/ResolvedEnergyCorrelators (2024).
  63. fasteec [35] achieves a substantial speed up by replacing particles with subjets whose radius is chosen dynamically, depending on the desired level of angular resolution. For non-integer N, fasteec furthermore uses a recursive algorithm that reduces the standard 22M scaling down to M2M [36].

  64. Duff Neill and Felix Ringer, Soft fragmentation on the celestial sphere, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 086.
  65. Lin Dai, Chul Kim, and Adam K. Leibovich, Large N-point energy correlator in the collinear limit, arXiv:2410.11614.
  66. CERN Open Data Portal, http://opendata.cern.ch.
  67. CMS Collaboration, Jet primary dataset in AOD format from RunA of 2011 (/Jet/Run2011A-12Oct2013-v1/AOD), CERN Open Data Portal (2016), 10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.UP77.P6PQ.
  68. Patrick T. Komiske, Radha Mastandrea, Eric M. Metodiev, Preksha Naik, and Jesse Thaler, Exploring the space of jets with CMS open data, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034009 (2020).
  69. Patrick Komiske, Radha Mastandrea, Eric Metodiev, Preksha Naik, and Jesse Thaler, CMS 2011A Open Data ∥Jet Primary Dataset ∥  pT>375  GeV∥MOD HDF5 Format (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3340205.
  70. Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam, and Gregory Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  71. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/l6nj-2gsh, which includes Ref. [72], which we used to verify the relation in terms of quantiles.
  72. Jasmine Brewer, José Guilherme Milhano, and Jesse Thaler, Sorting out quenched jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222301 (2019).
  73. Daniele Bertolini, Tucker Chan, and Jesse Thaler, Jet observables without jet algorithms, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 013.
  74. Daniele Bertolini, Jesse Thaler, and Jonathan R. Walsh, The first calculation of fractional jets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 008.
  75. Kyle Lee, Ian Moult, and Xiaoyuan Zhang, Revisiting single inclusive jet production: Timelike factorization and reciprocity, arXiv:2409.19045.
  76. Christian Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of pythia 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  77. Peter Skands, Stefano Carrazza, and Juan Rojo, Tuning pythia 8.1: The Monash 2013 tune, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3024 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation