- Open Access
Exploiting Isotopes for Precision Characterizations of Collectivity in Small Systems
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 012302 – Published 2 July, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k8rb-jgvq
Abstract
Whether or not femto-scale droplets of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) are formed in so-called small systems at high-energy colliders is a pressing question in the phenomenology of the strong interaction. For proton-proton or proton-nucleus collisions the answer is inconclusive due to the large theoretical uncertainties plaguing the description of these processes. While upcoming data on collisions of nuclei may mitigate these uncertainties in the near future, here we demonstrate the unique possibilities offered by complementing data with collisions of ions. We couple both nuclear lattice effective field theory (NLEFT) and projected generator coordinate method (PGCM) ab initio descriptions of the structure of and to hydrodynamic simulations of and collisions at high energy. We isolate the imprints of the bowling-pin shape of on the collective flow of hadrons, which can be used to perform quantitative tests of the hydrodynamic QGP paradigm. In particular, we predict that the elliptic flow of collisions is enhanced by as much as for NLEFT and for PGCM relative to collisions for the 1% most central events. At the same time, theoretical uncertainties largely cancel when studying relative variations of observables between two systems. This demonstrates a method based on experiments with two light-ion species for precision characterizations of the collective dynamics and its emergence in a small system.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (117)
- W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339 (2018).
- D. A. Teaney,Viscous hydrodynamics and the quark gluon plasma, in Quark-Gluon Plasma 4, edited by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010), pp. 207–266, 10.1142/9789814293297_0004.
- J.-Y. Ollitrault, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 236 (2023).
- J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. D 46, 229 (1992).
- D. Teaney and L. Yan, Phys. Rev. C 83, 064904 (2011).
- J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 211 (2018).
- B. Schenke, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 082301 (2021).
- J. Noronha, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430005 (2024).
- G. S. Rocha, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, and D. H. Rischke, Entropy 26, 189 (2024).
- R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke, Phys. Lett. B 774, 351 (2017).
- H. Mäntysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Lett. B 772, 681 (2017).
- J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024911 (2020).
- B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135322 (2020).
- W. Zhao, Y. Zhou, K. Murase, and H. Song, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 846 (2020).
- Y. Wang, W. Zhao, and H. Song, arXiv:2401.00913.
- A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 783, 274 (2018).
- A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 759 (2019).
- A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 122302 (2019).
- A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 965 (2019).
- A. Kurkela, S. F. Taghavi, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135901 (2020).
- V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014031 (2022).
- V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094013 (2023).
- V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 152301 (2023).
- T. Altinoluk and N. Armesto, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 215 (2020).
- P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics in and out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108651998.
- J.-P. Blaizot and L. Yan, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 412, 167993 (2020).
- S. Schlichting and D. Teaney, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 447 (2019).
- J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venugopalan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021).
- A. Soloviev, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 319 (2022).
- C. Aidala et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 15, 214 (2019).
- M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 242301 (2023).
- M. I. Abdulhamid, B. E. Aboona, J. Adam, J. R. Adams, G. Agakishiev, I. Aggarwal, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, A. Aitbaev et al., Phys. Rev. C 110, 064902 (2024).
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 724, 213 (2013).
- M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 428 (2017).
- S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 142301 (2019).
- U. A. Acharya et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 105, 024901 (2022).
- W. Zhao, S. Ryu, C. Shen, and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014904 (2023).
- V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 92, 034911 (2015).
- P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Lett. B 752, 206 (2016).
- J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, in Proceedings of the Opportunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC (2021), arXiv:2103.01939.
- S. Huang, arXiv:2312.12167.
- M. D. Sievert and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024904 (2019).
- B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044905 (2020).
- G. Nijs and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. C 106, 044903 (2022).
- G. Giacalone, J. Jia, and V. Somà, Phys. Rev. C 104, L041903 (2021).
- M. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 105, 014901 (2022).
- C. Zhang and J. Jia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022301 (2022).
- G. Nijs and W. van der Schee, SciPost Phys. 15, 041 (2023).
- H. Hergert, Front. Phys. 8, 379 (2020).
- A. Ekström, C. Forssén, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, W. Jiang, and T. Papenbrock, Front. Phys. 11, 1129094 (2023).
- G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 096302 (2014).
- H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, Phys. Rep. 621, 165 (2016).
- V. Somà, P. Navrátil, F. Raimondi, C. Barbieri, and T. Duguet, Phys. Rev. C 101, 014318 (2020).
- S. R. Stroberg, J. D. Holt, A. Schwenk, and J. Simonis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 022501 (2021).
- A. Tichai, R. Roth, and T. Duguet, Front. Phys. 8, 164 (2020).
- P. Arthuis, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, arXiv:2401.06675.
- B. Hu et al., Nat. Phys. 18, 1196 (2022).
- D. Lee, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 117 (2009).
- T. A. Lähde and U.-G. Meißner, Nuclear Lattice Effective Field Theory: An Introduction (Springer, New York, 2019), Vol. 957.
- D. Lee, Front. Phys. 8, 174 (2020).
- S. Elhatisari, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, N. Li, B.-n. Lu, U.-G. Meißner, and G. Rupak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 222505 (2017).
- B.-N. Lu, N. Li, S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, E. Epelbaum, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134863 (2019).
- N. Summerfield, B.-N. Lu, C. Plumberg, D. Lee, J. Noronha-Hostler, and A. Timmins, Phys. Rev. C 104, L041901 (2021).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/k8rb-jgvq for a detailed discussion of the treatment of uncertainties.
- M. Frosini, T. Duguet, B. Bally, Y. Beaujeault-Taudière, J. P. Ebran, and V. Somà, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 151 (2021).
- J. M. Yao, J. Engel, L. J. Wang, C. F. Jiao, and H. Hergert, Phys. Rev. C 98, 054311 (2018).
- J. M. Yao, B. Bally, J. Engel, R. Wirth, T. R. Rodríguez, and H. Hergert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 232501 (2020).
- M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J.-P. Ebran, and V. Somà, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 62 (2022).
- M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J.-P. Ebran, B. Bally, T. Mongelli, T. R. Rodríguez, R. Roth, and V. Somà, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 63 (2022).
- M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J.-P. Ebran, B. Bally, H. Hergert, T. R. Rodríguez, R. Roth, J. Yao, and V. Somà, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 64 (2022).
- T. Hüther, K. Vobig, K. Hebeler, R. Machleidt, and R. Roth, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135651 (2020).
- S. Marcos, H. Flocard, and P. H. Heenen, Nucl. Phys. A410, 125 (1983).
- L. M. Robledo and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054302 (2011).
- P. Marević, J. P. Ebran, E. Khan, T. Nikšić, and D. Vretenar, Phys. Rev. C 97, 024334 (2018).
- M. Kimura, T. Suhara, and Y. Kanada-En’yo, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 373 (2016).
- Y. Wang, S. Zhao, B. Cao, H.-j. Xu, and H. Song, Phys. Rev. C 109, L051904 (2024).
- B. Bally, M. Bender, G. Giacalone, and V. Somà, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 082301 (2022).
- B. Bally, G. Giacalone, and M. Bender, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 187 (2022).
- G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, and R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 202301 (2021).
- G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, and R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054909 (2021).
- G. Nijs and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 232301 (2022).
For all profiles we provide 20 k configurations as part of the submission.
- J. Weil et al. (SMASH Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 94, 054905 (2016).
- D. Oliinychenko, V. Steinberg, J. Weil, M. Kretz, J. Staudenmaier, S. Ryu, A. Schäfer, J. Rothermel, J. Mohs, F. Li, H. E. (Petersen), L. Pang, D. Mitrovic, A. Goldschmidt, L. Geiger, J.-B. Rose, J. Hammelmann, and L. Prinz, smash-transport/smash: Smash-1.8 (2020).
- T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
- G. Giacalone, G. Nijs, and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 202302 (2023).
- P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C 93, 044908 (2016).
- P. Bozek and H. Mehrabpour, Phys. Rev. C 101, 064902 (2020).
- G. Giacalone, F. G. Gardim, J. Noronha-Hostler, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C 103, 024909 (2021).
- G. Giacalone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 202301 (2020).
- G. Giacalone, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024901 (2020).
- J. Jia, S. Huang, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014906 (2022).
- N. Magdy, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 64 (2023).
- STAR Collaboration, Nature (London) 635, 67 (2024).
- S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 834, 137393 (2022).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 107, 054910 (2023).
- B. Pritychenko, M. Birch, B. Singh, and M. Horoi, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 107, 1 (2016); 114, 371(E) (2017).
- J. Jia, Phys. Rev. C 105, 044905 (2022).
- G. Giacalone, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 297 (2023).
- G. Giacalone, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 192301 (2020).
Here the charge radii equal the matter radii for NLEFT since the computation is isospin symmetric. For PGCM the matter radii are about 0.012 fm smaller than the charge radii.
- P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
- Y.-H. Lin, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 052002 (2022).
- I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 99, 69 (2013).
- N. Fortier, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 111, 014901 (2025).
- Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024905 (2022).
- Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054908 (2022).
- F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, V. Hoang, J. Noronha, and M. Radosz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 222301 (2021).
- C. Plumberg, D. Almaalol, T. Dore, J. Noronha, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev. C 105, L061901 (2022).
- R. Krupczak et al., Phys. Rev. C 109, 034908 (2024).
- L. He, T. Edmonds, Z.-W. Lin, F. Liu, D. Molnar, and F. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 753, 506 (2016).
- J. Schukraft, A. Timmins, and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 719, 394 (2013).
- C. Beattie, G. Nijs, M. Sas, and W. van der Schee, Phys. Lett. B 836, 137596 (2023).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. Instrum. 17, P05009 (2022).
- G. Giacalone, B. Schenke, S. Schlichting, and P. Singh, EPJ Web Conf. 296, 10005 (2024).
- H. Mäntysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 062301 (2023).
- www.gauss-centre.eu