Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Matrix-Weighted Networks for Modeling Multidimensional Dynamics: Theoretical Foundations and Applications to Network Coherence

Yu Tian1,2,*, Sadamori Kojaku3,†, Hiroki Sayama3,4,‡, and Renaud Lambiotte5,§

  • *Contact author: yu.tian.researcher@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: skojaku@binghamton.edu
  • ‡Contact author: sayama@binghamton.edu
  • §Contact author: renaud.lambiotte@maths.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 237401 – Published 13 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jw1k-6s7w

Abstract

Networks are powerful tools for modeling interactions in complex systems. While traditional networks use scalar edge weights, many real-world systems involve multidimensional interactions. For example, in social networks, individuals often have multiple interconnected opinions that can affect different opinions of other individuals, which can be better characterized by matrices. We propose a general framework for modeling such multidimensional interacting dynamics: matrix-weighted networks (MWNs). We present the mathematical foundations of MWNs and examine consensus dynamics and random walks within this context. Our results reveal that the coherence of MWNs gives rise to nontrivial steady states that generalize the notions of communities and structural balance in traditional networks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

6 November, 2025

Correction: An error in Eq. (1) has been fixed. The corresponding proofs in the Supplemental Material have been updated as well.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (60)

  1. M. Newman, The empirical study of networks, in Networks, 2nd ed. (OUP Oxford, New York, 2018), pp. 14–102.
  2. A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, and A. Morse, Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48, 988 (2003).
  3. I. Couzin, J. Krause, N. Franks, and S. Levin, Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move, Nature (London) 433, 513 (2005).
  4. M. Porter and J. Gleeson, Dynamical systems on networks: A tutorial, in Frontiers in Applied Dynamical Systems: Reviews and Tutorials (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2016).
  5. R. Lambiotte and M. Schaub, Modularity and dynamics on complex networks, in Elements in Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  6. M. Rosvall and C. Bergstrom, Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1118 (2008).
  7. D. Cartwright and F. Harary, Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory, Psychol. Rev. 63, 277 (1956).
  8. C. Altafini, Dynamics of opinion forming in structurally balanced social networks, PLoS One 7, 1 (2012).
  9. Y. Tian and R. Lambiotte, Spreading and structural balance on signed networks, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 23, 50 (2024).
  10. L. Böttcher and M. A. Porter, Complex networks with complex weights, Phys. Rev. E 109, 024314 (2024).
  11. Y. Tian and R. Lambiotte, Structural balance and random walks on complex networks with complex weights, SIAM J. Math. Data Sci. 6, 372 (2024).
  12. J. Schwinger, Unitary operator bases, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 46, 570 (1960).
  13. P. Barooah and J. Hespanha, Estimation from relative measurements: Error bounds from electrical analogy, in Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing (IEEE, Chennai, 2005), pp. 88–93, 10.1109/ICISIP.2005.1529428.
  14. A. Singer and H. Wu, Vector diffusion maps and the connection Laplacian, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 65, 1067 (2012).
  15. A. Novikov, D. Podoprikhin, A. Osokin, and D. Vetrov, Tensorizing neural networks, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., Montréal, Quebec, 2015), Vol. 28.
  16. N. Friedkin, A. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, and S. Parsegov, Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints, Science 354, 321 (2016).
  17. S. Parsegov, A. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, and N. Friedkin, Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 62, 2270 (2017).
  18. M. Ye, J. Liu, L. Wang, B. Anderson, and M. Cao, Consensus and disagreement of heterogeneous belief systems in influence networks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 65, 4679 (2020).
  19. A. Nedić, A. Olshevsky, and C. Uribe, Graph-theoretic analysis of belief system dynamics under logic constraints, Sci. Rep. 9, 8843 (2019).
  20. M. Ye, M. Trinh, Y. Lim, B. Anderson, and H. Ahn, Continuous-time opinion dynamics on multiple interdependent topics, Automatica 115, 108884 (2020).
  21. H. Ahn, Q. Van Tran, M. Trinh, M. Ye, J. Liu, and K. Moore, Opinion dynamics with cross-coupling topics: Modeling and analysis, IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 7, 632 (2020).
  22. A. Bizyaeva, A. Franci, and N. E. Leonard, Multi-topic belief formation through bifurcations over signed social networks, arXiv:2308.02755.
  23. S. Pilosof, M. Porter, M. Pascual, and S. Kéfi, The multilayer nature of ecological networks, Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0101 (2017).
  24. A. Brechtel, P. Gramlich, D. Ritterskamp, B. Drossel, and T. Gross, Master stability functions reveal diffusion-driven pattern formation in networks, Phys. Rev. E 97, 032307 (2018).
  25. J. Biamonte, M. Faccin, and M. De Domenico, Complex networks from classical to quantum, Commun. Phys. 2, 53 (2019).
  26. A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep. 469, 93 (2008).
  27. T. Carletti, L. Giambagli, and G. Bianconi, Global topological synchronization on simplicial and cell complexes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 187401 (2023).
  28. M. Kivelä, A. Arenas, M. Barthelemy, J. Gleeson, Y. Moreno, and M. Porter, Multilayer networks, J. Complex Netw. 2, 203 (2014).
  29. H. Sayama, Estimation of Laplacian spectra of direct and strong product graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 205, 160 (2016).
  30. H. Sayama, Graph product multilayer networks: spectral properties and applications, J. Complex Netw. 6, 430 (2017).
  31. G. Bianconi, Multilayer Networks: Structure and Function (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018).
  32. M. De Domenico, More is different in real-world multilayer networks, Nat. Phys. 19, 1247 (2023).
  33. R. Axelrod, The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization, J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203 (1997), https://www.jstor.org/stable/174371.
  34. J. Hansen and R. Ghrist, Opinion dynamics on discourse sheaves, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 81, 2033 (2021).
  35. C. Bodnar, F. Di Giovanni, B. Chamberlain, P. Lió, and M. Bronstein, Neural sheaf diffusion: A topological perspective on heterophily and oversmoothing in GNNs, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., New Orleans, LA, 2022), Vol. 35, pp. 18527–18541.
  36. L. Braithwaite, I. Duta, and P. Liò, Heterogeneous sheaf neural networks, arXiv:2409.08036.
  37. F. Barbero, C. Bodnar, H. de Ocáriz Borde, M. Bronstein, P. Veličković, and P. Liò, Sheaf neural networks with connection Laplacians, in Proceedings of Topological, Algebraic and Geometric Learning Workshops 2022 (PMLR, 2022), pp. 28–36.
  38. T. Gebhart, Graph convolutional networks from the perspective of sheaves and the neural tangent kernel, in Proceedings of Topological, Algebraic and Geometric Learning Workshops 2022, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR, 2022), Vol. 196, pp. 124–132.
  39. The code and documentation to reproduce all numerical results can be found at our GitHub repository: https://github.com/skojaku/matrix-weight-net.
  40. We note that each matrix weight may not be symmetric.

  41. We note that for a directed walk P with composing edges e1,e2…,ek, if we represent el=(ul,vl)(l=1,…,k), then the only requirement is that ul=vl−1 for all l=2,…,k. A directed walk becomes a directed path if there is no other repetition of nodes in all composing edges, and a directed walk becomes a directed cycle if the former is true apart from the starting and end nodes being the same.

  42. F. Harary, On the notion of balance of a signed graph, Michigan Math. J. 2, 143 (1953).
  43. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jw1k-6s7w for relaxed versions of coherence to characterize a broader range of matrix-weighted networks, formal statements of the theoretical results presented in the Letter, together with their detailed proofs, and additional results from the numerical experiments with varying parameters.
  44. N. Lynch, Distributed Algorithms (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1996).
  45. T. Balch and L. Parker, Robot Teams: From Diversity to Polymorphism, 1st ed. (A K Peters/CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2002).
  46. J. Russell Carpenter, Decentralized control of satellite formations, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 12, 141 (2002).
  47. J. Fax and R. Murray, Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49, 1465 (2004).
  48. N. Masuda, M. Porter, and R. Lambiotte, Random walks and diffusion on networks, Phys. Rep. 716–717, 1 (2017).
  49. M. Fisher, Shape of a self-avoiding walk or polymer chain, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 616 (1966).
  50. G. Pinski and F. Narin, Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics, Inf. Proc. Manag. 12, 297 (1976).
  51. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd, The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web, Technical Report No. 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab, 1999; The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the webPrevious No. SIDL-WP-1999-0120.
  52. A. Okubo and S. Levin, Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2001), Vol. 14.
  53. W. Ewens, Mathematical Population Genetics: Theoretical Introduction (Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2004), Vol. 27.
  54. J. Gold and M. Shadlen, The neural basis of decision making, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535 (2007).
  55. L. Gyllingberg, Y. Tian, and D. Sumpter, A minimal model of cognition based on oscillatory and reinforcement processes, J. R. Soc. Interface 22, rsif.2024.0402 (2025).
  56. D. Gleich, PageRank beyond the web, SIAM Rev. 57, 321 (2015).
  57. R. Lambiotte, J. Delvenne, and M. Barahona, Random walks, Markov processes and the multiscale modular organization of complex networks, IEEE Trans. Network Sci. Eng. 1, 76 (2014).
  58. R. Lambiotte, M. Rosvall, and I. Scholtes, From networks to optimal higher-order models of complex systems, Nat. Phys. 15, 313 (2019).
  59. P. Holme and J. Saramäki, Temporal networks, Phys. Rep. 519, 97 (2012).
  60. N. Masuda, K. Klemm, and V. M. Eguíluz, Temporal networks: Slowing down diffusion by long lasting interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 188701 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation