Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

L Entropy: A New Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Measure

Jaydeep Kumar Basak1,*, Vinay Malvimat2,†, and Junggi Yoon2,3,4,‡

  • *Contact author: jkb.hep@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: vinaymalvimat@khu.ac.kr
  • ‡Contact author: junggi.yoon@khu.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 080202 – Published 24 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kmpl-mdbx

Abstract

We advance “latent entropy” (L entropy) as a novel measure to characterize genuine multipartite entanglement in pure states, applicable to quantum systems with both finite and infinite degrees of freedom. This measure, derived from an upper bound on reflected entropy, attains its maximum for three-party Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states and n=4, 5-party 2-uniform states. We establish that it satisfies all essential properties of a genuine multipartite entanglement measure, including being a pure-state entanglement monotone. We further obtain an analog of the Page curve by analyzing the behavior of L entropy in multiboundary wormholes, emphasizing their connection to multipartite entanglement in random states. Specifically, for n=5, we show that random states approximate 2-uniform states, exhibiting maximal multipartite entanglement. Extending these ideas to finite temperatures, we introduce the multipartite thermal pure quantum state, a generalization of the thermal pure quantum state to multipartite systems, and demonstrate that the entanglement structure in states of the multicopy Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model exhibits finite-temperature 2-uniform behavior.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (37)

  1. M. Ma, Y. Li, and J. Shang, Fund. Res. 5, 2489 (2025).
  2. P. Horodecki, L. Rudnicki, and K. Życzkowski, arXiv:2409.04566.
  3. M. Choi, E. Bae, and S. Lee, Sci. Rep. 13, 15013 (2023).
  4. M. Hillery, V. Buzek, and A. Berthiaume, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999).
  5. R. Cleve, D. Gottesman, and H.-K. Lo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 648 (1999).
  6. H.-L. Shi, L. Gan, K. Zhang, X.-H. Wang, and W.-L. Yang, arXiv:2503.02667.
  7. H. J. Briegel, D. E. Browne, W. Dür, R. Raussendorf, and M. Van den Nest, Nat. Phys. 5, 19 (2009).
  8. G. Wong, R. Raussendorf, and B. Czech, Quantum 8, 1397 (2024).
  9. A. Gadde, V. Krishna, and T. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 106, 126001 (2022).
  10. N. Iizuka, S. Lin, and M. Nishida, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 037.
  11. W. Dur, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
  12. M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 1 (2007).
  13. S. Xie and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 040403 (2021).
  14. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
  15. C. Sabín and G. Garcia-Alcaine, Eur. Phys. J. D 48, 435 (2008).
  16. D. P. Chi, K. Jeong, T. Kim, K. Lee, and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032330 (2009).
  17. Z.-H. Ma, Z.-H. Chen, J.-L. Chen, C. Spengler, A. Gabriel, and M. Huber, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062325 (2011).
  18. A. Sen(De) and U. Sen, Phys. Rev. A 81, 012308 (2010).
  19. B. Regula, S. Di Martino, S. Lee, and G. Adesso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 110501 (2014).
  20. S. Xie, D. Younis, Y. Mei, and J. H. Eberly, Entropy 26, 217 (2024).
  21. A. J. Scott, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052330 (2004).
  22. W. Helwig, W. Cui, J. I. Latorre, A. Riera, and H.-K. Lo, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052335 (2012).
  23. B. Ahn, J. K. Basak, K.-Y. Kim, G. B. Koo, V. Malvimat, and J. Yoon, arXiv:2510.19922.
  24. S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 178.
  25. C. Akers and P. Rath, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 208.
  26. P. Hayden, O. Parrikar, and J. Sorce, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 047.
  27. Y. Zou, K. Siva, T. Soejima, R. S. K. Mong, and M. P. Zaletel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 120501 (2021).
  28. Y. Li and J. Shang, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023059 (2022).
  29. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/kmpl-mdbx for further details.
  30. X. Ge, L. Liu, and S. Cheng, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032405 (2023).
  31. C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 162.
  32. D. Goyeneche and K. Życzkowski, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022316 (2014).
  33. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  34. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2006) 045.
  35. T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto, Nat. Phys. 14, 573 (2018).
  36. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, and D. Harlow, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 032.
  37. S. Sugiura and A. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 010401 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation