Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Using the W Boson as a Standard Candle to Reach the Top: Calibrating Energy-Correlator-Based Top Mass Measurements

Jack Holguin1,2, Ian Moult3, Aditya Pathak4, Massimiliano Procura5, Robert Schöfbeck6, and Dennis Schwarz6

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 231903 – Published 13 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/j4sp-fcmd

Abstract

The top quark mass is a key parameter of the standard model, yet measuring it precisely at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is challenging. Inspired by the use of standard candles in cosmology, we propose a novel energy correlator-based observable, which directly accesses the dimensionless quantity mt/mW. We perform a Monte Carlo study to demonstrate the feasibility of the top mass extraction from Run 2, 3, and High-Luminosity LHC datasets. Our resulting mt can be defined in a well-controlled short-distance mass scheme and exhibits remarkably small uncertainties from nonperturbative effects, as well as insensitivity to parton distribution functions, outlining a roadmap for a record precision measurement at the LHC.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (107)

  1. M. Baak, M. Goebel, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, D. Kennedy, R. Kogler, K. Moenig, M. Schott, and J. Stelzer, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2205 (2012).
  2. M. Baak, J. Cúth, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, M. Schott, and J. Stelzer (Gfitter Group), Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3046 (2014).
  3. J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2008) 002.
  4. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, L. Senatore, and G. Villadoro, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2008) 075.
  5. J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Riotto, and A. Strumia, Phys. Lett. B 709, 222 (2012).
  6. G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 098.
  7. D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, G. F. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio, and A. Strumia, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 089.
  8. F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 120, 335 (2015).
  9. J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, E. Morgante, A. Riotto, L. Senatore, A. Strumia, and N. Tetradis, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 174.
  10. G. F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, and A. Strumia, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 192.
  11. T. Steingasser and D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095035 (2023).
  12. J. Khoury and T. Steingasser, Phys. Rev. D 105, 055031 (2022).
  13. T. E. W. Group (CDF and D0 Collaborations), arXiv:1407.2682.
  14. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 072004 (2016).
  15. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 761, 350 (2016).
  16. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  17. P. Nason, The top mass in hadronic collisions, in From My Vast Repertoire ...: Guido Altarelli’s Legacy, edited by A. Levy, S. Forte, and G. Ridolfi (2019), pp. 123–151; arXiv:1712.02796.
  18. A. H. Hoang, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 225 (2020).
  19. A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rep. 841, 1 (2020).
  20. R. Kogler et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045003 (2019).
  21. S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and M. Spannowsky, Looking Inside Jets: An Introduction to Jet Substructure and Boosted-Object Phenomenology, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 958 (Springer, New York, 2019).
  22. A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074021 (2019).
  23. S. Fleming, A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114003 (2008).
  24. S. Fleming, A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 77, 074010 (2008).
  25. A. H. Hoang, A. Jain, I. Scimemi, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 82, 011501(R) (2010).
  26. A. H. Hoang, A. Jain, C. Lepenik, V. Mateu, M. Preisser, I. Scimemi, and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 003.
  27. A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak, and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 002.
  28. B. Bachu, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, A. Pathak, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014026 (2021).
  29. M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P. Salam, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 029.
  30. A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 146.
  31. A. Ferdinand, K. Lee, and A. Pathak, Phys. Rev. D 108, L111501 (2023).
  32. A. Pathak, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 054.
  33. J. Holguin, I. Moult, A. Pathak, and M. Procura, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114002 (2023).
  34. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1585 (1978).
  35. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2298 (1978).
  36. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Lett. 85B, 297 (1979).
  37. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2018 (1979).
  38. D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2008) 012.
  39. H. Chen, I. Moult, X. Y, Zhang, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054012 (2020).
  40. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 071903 (2024).
  41. A. Tamis, in 11th International Conference on Hard and Electromagnetic Probes of High-Energy Nuclear Collisions: Hard Probes 2023 (2023), arXiv:2309.05761.
  42. W. Fan, Imaging Cold Nuclear Matter with Energy Correlators at the future EIC, DIS 2023, https://indico.cern.ch/event/1199314/contributions/5193362/attachments/2621033/4532901/DIS2023_wenqing_033023.pdf.
  43. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 560 (2023).
  44. CMS Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 963 (2023).
  45. J. Holguin, I. Moult, A. Pathak, M. Procura, R. Schöfbeck, and D. Schwarz, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 072.
  46. M. Xiao, Y. Ye, and X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 088.
  47. P. T. Komiske, I. Moult, J. Thaler, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051901 (2023).
  48. X. Liu and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091901 (2023).
  49. H.-Y. Liu, X. Liu, J.-C. Pan, F. Yuan, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181901 (2023).
  50. H. Cao, X. Liu, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114008 (2023).
  51. H. Chen, M.-X. Luo, I. Moult, T.-Z. Yang, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 028.
  52. H. Chen, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 112003 (2021).
  53. H. Chen, I. Moult, J. Thaler, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 146.
  54. K. Lee, B. Meçaj, and I. Moult, Phys. Rev. D 111, L011502 (2025).
  55. E. Craft, K. Lee, B. Meçaj, and I. Moult, arXiv:2210.09311.
  56. K. Devereaux, W. Fan, W. Ke, K. Lee, and I. Moult, arXiv:2303.08143.
  57. M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W. J. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 087.
  58. K. Lee and I. Moult, arXiv:2308.00746.
  59. Z. Yang, Y. He, I. Moult, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 011901 (2024).
  60. J. a. Barata, J. G. Milhano, and A. V. Sadofyev, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 174 (2024).
  61. C. Andres, F. Dominguez, R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, and I. Moult, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 262301 (2023).
  62. C. Andres, F. Dominguez, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, and I. Moult, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 088.
  63. K. Yan and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021602 (2022).
  64. T.-Z. Yang and X. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 006.
  65. H. Chen, I. Moult, J. Sandor, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 199.
  66. C.-H. Chang and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 126.
  67. N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, arXiv:1503.08043.
  68. N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 105.
  69. C. Andres, F. Dominguez, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, and I. Moult, Phys. Rev. D 110, L031503 (2024).
  70. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  71. W. Chen, J. Gao, Y. Li, Z. Xu, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 043.
  72. I. Feige, M. D. Schwartz, I. W. Stewart, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 092001 (2012).
  73. I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 160.
  74. A. J. Gao, H. T. Li, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 062001 (2019).
  75. M. Dasgupta, L. Magnea, and G. P. Salam, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 055.
  76. M. Bahr et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 639 (2008).
  77. M. Bahr, S. Gieseke, M. Gigg, D. Grellscheid, K. Hamilton, S. Platzer, P. Richardson, M. H. Seymour, and J. Tully, arXiv:0812.0529.
  78. J. Bellm et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 452 (2020).
  79. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  80. N. Fischer, S. Prestel, M. Ritzmann, and P. Skands, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 589 (2016).
  81. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  82. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  83. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/j4sp-fcmd for comparing results from Herwig 7.3 and 7.2 versions and discussing the subleading pT dependence of ζt/ζW.
  84. J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, J. Phys. G 42, 015005 (2015).
  85. L.-B. Chen, H. T. Li, J. Wang, and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054003 (2023).
  86. L.-B. Chen, H. T. Li, Z. Li, J. Wang, Y. Wang, and Q. F. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071503 (2024).
  87. T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert, and S. Pozzorini, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 008.
  88. A. V. Belitsky, G. P. Korchemsky, and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Lett. B 515, 297 (2001).
  89. G. P. Korchemsky and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B555, 335 (1999).
  90. G. P. Korchemsky, G. Oderda, and G. F. Sterman, AIP Conf. Proc. 407, 988 (1997).
  91. S. T. Schindler, I. W. Stewart, and Z. Sun, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 187.
  92. H.-M. Chang, M. Procura, J. Thaler, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 102002 (2013).
  93. H.-M. Chang, M. Procura, J. Thaler, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. D 88, 034030 (2013).
  94. H. Chen, M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W. J. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 185.
  95. H. Chen, M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W. J. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 076021 (2025).
  96. M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 139.
  97. Y. Li, I. Moult, S. S. van Velzen, W. J. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 182001 (2022).
  98. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 232, 113 (1989).
  99. H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 240, 447 (1990).
  100. G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 279, 359 (1992).
  101. C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Lett. B 516, 134 (2001).
  102. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  103. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002).
  104. M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, A. Signer, and G. Zanderighi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 011602 (2004).
  105. M. Beneke, A. P. Chapovsky, A. Signer, and G. Zanderighi, Nucl. Phys. B686, 205 (2004).
  106. M. Beneke, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 261–262, 218 (2015).
  107. P. T. Komiske, Energy energy correlators package, https://github.com/pkomiske/EnergyEnergyCorrelators.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation